/sfg/ Spaceflight General

[Anonymous No.15357868]

Penultimate day - edition

Previous >>15355275

[Anonymous No.15357876]

>>15357868
Space is fake

[Anonymous No.15357879]

Orbital test failure strawpoll, second day running

https://strawpoll.com/polls/ajnEOeNXAZW

[Anonymous No.15357881]

>>15357868
I hate that word

[Anonymous No.15357883]

>>15357876
henlo again page 1 fren

[Anonymous No.15357884]

[Anonymous No.15357886]

TWENTY FOUR HOURS REMAIN

[Anonymous No.15357889]

alright wheres the false flagging gore poster

[Anonymous No.15357890]

>>15357884
it barely moves yet they can't make a wheel that lasts.

[Anonymous No.15357891]

Good thread OP.

[Anonymous No.15357892]

>>15357889
Nothing happens as long as the Anime spam subsides

[Anonymous No.15357897]

>>15357889
Gore posting will continue until moral improves

[Anonymous No.15357900]

Henlo!

[Anonymous No.15357903]

>>15357884
the absolute state of JPL

[Anonymous No.15357904]

>>15357900
Hi!!

[Anonymous No.15357906]

>>15357904

[Anonymous No.15357909]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647569817606533120

The Mars colony will consist of ubermensch

[Anonymous No.15357912]

>>15357909
this has been known for like 50 years but is controversial since it has racist implications

[Anonymous No.15357917]

Becoming a colonist on the Martian frontier is my only hope of getting away from all these brown people they keep bringing into my country

[Anonymous No.15357918]

>>15357917
brown people will come to the colony as well no doubt, but as long as there is a high fitler (which there will undoubtedly be), then the colony will have traits that are much "better" than the mean traits on earth, both IQ and probably other traits as well

[Anonymous No.15357923]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1178014342031298561

[Anonymous No.15357925]

>>15357918
I can accept that, if they are the well behaved kind and aren’t just criminal or extremists like the ones I’m receiving now

[Anonymous No.15357926]

>>15357923
annoying that hes the only person who can authentically say this

[Anonymous No.15357927]

A mars colony will be full of space Mexicans and you all know it

[Anonymous No.15357929]

>>15357923
Love that hes the only person who can authentically say this

[Anonymous No.15357932]

>>15357926
it's cringe when he says it.

[Anonymous No.15357934]

>>15357925
with future spinhabs far away from other places you could have colonies that are something like ethnonationalist nations were a few centuries ago
lets say a place with only icelandic people or something and they could be autonomous like a small city state
countless small floating city states in space

[Anonymous No.15357937]

>>15357927
substantiate your claims

[Anonymous No.15357941]

>>15357927
Brilliant

[Anonymous No.15357944]

>>15357937
Obviously US government will make sure that every human habitation in space will have its fair share of minorities.

[Anonymous No.15357946]

Has SpaceX reported the anomaly to the FAA yet or do they have to wait for monday morning?

[Anonymous No.15357947]

i didnt know masseys was a fucking island

[Anonymous No.15357949]

[Anonymous No.15357950]

>>15357947
The site of Musk's Final Stand.

[Anonymous No.15357951]

>>15357934
What's the argument against space terrariums?

[Anonymous No.15357952]

>>15357884
Nothing says planned obsolescence better than some alu-butter wheels.

[Anonymous No.15357953]

>>15357946
there was no anomaly

[Anonymous No.15357955]

>>15357949
Post more aesthetics

[Anonymous No.15357956]

>>15357884
So what happens first, JPL sends a fuck-off huge rover to Mars on starship, or colonization efforts start and thousands of teslabots are sent over

[Anonymous No.15357957]

>>15357884
are those percy wheels?
wtf

[Anonymous No.15357958]

too bad they didnt post one without the couple

[Anonymous No.15357960]

>>15357958
just ai them out

[Anonymous No.15357961]

>>15357958
There’s apps now that can remove photobombers

[Anonymous No.15357963]

>>15357958
we all know this couple

[Anonymous No.15357964]

>>15357956
Isn't the next mission for JPL to retrieve the dirt capsules that the current rover is leaving everywhere? That project is going to take like a decade and after that there might be a huge rover by JPL but thats like the next cycle
so 15-20 years away, boots will hopefully happen way sooner (like under 8 years)
predicting the timeline for teslabots its is own thing, but the way JPL is doing things the latter might actually, unironically happen before the first one

[Anonymous No.15357965]

>>15357963
me on the right but with no autistic wife

[Anonymous No.15357967]

>>15357918
just make sure that life on the frontier is uncomfortable hard work for no monetary gain. Nogs will simply refuse to go. If you make decadent paradises like >>15357934 refugees and gibs grifters will migrate there by any means necessary, usually they get in by sympathy conning your soft population.

[Jealous No.15357968]

>>15357963
lol

[Anonymous No.15357970]

>>15357958
would bang

[Anonymous No.15357971]

>>15357965
Do you have a pussy (read: cat) though?

[Anonymous No.15357972]

>>15357953
Whipping the sparks out of your launch tower isn't a preflight operations anomaly? If the FAA thinks it is and SpaceX launches without reporting all legal hell breaks lose.

[Anonymous No.15357975]

[Anonymous No.15357979]

>>15357972
its fine, don't worry about it
nothing substantial happened

[Anonymous No.15357982]

got married on the boca chica beach?

[Anonymous No.15357984]

>>15357964
It would be funny if the Mars Sample Return was completely obsoleted by a single pioneering cargo starship going to Mars in the 2024 transfer window

[Anonymous No.15357989]

i hate it

[Anonymous No.15357991]

>>15357984
it'll never be human rated between tomorrow and next year. expect years of red tape so nasa gets to do it first.

[Anonymous No.15357994]

>>15357984
>Bringing samples from Mars is the logical next step for robotic exploration and it will require multiple missions that will be more challenging and more advanced than any robotic missions before. Accomplishments in robotic exploration in recent years have increased confidence in success – multiple launches will be necessary to deliver samples from Mars.

>ESA is working with NASA to explore mission concepts for an international Mars Sample Return campaign between 2020 and 2030.

>Three launches will be necessary to accomplish landing, collecting, storing and finding samples and delivering them to Earth.

>NASA’s Mars 2020 mission will explore the surface and rigorously document and store a set of samples in canisters in strategic areas to be retrieved later for flight to Earth.

>Two subsequent missions are foreseen to achieve this next step.

>A NASA launch will send the Sample Retrieval Lander mission to land a platform near the Mars 2020 site. From here, a small ESA rover – the Sample Fetch Rover – will head out to retrieve the cached samples.

