/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9640658
That's less sexual and more just matter of fact. The character wears underwear and if you make its model move in a position where you can see them, then you'll see them.
In the same way that there's nothing inherently sexual about mimicking breast jiggle physics, the sexual nature of it is more in the eyes of the viewer than the replication of some aspects of reality.
When I incidentally see the panties of a fantasy robot character doing a jump kick, I don't think anything sexual about it. It's just what it would actually look like. The alternatives are arguably more weird. Creating voids in the sprites, contorting the model in awkward positions, flatout removing the range of movement, changing the clothing style to not fit the character, or whatever else.
I don't fully understand why people assert underwear as inherently sexual when they're just another article of clothing and style that people and characters just happen to need.