[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers


View post   

File: 317 KB, 1240x1753, 1633396426089.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12209733 No.12209733 [Reply] [Original]

goobas bum just destroyed a thread

>> No.12209961

>>12209733
Nice

>> No.12210166
File: 511 KB, 2146x2994, bratty [sound=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.catbox.moe%2Fwlqqxf.mp3].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12210166

Excellent

>> No.12210203

>>12209733
>>12210166
Prone bone position

No breaks

Hair pull

Sweat panting loud neighbors knocking door neighbors calling police

Bedframe cracking breaking

>> No.12210258
File: 464 KB, 2146x2994, 1634169472172.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12210258

>>12210166

>> No.12210311

>>12210258
very nice

>> No.12210731

Pedophiles

>> No.12210817

kys pedochumps

>> No.12210820

>>12210258
These handprints are mine btw.

>> No.12211744
File: 306 KB, 842x496, Tw@GAOlukchup 1305631537866579968 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12211744

>>12209733
>>12210258

>> No.12211805
File: 1.22 MB, 2048x1426, 519D9112-180A-4FF2-8306-E4135C073EDA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12211805

>>12210731
>>12210817
Seethe

>> No.12211972

Thank you, Cover, for letting Haato and Coco alienate people from a culture of discipline, leaving baizuo as your only audience
>>12211805
Unironically, two bombs weren't enough.

>> No.12212026

Based and continue to seethe

>> No.12212065
File: 50 KB, 819x502, 1632745794277.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212065

>>12210817
ogey

>> No.12212095
File: 205 KB, 1019x483, 1634836997072.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212095

>>12210731
>>12210817
>>12211972
oh nyoooooo
im not even a chumbud, i just love guras erotic body

>> No.12212123
File: 138 KB, 638x901, 1631046571051.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212123

>>12210817
normalfags seething on /vt/?
impossible

>> No.12212259
File: 1.55 MB, 4096x1355, 1630094852519.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212259

>>12211805
take a full one

>> No.12212404

>>12212065
The West; where you can get paid to show people child porn, "for science"!
>>12212095
>haha yeah i'm a pedophile, so what?
I appreciate your honestly.
>>12212123
Funny that you have to cope with being called out by using "normal" as an insult.

>> No.12212456

>>12212404
bruh chill shes like 9420 years old

>> No.12212469
File: 194 KB, 220x258, what.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212469

>>12212065
>Adolescent Male
>15%

>> No.12212471

kys cumsharts

>> No.12212482
File: 226 KB, 463x453, ogeystop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212482

Stop replying to bait and post more cunny
I came here to fap not to stare at a faggot with his Reddit tier cringe behaviour

>> No.12212586

>>12212456
>her age is a mid-2000s forced meme, she just looks and acts like a kindergartner!
Baizuo.

>> No.12212663

>>12212586
>Baizuo
stfu Cheng Bugmen, your entire species thrives off of eating sharks anyway. Dont judge me.

>> No.12212696
File: 524 KB, 675x1131, 1633329449632.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12212696

>>12212586
but aren't lolis the best?

>> No.12212942

>>12212663
Just because a word accurately describes you, doesn't mean you can just dismiss the language it comes from to invalidate it.
>>12212696
You are why 1984 is an instruction manual.

>> No.12213064
File: 646 KB, 1000x1412, 1633663235885.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213064

>>12212696
indeed they are

>> No.12213138

>>12212942
wait doesnt that word describe western white liberals instead of pedophiles?

guess you just heard that word somewhere, huh

>> No.12213275
File: 488 KB, 944x1157, 1630094983410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12213275

>>12213064
based

>> No.12213311

>>12213138
>western white liberals instead of pedophiles
Yes, the floor is made of floor.

>> No.12213323

>>12212663
That's probably not even a bugman, it's someone using some chink word as bait.

>> No.12213330

>>12211972
I agree, if two nukes brought us this amount of loli just imagine what three would have brought us. We'd have h doujins find their way into mainstream bookstores in the West.

>> No.12213420

>>12213311
ok ngl i chuckled, gg

>> No.12213644

>>12212065
4-10 years is too big a gap
half of that range is lolicon and the other half is toddlercon, lolicons are way more common than toddlercons

>> No.12215855

>>12213644
>playing semantics with pedophilia

>> No.12215978

>>12213644
>lolicons are way more common than toddlercons
isn't that a common knowledge?

>> No.12216237

>>12211972
>These people jack off to fictional drawings I don't like? Unironically, the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians wasn't enough.
What did the moralfaggot mean by this?

>> No.12216299
File: 3.36 MB, 4169x4674, 1631847935529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12216299

fags will be fags
post more same bum

>> No.12216336

>>12216237
>>12215855

>> No.12216457

>>12216336
>>12216237

>> No.12216754
File: 726 KB, 2250x1375, 1613202102351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12216754

garr gooruh exhaustive bum compilation

>> No.12218505

>>12216457
That's what I replied to, yes. Anyone can see that.

>> No.12218735

>>12218505
Then answer the question properly instead of linking to an evasive non-answer.

>> No.12219327

>>12218735
Oh, that wasn't a rhetorical question?
Exactly what I said; the characters being fictional and "actually internet-meme-years-old," doesn't negate being fucked in the mind, because you still find the bodies of children sexually gratifying.

>> No.12219682

>>12219327
I fail to see how it doesn't, the "bodies of children" you're talking about don't look like the bodies of actual children at all, it should go without saying that if you can't tell the difference between a stylized cartoon anime girl and a real girl you're pretty fucked in the mind yourself. There's plenty of examples of realism in drawings, these drawings aren't realistic in the slightest.
Not to mention that's not the question I asked, I asked why you feel that people who jack off to things you don't like (cartoons I might add) justifies the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, as you claimed that "unironically, two bombs weren't enough" in response to it. Calling for people's deaths as an overreaction to an ultimately harmless thing sounds quite fucked in the mind to me.

>> No.12220533

>>12210817
WAIT
DEJA-VU
I
COULD
SWEAR
I
HAVE
SEEN
THIS
BEFORE

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action