>Once it has collected them in what can be likened to an interplanetary treasure hunt, it will return to the lander platform and load them into a single large canister on the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This vehicle will perform the first liftoff from Mars and carry the container into Mars orbit.

>ESA’s Earth Return Orbiter will be the next mission, timed to capture the basketball-size sample container orbiting Mars. The samples will be sealed in a biocontainment system to prevent contaminating Earth with unsterilised material before being moved into an Earth entry capsule.

>The spacecraft will then return to Earth, where it will release the entry capsule for the samples to end up in a specialised handling facility.

[Anonymous No.15357995]

if its launching in the morning then its going to be hard to see? i might not be able to see it from my location...

[Anonymous No.15357997]

>>15357989
I’ve never been into super hero movies, never understood why people like it so much

[Anonymous No.15357999]

>>15357991
I said cargo starship not human one, even if it takes until the 2028 window for humans to start going that's a good five years ahead of the Sample Return timeline

[Anonymous No.15358000]

>>15357994
pathetic

[Anonymous No.15358004]

>>15357979
Well, no one was hurt but something potentially dangerous happened that shouldn't.

[Anonymous No.15358005]

> The NASA-ESA Mars Sample Return is a proposed Mars sample return (MSR) mission to collect Martian rock and soil samples in 43 small, cylindrical, pencil-sized, titanium tubes and return them to Earth around 2033.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA-ESA_Mars_Sample_Return

I wonder if JPL is going to pivot or not?
Didn't they hamstring and try to block Red Dragon already? They might have the motive to block, but after it becomes inevitable perhaps they are nimble enough to pivot? Probably not though

[Anonymous No.15358006]

>>15357994
Has there been any actual hard progress on this? I know lockmart was working on the MAV, but are there any definite timelines or launch vehicles?

[Anonymous No.15358007]

>>15357971
no i have a doggo though

[Anonymous No.15358010]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9G36CDLzIg

> 17.11.2022
>NASA and the European Space Agency are developing plans for one of the most ambitious campaigns ever attempted in space: bringing the first samples of Mars material safely back to Earth for detailed study. The diverse set of scientifically curated samples now being collected by NASA’s Mars Perseverance rover could help scientists answer the question of whether ancient life ever arose on the Red Planet.
>Bringing samples of Mars to Earth for future study would happen in several steps with multiple spacecraft, and in some ways, in a synchronized manner. This short animation features key moments of the Mars Sample Return campaign: from landing on Mars and securing the sample tubes to launching them off the surface and ferrying them back to Earth.
>Animation is contributed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the European Space Agency, Goddard Space Flight Center, and Marshall Space Flight Center.

[Anonymous No.15358012]

>>15358007
Infinitely more valuable than a woman

[Anonymous No.15358014]

>>15357909
>Elon Musk doesn't know what "raised seperately" mean

[Anonymous No.15358015]

>>15358010
>2033
>ambitious
I HATE OLDSPACE I HATE OLDSPACE I HATE OLDSPACE

[Anonymous No.15358021]

>>15358015
you'll get some tubes of rogg in 2040 and you'll be happy

[Anonymous No.15358024]

I'll be on Venus, in my cloud colony

[Anonymous No.15358026]

>>15358021
It's incredibly some people aren't satisfied with the breakneck pace of getting a several grams of mars dust by 2045.

[Anonymous No.15358029]

>>15358006
literally none
everyone knows its going no where and a starship will take a shit on it

[Anonymous No.15358030]

>>15358010
one one hand these rube goldberg machine missions are pretty cool but on the other hand, really? what the fuck
mass autism, not even once

[Anonymous No.15358031]

rockets never actually go to space because space is fake.

[Anonymous No.15358036]

>>15358014
the point is, even if you raise twins separately their IQs are going to be very close to each other
the point is that IQ is genetic, his twins having an almost identical IQ just reinforces the point

[Anonymous No.15358039]

>>15358026
only for them to go "cor, we've learned nothing, we think there might be past life and more water so we'll send another rover in the 2070s if budgetary constraints allow"

[Anonymous No.15358043]

>>15357909
My experience with IQ tests is that your performance increases a lot if you have done an IQ test before.
They have certain styles of questions and you can answer them much faster if you know what you are looking for.
So that the variance is close to the same person doing a test twice, probably doesn't say as much as it seems because that variance is already high.
It's not really a proper control.

The difference between random and twins is possible evidence of genetic influence, but we don't actually know how well the environment is controlled here, besides that they aren't raised together.
There can still be confounding environmental factors based on the fact they are both adopted (IE adoptee parents are often subject to strict criteria to ensure fitness), both raised in broadly similar areas and both identical.
If for example you believed that en-equal racial education outcomes had an effect on IQ in adults, then the fact that the children would be the same race would reduce variation relative to the general population.

I'm not making an argument for or against the relative influence of genetics, I just really hate when people use misleading graphs and data to confirm their biases.

[Anonymous No.15358046]

>>15358030
Just think, in 23 hours Mass autism will be a thing of the past
We can send up another JWST that's 3x heavier but 1/100th the cost

[Anonymous No.15358049]

>>15358031
I work with a guy that actually believes this, he told me it must be true because rockets always curve instead of going straight up. Imagine being this stupid

[Anonymous No.15358050]

>>15358036
That's like 60 year old info though, nothing new

[Anonymous No.15358053]

>>15355071
I think they're planning to sustain themselves on thruster sales (and investor money) until their orbital launch vehicle is around. In his MECO interview their CEO seemed hopeful but not delusional about a suborbital payload market emerging

[Anonymous No.15358056]

>>15357991
>human rated
Only matters if you're launching NASA astronauts. It won't happen, but if SpaceX has a crew of cowboy employees ready to fly in 2024 the government can't do anything to stop them.

[Anonymous No.15358058]

>>15358043
cope
> If for example you believed that en-equal racial education outcomes had an effect on IQ in adults, then the fact that the children would be the same race would reduce variation relative to the general population.
complete non-sequitur, the twins in this case had a similar IQ to each other, not their underlying race

[Anonymous No.15358060]

>>15358058
What about studies on twins who are of different races? Would the black twin have the same iq?

[Anonymous No.15358062]

>>15358060
>twins who are of different races
anon i...

[Anonymous No.15358077]

>>15358058
Really do you have evidence of that? The chart does not specify race or background when it talks about random people, it is presumably taking from the whole population.

[Anonymous No.15358081]

spaceflight

[Anonymous No.15358084]

does nsf go live at midnight or what?

