[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 80 KB, 600x721, g2580000000000000008d2eabe8aa4b827fd31721dfc099fe5343700182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599679 No.1599679 [Reply] [Original]

Why is downs syndrome considered a mutation/disease but homosexuality is beautiful and correct?

>> No.1599690

Why are homosexuals the ones who are considered faggots when there are so many OP's who are more worthy of the term?

>> No.1599691
File: 56 KB, 500x339, trollin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599691

>> No.1599694

because faggts tend to look more stylish

>> No.1599696

>>1599679
Because it's not quite clear that homosexuality is genetic.

>> No.1599703

>>1599696
>homo...genetic, bullshit
if homosexuality is genetic, i dont want to hear shit about evolution ever again

>> No.1599705

y so samefag

>> No.1599708

>>1599703
Traits that aren't beneficial DO pop up through genetics on account of how the genetic code is really fucking complicated and there isn't any sentient being debugging it. One wouldn't think that something like sickle cell anemia could evolve but when two separate genes that provide malaria resistance combine and BAM fucked up red cells.

>> No.1599715

>>1599703
>>1599703
>>1599703

Why are you on /sci/?

>> No.1599727
File: 14 KB, 300x300, george-bush.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599727

>Why is downs syndrome considered a mutation/disease

>> No.1599729

homosexuality does not mess up a person's thinking skills in everyway like down syndrome does.

>> No.1599742

>>1599708
sickle cells have a purpose, homosexuality is a direct threat to the population

>> No.1599748

>>1599708
evolution would remove homosexuals though

>> No.1599751

>>1599742

>>homosexuality is a direct threat to the population

No, it's not.

Homosexuality has been around for millions of years, and it is an evolved trait.

>> No.1599752

>>1599748

...and will, eventually.

>> No.1599754
File: 28 KB, 272x312, myfacewhilereadingthisthread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599754

>>1599742
>homosexuality is a direct threat to the population

Ok op you now have my attention please elaborate.

>> No.1599755

>>1599742
Hehe, look, he thinks that our population isn't growing fast enough. Cute.

>> No.1599756

>>1599742
>>1599703
>>1599679
0/10, but op's was funny

>> No.1599765
File: 24 KB, 369x265, 1270475244192.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599765

>>1599748
>>1599752

>Doesn't understand how evolution works

>> No.1599776

>>1599751
homosexuality doesnt foster human survival and its spread threatens its continuation. secondly, homos arent born homos, its a mutation that happens as you grow. the only reason people pair off is to reproduce. wanting a partner isnt in our genes

>> No.1599777

>>1599751

True homosexual's can't breed, so there's no way for heredity to take place.

You can manufacture a homosexual through environmental changes.

>> No.1599789

>>1599776

Actually, thanks to homosexuality overpopulation isn't a worse problem and there are gay surrogate parents to adopt unwanted children.

I think the world might even need more gays.

>> No.1599790

>>1599777
>homosexual's can't breed
hahaha oh wow

>> No.1599793

>>1599790

>True homosexuals

You're not very good at this reading thing, are you?

>> No.1599799

because the fag lobby is more powerful than the retard lobby.

>> No.1599807

>>1599703
>this

>> No.1599819
File: 99 KB, 400x400, If-homosexualism-is-genetic-how-is-it-transmitted.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599819

>> No.1599824

>>1599777True homosexual's can't breed

Plenty of lesbians decide they want to form babby. Plenty of faggots donate sperm. Your hypothesis is invalid.

>> No.1599830

>>1599776
>>1599824 explain it

>> No.1599835

>>1599799
this

homosexuality's classification was changed from a disease to a "lifestyle" /"normal human variation" not by the medical or scientific communities, but by protesters and political activists in the '70s.

>> No.1599840
File: 26 KB, 222x140, battletrolls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599840

This thread...

>> No.1599843

SO FUCKING OBVIOUS

>> No.1599844

>>1599799
>>1599799
>>1599799
>>1599799
>>1599799
we have a winner

>> No.1599845

Most people don't understand that homosexuality is viral in nature.

