/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3382314
>standardize a-buncha-bullshit-that-means-nothing-to-me-as-gamer
If "made games more affordable and spacious to put in more content" truly meant nothing to a gamer I guess, 'specially the former..

>Also, see pic. I don't know how factual it is, but at least this account from /v/ says Sony treated everyone like trash
So Sony got a little jealous that Naughty Dog put out a more technically impressive product? Nothing much really, especially since they've actually came to embrace it later on (otherwise all that wacky Jap shit like the music video would've never happened).

> and I know that's where your source for "Nintendo dogging on third-parties" comes from.
So I pulled out a well-documented Nintendo issue from some shitheads on /v/. That board is my only source on the matter, okay..

http://operationrainfall.com/2013/05/16/why-do-third-parties-hate-nintendo/

http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/15/nintendo-and-the-third-party-problem-readers-feature-5062671/

https://books.google.com/books?id=0vc2DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=Nintendo+Masaya+Nakamura&source=bl&ots=_vauUIHV-c&sig=Z-GJAYeVEwV1Z7WPJBpSzrKAZ3o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjpiILB4IzOAhWDHx4KHfMvAXMQ6AEIKzAC#v=onepage&q=Nintendo%20Masaya%20Nakamura&f=false

https://web.archive.org/web/20150509184630/http://www.geekcomix.com/vgh/fourth/nesbad.shtml


>So... it's your word against Rareware.
And it's yours against Nakamura, and almost any other 3rd party dev who worked on the NES/SNES.

>>3382297
I'm sorry you were stuck with the 1001 mang.