/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

i wish the investors' thirst for money and disregard for anythng else work in our favor this time.

>>57690646
You're not a schizo, you're a retard for thinking that any investor with a major stake in a company actually knows shit about the product. The reason products with too much influence from the investors go to shit is that investors can only conceive reality in the form of a stock either going up or down. They don't know shit about anything else outside of what the general idea behind the product is regarding the companies they invest in. At most, if they are really involved, they'll know about some of the competition and whether their stock is doing well.

>>57690646
You're giving way too much credit to investors. Imagine the worst kind of numberfag but they're also a boomer and barely cognizant of what streaming is let alone a vtuber.

>>57691756
This, there's a reason Valve is the only big game company that still has vision, and that's because it's not public

In my experience investors would not want Cover to limit their revenue by cutting males. Investors are dumb as shit. They don't understand vtubing and have no desire to understand vtubing. They don't want Cover to just cut their losses in order to be "more financially responsible" or something, they just want Cover to turn over bigger revenue quarter after quarter.

>>57697684
Ubisoft still has a vision, it's just kind of bad.

>>57700100
They might look at opportunity cost and ask why the fuck the company tries to shill males instead of doubling down on the females.
Technically, that’s also retarded investor logic just like >>57691756 says. But letting them believe that number not go up fast enough = bad is easier than explaining the nuances of gender in vtubing and why no corpo so far has been able to include mixed genders without one getting dominant over the other.

i see nothing wrong with this, and wish the best of luck to the investors. they seem to understand the vision. ganbatte kudasai

>>57691756
yup, goes double for jap investors too

>>57690646
That makes sense, but we can always go back to the fact that male collabs are not new. They're a thing since 2018, and they keep being one. Your speculation may not be false, but at the same time, it tries to explain something which already has an explanation.
The shilling of the homos is particularly big recently though, so your point stands pretty still. Since Tempus it seems like the investors aren't happy so they want more profit from the homos, but even with all the shilling, it's just not working.

>>57705411
Male collabs with certain holos, a minority now, is not new, yes.
However the coercion exhibited recently to force those that have never male collabed, who in some instances have made it as clear as possible that they don't want that kind of content, is new.
From Kanata's manager actually lying to her to get her on that mixed MC event, to Nene's manager who gaslit her and wore her down such that she had to agree to the valorant thing to IRyS , already on the back foot for so any reasons, being "asked" to participate in the OW thing.

This is new because it's not voluntary like the older instances homobeggars screech on about incessantly as if it holds the same relevance with the hololive of 2023 as it might have in 2019.

>>57690646
>imma shag your mum
ogey

>>57696326
And also they have stupid amounts of stealth political power.
... Holy shit. We're all fucked.