>> No.1599862

>>1599845
says the homosexual
wild animals arent homos

>> No.1599863

>>1599824

I'd like to see a study done about this just to be sure anyway.

I mean, what are the odds that a faggot donates sperm to a lesbian couple and that the spawn becomes a faggot and/or lesbian?

I believe a spawn raised by two lesbians might have a chance of being straight. But two faggots raising a spawn... just kill the poor bastard now.

>> No.1599864

>>1599819
Looks like someone doesn't know how to draw a punnet square.

>> No.1599866

>>1599862
Anyone?

>> No.1599869

>>1599864
recessive traits that kill themselves off arent genetic traits, theyre mutations
>fags creating fags is not possible
thank you god

>> No.1599879

>>1599862
bullshit you get infected with the gay virus when your a child it's a std

>> No.1599880
File: 161 KB, 500x375, 447688070_46dc251aea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599880

poasting in a troll bread

>> No.1599886

if everyone on the planet was completely gay

we would all die within a single generation

think twice before sucking on that weiner gentlemons

>> No.1599890

>>1599708
>nothing sentient debugging genetic code
>mfw evolution didnt happen without god

>> No.1599891

>>1599866

That troll will go hungry tonight.

>> No.1599894

>>1599886
Homosexuals aren't sterile. They can masturbate in a goddamn Dixie cup and dump it in some girl's vagina if it comes down to it.

>> No.1599895

>>1599799because the fag lobby is more powerful than the retard lobby.

I don't know the retard lobby is pretty powerful. They even control both major American political parties.

>>1599862wild animals arent homos

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal.html

>Filmmakers recently went in search of homosexual wild animals as part of a National Geographic Ultimate Explorer documentary

If you don't STFU the fag conspiracy and I will make sure the nature channel has nothing but homosexual animals fucking 24 hours a day.

>> No.1599899

>>1599894
gay men suffer from low sperm counts because semen acts as a spermicide

>> No.1599900

>>1599891
because it cant go refuted

>> No.1599903

>>1599900

HA!.jpeg

>> No.1599906

>>1599886if everyone on the planet was completely gay we would all die within a single generation

Except that having babies and having sex need not be in any way related. This is the 21st century you know.

>>1599894They can masturbate in a goddamn Dixie cup and dump it in some girl's vagina if it comes down to it.

Or, you know, just close their eyes and think of dick.

>> No.1599908

>>1599895
bullshit from homos

>> No.1599910

>>1599894

The point being that homosexuality is instant death to humanity.

>> No.1599914

>>1599891
No, he's going to samefag it with other trolls and newfags.

>> No.1599915

"Threats" are subjectively defined, you fucking mongoloid. Mutations are fucking neutral and have no purpose, unless humans sort them into their own categories of 'we can use this/this does not harm us' and 'oh shit this fucking sucks'. Homosexuality can go both ways. It is bad if you want it to be bad, because people will fear it. But it is good if you want it to be good, and will only be good if people accept it.

As for EFFICIENCY, which is objective but is perceived subjectively, homosexuality has been argued to be economically good because it is kind of impossible to just ignore it and hope it will go away- it is too prevalent in people, since there are tons of fags everywhere. It can be argued that violence and rape, if allowed to roam, will also be prevalent. However, the difference is that homosexuality was offensive, but is now accepted because there aren't really any negative side effects to it. And once it has been accepted, it BECOMES 'good'. It sounds ridiculous, but (cont)

>> No.1599917

>>1599899
No they don't.

>> No.1599919

>>1599900

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

>> No.1599922

>>1599915
homosexuality isnt neutral, its spread directly affects the human population

>> No.1599923

>>1599910
No it isn't.

>> No.1599924

OP here. I'm actually a representative from Conservapedia.com. I've heard a science and math board was discussing some of our articles, so I decided to take it up here. In retrospect, I should have been more transparent about this.

>> No.1599928

the APA pretty much caved in to threats and intimidation from radical homosexual activists.

>> No.1599929

>>1599862
>wild animals arent homos

So I guess you're not very smart are you.

