[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

View post   
File: 1.54 MB, 1435x1414, Crash-bandicoot-3-warped-scus-94244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506495 No.8506495 [Reply] [Original]

What a slog of a game

>> No.8506513

Funny how even as a kid I thought there were too many gimmick stages. I just wanted to platform - I still prefer Crash 2 over 1 and 3.

>> No.8506536

>>8506513
whats wrong with 1?

>> No.8506568

>>8506513
Crash 2's improvements over the first game was huge compared to Crash 3. Crash 2 is by far the best in the trilogy.

>> No.8506576

>>8506536
the save system, movement mechanics, and level variety

>> No.8506662

Crash 3 is excellent even thought the flying levels and time trials can suck.

Crash 3 = Crash 2 > Crash 1

>> No.8506670
File: 28 KB, 99x97, ICOFace.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506670

>>8506662
>holding Crash 3 as the best game and 1 as the worst
This is exactly how you spot a filtered shitter.

>> No.8506680

>>8506670
All three are between 8-9 out of ten so it hardly matters how you rank them.

>> No.8506681

>>8506662
>flying levels suck

Fuck you, they were the only gimmick level aside from the Hog Wild and Boulder Dash clones that was actually good.

>> No.8506691

>>8506662
the flying levels are straight bad
the underwater levels suck
tiger levels are as good as the boar and bear levels
bike levels suck
jet ski levels are godawful normally, but they're kind of fun if you're doing the time trials

>> No.8506708

>>8506691
time trials are what I dislike the most. they're not challenging, they just force you to replay EVERY level slightly faster (or with the running shoes) so you can get 100% completion

>> No.8508074

>>8506495
the bike levels, coco jetski, plane levels, the dino levels and the coco spaceship boss fight were so boring.
but the rest of the levels were pretty fun, specially egypt levels, so fucking good.
Coco's tiger levels were great too at high speed.

>> No.8508243

I wouldn't describe an easy game that can be beaten in 4-6 hours as a slog.

>> No.8508654

>>8506708
Yeah, and the remaster thought it was a good idea to shoehorn them in the first 2 games. The first game was the worst because you were never meant to rush through those levels in the first place.

>> No.8508664

>>8506495
I liked all the gimmick levels. They were cool.

>> No.8508665

>>8508664
Based.

>>8508654
>remaster
Ewwww.

>> No.8508685

>>8508654
>>8508665
it's a remake, not a remaster

>>8508243
slog does not mean difficult mate

>> No.8509071

Gee I never saw these Crash 3 opinions before

>> No.8509241

Crash 2 and 3 are easy and thus aren't as good as 1.

Crash 1 > 2 > 3 > TR >> Bash

>> No.8509501

>>8506662
i actually agree with this
>>8506670
it's not saying 1 is bad by any means but 2 is better and 3 is alot more fun

>> No.8509520

>>8508654
>The first game was the worst because you were never meant to rush through those levels in the first place.

I have the exact opposite opinion, I thought the time trials were the best in 1 because it doesn't have any stupid running shoe gimmick like in 3 or 2's remake. In 1's time trials you just beat the levels fast, you can do them whenever you want, they're optional, and you actually beat them properly instead of just bullshitting through them with running shoes that the levels weren't designed for.

>> No.8509580

>>8508654
>and the remaster thought it was a good idea to shoehorn them in the first 2 games
Yeah but you don't actually have to do the time trials in those. They're just for speed running autists

>> No.8511172

>>8506536
He's a pants-shitter who can't handle actual challenge.

>> No.8511174

>>8506495
holy god i want to cream in coco more than anything

>> No.8511219
File: 48 KB, 724x1024, FCBAB3E40F7A4AC2938707F3EEEF2BEF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8511219

>>8511174
Based and same.