[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 238 KB, 720x452, TMMfc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9864382 No.9864382 [Reply] [Original]

Carl Sagan BTFO

>> No.9864389

>inb4 300 replies 20 images and 10 posters.
You autists get bajted easily.

>> No.9864580

>>9864389
>bajted
Look at this retard and his inability to spell.

>> No.9864582

>>9864580
It's the plural of jebated

>> No.9864584

>>9864580
Look at that! You just got baited.

>> No.9864586

>>9864584
No! It was you who was baited as you responded! Bait supreme!

>> No.9864590

>>9864584
lol you just fell for my bait

>> No.9864631

>using deduction in an incomplete logic system

asking for trouble

>> No.9864654

>>9864631
Deduction is fine as long as the axiom deducing from is true... at least it’s not induction, kek

>> No.9864659

>>9864389
>>9864580
> autist
> retard
> why the ableism

>> No.9865014
File: 244 KB, 720x452, absence-of-evidence-edit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9865014

Hers is not a bad proof, except that the two lines
in red (at left) are superfluous, and she should
perhaps display the lines
P(¬B|A) + P(B|A) = 1
P(B|¬A) + P(¬B|¬A) = 1
...as how the second line comes from the first.

>> No.9865024

>>9864382
>absence of evidence a = negation of A
absence of evidence is the negation of a statement. you're assuming what you are trying to prove.

>> No.9865545

>>9865024
Absence of evidence is the negation of evidence. How is this assuming anything?