/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>759187
No, the avatars are their property

>>759248
what about Fubuki?

>>759187
pretty sure cover owns everything. the channel itself, the avatar, the "lore" etc. only with their permission they would be allowed to exist. if someone graduates in bad blood, they will be gone from the internet.

>>759187
Coco would keep Coco Kaine because, as of right now, Cover doesn't own that

All the charas are property of Cover with Suisei probably being the only exception, depending on how her contract was written up.

>>759475
Big brain. I didn't think of that. Can you imagine if Coco Kaine randomly showed up?

>>759271
WHAT about Fubuki?

>>759415
Cover doesn't own Smol Ame

>>759528
They most likely own her Hololive outfits

>>759562
actually, they do.

>>759415
They don't own any lore that fans create nor do they own any fan-characters. Meaning if any Holo were to use any fan character, and it became a big part of that Holos identity, Cover wouldn't own that.

>>759700
how does that work?

>>759847
They own Amelia character, any variations is "Amelia character"

>>759248
What about Suisei?

>>759187
Artia and the CN people didn't get to keep theirs

>>759899
We would need to know if she gave them the right when she signed up.

>>759847
It's written in the japanese side that if you post anything on the art tag they don't own you anything and can use it how they please.

Who owns Haachama?

>>759952
Does Cover own this outfit? Or any outfit design that artist post on their talents art tags?

>>760032
they own the lore and the name etc. whats so hard to understand about this.

sure you can make an avatar that looks similar. but youre not allowed to use the name or the detective stuff. it would be a new avatar.

>>759952
>>760032
Does Cover own the Fubuki Chainlink edits?

>>760032
If it was posted on ameliART they are legally in the right to use it how they please, but that's morally wrong so everyone would dogpile on them for it if the artist didn't get anything.

>>760189
if they own it, it's canon right?
COVER officially endorses Chainlink, BUY BUY BUY

>>760094
I think there's a misunderstanding here. I'm rereferring to the outfit specifically.
If an artist designs a new outfit Hololives characters, for fun as in not commissioned by Cover, but uses their hashtag. Does Cover own that outfit design?

Awful bullish of Cover to use two characters to promote LINK

>>760318
Sorry didnt see this >>760189

>>760189
Is this a Cover thing or Japanese law thing?

>>760388
Japanese law, Comiket survives because they turn a blind eye, if Cover wanted to sue the dude that did the shion doujin they could, there's no fair use there, transformative content legally isn't the property of the person that made it until stated otherwise by the owner of the IP.

>>760463
what happens if you just happen to make a fan outfit and upload it on your website or whatever, but SOMEONELSE posts it with the ameliart hashtag, is that your problem as well?

>>759187
Most definitely not. All characters belong to cover. Would the talent retain their fans. For the most part yes any fans lost are recouped by not having cover gouge 30% of your supers or railroading you with weird manager shit.

>>759187
To this day, Azuma Lim is the only one that got her character back after leaving, but it's really fucking hard and took many months and courtroom cases, so many that people thought she retired.

>>759187
>Oshi
Go back to >>>/jp/

>>760388
They own the copyright for the characters', designs', lore, etc. They could sue anyone making a derivative work for copyright infringement, it's just that they aren't american (or Nintendo) and they understand the concept of free advertising so they won't do it

>>761060
>>>/reddit/