[Anonymous No.15358089]

So there’s no way that SpaceX develops and tests landing, refueling, reuse and gets starship crew certified for HLS in 2 years right?

[Anonymous No.15358088]

ELON NO

[Anonymous No.15358094]

>>15358089
artemis 3 aint happening until at least 2027, maybe even 2029

[Anonymous No.15358099]

>>15357970
I'd bank that sheet metal so hard too.

[Anonymous No.15358101]

>>15358089
They don't need most of those things for HLS to work, only thing it needs to do is be able to refuel and land on the moon.

[Anonymous No.15358103]

polaris dawn are likely to fly on starship before nasa will

[Anonymous No.15358106]

>>15358077
>>15358077
Difference between two random people is about looking at the chart 17, a bit over one standard deviation if the population mean is 100 and std 15 (as it usually is), which is basically the same you get if you look at the equation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_absolute_difference)) for the mean absolute difference of a normal distribution, which would be 2/sqrt(pi)
*std = 16.92 in this case

if IQ wasn't genetic, the mean absolute difference between the twins should be close to this value (17), and not 7 or something like it appears to be
its almost identical to a person taking a two tests

[Anonymous No.15358115]

>>15358088
oh fuck i just understood why elon said delayed 3 days...

[Anonymous No.15358116]

>>15357927
Mars will quickly go from "holy shit I'm on Mars" to the equivalent of working on an oil right or fishing boat or something, like oh man this kinda sucks but at least I'll get some decent money when I finish this nine month tour

[Anonymous No.15358117]

>>15358106
> shitting up /sfg/ with IQ posts
we have a whole board for that anon

[Anonymous No.15358125]

>>15358116
this
except the risk of imminent death will be alot higher
if someone freaks out they could kill an entire section with a wrench too

[Anonymous No.15358126]

>>15358116
I think the people there would be much more mission focused
at least until the colony gets large enough
people just looking for a payday will risk their lives to go to mars? I really doubt that, they would at least have some interest in going to space and so on
being a mars pioneer won't be easy or safe, it won't be sold as easy or safe

[Anonymous No.15358127]

Why is Musk doing the construction process next to the fucking ocean.... and hit by annual hurricanes... in an area that's 1 foot above sea level..

[Anonymous No.15358128]

[Anonymous No.15358130]

>>15358127
To test SpaceX's abilities.

[Anonymous No.15358135]

>>15358126
anon it will have to be easy and mostly safe for the pay
or you're not going to get enough qualified people

[Anonymous No.15358136]

>>15358127
In theory the testing should be easier because it's fucking empty there, unfortunately they didn't account for beetles.

[Anonymous No.15358137]

>>15358126
>people just looking for a payday will risk their lives to go to mars? I really doubt that
You underestimate how bored and poor a lot of Americans are. A minuscule fraction of the kids enlisting in the military instead opting for Mars duty is all that will be needed for the next few decades

[Anonymous No.15358138]

Goodnight /sfg/. It's cool that such an important event is happening in comfy ausfag hours. I hated having to wake up for the hops only to find that fuelling was delayed or whatever. See you tomorrow bros.

[Anonymous No.15358140]

>>15358127
hard mode so when they get to mars it will be easy

[Anonymous No.15358143]

Fresh ESG Hound

https://blog.esghound.com/p/spacexs-texas-rocket-is-going-to

>An FWS employee measured a sound intensity reading of 110 decibels (dB) three miles from the launch site during a static fire test conducted in February.

>I expected more from our agencies, from the press, and frankly from SpaceX itself. I still am in shock that a rocket system, the largest in history, will be fired off, from an inadequate facility, in the middle of an endangered species habitat, by a company that revels in the beautiful failure of explosions with seemingly no guardrails and no respect for the real danger this operation presents to the public.

[Anonymous No.15358145]

>>15358143
>I still am in shock that a rocket system, the largest in history, will be fired off, from an inadequate facility, in the middle of an endangered species habitat

good, fuck beetles

[Anonymous No.15358146]

>>15358135
wrong, spacex is not easy (somewhat safe I guess) and its still the most wanted place for new graduates

>>15358137
you think people would go to mars even knowing its very difficult and dangerous and the pay would be probably mediocre at best, not something you would do if you wanted to become rich

[Anonymous No.15358147]

https://thenextweb.com/news/europe-surpasses-us-in-private-spacetech-investment-for-first-time-seraphim-space-research

This is hilarious
>For the first time ever, Europe has surpassed the US in private spacetech investment, according to new research from Seraphim.

but it's only for YTD 2023 (Q1 2023) AHHAHA
Also It's *mostly* due to that one Isar Aerospace investment

[Anonymous No.15358151]

>>15358127
you have to have the construction location close to the launch site, moving around those massive boosters and starships isn't possible to do for long distances
the launch site needs to be close to the sea so the launches don't go over populated areas

[Anonymous No.15358153]

>>15358116
Musk will have people working for pennies and they'll be sucking his dick to do it.
Maybe pay them in martian tenements.

[Anonymous No.15358160]

>>15358106
So the difference between someone doing two tests is almost half a standard deviation? That's enormous! I don't know how any unbiased person could justify using that as a control.
>If IQ wasn't genetic
I am not saying that there isn't a genetic role in intelligence, I am saying people are drawing conclusions that the data, shoddy as it is, does not support.

[Anonymous No.15358164]

>>15358146
not everyone wants to become rich.

[Anonymous No.15358166]

They should just convert whole Cape into a facility for Starship. Who cares about other rockets.

[Anonymous No.15358170]

>Teams are completing final checkouts and reviews ahead of Starship’s first flight test attempt; weather is looking pretty good for tomorrow morning but we're keeping an eye on wind shear

[Anonymous No.15358172]

>>15358143
he is basically saying buildings will collapse, peoples eardrums will be blown out, windows will shatter on south padre

> The heat plume expected from launch would instantly kill any animal unfortunate enough to be caught in its wake. Though SpaceX did admit to this fact, several wildlife biologists I spoke with were stunned at some of the language used in FAA’s justification for minimizing modeled casualties. Lines such as: “Noise from the Raptor engines would cause a startle response of animals and would effectively direct them away from the area and reduce the risk of being affected by the heat of the plume4
” appear to serve more as handwaving away actual impacts rather than discuss them in a serious manner.
based

> I expected more from our agencies, from the press, and frankly from SpaceX itself. I still am in shock that a rocket system, the largest in history, will be fired off, from an inadequate facility, in the middle of an endangered species habitat, by a company that revels in the beautiful failure of explosions with seemingly no guardrails and no respect for the real danger this operation presents to the public.
haha fuck you cunt

[Anonymous No.15358175]

Whoever made this should sign it, so I can upload it to e621

[Anonymous No.15358178]

>>15358172
isn't cape canaveral not only the busiest space port in the world but also one of the best national parks boasting some of the nest nature protections on earth?
>yes it is

[Anonymous No.15358179]

>>15358170

[Anonymous No.15358182]

>>15358172
Do you blame the driver if he hits a deer jumping right in front of his car.

