/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>41078171
>subgrowth over 2022 rather than just total subs, especially since that's how the conversation started anyway.

>>41078877
>what's the R2 of >>41077946 btw
If you draw a trendline joining the two disjoined sets R2 you would get
>0.4
With that said, if you receive that as an assignment and draw that trendline joining the two sets with a single line you would get it marked F

Same for this one, which is the "subs growth vs ccv". In this one the split is even more apparent but it validates better the point you are trying to make.

For this one you would have to remove
>the "first army"
for being outliers and in another completely different category
and also
>HoloX
because subs growth correlate with recency of debut for "young" gens like that.

If you would remove both those groups you would get a very good correlation on the remaining 23 channels, with the following meaning
>in 2022, the higher the live audience, the higher the subs growth
or
>in 2022, the higher the subs growth, the higher live audience