[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.69922557 [View]
File: 29 KB, 230x345, n14040-o1st9jZsCZcN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
69922557

>>69921893
I'll be there to argue it was actually FT

>> No.68522326 [View]
File: 29 KB, 230x345, n14040-o1st9jZsCZcN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
68522326

>>68517324
>>68519005
This is unironically as plausible as ft being the poster theory
Orange
>he COULD be her stealth manager thus giving him access to emails and or discord(latter is highly unlikely)
>he COULD have gotten the high quality giru drawing from that
Forest tree
>he COULD be part of this community and a /shon/ poster/lurker
>he COULD have went behind shondo's back and get access to her emails(since he lives in the same house) and he'd also have access to the giru drawing if we argue she downloaded it already
Now let's look her reaction and what they could mean in both cases:
Orange theory:
>she could guess it was orange, due to the post having information only someone with access to her email and discord/files could have posted about
>given other events happening around that time it wouldn't be crazy to say she'd call orange out or distance herself from him due to the post
>thus it's unlikely to think this was the case
Forest tree theory:
>she'd have no clue it was ft, thus validating her reply to the tweet on her art tag about the situation being one of confusion and indirect denial of making such a post
Now, allow me to present a new theory:
The email address ray used was a wrong one and never actually owned by shondo, but by someone else
>validates the poster having information only someone with access to the email address could get
>if we argue the poster previously asked giru for a higher quality image of the drawing it won't require them to have access to shondo's discord/files
>gives full credibility to her reaction to the tweet as being genuine, as she wouldn't even have received ray's emails

>> No.67779931 [View]
File: 29 KB, 230x345, n14040-o1st9jZsCZcN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
67779931

>>67779896
Wrong, there is a non-zero chance it was ft

>> No.66969606 [View]
File: 29 KB, 230x345, n14040-o1st9jZsCZcN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
66969606

>>66969487
I won't!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]