[Anonymous No.15358183]

>>15358043
>My experience with IQ tests is that your performance increases a lot if you have done an IQ test before.
I think it would be easy to rigorously test if taking more IQ tests will increase performance on them

[Anonymous No.15358186]

>>15358170
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1647601303634460674

[Anonymous No.15358188]

>>15357957
no curiosity

[Anonymous No.15358189]

[Anonymous No.15358190]

>>15358183
Some even ask if you have taken iq tests before
The science is well settled at this poiny

[Anonymous No.15358192]

>>15358182
Yes, drive slower and stop using high beams

[Anonymous No.15358193]

[Anonymous No.15358195]

>>15358160
>I am saying people are drawing conclusions that the data, shoddy as it is, does not support.
What's your best argument for IQ not being entirely determined by genes? (as opposed to environment)

[Anonymous No.15358196]

>>15358172
>real danger this operation presents to the public.
what danger?

[Anonymous No.15358198]

100% chance there will be one or several holds on the first day. No idea if it’ll scrub though but probably.

[Anonymous No.15358201]

>>15358010
I can't help but think that this is an incredibly mass inefficient way of bringing back what amounts to a few pounds of dust. The lander looks almost as heavy as the rocket, and that as heavy as the space probe.

For the love of God I hope Elon makes a mission to get back their own samples by 2028 fuck this old space decade long garbage. There has to be a better way

[Anonymous No.15358203]

>>15357957
no, that's Curiosity at 4.5 years after touchdown

Percy's wheels are doing much better, having been designed based on the lessons learned with Curiosity

[Anonymous No.15358207]

>>15358172
>he is basically saying buildings will collapse, peoples eardrums will be blown out, windows will shatter on south padre

Arise, arise, Stans of Elon!
Fell deeds awake: thunder and rapture!
Eardrums shall burst, glass be shattered,
a blast-day, a blazing day, ere the sun rises!
Launch now, launch now! Launch to orbit!

Total Bird Death! Total Bird Death! Total Bird Death!
Ignition sequence start!

[Anonymous No.15358208]

i cant wait to see what a mature passenger starship looks like on the outside and inside
right now starship is still kind of primitive

[Anonymous No.15358210]

>Falcon Heavy is returning to its hangar at launch complex 39A
It's over

[Anonymous No.15358211]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3onyucg_MG4

[Anonymous No.15358213]

Imagine making wheels that damage themselves driving at 1 meter a day

[Anonymous No.15358215]

>>15358201
Needs a laughing SpaceX astronaut just digging up samples with a shovel

[Anonymous No.15358220]

>>15358203
lets see how they look in another 3 years

[Anonymous No.15358219]

>>15358213
space is hard

[Anonymous No.15358221]

>>15358213
Imagine driving a cubic kilometer a day with Starship

[Anonymous No.15358226]

If Apollo were to “continue” in the form of biyearly flights to the moon, would we have eventually seen COTS but for lunar crew and cargo?

[Anonymous No.15358228]

[Anonymous No.15358230]

>>15358195
The Flynn effect is the most stark example, the population 70 years ago would perform a full standard deviation lower if compared to the test scores of present population.
There are also meta studies that show the improvements from education accounting for selective factors, by comparing IQ at different ages and by observing the drop in IQ amongst students when out of school (IE over long holidays).
Many of the race IQ studies also show significant differences between the IQ performance of black children raised by white parents as well as showing that the gap between white and black scores has closed over time.

[Anonymous No.15358232]

>>15357868
21 hours and 30 mins till Starship

[Anonymous No.15358231]

>>15358228
It’s crazy to think space opera stuff existed even before we put probes in LEO

[Anonymous No.15358235]

Less than 24 hours from now Starship will have launched (or scrubbed)

[Anonymous No.15358236]

>>15358146
If you tell a kid from Arkansas that he can make $400k for a 26 month tour plus nine months of training he will jump in a heartbeat. That salary is peanuts in the broader scheme of a Mars development plan.
Again you are underestimating how poor and optionless a lot of people are. 50k young people enlist in the US Army every year and accept plenty of danger in exchange for $23k/year and often no meaningful skill development.

[Anonymous No.15358237]

>>15358230
wrong

[Anonymous No.15358239]

>>15358103
I know the Polaris contract has them has the first Starship crew, but does that include on any Starship or just of one capable of launching/landing crew? HLS Starship looks simpler and safer than the Starship Polaris would use.

[Anonymous No.15358241]

>>15358230
Me on the right, Krystal on the left

[Anonymous No.15358243]

>>15358237
thats a very good argument i never thought of that

[Anonymous No.15358246]

>>15358243
shut up about IQ already nigger

[Anonymous No.15358249]

>>15358236
We're going to be too old =(

[Anonymous No.15358250]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647610092974399491

9h 20min to Musk Starship Twitter Spaces (twitter audio livestream) exclusive for people who subscribe to Musk on Twitter

[Anonymous No.15358252]

>>15358236
The problem is that 99% of the people who would accept something like that are not the types of people you want on a Mars colony.

[Anonymous No.15358257]

>>15358030
Oldspace's defining trait is autism, really. I despise it in principle but hold an irrational love for the weirdness mass savings produce

[Anonymous No.15358259]

I'm so bored, what should I do while I wait for the launch? Then when it scrubs, 20h waiting again
AAAAA

[Anonymous No.15358260]

>>15358259
learn something with gpt4

[Anonymous No.15358261]

>>15358252
People who would accept something like that work fine on oil rigs and in mines and on every other industrial project in the developed world.

[Anonymous No.15358265]

reminder elon will be talked about for hundreds or thousands of years to come
there will be statues of him, cities named after him, children of no relation will be named after him...