There have been several documented cases of animal homosexuality/bisexuality

Even some of our closes animal relatives (bonobos) exhibit rampant bisexuality and in fact solve their problems not with fighting, but with sexing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sexual_behaviour#Homosexual_behaviour

we could learn a thing or two from them

>> No.1599930

>>1599919
home tendencies in worms, theyre fucking hermaphrodites, try again

>> No.1599933

>>1599906

Your abundance of faith in homosexuals is disturbing.

Faggot.

>> No.1599935

>>1599929
wild animals commit rape to

i guess that makes rape acceptable

>> No.1599936

>>1599922
>implying you can "catch" homosexuality

>> No.1599937

>>1599933
Yup. THAT's the most disturbing part of this discussion.

>> No.1599938
File: 34 KB, 294x313, ....jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599938

>>1599929
>wiki
and you expect me to believe you

>> No.1599940

>>1599924

Conservapedia is the biggest fucking joke on planet earth.

>> No.1599944

>>1599935
I didn't say that it's "right"

I made no moral judgement, just that it occurs in animals

>> No.1599945

>>1599922
Homosexuality is fairly positive if your end goal is a stable, happy population size. If your goal is to overrun every livable corner of the globe with starving, uneducated mud people then it's less desirable I suppose...

>> No.1599948

>>1599924
Kill yourself.

>> No.1599949

>>1599936

>implying that you can't "catch" homosexuality

also, you apparently have been infected

>> No.1599950
File: 17 KB, 405x289, facepalm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599950

>>1599938
>my face when you don't know how to click on the source links

http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx

is that better for you broski?

>> No.1599951

>>1599936
>lololololollololoolollolololollololololololo
its either genetic or evolution is bullshit, either way= bullshit

>> No.1599952

oh dear god.

>> No.1599953

>>1599915
We basically operate in a capitalist society. As we open ourselves up to supply and demand, demand (or the consumer) becomes a strong power in history. It is the consumer who decides what is good and bad. If they want homos to be bad, then HOMOS ARE BAD. But if they don't want them to be bad, THEN THEY'RE NOT BAD- because really, you have to admit, the only problem with homosexuality is that it offends people.

There is nothing set in stone about right and wrong until the consumer makes it sets it in a law; once the consumer (or human) sets or alters a law, that aspect conforms and wraps around it. Homos, who were previously drug junkie and disgusting drag queens, slowly become responsible husbands. This is not saying all homos used to be junkies or drag queens (ie Alan Turing)- it's just that the image of them changed, and the only thing that matters in the public is image (which is not an illusion- it is a compressed file that makes it easy to access, so to say). And now, since homos are slowly becoming more organized, well, i guess we should make them more organized.

tl;dr again, homosexuality is not good nor evil, it is only if it can fit and not threaten society. since some faggots decided to create a gay movement, it's now good, whereas previously it really was bad because it shocked a ripple through people's safety and nerves (which is bad for everyone, OBVIOUSLy)

>> No.1599954
File: 93 KB, 677x335, maximumtrolling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599954

>>1599940
it's The Trustworthy Encyclopedia

>> No.1599955

>>1599936implying you can "catch" homosexuality

Pujo made me gay.

>> No.1599957

>>1599936
homosexuality is viral in nature usually transmitted by sexual intercourse before puberty. This is well known.

>> No.1599963

>>1599945
sterile beings arent positve

>> No.1599964

>>1599951
how do i logic?

>> No.1599967

>>1599957
No it isn't.

>> No.1599970

>>1599963
Homosexual beings aren't sterile.

>> No.1599975

>>1599951
I don't think you realize how evolution works.

EVERY gene does not need to have a positive impact to be propagated through a species.

You don't even know if homosexuality is caused by a single gene or is multifactorial, you're just a troll and I'm leaving this thread

/sci/ is the worst fucking board on 4chan and it pains me to say it, but it should be deleted

>> No.1599978

>>1599967
yes it is. let me guess you're one of those ignorant fucks that thinks homosexuality is a choice? HUMAN SEXUALITY IS NOT A CHOICE!

>> No.1599979

>>1599964
derp, with devolution

>> No.1599980

>>1599957
Well then tell your priest to stop fucking little boys.

