/vr/ - Retro Games

>>8465990
Not even remotely the same and it was an editing error. Games are toys, they are sold in toy stores, you play with them. You can tell yourself whatever you want, but really you shouldn't care what people think about you, anon. This could be us.

>>4381041
I agree 100%. It's really hard to find 'recent' info, and while I absolutely support RetroUSB, and other small, niche operations like it, it's frustrating to hear so little about a product that's built to be updatable and improvable. I mean, at least with the PowerPak it's been wide-open for the community to step in and improve the hell out of it. That kind of thing would be awesome for the AVS; considering it's low price. If the community could go wild with it, I'm sure we would see some awesome improvements.

I get frustrated with Krikzz' operation for the same reason, too many products, not enough progress on excellent products that could be even better.

On the NT, I could pony up the $500 without a huge struggle, but even still, it just seems outrageous to me, almost too indulgent for a game console. I don't know, I'm still on the fence about the AVS, but I think if I got it I would really enjoy it.