/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>48037065
>Then why are you calling the first one God?
...I didn't? God isn't a contingent fact, he's a necessary being. Less drag queen novels, more grammar books, amerimutt.
>>48037240
>so basically 'natural' is just whatever you arbitrarily and narrowly define it as just to prove your circular point then?
How is it an arbitrary definition? Answer honestly: is a penis meant for a vagina or not? Don't assume a contrarian position because of pride, be fucking sincere. Your own reason and logic tells you that it *is.*

>>48037767
>You sound like you are devolving into a God of the gaps here.
Self-defeating argument. Who's to say you aren't devolving into a "science of the gaps" argument? Or naturalism of the gaps, materialism of the gaps, etc etc.
>When science gets a definite answer you don't like will God flee into another, deeper, darker gap?
Can Science(TM) prove that an infinite regress of contingent facts is logical? Fuck no.