[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games


View post   

File: 54 KB, 640x448, castlevania-dracula-x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5972547 No.5972547 [Reply] [Original]

Why are opinions on this game so polarized?

>> No.5972554
File: 366 KB, 320x784, unknown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5972554

>>5972547
Because a different version exist, and is the original. When this game came around pretty much the only version westerners had, finding out there was a different version of this game with better music and voice acted cutscenes, as well as a bonus character, was kinda infuriating to know we would never play it for at least a very long time.

That's not to say Dracula X(SNES)/Vampire's Kiss is a bad game, or even completely inferior. It had arguably better graphics at the very least and had different but still interesting levels, but at the end of the day it still lacked features so of course it's going to be considered the butchered port.

>> No.5972562

>>5972554
You wanna see something gay?

http://youtu.be/IW_OZxw_eTw

>> No.5972563

Because half the world is stupid (the half that likes the game) and the other half is intelligent (the side that knows it's shit)

>> No.5972565

>>5972554
I'm literally gay.

>> No.5972572

>>5972547
People played it because they heard Akumajō Dracula X: Rondo of Blood was good, thought this was the same game, and because they were sheep were convinced this was a good game. Then years later when they realized their mistake, that Rondo was a different game with the same guy and played through rondo and then had to reevaluate it their opinion on it they no longer had that "this is a good game" filter so that's how you get the polarized response.

>> No.5972578

>>5972565
Are you OP?

>> No.5972617

Because it's a step back in every regard compared to the far superior CV IV

>> No.5972676

>>5972617
The fact that you can't break the difficulty by holding the whip up in the air to somehow kill things makes Dracula X the superior game.

>> No.5972708 [SPOILER] 
File: 203 KB, 900x637, 1572089889871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5972708

>>5972617
>far superior CV IV

>> No.5972736
File: 9 KB, 220x236, 1359794551310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5972736

>>5972676
>instead of making better maps let's gimp what the player can do

>> No.5972742
File: 562 KB, 2730x4096, castlevania-charlotte--2159e48495f4d7aee96e1aff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5972742

>>5972547
RoB was a holy grail for quite a while.
This was seen as a bastardization of it and basically an insult to injury (rather than a separate, different game, which it is).
Later we played RoB and, although it was pretty damn good, it wasn't actually better than CV1 or CV3. Many people stopped deifying it and played the SNES game with an open mind. But some people never moved on from the nineties and have a warped view where they believe RoB to be better than it is and the SNES version worse than it is.
Pic unrelated.

>> No.5972825

>>5972708
I still don't understand this meme

>> No.5972826

>>5972742
Correct answer.
Western video game journalists treated the japanese Rondo of Blood as a holy grail, knowing that very few people in the west could play it (no emulation back then).

>> No.5972835

>>5972547
Because who enjoys classicvania when easily palatable plebvanias like SC4 and Rondo of Blood exist?

>> No.5972951

>>5972547
It's better than IV.

>> No.5972970

why are castlevania fans so autistic and elitist?
or is just /vr/ larping?

>> No.5973002

>>5972708
I'm glad Metriod fans are as autistic as CV fans. Imagine Metriod fans complaining that Super Metriod is worse than Metriod 2 because shooting at a diagonal or wall jumping makes the game easier.

>> No.5973068

>>5973002
Walljumping does suck, though. It's a "get out of pit traps free" card.

>> No.5973073
File: 53 KB, 420x352, hg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5973073

>>5972736
>let's increase the player's abilities without making better maps to usee them in

>> No.5973119

>>5972547
Because people keep comparing it to Rondo. This retard: >>5972554 even thinks it's a port of Rondo, despite them having completely different names in Japan.

It's an awesome game. Rondo is better, but that's completely irrelevant. Super IV is better, too, but nobody holds that against it.

>> No.5973126

I like it better than IV, better bosses, difficulty and OST

>> No.5973151

>>5972547
Because the game is shit and inferior, but nintendo fanboys are super insecure and feel the need to slavishly devote themselves to promoting and defending every single exclusive on their shitty consoles no matter how bad.

>> No.5973156

>>5972742
>it wasn't actually better than CV1 or CV3
No dumbfuck nesbabby, it definitely is. FUCKING KILL YOURSELF

>> No.5973158

>>5973002
The difference is the gameplay in Metroid sucks and people only like it for the graphics and muh atmosphere, so of course no one is going to deny Super is the best one.

>> No.5973172

Another shitty castlevania thread.

>> No.5973180

>>5972547
Hipster tryhards think they're cool for preferring Rondo of Bootleg to the real Dracula X.

>> No.5973356

>>5973151
>b-but nintendo
another console warrior bites the dust

>> No.5973357

>>5973151
A lot of people who shit on Dracula X are IV fans, so no, your theory is wrong, console warrior.

>> No.5973445

>>5972547
Pro: Great music
Con: lackluster programming in a 16MB cart unlike Super CV use 8MB

>> No.5973448

>>5973119
I didn't say I thought it was a port you moron, I said its considered an inferior port by most people.