[Anonymous No.15358268]

>>15358249
I think they'd want old people, staying on Mars raises your risk of cancer in the next 20 years, but if you're already like 50 then it doesn't even really matter anymore

[Anonymous No.15358270]

>>15358239
i think they're going up in a dragon then docking with a starship

[Anonymous No.15358272]

>>15358268
mars cancer risk doesn't matter
literally a few cm's of material above your head is all you need

[Anonymous No.15358274]

>>15358239
Have they talked about what the lunar starship would be made of? Maybe stainless steel structure but the outside looks different

[Anonymous No.15358275]

>>15358272
Actually yeah I suppose the bigger issue is the trip, staying in deep space for 18 months

[Anonymous No.15358277]

>>15358274
Stainless painted white.
Simple as

[Anonymous No.15358278]

>>15357879
>Mars blows up on launch
Thanks my brain, you're very good at reading things.

[Anonymous No.15358283]

>>15358275
>staying in deep space for 18 months
Transit time will be like 4 months anon

[Anonymous No.15358282]

>>15358275
>18 months
its like 4-5 months
low dose radiation is completely overblown too

[Anonymous No.15358285]

>>15358282
>>15358283
Oh wait was it that little, I thought it was like nine months one way

[Anonymous No.15358289]

>>15358285
Depends on the type of transfer you use. Some old mission plans had 180 day or longer transfers for mass autism but with starship it doesn't make sense to save that bit of fuel for like 2x travel time

[Anonymous No.15358290]

Chinese Starship launching from man-made island in South China Sea 2028 (colorized)

[Anonymous No.15358293]

>>15358282
>>15358283
Delusional
>>15358285
Yeah that's about right. With higher energy you can get to about 7 and a half.

[Anonymous No.15358295]

>>15358293
>Delusional
prove otherwise
every single sim i have seen shows 5ish months transfer time

[Anonymous No.15358307]

>>15357909
>>15357912
Bros, would you have children with an otherwise excellent partner with IQ less than 100? Even Elon fucked Amber Heard. I'm concerned about the consequences of super models and actresses for the Martian race.

Does Mars need a "no idiots" policy, and if so what should be the cutoff? What does the ideal Martian eugenics program look like? Subsidies for high IQ breeders and their children? Free transportation to Mars for desirables?

[Anonymous No.15358308]

>>15358293
Perseverance was 6.5 months and it was a relatively low energy trajectory. 4-5 months is entirely achievable every window

[Anonymous No.15358313]

>>15358308
how much delta v does a fully fueled 150t starship have in leo again?
it was some absurd amount right?

[Anonymous No.15358317]

>>15358307
with space colonization there has to be a balance of ethics and ambition, IQ might be controlled for but I see it as far less important than the question of subjecting children to sealed environments for their entire lives.

[Anonymous No.15358318]

>>15358282
>low dose radiation is completely overblown too
Gateway will prove or disprove that

[Anonymous No.15358319]

>>15358313
enough to take 100 tons anywhere in the solar system, maybe even escape trajectory.

[Anonymous No.15358320]

when are we getting cyberpunk starbase again?

[Anonymous No.15358321]

>>15358320

[Anonymous No.15358322]

>>15357956
They only have 30 years before the megaton mark and the official foundation of the Martian capital city. They can barely plan two missions in that time. There are good odds the rover after next or the one after that gets flipped over by a drunk Martian separatist. All assuming Elon lives long enough.

[Anonymous No.15358326]

>>15357958
crop, nigger

[Anonymous No.15358331]

>>15358318
we already know this from earth that its not true
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsar,_Iran#Radioactivity
low dose radiation is a complete fucking nothing burger
it might actually be good for us

[Anonymous No.15358333]

Yeah, I'm thinking kino

[Anonymous No.15358337]

>>15358319
IIRC it doesn't get past Saturn without gravity assists

[Anonymous No.15358339]

hopefully the last day people have such dismal thoughts as pic related, soon we'll be swimming in deltaV

[Anonymous No.15358341]

>>15358318
>>15358331
also fuck i love bing gpt
i couldn't remember the name or where that city even was but bing figured it out

[Anonymous No.15358343]

I remember Scott manley saying that the pads at LC-39 were built with the super heavy NOVA rocket in mind, in reference to starship operating there.

However on Wikipedia it says that they were actually planning three seperate pads for Nova and they were cancelled when they finalised around Apollo around Saturn.
Any idea about this?

Also worth considering that the original Nova was just an alternative design to the S-V, with similar capability.
It was the second Nova design study that created a much larger rocket for mars missions (up to 600 ton payload to LEO), and weighed around the ballpark of the SS/SH stac.

[Anonymous No.15358348]

>>15358337
One should wonder how long whatever equipment you can cram into a starship hold can sustain human life. Comet colonists within our lifetime?

[Anonymous No.15358351]

>>15357997
They're fun for children and people who are capable of not thinking about anything at all and just enjoying the flashing lights. It's also possible to do the opposite and overintellectualize the experience. You can take the lit crit mental masturbation approach to essentially anything, because the thing being critiqued takes a distant second to your own gay thoughts about your own gay thoughts about the subject.

[Anonymous No.15358352]

>>15358341
did you fact check it? its very nice, but gets stuff wrong still

[Anonymous No.15358353]

>>15358333
>a later idea to recover only the tail section with the engine was dropped as well because this was expected to produce a return on investment after only about 500 launches
SMARTbros...

[Anonymous No.15358354]

Anyone here think the current LLMs could help with the space industry? They're already better than humans at spotting disease in MRI scans, so I guess they could be useful for spotting things in telescope imagery?

[Anonymous No.15358356]

>>15358352
nah, its close enough and who knows maybe some of the shit it hallucinated is true and we haven't figured it out yet

[Anonymous No.15358358]

>>15358014
Musk haters are really getting desperate. Seethe, you disgusting pervert.

[Anonymous No.15358360]

>>15358354
shit like langchain might be useful for connecting to bots or keeping people on other planets company
other than that i don't they will have much use

[Anonymous No.15358364]

>>15358354
they are going to help with every industry making people much more productive

[Anonymous No.15358365]

>>15358062
You can in theory get a normal looking twin and a black one out of two mutts.

[Anonymous No.15358366]

>>15358116
>nine month tour
Where are they going after that?

[Anonymous No.15358371]

>>15358366
Ceres, the Jovian system, etc.
>Yeah man I signed a 2 year contract for mining on Ceres lol.

[Anonymous No.15358372]

>>15358366

[Anonymous No.15358376]

>>15358348
>Comet colonists
Hell no, how easy would it be to get flung into the abyss?

[Anonymous No.15358380]

>>15358147
Europe outspending the US for absolutely dogshit results is only that much more shameful. How do Eurocucks even get out of bed in the morning?

[Anonymous No.15358382]

>>15358308
What's with those white bits in the middle of each blob?

