/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15380656]

>1 Launch
>To the moon and back
The seethe will be even more hilarious when musktards realize more and more with each """test""" how retarded the BFR design was from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.15380786]

>>15380656
>Raptor engines cooking off one by one in a cascade failure as the others have to struggle to lift more and more weight
>finally the rocket just can't attain escape velocity
>it's underpowered af even with almost three dozen Raptors maxed out
>and the test flight had no payload and probably minimal fuel in the second stage

[Anonymous No.15380804]

>>15380786
It's almost like people should learn from mistakes of the past kek

[Anonymous No.15380807]

>>15380656
>1 launch
>that'll be $20 billion dollars please

[Anonymous No.15380822]

>>15380807
>10 launches
>That'll be 20 billion dollars please
>Also im sorry but your astronauts died while trying to reach orbit, none of the launches worked
Kek

[Anonymous No.15380834]

>>15380822
Don't count your dead astronauts before they blow up.

[Anonymous No.15380846]

>>15380834
Don't count your "successful" tests before they reach orbit

[Anonymous No.15380858]

>>15380656
The earth is flat with a dome. All these "tests" are pure propaganda for the cattle. They can never leave this plane alive.

[Anonymous No.15380859]

>>15380846
I'm not. The launch was a failure. It sucks, but these things happen. You learn from it and try to do better.

The alternative is you shut everything down the first time you encounter a hurdle and go nowhere.

[Anonymous No.15380890]

>>15380858
>>>/x/ and stay there, filthy schizo.

[Anonymous No.15380917]

>>15380859
>The alternative is you shut everything down the first time you encounter a hurdle and go nowhere.
No, the alternative is you do as much right as possible the first time, just like the winners did in the past retard

[Anonymous No.15380920]

It was designed by white heterosexual males in a meritocratic society. Of course it worked out of the box.

[Anonymous No.15380982]

>>15380917
>No, the alternative is you do as much right as possible the first time, just like the winners did in the past retard
>you do as much right as possible the first time
>the first time

[Anonymous No.15380991]

>>15380982
Yes something that literally never happened in a single Apollo launch afterwards. With muh ebin BFG this will be a literal daily occurrence except casualties x30 kek

[Anonymous No.15381036]

>>15380656
SLS had a failure with Challenger. Changing the name of the system because the crew and cargo have been moved from the side to the top doesn't change the fact that SLS is built upon the system that killed seven astronauts and destroyed an orbiter. And that happened in the production phase, not the test phase.

[Anonymous No.15381079]

>>15381036
>SLS had a failure with Challenger
The absolute state of coping musktard brainlets holy kek

[Anonymous No.15381099]

>>15380991
>Yes something that literally never happened in a single Apollo launch afterwards.
Pic related was just three years later. Space exploration is inherently risky. There will ALWAYS be a risk of something going wrong when you're dealing with complex technology in an inherently dangerous environment. In three hundred years if we haven't blown ourselves up and there are humans travelling between planets on a regular basis, there will STILL be shit going wrong. There will STILL be vehicles blowing up. There will STILL be people getting killed. You can take all the precautions in the world and shit will STILL go wrong, and if we're not willing to accept that that risk comes with the territory we should just pack up and go back to our caves.

The first crewed mission of Falcon was its 98th.
The first crewed mission of Starship will not be its 2nd.
They'll test it, they'll work out as many of the bugs as they can, and at some point they'll make the leap to manned flights, and something MAY still go wrong, just like something MAY go wrong with Ares II, and if/when that happens I pray that people aren't stupid enough to say "well, I guess we'll just give up now" like they almost did after Apollo 1, like they almost did after Apollo 13, like they almost did after Challenger, and like they very nearly did after Columbia.

[Anonymous No.15381106]

>>15381099

[Anonymous No.15381145]

>>15381099
Cope and seethe
Imagine being so retarded and not understand that 10x the cost but 10x less the failure rate per launch is better than the other way around

[Anonymous No.15381161]

>>15380656
It's starship super heavy

[Anonymous No.15381167]

>>15380991
Why should oligarchs care about fried wagies when there are thousand more lining up to man the next firecracker?

