/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>42039111
>name ends in A
DARPA is a woman
>DRACO nuclear thermal rocket program
>draco is latin for dragon

>catalog bait thread is bumped
>/pcg/ is being shit up
is there a connection?

>>41707512
>Trying to figure out how to blame this on Tempus

>Korone trends amidst Corona
>Rushia trends amidst Russia
It must be a coincidence, right?
surely Hololive doesn't hold this much power, does it?

Am...am I the only one hear who thinks she looks pretty good?

Have any of you seen 25-something yr old woman at that age with no makeup? Even your hottest celebrities look like ghouls from a horror movie.
Two things are really really positive. Her face/skull has a great shape, skin is very clear, her hair is nice.

I've seen how ugly most girls really are. I know this might be hard for you virgins to understand, but shes actually not even ugly. Her factory-settings face is well-shaped, her skin is clear, and her hair is nice.

Girls would murder to look like that naturally.

I've been thinking about this question, and here are some qualities:
>design
>commitment to character/lore
>audience interaction
>high output of clippable moments per stream (a measure of how entertaining they are)
>a number of features or memes personal to them that incentivise viewers to adore/simp for them (the more, the faster they grow by memes)

>>7393873
where the hell is even the correlation between those two, you dumb ass nousagi??