[Anonymous No.15358385]

>>15358348
i remember some anon did the math and with solar power you could survive like 30 years by yourself

[Anonymous No.15358387]

>Be Martian Soldier in 2250
>Girlfriend left you after getting out of basic on the Deimos spinhab
>Martian withdrawal from Ganymede was a disaster and pics of the embassy being evacuated are all over the InterplanetaryNet
>Earth started invading the Moon a year ago and lost 40,000 soldiers and can’t establish supremacy over the skies
>Titan’s spy solar sails have entered the Martian system 3 times over the past few years
>Inflation is pretty bad; buying a Mushroom Burger (tm) is now worth 300 Maddies (mars dollars)
>everything sucks, hate it
>Oh man, looks like I have a year long deployment to the Islamic Republic of Triton again

[Anonymous No.15358388]

>>15358382
Times when you can't reach mars

[Anonymous No.15358390]

>>15358213
Brought to you by literal satanists. Imagine selling your soul for such shitty results. Satan really is the father of lies.

[Anonymous No.15358391]

>>15358380
Muh socialism

[Anonymous No.15358394]

Here a question that will cause controversy, what’s the best way to terraform mars with the least amount of time and investment?

[Anonymous No.15358396]

>>15358394
Terraforming is a meme and unnecessary

[Anonymous No.15358402]

>>15358207

[Anonymous No.15358404]

Hello my dearest, how are you?
The roads at home must be covered by snowstorms.
Stars are falling in the Martian dawn sky,
Just don't tell mom I'm in Starbase.
Stars are falling in the Martian dawn sky,
Just don't tell mom I'm in Starbase.

[Anonymous No.15358405]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dQVAoGl1xc

Deneb sounding rocket third attempt soon.

[Anonymous No.15358408]

Space Canadian weighs in

[Anonymous No.15358407]

>>15356989
>we should send all asteroids in the asteroid belt and crash them in to ceres so it can be a proper planet. clears its orbit and such
Ceres will NEVER be a proper planet even if you did that lmao

[Anonymous No.15358409]

>>15358394
Depends on what constitutes “terraformed” to you. Dump industrial quantities of the strongest greenhouse gasses we can produce for decades until the frozen CO2 starts to melt. Then you get a mars thats as cold as Antarctica with a very thin poisonous atmosphere. But at least you can go outside with a warm jacket and a breathing apparatus.

[Anonymous No.15358410]

>>15358380
Based retard.

[Anonymous No.15358412]

>>15358409
Wouldn’t the difference in pressure harm you?

[Anonymous No.15358413]

>>15358320
>everything is dirty
>everything is owned by a megacorporation
>heavy industry
>software controls everything
>constant innovation
>direct brain interfaces
>offworld colonization
>global telecommunications system
>satellites
>manned spacecraft
What exactly is missing? A shared global VR environment and AI trying to wipe out mankind?

[Anonymous No.15358415]

>>15358265
Elon Musk first Fabricator of Mars, beloved by the Omnissiah

[Anonymous No.15358416]

>>15358413
When do we get robot limbs though?

[Anonymous No.15358417]

>>15358380
>How do Eurocucks even get out of bed in the morning?
we've got a few hours of head start compared to americans.

[Anonymous No.15358420]

>>15358412
I have no idea how thick the atmosphere would be if all the dry ice was turned to gas. Maybe it’d be thick enough not to harm you. Or at least not much in the short term.

[Anonymous No.15358422]

So how many days of scrubbing do we have ahead?

Tomorrow will 97% be a massive blueballing.

[Anonymous No.15358426]

>>15358422
It’s the first launch of a new rocket so yeah, good chance they scrub

[Anonymous No.15358428]

>>15358339
Less delta-v than solar electric and not fast enough acceleration for short Mars transits, it's DOA regardless of how hard old space shills it.

[Anonymous No.15358430]

>>15358394
Use Starship to install giant mylar mirrors that concentrate sunlight at the poles. 1 1km square mirror focusing sunlight to a 1m square on the surface will vaporize ice instantly. That's a lot of CO2.
You can install larger mirrors to vaporize rock as well.

[Anonymous No.15358431]

>Even our science-fiction is dominated by concepts involving the settlement of the surfaces of other planets. Isaac Asimov dubbed it "planetary chauvinism". We also tend to visualize extraterrestrial civilizations as living on planets, when a planetary existence may only represent a very early stage in the development of technological cultures. But living on a planet is all we have ever known, so it may be little more than a failure of imagination. This may be best illustrated by an analogy:
>Imagine that you can intelligently communicate with a fetus in his eighth month of development. You inform him that in 30 days, he will be leaving his womb. What is his reaction?
>In all likelihood, his response would be along the lines of, "Well, I sure hope my new womb is bigger, this one has been getting a little crowded here lately. I also wonder if the next womb is going to wiggle around as much as this one". The concept of life outside a womb is beyond his experience and comprehension.
>We are born on a planet, and live our entire lives on a planet. When we struggle to visualize our future in space, we imagine leaving Earth and going to live on...another planet. We then pat ourselves on the back for this brilliant leap of the imagination.
>In imagining ourselves climbing upward away from the Earth and crossing the sunlit vastness of space, only to head back down a gravity well to the surface of another planet, we may be manifesting the same lack of experience as that fetus.
>It could be that humanity is on the verge of being born out into the universe. And it may not be just more of the same.
Well dwellers cannot recover from this

[Anonymous No.15358436]

>tfw NASA has no Mars rover in the pipeline

[Anonymous No.15358439]

>>15358394
I don't think there's any way to terraform Mars quickly without killing everyone there, where quickly is still on the order of centuries or millennia. It's probably better to colonize first and terraform slowly if at all unless you're planning on your Earth-like Mars being a present to the successor species to mankind.

[Anonymous No.15358447]

>>15358380
Raped awake by "refugees"

[Anonymous No.15358452]

>>15358431
living on the surface of a ball instead is just very mass inefficient compared to fashioning the material of that ball into spinning habitats
most of the mass is useless and dead

[Anonymous No.15358454]

>>15358436
It's fine, just weld a Kuka industrial arm to a Tesla Truck. Paint them white, then send it.

[Anonymous No.15358462]

>>15358430
Can’t we just use thermonuclear bombs in the poles?