[Anonymous No.15381233]

>>15381145
>10x the cost but 10x less the failure rate per launch is better than the other way around
It's a tradeoff. More cost and fewer attempts means less risk, but it also means you're not getting as much done. One launch every few years isn't going to build orbital infrastructure or colonize worlds - you need bulk.

[Anonymous No.15381251]

>>15381233
>you're not getting as much don
KEK how many times has starship reached the moon again?
SLS 1 - Starship 0

[Anonymous No.15381254]

>>15380890
The flat earth truth is censored on /x/ as it destroys all the retarded narratives the glowniggers are running there.

https://youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4
https://youtu.be/p-BFmn2S_jU
https://youtu.be/BVJgObFHLY4
https://youtu.be/ru5fdfovkGI
https://youtu.be/74KRZt5oJME
https://youtu.be/tdwy-hxS-ts
https://youtu.be/UAx5cl9VpTE
https://youtu.be/JlFnJPFjcc0
https://youtu.be/XetG30_YOeo
https://youtu.be/ziVLbEoQ4Sc
https://youtu.be/k0xClWgidZU
https://youtu.be/UbYtkrTquXE
https://youtu.be/1WHIr-IFqAo
https://youtu.be/WcqKUhU0WDc
https://youtu.be/wPrDg0CtWnk
https://youtu.be/hoGTBdu7dMc
https://youtu.be/mcLwr86emds
https://youtu.be/U_bJYXS9p4A
https://youtu.be/JOqc63Pp9OA
https://odysee.com/@probablyalexandra:6/an-inconvenient-history:b
https://youtu.be/X-w8acuxF6w
https://youtu.be/nGLJ5XJP3uE
https://youtu.be/olbyJDou4qQ
https://youtu.be/0Q18iSz6mus
https://youtu.be/CLzj4PKJ2O4
https://youtu.be/aFFM3YJAs4Q
https://youtu.be/Stft_t48Hxc
https://youtu.be/OPQLFlf89s8
https://youtu.be/QWa7lTxhrKI
https://youtu.be/hyo8eKrinDM
https://youtu.be/DdLLamniSyg
https://youtu.be/udjk_FB80kM
https://youtu.be/4nKIN_eHYxw
https://youtu.be/fDBRhxryfZM
https://youtu.be/-rmDj1MJyaY
https://youtu.be/Kv9-JuLRpg0
https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8
https://youtu.be/DHhgLnIvuAs
https://youtu.be/CDG4oiCx_is
https://youtu.be/wz68Q2Nz05A
https://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0
https://youtu.be/uUuTAflN1rU
https://youtu.be/lkmY_4PKMlY
https://youtu.be/McdMMmclGVc
https://youtu.be/Cm7fBZq-8T4
https://youtu.be/4SlRsbQ3nfM
https://youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHw
https://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfss
https://youtu.be/CATklVkPEMw
https://youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxA
https://youtu.be/ofp8qiL3dTs
https://youtu.be/WXaXnAvEpB8
https://youtu.be/gWnFMWqDRQE
https://youtu.be/EvnrD49RmAY
https://youtu.be/3wU8_jT61eE
https://www.youtube.com/c/DeanOdleEurope/videos
https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-rulers-and-their-secret-signs_Dr5f3CZu6CvGLgW.html

[Anonymous No.15381268]

>>15380656
>1 launch
And 1/5th the payload in a non reusable rocket. God you guys are retarded

[Anonymous No.15381277]

>>15381268
>And 1/5th the payload of my imaginary payload

[Anonymous No.15381281]

>>15381268
>>15381277
Oh no no no

[Anonymous No.15381284]

>>15381251
Ask again in 2026.
If it's 3-0 I'll concede your point.

[Anonymous No.15381300]

>>15381277
No need to call things fake just because you are too retarded to understand something anon.

[Anonymous No.15381981]

>>15381254
>faggot schizo even washed out of /x/ with his gay YT watchlist

[Anonymous No.15381989]

>>15381300
>I just believe big numbers because they said so

[Anonymous No.15382002]

>>15381145
>10x less failure rate
SLS only flew once, the failure rait until a known figure yet

[Anonymous No.15382006]

>>15382002
>until
isn't*

[Anonymous No.15382015]

>>15381989
>I know way more about space flight then the company that launches over 50 rockets a year
There's nothing wrong with being retarded anon, but you don't need to sperg it all over the internet. Go back to lurking

[Anonymous No.15382033]

>>15382015
I literally do, I know more than >90% of them. I have a doctorate and work in my university's space center.

