[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
>> No.72449559 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1683396734694206.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
72449559

Schizo chads we win again

>> No.56087431 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1674919120075225.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56087431

>>56087316
Meds.

>> No.55715132 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1670021604332808.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55715132

>Pippa sings lemon boy
>Lumi posts lemon pepe
The voices tell me this means something

>> No.54198593 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1680288300695128.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54198593

>>54198559

>> No.53919190 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1666195327927246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53919190

>>53918902
>(me)

>> No.23691032 [View]
File: 41 KB, 600x450, 1651015513709.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23691032

I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask this but I can't think of any other place that would know, but:
Do hours watched on stream contribute to a YouTuber's monthly income, or is it just video view time that matters for the paycheck? Ignoring memberships and superchats, of course.
I wonder why many vtubers on Youtube no longer go for edited, dense content and instead just stream and leave the VODs up and let clippers produce edited content. Assuming streaming doesn't pay per watch time, is it just not worth the effort to make a 15 minute video with high viewer engagement?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]