[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 278 KB, 1003x373, 101796.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2844298 No.2844298 [Reply] [Original]

Limited only for the mid tiers in terms of holo subs numbers. Excluded are the 1 million club chuubas and the bottom 15 sub chuubas. (PS I'm not a Kiara hater)

>> No.2844721

Why is shuba in A?

>> No.2845686

>>2844721
She is too genki but still good enough to be an A

>> No.2845700

>>2844298
kuso thread

>> No.2845779

Swap mio with botan and this is good

>> No.2852404

>>2844298
Why is Sora in B?

>> No.2852583

>>2844298
OP is a faggot.

>> No.2859151

I actually like all these girls enough to not put any at C tier.

>> No.2859269

>>2844298
Seems a bit disingenuous calling Miko a mid tier. She is very much a high tier as far as viewers are concerned and outperforms a good amount of the ones already at 1 million subs (Okayu, Coco, Rushia, Amelia, Mori, Noel).

She will be at 1 million soon anyway so I guess it doesn't really matter, lol.

>> No.2859341
File: 240 KB, 1881x94, Tier.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2859341

>> No.2859367

i respect Sora and i love her singing, but damn her streams are terrible
i often feel like i'm watching an amateur, not the face of the company

>> No.2869060

>>2844298
Only S in that tier is Suisei.

>> No.2869464

>>2859269
yeah a tier list based on sub count is pretty weak. Id argue that avg viewers is a better indication because they're primarily streamers.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action