/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>24202557
And Youtube has shown that it can and will delete the extra views if they are suspected to be unnatural.
Next you'll tell me I can't trust Youtube's VOD view verification system, and I'll ask which obviously viewbotted stream had their views kept intact.
I had this same argument when I first posted the data.

>>24084769
I understand the difference mate, but Koron and Sara's streams were pretty obviously viewfarmed, since their CCV was consistent and did not dip by much for the ENTIRE stream.

Unlike bots, which spike the stream but are immediately culled (as in Millie and Ike's case).

So if there WAS a viewfarm causing the Worm in Vox's stream, it would have resulted in Youtube cutting the VOD views more than normal during the course of the verification, which is why this experiment was even started.

As concluded above, there was no extra VOD view cull caused by the worm, so it's pretty clear that the worm is not caused by a viewfarm.