/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>5829205
>I t's not their main source of income, to them it's a side gig
How can it be “a source of income” if they’re doing it for free?
I already regret asking, it made me sad and the attempts to justify it or make it sound less bad are aggravating me.

>>3605088
I don’t know if that’s some exculpatory evidence or if it’s even more damning than the original accusation.

Anyway, it’s all silly wankery based on the most unfounded rrat people come up. What’s in front of them is the avatar, for all that matters what’s behind the avatar could as well be a trained cat.
It wouldn’t matter anyway (or shouldn’t at least), the character is what exists and people will fantasize whatever they want about it, with no bearing at all on reality.
Some want the “gamer girlfriend” experience, some want the “19 years old virgin giving them hints of sexual interest” experience and some (like me) just like a cute anime girl making cute anime girl sounds on the background.
People fighting about what they want the character to be are silly.