[Anonymous No.15382036]

>>15381145
You can't fit a fucking curve with one data point, anon. See how Artemis II and III go or if we even fucking HAVE an Artemis IV+ before you start boasting about your success rate.

[Anonymous No.15382040]

>>15382033
based Dunning–Kruger effect anon

[Anonymous No.15382045]

Flat Earth Proofs:
>8 inch x miles^2 curvature rate is demonstrably nonexistent; we can see easily 20-50mi
>geometry dictates the curvizon must be a physical barrier blocking your view only 3 miles away
>water surface is flat and level to infinity
>the horizon is optical and always at eye-level
>perspective exists
>air-planes fly straight level lines, heading into the horizon, keeping the same altitude, and never account for any curvature
>gyroscopes work
>vacuum next to an air-pressure system lmao
>coriolis effect does not exist, interestingly no one who operates real world machinery considers any globe related science
>sonar and radar works
>we don't feel any movement; a constantly spinning, corkscrewing, chasing, multi-directional ball-earth would be deadly
>sextants work
>why do all governments throughout every war agree on 1) space and 2) the antarctic treaty?
>a compass works and always points north
>no one has ever physically discovered a curve, it was conceptualized and later faked with 1960s special effect moon-stories on television
>GPS - Ground Positioning System
>star constellations are always the same, turning around Polaris that is always at the very same spot
>land surveys work
>flight routes and emergency landings only make sense on flat earth
>we can literally see that the earth is flat

Globe Earth Proofs:
>CGI exists
>you are a wellpoisoner if you don't believe in the globe
>NASA employees diving in a pool
>Elon saves us from globohomo, we escape earth and live on a death planet under a dome that protects us from the vacuum of space
>a fish-camera can bend the horizon in both directions (convex and concave earth exist simultaneously)
>sticks and shadows proved my table is a ball
>The Science™ experts told us the earth is a globe
>everyone believes it so it must be real
>I like Star Wars, pop-culture doesn't lie
>I fucking love science!
>why would they lie?
>I have to go to work tomorrow
>I saw it on TV
>It is real in my mind
>fuck off, retard

[Anonymous No.15382119]

>>15382045
>8 inch x miles^2 curvature rate is demonstrably nonexistent; we can see easily 20-50mi
>geometry dictates the curvizon must be a physical barrier blocking your view only 3 miles away
But you won't see the ground after 3 miles. Because of the curve. You can see mountains and tall buildings, sure.
>water surface is flat and level to infinity
>the horizon is optical and always at eye-level
>perspective exists
Are basketballs flat too anon?
>air-planes fly straight level lines, heading into the horizon, keeping the same altitude, and never account for any curvature
Except they do
>gyroscopes work
Works fine on a sphere earth.
>vacuum next to an air-pressure system lmao
Space isn't the kind of vacuum that sucks up dirt in your house my man.
>coriolis effect does not exist,
Except it does
>interestingly no one who operates real world machinery considers any globe related science
Bridge builders do.
>sonar and radar works
Anon are you just naming off random shit at this point?
>we don't feel any movement; a constantly spinning, corkscrewing, chasing, multi-directional ball-earth would be deadly
The same reason your coffee doesn't spill when traveling 70mph.
>sextants work
They way you idiots view the sky is all kinds of screwed up so the fact thy work is evidence of sphere earth.
>why do all governments throughout every war agree on 1) space and 2) the antarctic treaty?
Why do all governments, throughout every war agree that the world is round? You would think one would spill the secrets since its so obvious.
>a compass works and always points north
Yeah, just naming off anything your smooth brain can think of.
>GPS - Ground Positioning System
How the fuck do you even expect GPS to work when there's a god damn dome blocking us from space?
>star constellations are always the same, turning around Polaris that is always at the very same spot
Except for the entire southern hemisphere.
>land surveys work
Ah, an other profession that has to think about the curve.

[Anonymous No.15382126]

>>15382119
Forgot pic