>> No.5973450

>>5973180
So this bootleg? It a classic demake port.

>> No.5973458

>>5973151
Gay post

>> No.5973515

All the castlevania games are super gay. Shill this crap series as hard as you like, it wont make the games any better.

>> No.5973521

>>5973515
fuck you faggot, your favorite castlevania AND favorite console suck, SUUUUUUUCK!

>> No.5973606

>>5973515
Just like joe

>> No.5973635

>>5972736
Putting limitations on the player isn't inherently bad. Castlevania 4 is my second favorite Classicvania behind the first one, but I don't think its controls would work for any of the other games, besides maybe Bloodlines.

>> No.5973653
File: 142 KB, 500x1598, 744AF797-279E-4B9A-9745-3C3F3D3EB305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5973653

>>5972742
Who’s care about panty. I hype on fire upcoming Switch ver.

>> No.5973864

What's the best way to play Rondo?

>> No.5973901

>>5973864
On a PC Engine Duo, paired up with a nice, sharp CRT.

>> No.5974041

>>5972547
It's not a bad CV game. It's just that there's better CV games out there than this.

Bad CV games would be The Adventure or that horrid Amiga port of CV1.

>> No.5974082

>>5973864
The PSP remake, it's unironically better than the original version.

>> No.5974173

Dracula X is like the perfect version of the NES games. Tight, rich, tough, and definitely worth playing. It's only tie to RoB is in some of the visuals/sound.
I suck at it but still try it out because it's awesome.

>>5973864
The Wii version plays flawlessly on my end.
Play it on a CRT w/ component with a great sound system for maximum awesome.

>> No.5974192

>>5974173
Nah, think ill stick to playing it on the turoduo as intended. Lol... playing on wii like some poorfag

>> No.5974217

>>5974192
Whatever. It doesn't matter really.

>> No.5974475

>>5972547
Because no one knew it as a kid, and adult discoveries of "secret" material are always garbage opinions, especially online

>> No.5976774

>>5972547
it's a great game. the graphics are leagues better than IV and the music is as good.

it just plays more like nes games. no, it's not as cool as rondo but it's still an 8/10 game imo.

>> No.5976791

Oh hey, Rondo is 26 years old tomorrow.

>>5972572
Nobody who played this game when it came out even knew what the fuck a Turbografx was, let alone that there was a Japan-only Castlevania game on its CD peripheral in 1993 that it was based on.

>>5974173
Agree. DX SNES is an excellent duck-n-strut. Enemies spawn in accordance with screen space and scrolling conjointly with rhythmically metered platforming sections, in true Castlevania form. Compare that to Rondo where enemies have basic spawn points on the stage itself that repeat ad nauseum and will often bring your gameplay to a standstill to fight one thing. The SNES game is far better imo.

>> No.5976793

>>5972708

don't really get this one, or the joke. are you saying they made it so easy with the whip its as easy as mario?

>> No.5976797

>>5976793
I just noticed it's specifically Mario 3 with raccoon dressings and all, so I'm pretty sure it's a troll image.

>> No.5976837

Because despite it being a watered-down port of Rondo from PCEngine, people believe it is its own game. It has no place in continuity, it makes no sense, its shit.

tl:dr - contrarianism

>> No.5976851

Because normalfags can't play difficult games. And Dracula X was harder. That's the reason. RoB is a meme. DX had better levels.

>> No.5976856

Konami raped some anon’s mom and then shot his dig right in front of him. Since that day, that anon vowed revenge by shitposting about Castlevania and Metal Gear

>> No.5976876

>>5976837
>Because despite it being a watered-down port of Rondo from PCEngine, people believe it is its own game
Oh yeah? It's a port? Where is Cerberos on PC Engine Rondo?

>> No.5977548

>>5972547
It is simply inferior to Rondo. Since many of us have been able to play it on emulator we now know how good Rondo always was.

>> No.5977603

>>5976837
>didn't play the games
>still posts fanfic about them

>> No.5977740

>>5977548
Eh, Rondo's not THAT good. And Dracula X might be better to some people who prefer more challenge rather than focus on exploration.
They're both good games, but one is overrated, and the other is underrated.

>> No.5977987

>>5973864
Just buy it on ps4, anyone telling you anything different is an autistic troll

>> No.5980026

>>5972708
I don't get it

>> No.5980080

>>5976791
>Nobody who played this game when it came out
Literally no one played this when it came out, it sold like ten copies back then. Where most people played it for the first time was when they went on some late-90s/early-00s emulator site and downloaded draculax.smc and played it in zsnes

>> No.5981231

>>5972547
Because it's shit but since it's different you got retards claiming it's only hated on for being different and not because it's fucking shit. So basically the video game equivalent to Halloween 3.

>> No.5981273

>>5981231
What's "shit" about it? I thought it was one of the best classicvanias, I liked it more than Rondo of Blood, too. Both are fine games, but I enjoyed Dracula X more.