/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>41078171
>they're not *not* correlated
Below a certain threshold you can safely chalk a correlation as "spurious", coincidental.

Here is another chart
>post number in this thread vs. seconds
for instance, for your post the pair is
>35,41078171
It also shows a slight positive correlation despite having ZERO actual correlation, because of the nature of numbers. It will never be really zero, just very close to zero like >>41077353 was.