[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 201 KB, 976x1517, 03708B8D-D1B0-4692-BE18-FAFBE1C9FC56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8579795 No.8579795 [Reply] [Original]

Are numbers an accurate measure of how good a vtuber's content is?

>> No.8579854

>>8579795
Using that logic, rhombusnigger is the greatest rigger to have ever lived.

>> No.8579972

>>8579795
How good something is is subjective. Anyone who tells you otherwise is just sharing their opinion.

>> No.8580026

>>8579795
No and this is not to shit on anyone with big numbers. Is Jake Paul one of the best content creators on YT bc of numbers. What about Amouranth on Twitch?

>> No.8580141 [DELETED] 

>>8579854
No, but very good for shit posting and tribalfagging

>> No.8580179

answer from qualified person
https://twitter.com/Asmongold/status/1421667957629915139

>> No.8580254

>>8579795
No, but very good for shit posts and tribalfagging

>> No.8581673

>>8579795
Despacito has 7 billion views, is that the best song that ever existed?

>> No.8581793

>>8579795
Certainly not in Gura's case.

>> No.8581815

>>8579795
Of course not but everyone knows that.

>> No.8582227

no fuck off

>> No.8582277

>>8579795
No. The only people who use numbers as a metric for quality are shitposters, and these shitposters usually use numbers to shitpost about vtubers they personally don't like.

In the end, the only thing that matters is what you think of a vtuber and their content. Anyone else's opinion is irrelevant.

>> No.8582420

>>8579795
Yes, just like they are a measure of how good a musician's music is.

>> No.8583927

>>8579795
No
Bigger numbers also sign of dangerous "fans" that wants attention from the liver

>> No.8583984

>>8580026
>Amouranth on Twitch?
She does not even have the biggest numbers, she's shit on by all those Minecraft zoomers and FPSfags

>> No.8584041

>>8579795
Not really. Theres still genuinely amazing streamers below 10k.
I think Gura is good though.

>> No.8585805

>>8579795
It's a decent relative measure of popularity that (unfortunately) will influence corporate decisions.
It's a shitty measure of quality unless those numbers can hold up for decades.

>> No.8586046

I'm a cumshart who thinks gura is the best chuuba streaming right now. But she definitely doesn't deserve 3.3 million subs. She definitely deserves the most subs in hololive but her subscriber count is absurd. That being said what she does deserve is her VOD views.

>> No.8586324

>>8581815
>but everybody knows that
If only that was true anon.... If only that was true..

>> No.8586519

>>8586046
Holy shit, there is reason within that fanbase.

>> No.8586725

>>8586519
Yeah I may be reasonable but I'm still going to troll in numberfag threads because my oshi has more numbers than your oshi. Get fucked.

>> No.8586965

>>8586725
Guess what? i dont fucking care LMAO. Go and shit up numberfags, I wont be there.

>> No.8587251

>>8586965
Cope.

>> No.8587793

>>8581673
Yes

>> No.8588108

>>8579795
Yes

>> No.8588264
File: 19 KB, 128x128, 0D7BEF28-1012-4FBF-8F6E-E21662B332DA.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8588264

>>8587251

>> No.8588267
File: 750 KB, 762x360, oh no no no[sound=files.catbox.moe%2F68qwjx.opus].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8588267

>>8579854

>> No.8588276

>>8581673
It's kind of a banger ngl

>> No.8590713

No, because otherwise Nene would be number 1 everyday.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action