/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>31510518
Hello OGsuner.

>>31511225
Welcome back! Have fun catching up!

>>31514313
Take care Secretary!

>>31515154
I mean, we can have the /vt/ ages, their lengths, their orders, and eveyrthing relating to them be different from the real world. There is no reason for us to follow the real world in this, unless it makes it easier or more fun.

>>31501922
And now finally, an answer.'
>numbered points
Yeah, that was basically the idea. Each single "term" of the contract would be a glyph, which in itself is a set of glyphs. Basically the contract has 3 layer of glyphs, the contract itself is one huge glyph circuitry, which in turn is comprised of two sets of glyphs, the special glyph (or perhaps 'binding glyph'), and the terms. The term glyphs then are in turn comprised of yet smaller glyphs.
emantics
I left out "artificial" because adding it into a non-formal "sharing of (yet) non-canon ideas" post did not feel right. I would add that for documentation probably, although I think the fact that I said
>... contract's glyphs essentially create a Vitium Structure ...
gives enough context to the reader to understand that this is not a naturally occurring concept.

>and it requiring people to actively manipulate things in the physical and conceptual realms to create the conditions necessary for a vitium structure to form in a communicable way.
So essentially, there would have to be a signing ritual. As the (artificial) Vitium Structure created by the contract would be a pretty "small" one (by energy mass), I dont think the creation of it would need as chaotic conditions as some other Vitium Structures would.
> the concepts are always there, but artificial concepts are the forced tying and strengthening of those concepts together
I personally think through the quantum interpretation, because its easier for me to understand. The way I see this working under that interpretation is that the Vitium Field is in a superposition of infinite concepts everywhere, being in the state of the all-encompassing everything concept, which is the most vague concept possible. More specific concepts are formed as energy is expended to remove sub-concepts from the everything concept. Energy is released when the more specific concepts collapse back to the vague.

Kind of like with quantum fluctuations and empty space I suppose, with areas without fluctuations being the areas where "matter" exists. Its been a while since i heard of that though so my memory may fail me here.

Point being, that artificial concepts are formed as stuff is removed and "shapes" (for the lack of a better term) are carved into the everything concept. When there is chaos in Vitium Field, shapes pop into existence spontaneously (and then are annihiliated), meaning that your Vitium-Strutcture-to-be could use an existing shape as its base, meaning that you need less energy to form that structure, and stabilize it.

For me, "bundle of concepts (tied together artificially)" == "A superposition of structures in the Vitium Field, in a certain "shape" (for the lack of a better term".

Im not sure if you are misunderstanding anything, am I? I feel like we are very much on the same page here even though we prefer to use different terminology and different interpretations. The outcomes are the same.

>>28407322
>this is basicly them living in the now times while the rest of the world is living in a post WW1 era.
Not even close. Technology has advanced at an exponential rate in the late 1800s and 1900s. The difference between 1920s and 2020s is way bigger than the difference between and 1750s and 1850s

>>28408375
JWU a few hours ago, and got my coffee. My sleep schedule is fucked and its already late afternoon here.-

ahhhh i can't wait to hear her voice...

>>17565112
>Cont. on the topic of referencing people.
Had to mention that what you have been doing so far has been a good middle ground. You haven't named the characters but you have hinted at who they are, mostly in the form of referencing their oshi. This helps avoid the risk of circlejerkiness, but it also increases the "mysteriousness" of the text if that as a term makes sense, whether this is a good or bad depends on the nature of the text, but so far it has worked.

>first part of >>17565112
You should ask the people themselves if they are OK with the depiction you are going for. There isnt a single universal rule for this one, some anons are OK with it, some may not.

As for completely made up characters, no need to restrict yourself.

>second part
I did have some ideas set out for the storyline, a skeleton of a story in a sense, but I just lost motivation with it. The storyline is on hold, and I might continue it if I ever get inspiration for a chapter but I cant say for certain. Consider the events of that story to happen at an undefined time, so no need to limit your own chapters in any way.
I also have had some ideas for a second storyline set in the same setting, referencing some other events that may or may not happen at some point in the future.

>>13317340
You think someone like gabe would respect the sanctity of marige?

>>13071412
Koko

>>12974006
Me three

>>12628737
why aren't you saving more kronii art?