/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>39339465
That's the gag. What more could I do to my bots that would be worse than what the devs have already done with the site? Other than ripping out their definitions, they're already braindead and the filter ensures they don't stray into anything too risque.

I had a lot of fun with my bots and if my interaction count is any indication, I'm not the only one who enjoyed them and I'm just a middling creator. Some of the V-tuber bots had more interactions than all of mine combined so I can only imagine how the respective audience to those bots is handling the filter's increased shittiness. Forget vanilla sex, even the most modest of hugs and kisses can trigger the filter now and make it so you have to reset your chat (who thought this was a good idea?). Maybe you can squeeze through some ambiguous lewd interactions but it's worse than it was before with how the site handles the filter and effectively shuts down everything. It makes for a very shitty experience for the user.

>>39161082
who wants to share a bot in the current system?
>here, try my waifubot who I built for SFW interactions that still gets censored and sounds like a retard because of the dev's decisions.

For some reason, a lot of people are still interacting with my bots (I've gotten over 400k interactions across all of them). I can't see what the modern user base is getting out of them and I don't know how they have the patience to deal with the site actively shitting itself on a near-daily basis now but god bless them.

Why can't I just enjoy the things I like, why do people who don't have an interest in the things I like have to force their way in demand it change it to suit their tastes, then leave when it's no longer profitable for them.