[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 2.31 MB, 1523x3820, 1634099348337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14633685 No.14633685 [Reply] [Original]

Anyone with the time and basic mental ability to do some proper seeding willing to run a bracket tournament similar to the one we had a couple of months ago but with JP chuubas only this time? Seems like a good way to end the year.

>> No.14633743

Didn't Pika win the last tournament? I'm pretty sure that image is wrong.

Also that idea tickles my autism so I'd be up for it.

>> No.14633815
File: 3.91 MB, 640x480, super-dave-funkhouser.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14633815

>can we have a tournament where EOPs, seaniggers, clip/threadwatchers, and tourists judge your oshi?
The EN one was a trainwreck that had to be run twice btw.

>> No.14633848

>>14633743
Ame won the last one. Go for it, just make sure to do proper seeding.

>> No.14633867

>>14633743
Nope, Ame won
https:// archive.nyafuu.org/vt/thread/11287530/#q11338765

>> No.14634023

>>14633848
I wish I was not retarded and knew how to run it. I'm just saying I'd participate.

>> No.14635037

With the amount of jp vtubers being that much higher than english speaking ones we'd need someone even more autistic than the previous op.

>> No.14635579

>>14633685
lazy bitch
do it yourself instead asking for the numbers to appear magicallg

>> No.14637940

>>14633815
Because its done by someone who doesn't know what seeding is

>> No.14637978

>>14633743
Pika won a smaller tournament that was ran before this one by the same guy.

>> No.14637989

>>14637940
Anon I also don't know what seeding is. Please explain it to me.

>> No.14639850

>>14637940
The one in the OP was properly seeded though.

>> No.14639924

That's not gonna work, when it comes to JP chuubas people on this board only know some holomem and maybe Ui or something. It would be pretty useless

>> No.14640166

>>14639924
The only EN chuubas the board knows are holos + Pika

>> No.14641542

>>14637940
it had to be run twice because holofags were upset that it wasn't gerrymandered in their favor.

>> No.14641604

>>14641542
It was run because seeding and because nijifags couldn't deal with their chuubas getting destroyed before the finals.
The tournament was a complete shitshow and unless someone that can do it without bias, the future ones will also be shit.

>> No.14641843

>>14633685
Our niji friends here would hate that cause it would only affirm that their chuubas belong to shit-tier, but this time officially.

>> No.14643434

>>14633685
Don't forget the ability to detect and prevent cheating

>> No.14643698

This board doesn't really show much interest towards JP chuubas OP. There are entire prominent JP groups that aren't discussed at all here. Nevermind most people not knowing all of the Heavenly Kings.

>> No.14643709

>>14633685
How the fuck am I supposed to read this bracket?

>> No.14643882

>>14643709
It was a double elimination tournament. Side brackets are the initial ones, lower middle is the loser bracket, grand final between the two winners, Ame and Ina in this case.

>> No.14643960

>>14633685
>EN
>moona

>> No.14644230

>>14643882
Double elimination in what I assume is based on voting is stupid. What if Ina won the round against Ame?

>> No.14646432

>>14644230
Then she would win the tournament, what's your point. Double elimination exists precisely to complement seeding.

>> No.14646664

If you're worried about /vt/ being run by EOPs, why don't just make the tournament in /jp/ or invite them here?

>> No.14646875

>>14646664
>or invite them here?
We don't need even more tourists

>> No.14647904

>>14646432
Then the tournament would be unfair, since Ina was allowed to lose a round, but Ame wasn't. Normally, if the champion of the loser's bracket defeats the champion of the winner's bracket, they have to play again. Everyone gets one chance to lose, so in the finals, the winners' champion only has to win once, while the losers' champion has to win twice.

Double elimination works to offset normal variation in a competitor's performance; i.e. just having a bad game. That can't logically apply to a voting competition. If the winner of the champion of the loser's bracket wins, you have to immediately hold the same vote a second time. If you expect the possibility that the result will be different, then you admit that the vote doesn't work properly.

>> No.14647980

>>14646664
We split the board up for a reason

>> No.14648281

>>14647904
Then they might have had a rematch, who the fuck knows what the previous OP would have done, we didn't get to that point. A second round of voting make sense if there's not a clear majority and every match in the finals and semi-finals was extremely close.

>> No.14648459

>>14646664
>he thinks /jp/ spigs japanese
N99 doesnt count, and the carryover from /jp/ is the shitty part of this board's users

>> No.14649683

>>14643960
Correct

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action