/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>31027381
>>31027350
The "proof" is my actual logic, I don't need to grab an example of anyone doing anything, my argument to being with is that the probability of someone engaging in A will be >0 so you can grab screenshots of one or a couple of persons doing something and it still wouldn't be anything but anecdotal evidence for the sake of making a broad, all encompassing, claim.
My argument is purely a priori logic I do not require a posteriori evidence.
>>31027435
There's no realistic proof by which you can prove that an entire fanbase does X or Y. You can point to segments of it and prove that they do or that the majority of a segment does. This isn't me dismissing anything, generalizations are logical fallacies.
>What kind of "proof" you want
"To confirm the statement 'All ravens are black', it would be necessary to observe all ravens. This is difficult but possible."
>>31027580
Pic related.
>>31027711
I never argued that there's no Nijisanji fans here. In fact I made no claims about who frequents these threads.