/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7376087
no, we understand exactly what's happening.

>>7203075
>This board is for the discussion of classic, or "retro" games
There's no rule that we can't use modern games as examples or comparisons for the discussion of retro games

>>7077570

>>6711754
In 5 years we would have to suffer 7th gen toddlers shitposting along with the 6th gen toddlers

No thanks

>>6701875
It is not retro according to the rules
The more butthurt you are about it the better

>Modern castlevania box art deleted by mods
>GBAfags BTFO again
NEVER OLD ENOUGH

>Dreamcast released in 1998
>Ps2, GBA 2000
>GC, Xbox 2001
>Dreamcast allowed on /vr/ in 2014
>mfw 2016 come and gone without PS2 and GBA being allowed
>mfw 2017 come and gone without GC, XBox allowed
>mfw Dreamcast was never specifically added because it became old enough but because instead of trying to define each console individually as retro, moderation just simplified the rule to make it a hard stance against hardware released post Y2K
>mfw 6th gen toddlers forever BTFO and their consoles will never be old enough

>>6530703
> was a success for apple
> weren't even competing in the same market niche
revisionist history, everyone. you let us know, mr zoomer, when an apple computer holds the record for the best selling home computer of all time.