>> No.1599982

>>1599945

Your utopian views of homosexuality is a just little too ridiculous.

Cite one civilization having utilized homosexuality. You can't because it doesn't make any fucking sense nimrod.

>> No.1599983

>>1599975
>/sci/ is the worst fucking board on 4chan and it pains me to say it, but it should be deleted

It doesn't exactly pain me to say it, but /sci/ is one of the easiest boards to troll. Case in point - this thread.

>> No.1599984

>>1599970
Yes they are. The homosexual life style lowers sperm counts, because semen is a spermicide.

>> No.1599985
File: 7 KB, 165x225, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1599985

>>1599978
thinks homos have to be homos

>> No.1599988

>>1599978
Dude... pick a side and STAY ON IT YOU COCKFACE DOUBLE FAGGOT

>> No.1599990

10/10 - SUCCESSFUL

>> No.1599992

no matter how you look at it, fags are fags
you could train people to be fags, or they could just be fags, either way theyre fags

>> No.1599994

>>1599982
>Cite one civilization having utilized homosexuality.

It was a requirement for Spartan soldiers to be homosexual so they would protect their partners in battle.

>> No.1599995

>>1599963sterile beings arent positve

What does that say about permavirgins like you?

>> No.1599998

>>1599985
They do. That's easy to say when you haven't been exposed the virus.

>> No.1600002

>>1599984
No it doesn't. By that logic, everyone on the planet has a low sperm count.

>> No.1600004

OP, trolling is quality, not quantity

>> No.1600005

>>1599994
>implying you saying that is citing an article


so how's being a retard working out for you?

>> No.1600007

>>1599988
fuck you bigot. I haven't changed sides.

>> No.1600011

this is not what you call trolling. it's just retarded spam.

>> No.1600014

>>1599982Cite one civilization having utilized homosexuality. You can't because it doesn't make any fucking sense nimrod.

Ancient civilizations flourished if they had population growth so they could go off and conquer their neighbors. We aren't doing that any more so we've got to reign in our population growth. What we SHOULD be doing is finding a way to shrink the population growth of more primitive civilizations so they don't overrun western civilization. I suggest nerve gas.

>> No.1600015

>>1600007
You actually have.

>> No.1600016

>>1599994
da fux, prove it

>> No.1600018

>>1599994
sure they were just like every prominent historical figure to date my have been homosexual. Spread your fagot lies somewhere else. This board is dedicated to science and reason.

>> No.1600021

>>1599984
lower sperm count doesnt mean 0% chance to have a baby.
lower sperm count means less of a chance to have one.
lrn2troll

>> No.1600022

>>1600005
>herp

Everything you've said in this thread, including that post, is now invalid because you didn't cite an article. Sorry.

>> No.1600026

>>1600002
Everybody doesn't have fucking sex with men. Women don't have sperm you understand? Fucking retards gtfo my /sci/.

>> No.1600027

>>1599998
>thinks kleptomania is a real disease

>> No.1600030

>>1600022
>implying I didn't cite pertinent articles in my posts

>> No.1600031

Are we being raided by /new/ or something? Jesus, this seems organized.

>> No.1600032

>>1600005
http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa072099.htm
>Sparta, even with its relatively free women, had homosexual relationships built into the structure of the training all young Spartan men received.

>> No.1600034

>>1600026
By virtue of the fact that we have sperm in our bodies, we're exposed to it 24/7.

>> No.1600036

>>1600030
>implying you did

>> No.1600037

>>1600031
seems like its 5 people going back and forth changing sides and shit
idk its gay but funny

>> No.1600038

>>1600015
No I was trying to discuss how homosexuality is biological in nature and you fucking bigots said it wasn't.

>> No.1600040

>>1599994

That isn't a fact. There's no evidence to support that claim.

>> No.1600042

saying homos are genetic is like saying theyre diseased. if so, they should be treated like sickle cell patients, dont mate with another diseased person... but wait it cant be passed on

>> No.1600043

And this thread, ladies and gentlemen, is the result of the conservative movement. Enjoy.

>> No.1600046

>>1600032
how about a non fag source. Spartans also beat their children. What's your point.

