>>12836690
As much as all of those is or isn't true, I think ultimately the most important of those is 2) and following from that, the decision is simple, because removing covercorp's cut on her income drastically improves it. Instead of it being:
>youtube cut 50% (eg make $1000, youtube take $500)
>cover cut 30% (that $500 becomes $350)
>tax cut 50% (that $350 becomes $175)
it becomes
>youtube cut ($500)
>tax cut ($250)
That's a 40% increase in the final profit. Now start adding zeros for long term income, and instead of making 175k from 1 million, she's making 250k from 1 million. Say she ends up generating $5 million gross income, she's made an additional $375,000 in NET revenue.