[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.53297758 [View]
File: 83 KB, 720x720, fauna1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53297758

>>53297443
>>53297452
>>53297463
>>53297542
I like that Fauna doesn't view me as a friend because I'm not her friend and that's how it should be; she's a roleplaying streamer who lives a million miles away from me afterall. But I don't see what this has to do with shipping at all - the whole point of shipping two people/characters is that you are not one of them so I don't see how this is some kind of own or anything.
I like watching Fauna interact with other girls and shipping them in my head, and she likes it too, why would that mean I also want to ship myself with her or something? It doesn't

>> No.40616160 [View]
File: 83 KB, 720x720, f01e750f16e04010964d1a57e25bd999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
40616160

>>40615506
>If I can't determine if they don't understand death in a meaningful capacity, you can't say that they suffer in a meaningful capacity
I can say they suffer because they react to pain and clearly experience emotional distress (just go get a pet dog and then kick it regularly and it will whimper and start avoiding you/acting depressed and become aggresive toward you eventually). Whether a living being can suffer or not isn't determined by whether they understand death otherwise it means you're saying young human children can't suffer just because they don't understand death either. Do you think torturing and killing a 5 year old is ok just because they don't understand death yet?

>Your assumption that life existing is morally good or not has no basis
My assumption that life existing is morally good is a fundamental axiom, you can say this is irrational or has no basis but it doesn't matter, it's a core belief. I believe life existing is morally good just because.

>Also your assertion about killing people in their sleep doesn't follow
It does follow because while asleep people have no concept of what is happening to them in the real world or concept of death. Following your logic, killing someone in their sleep when they are not conscious is ok because life only matters/can suffer when the fear of death/awareness that they can or are going to suffer is present, which is not the case to an unconscious person.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]