>> No.1600047

>>1600042
If it's genetic, then yes, it can, you RETARD. Die slow.

>> No.1600048

>>1600037
of course its gay, were talking about homos

>> No.1600050

>>1600040
lol @ christfags making up their own version of history.

>> No.1600054

>>1600047
thinks, mules can pass on genes

>> No.1600056

>>1600034
>hurr durr

we have sperm in our genitals

>> No.1600057

>>1600046
someone asked for one example of a civilization utilizing homosexuality, I provided it.

>> No.1600059

>>1600050
>implying history accounts are accurate

>> No.1600061

>>1600056
I forgot we all don't keep our prosthetic cocks in our nightstands like you do, you freak.

>> No.1600063

>>1600059
>ask for one example of a civilation utilizing homosexuality
>example is provided
>deny history, replace with bullshit

>> No.1600068

>>1600061

>get proven wrong

>resort to ad hominems

>> No.1600070

>>1600057
you provided speculation on the part of historians.

>> No.1600071

>>1599679

Because of the hypocrisy of certain people.

>> No.1600072

>>1600068
>Miss point entirely of post
>Try to sound intelligent with Latin phrases

>> No.1600075

>>1600070
Not speculation, there's enough evidence that there's really no question.

>> No.1600076

GOD DAMN THIS THREAD MAKES ME RAGE!

everybody knows the homosexual gene is carried in a virus

>> No.1600079

>>1600075
there is no written records

>> No.1600083

>>1600068
He means that our genitals are a part of our body, except for yours, apparently.

>> No.1600092
File: 76 KB, 495x479, 1262912172211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1600092

>> No.1600093
File: 5 KB, 333x323, digdug.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1600093

>>1600079
What's the point in asking for a historical example if you replace history with your own bullshit anyway?

>> No.1600097

homosexuals are fags

>> No.1600098

>>1600083
nobody said they weren't

I said the semen is a natural spermicide

>> No.1600102

>>1600093
what history? All I see is guess work and speculation to support the fag agenda.

>> No.1600104

>>1600098
So basically it should be self-destructing in our balls right now as we speak, right?

>> No.1600106

Down syndrome: retards who can't hold a job. Burden on society for the rest of their lives. If they reproduce, if they're capable of it at all, they have a 50% of passing on the extra chromosome.

Homos: Can hold a job, and often in positions requiring considerable intelligence and/or creativity. Physically capable of reproduction, and can have kids via sperm/egg donation, surrogate mothers, in vitro, etc.

Society only frowns upon them because we still take a collection of Semitic fairy tales seriously.

>> No.1600107

there is a reason why homos arent accepted. thats all

>> No.1600109

>>1600102
>implying it's guesswork and speculation
>implying there's anyone who deserves the term "fag" applied to them more than you

>> No.1600114

>>1600107
Except that they are for the most part.

>> No.1600115

>>1600072
>Try to sound intelligent with Latin phrases
>resort to ad hominems

Two more weeks until school starts. Two weeks.

>> No.1600119

>>1600106
nature doesnt sperm donate. theyre frowned upon because theyre unnatural faggots

>> No.1600123

>>1600109
>implying you have an argument

>implying you don't have to resort to name calling because you have no point

>> No.1600125

>>1600115
it pisses me off when people use ad *ems in everyday conversation. It's lazy.

>> No.1600126

>>1600114
pffffffffff lol
in cali they almost get right to marriage after losing to 75% and a riots about to breakout.

>> No.1600129

>>1600104
what does your balls have to do with another mans semen?

>> No.1600131

>>1600126
That's just about marriage. That's a totally different story. There is no death penalty for homosexuality in America. There is no death penalty for it in most of the world. Therefore, it's accepted in most of the world.

>> No.1600132

>>1599679

What would happen if that ever found a cure?

Dead of the faggot lobby?

I sure hope so.

I'm sick of them playing victim!

>> No.1600133

>>1600123
>implying you have an argument other than to deny that history happened
>implying I didn't use the exact same word you used, and that you didn't have to resort to pointing it out because you have no point

>> No.1600135

>>1600129
What's the difference between your semen and another man's semen?