[Anonymous No.15358466]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHZQHhB1yE

homeless person video, one of the least annoying NSFers

[Anonymous No.15358469]

>>15358436
>There no satellites in Venus's orbit

[Anonymous No.15358473]

>>15358462
you are going to need a lot of bombs and radioactive fallout everywhere

[Anonymous No.15358475]

>>15358466
I’m going bald and I’m afraid of looking like a redditor

[Anonymous No.15358476]

>>15358382
Gremlins

[Anonymous No.15358477]

>>15358462
I'm thinking in terms of how easy it would be. Nukes are powerful because they release a lot of energy in a very small amount of time. But destruction isn't the objective here: the absolute amount of energy being delivered is. A mirror delivers energy continuously, not just once. I have no idea how long it would take for a mirror to outperform a nuke, but eventually it would surpass the amount of energy delivered. And it weighs a lot less, so you can bring more to Mars.

[Anonymous No.15358479]

>>15358422
These vehicles do not use liquid hydrogen.

[Anonymous No.15358484]

>>15358307
Amber Heard is intelligent and cunning

[Anonymous No.15358485]

>>15358439
>I don't think there's any way to terraform Mars quickly without killing everyone there
Good news anon, nobody is there

[Anonymous No.15358486]

>>15358477
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/08/zubrin-and-mckay-plans-for-terraforming-mars-with-giant-orbital-mirrors-cited-by-elon-musk.html

[Anonymous No.15358487]

>>15358473
ehh, it's already radioactive. a little more can't hurt

[Anonymous No.15358488]

>>15358422
probably 14 or so days before launch

[Anonymous No.15358492]

>>15358436
But it has a Mars helicopter

[Anonymous No.15358502]

Fellow Commiefornians, when are you waking up tomorrow?

[Anonymous No.15358512]

>>15358502
All nighter baby

[Anonymous No.15358518]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TKJUJy7LhU

Interview with a mayoral candidate for Brownsville and I guess some history of the site

>Here is an interview with Jessica Tetreau, mayoral candidate for the city of Brownsville, Texas and someone who has been on the SpaceX journey since before they broke ground.
>September 22nd, 2014 was the day SpaceX broke ground in Boca Chica on a project that not only changed the area forever, but one that will, if successful, propell man further than ever before.The SpaceX South Texas launch site is right along Boca Chica Beach, less than 10 miles from Brownsville city limits.
>Jessica Tetreau is one of the few that can say she’s been along for the ride since the very beginning. The original purpose and timeframe for launches have both changed since its big celebratory groundbreaking nearly a decade ago.
>While reporters told the public launches would start in 2016, we still have yet to see a fully stacked Starship launch, but as of this video release, that date could be April of 2023.
>We have had action and excitement over the years, with it all starting in 2019 with SpaceX’s 150 meter starhopper test.
>The timeframe isn't the only moving target. The purpose of the site also changed from its original use.
It was supposed to support Falcon 9 and Falcon heavy launches, but in 2018 SpaceX announced a change of plans stating the site would be used exclusively for the next generation launch vehicle, Starship.

[Anonymous No.15358519]

>>15358484
and a bed shitter

[Anonymous No.15358521]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647629006089461761

[Anonymous No.15358525]

>>15358521
COOMING

[Anonymous No.15358527]

>we're at least 10 years away from people on mars
how do we cope until then?

[Anonymous No.15358528]

>>15358521

[Anonymous No.15358529]

>>15358519
hot

[Anonymous No.15358531]

Starship will NOT fly
2 weeks until 2 weeks forever

[Anonymous No.15358536]

Even if catching with tower doesn't work, the tower is quite good isn't it

[Anonymous No.15358539]

>>15358430
aluminized mylar is only 3 tons per km^2
the cross sectional area of Mars is 4e7 km^2, so to simply double the solar irradiance you'd need ~1e8 tons, 100 times more than Musk's megaton goal, even assuming perfect efficiency and no other structural or station keeping components, which would in all likelihood be much heavier than some film

[Anonymous No.15358540]

>>15358527
By watching all the badass shit starship enables before then

[Anonymous No.15358543]

>>15358536
Yeah the stacking is great

[Anonymous No.15358545]

>>15358536
Honestly even if catching doesn’t work, who’s to say a Falcon 9-style system isn’t “good enough”

[Anonymous No.15358546]

>>15358485
...but we're planning on sending people in the next few millennia, right? Right?!

[Anonymous No.15358547]

>>15358521
aaAAAAAAaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.15358548]

>>15358502
>be Californian
>wake up
tremendously poor decision

[Anonymous No.15358549]

>>15358545
>>15358536
Oh ye of little faith

[Anonymous No.15358554]

>>15358549
I'm just a little sceptical about catching starship, booster should work

[Anonymous No.15358555]

>>15358546
We need to fix our problems here on Earth first before we can even think about expanding to other planets.

[Anonymous No.15358562]

>>15358527
I guess we'll have to settle for worldwide wireless gigabit, no more cable companies or non-Starlink ISPs, hosting servers wherever the fuck we want, broadband on airplanes, total US (read: SpaceX) domination of space and possibly manned space combat.

[Anonymous No.15358565]

>>15358555
I'm so glad SpaceX is building military hardware now

[Anonymous No.15358566]

>>15358518
actually its basically all about the history of the site, starting from 2014

[Anonymous No.15358570]

>>15358153
He'll pay them in air, needed to filter out the Martian radiation or they'll become mutants with psychic abilities.

[Anonymous No.15358574]

>>15358565
>>15358562
SpaceX has ensured that America will dominate the world for the next several decades

[Anonymous No.15358576]

>>15358555
No. That goal is unattainable since humans just invent new problems to address whenever we solve old ones.

[Anonymous No.15358579]

ARE WE GOING?!

[Anonymous No.15358580]

>>15358518
If only they knew it would be a garbage place for Starship

[Anonymous No.15358581]

>>15358570
don't threaten me with supernumerary-breasted space whores!

[Anonymous No.15358583]

>>15358579
thursday or friday. retards think tomorrow

[Anonymous No.15358584]

Has the F9 surpassed the Space Shuttle in mass-to-orbit yet? Does anyone have a graph of some collection of launch vehicles and total mass to orbit?

[Anonymous No.15358586]

>>15358580
the other locations mentioned that spacex was looking at was florida (happening as well), puerto rico and georgia
you sure those would have been better?

[Anonymous No.15358587]

>>15358579
In approximately one fortnight

[Anonymous No.15358588]

>>15358583
I look forward to your apology and livestreamed suicide (disemboweling with no second)

[Anonymous No.15358591]

>>15358586
Who knows, maybe? Maybe other places didn't have beaches nearby that had to be open on weekends.

[Anonymous No.15358592]

>>15358588
found the retard

[Anonymous No.15358596]

>>15358592
Convincing argument!