>> No.1600139

>>1600133
>grasping at straws

you provided no history and now your just making shit up. As if other historians are lying.

>> No.1600141

>>1600135
Wow if you don't understand genetics I see no point in talking to you.... sad

Why are you on /sci/?

>> No.1600142

>>1600139
>implying I didn't provide history
>implying historians who have commented on the topic of homosexuality in ancient Sparta are lying

>> No.1600145

>>1600139
facepalm.jpg

>> No.1600147

>>1600131
we dont kill mules, we dont kill people with dont syndrome, that doent mean we accept people with downsyndrome

>> No.1600148
File: 20 KB, 321x267, coolface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1600148

>>1600141
>ad hominem

>> No.1600149

>>1600106

I never heard of retarded people reproducing. Who the heck would let that happen anyway?

>> No.1600152

>>1600147
Except that we do. I dare you to go out and publicly make fun of someone with Down Syndrome. See where it gets you.

>> No.1600153

>>1600139
>your

>> No.1600156

>>1600142

you provided nothing but lies.

>> No.1600160

>>1600141
What does anything that we've been talking about have to do with genetics? I'm curious.

>> No.1600161

>>1600156
>ask for a historical example
>historical example is provided
>call it "lies," replace history with your own bullshit

>> No.1600162

>>1600141
You said that gay men have a lower sperm count because they're exposed to sperm more. Tell me where genetics comes into the equation.

>> No.1600164

>>1600152
we pity people with down syndrome, which is a form of nonacceptance. how many opportunities are there for down syndrome people

>> No.1600171

The iceberg of clinical fact looming up in the dark is this: that homosexuals who want to become heterosexual can and do change, as authoritative medical research has now demonstrated. Given the will, and skilled therapy, there can be an end to the nightmare of same-sex attraction. That is the best news for our heartsick friends down below deck, but it is bad news for the complacent triumphalists of the Gay Titanic.

Bad news for their tall tale that being gay is like being black, an immutable inborn identity. Bad news, in the debate on gay marriage, for their false analogies with apartheid and Aborigines, since blacks cannot stop being blacks, but gays can stop being gay.

Homosexuality emerges in its truer light, not as a minority "genetic identity" but as a complex conditioned behaviour, which can and does change.

As to the exact causes of homosexuality, the medical jury is still out. But the baseless claim, promoted by Justice Michael Kirby and others, that gays are just born that way, is given no support by the American Psychiatric Association. Their Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation (2000) sums it up: "There are no replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality".

As to the ability for homosexuals to change, late last year a remarkable research paper was published in the Archives of Sexual Behaviour (October 2003) by one of America's senior psychiatrists, Dr Robert Spitzer. Significantly, this was the same Spitzer whose reforming zeal helped delete homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association's manual of mental disorders back in 1973. Now he has published a detailed review of "200 Participants Reporting a Change from Homosexual to Heterosexual orientation". He writes of his research: "Although initially sceptical, in the course of the study, the author became convinced of the possibility of change in some gay men and lesbians."

>> No.1600174

>>1600164
You are even dumber than a bucket of rocks. Ever been to Walmart? People with Down Syndrome work there every day with normal shifts and normal tasks. You live a sad life.

>> No.1600176

>>1600162
You do understand sperm contains DNA right?

>> No.1600179

>>1600171
Even "ex-gays" admit that they still have feelings for men.

>> No.1600180

>>1600160
>what does homosexuality being genetic have to do with genetics?

>> No.1600181
File: 147 KB, 484x453, fuck a you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1600181

>>1600174
>working at walmart=opportunities
OBJECTION

>> No.1600182

>>1600176
Yes? Again, what does that have to do with anything?

>> No.1600188

>>1600180
Read the whole fucking conversation, dumbass.

>> No.1600189

>>1600181
For people with Down Syndrome? Yes. It is an opportunity.

>> No.1600190

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

>> No.1600205

>>1600190
if this were true then the majority of men now and nearly everyman from lets say the '50s would be homosexual since disgust at the practice used to be ubiquitous in the western world.

>> No.1600206

>homos are gonna burn....let 'em burn, gotaa let 'em burn
just remeber, its too late to change your mind when your rolling around in a lake of fire

>> No.1600209

>>1600182
if you can't understand genetics I don't have the time to teach you

>> No.1600210

>>1600205
that study is based on modern homophobic men. the difference is homosexuality is now more commonly accepted.

>> No.1600213

>>1600205
Some probably were, some were probably just going along with the flow. Times have changed since the 50s, in case you didn't notice, grandpa.

>> No.1600220

>>1600210
homophobia=fear of homos
so what is it called when you genuinely hate them

>> No.1600222

>>1600209
I do understand genetics. I'm pretty sure it's you who has no understanding of genetics.

You're saying that because sperm contains DNA, it's a spermicide, and even though every man is exposed to it on a daily basis, it only affects a gay man's sperm count for some bizarre reason. Skin cells contain DNA, too. Your point?

>> No.1600225

>>1600220
Homophobia. The definition has expanded over the years.

>> No.1600229

>>1600213
Talk to older men. They certainly don't seem to be going with the flow to me.

>> No.1600230
File: 33 KB, 500x449, imagine babby.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1600230

>>1600220
>how do i english?

don't worry, babby! here's a nice little dictionary definition for you!

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homophobia
>irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

>> No.1600231

>>1600229
>implying you can completely understand the workings of every man's mind.

>> No.1600233

>>1600222
Here go to www.lemonparty.org

it will explain to your retarded ass I don't have time

>> No.1600236

>>1600233
I just broke a troll.
:)

>> No.1600239

>>1600233
>mfw you have that bookmarked

>> No.1600241

>>1600225
i dont consider god to have homophobia

>> No.1600244

The trolls are dissipating.

>> No.1600247

>>1600222
because sperm is predatory

>> No.1600251

I think we should archive this.

>> No.1600253

>>1600244
no, its just been you samefagging

>> No.1600255

You know way /sci/ is so fun to troll? Because even when you you dumbfucks know you're being trolled you can't help yourself. It must hurt to allow other humans to have that much power over you.

>> No.1600259

>>1600255
It still isn't as sad as the people who spend time trolling.

>> No.1600261

>>1600259
Word.

>> No.1600368

>>1600239
sure is newfaggy in this area

>> No.1600412

>>1600368
No one's used the word newfag in a while, newfag. The new butthurt term is summerfag.

>> No.1600925

SUPER B̳͙͕͓̰̯̎̂Ǘ͔̞̤̺̍̉͛͌M̾ͣ͊͆̊͒̚ͅP͇̙͙͑́̉ͤ̇

>> No.1600933

>>1599679

i've never seen an old guy with downs syndrome before

this looks weird as hell to me

>> No.1600941

>>1600135

one comes from your balls, the other comes in your ass

BREAKING NEWS BEING GAY IS A MENTAL DISORDER WITH PREVALENCE ABOUT EQUAL TO OTHER WIDELY ACCEPTED BIOLOGICALLY BASED MENTAL ILLNESSES.

HOPE YOU DON'T FORGET TO TAKE YOUR FAG PILLS WHEN THEY CURE IT BUDDY LEST YOU GO OUT AND BUY A NEW CHINCHILLA COAT TO MATCH THE FAT DICK IN YOUR ASS!

>> No.1600975

Because, m'deary, Downs Syndrome prevents people from contributing to the rest of society. Faggotry does not.

(and if you think children are a contribution to society... well, you might be right, but there are other ways that don't have any chance of helping a malthusian catastrophe along).

Enough of that, I'm being trolled.

>> No.1601088

>>1600247
So are you implying that homosexual males have sex in a way in which one man's sperm either breaks through layers of skin, flesh or other tissues, goes into each others genitals and does battle with the other person's sperm with some newly acquired chemical and physical properties that somehow make it able to destroy someone else's sperm without it destroying itself, or are you just ignorant on the fact that sperm does not cause itself to self destruct? (not to be confused with sperm cells dieing naturally)

>> No.1601769

>>1600941
see
>>1601088