[Anonymous No.15358600]

>>15358574
A fantastic achievement!

[Anonymous No.15358604]

>>15358584
probably? Considering it had more flights?

[Anonymous No.15358605]

>>15358574
Don't worry, Biden made sure to counterbalance Elon's efforts so this won't be true

[Anonymous No.15358606]

>>15358584
I imagine it depends on whether you define the orbiter as payload or launcher. If not f9 definitely wins, if you do then I don't know

[Anonymous No.15358607]

>>15358600
I hope they put ozempic in the water

[Anonymous No.15358609]

>the schizo is at it again

[Anonymous No.15358614]

>>15358390

[Anonymous No.15358615]

>>15358175
make her more anime
more kemono
then it will be truly based

[Anonymous No.15358617]

>>15358600
This is an American world and you live in it.

[Anonymous No.15358619]

>>15358617
I really like this artist even if the radiators aren't big enough

[Anonymous No.15358622]

>>15358619
We need more realistic spaceships in media

[Anonymous No.15358627]

>>15358574
Don't worry. The Chinksects will manage to copy SpaceX eventually and won't have their population completely destroyed by brownoids and internal conflicts in the upcoming decades like the US and Europe will.

[Anonymous No.15358629]

>>15358627
Their demographic crisis will do it instead

[Anonymous No.15358631]

>>15358627
Do you think the Chinese will save you? Lol

[Anonymous No.15358636]

>>15358376
looks kinda comfy, and the skiing should be good

[Anonymous No.15358639]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dQVAoGl1xc

5-10 minutes until launch

[Anonymous No.15358640]

>>15358521
>attempt
SCRUB CONFIRMED

[Anonymous No.15358641]

>>15358622
I agree. Although some people overcorrect and make every ship into a stack of ISS modules, unless it's deliberately near future oldspace aesthetic some balance of realism and artistry should be bridged

[Anonymous No.15358643]

>>15358469
JAXA's Akatsuki is still there.

>>15358436
ESA is still working on ExoMars though.

[Anonymous No.15358644]

>>15358627
This is what worries me. Le 56% (now probably 51%) meme is true, whilst China actively disallows degeneracy and can act on their will immediately. Want a space port in this location? Sure, we break ground next month. Here it's 1.5 years before you can start breaking ground, and then add 2 years for lawsuits if it's important enough but not a military installation. I hate this clown world

>>15358629
Not quite as quickly as the USA.

[Anonymous No.15358646]

>>15358636

[Anonymous No.15358649]

>>15358639
Where did it launch to?

[Anonymous No.15358651]

>>15358649
Kiev

[Anonymous No.15358653]

>>15358643
Amazing to think that exomars was an offshoot of the aurora manned mission architecture

[Anonymous No.15358654]

>>15358631
No, I think they will destroy us in the long run. The west is degrading at a staggering rate and will be completely fucked when the reddit generation is put in charge. We're already see those effects now. Only the most delusional underage subhuman mutt like >>15358574 believe the future looks bright for the west.

[Anonymous No.15358655]

>>15358649
its some suborbital student project, who cares lmao

[Anonymous No.15358660]

My body is not ready.

[Anonymous No.15358664]

>open up new thread in the morning
>already past the bump limit
Why do europeans care so much about starship all of a sudden?

[Anonymous No.15358665]

>>15358655
Just that no one bothered pointing camera up

[Anonymous No.15358668]

>>15358654
My dude not even actual Chinese people think like that, get off the culture war treadmill

[Anonymous No.15358670]

>>15357884
Very, very disrespectful!

[Anonymous No.15358671]

>>15358668
The average Chinese person is a drone that believe whatever they're told.

[Anonymous No.15358673]

>>15358668
t. gaslighting chink

[Anonymous No.15358674]

>>15358654
>The west is degrading at a staggering rate
by which measure and how is china outperforming us in those measures?

[Anonymous No.15358677]

You have to get up earlier man, even in CA it's already almost ten. Morning is the best part of the day

[Anonymous No.15358682]

Let's see Paul Allen's rover wheels.

[Anonymous No.15358683]

Two weeks bros… are we finished?

[Anonymous No.15358684]

https://twitter.com/peterrhague/status/1647629036611313664

[Anonymous No.15358688]

>>15358684
Based and red pilled. Calling out trannyism cult in the US today

[Anonymous No.15358690]

>>15358683
there is still hope

[Anonymous No.15358689]

>>15358682

[Anonymous No.15358692]

over 100 votes on the failure point poll now, the proportions haven't changed much

[Anonymous No.15358693]

>>15358006
They exit Phase A pretty soon so they can actually start making stuff. Now that you mention it they put out a press release a few days ago that I didn't see anyone talking about
https://mars.nasa.gov/news/9377/nasa-to-convene-mars-sample-return-review/

[Anonymous No.15358695]

>>15358674
By not having their demographics replaced by low IQ brownoids and having far more control over internal conflicts while in the west it's just escalating?

[Anonymous No.15358696]

>>15358674
Race and IQ, mainly

[Anonymous No.15358703]

>>15358354
Already being used actually
https://phys.org/news/2018-09-machine-astronomy.html

It'll get way more important in the future because the data being returned by missions is only increasing, and absolutely vital if you're doing solar observation

[Anonymous No.15358705]

[Anonymous No.15358707]

>>15358692
Most optimistic result on tiles

[Anonymous No.15358708]

>>15358684
OrthodoxBros in real life
>Cool, generally respectable people
OrthodoxBros on the internet
>Retarded and cringy
Why are they like this?

[Anonymous No.15358715]

>>15358521

[Anonymous No.15358717]

>>15358705
Right pic goes hard

[Anonymous No.15358719]

>>15358703
LLMs are one archictecture of deep learning, which is again one are of machine learning
Large language models (LLMS) =/= Machine Learning (LM)

[Anonymous No.15358721]

>>15358201
Part of the sell is that it's a step on the way to developing actual human-class landers. I'd think it makes more sense to just develop something larger, like 5-10-ton, but I'm not part of JPL so whatever

[Anonymous No.15358722]

So SpaceX didn’t even replace the two raptors which didn’t fire during the 33 engine test. Wonder what their issue was

[Anonymous No.15358724]

>>15358719
Hear me out, what if we converted the data to ASCII characters and set a language model loose on it

[Anonymous No.15358731]

>>15358705
It's cool how similar those pictures look at a glance despite essentially every detail being different.

[Anonymous No.15358732]

>>15358431
almost all science fiction is gay, and a waste of time. science fiction writers were all weird psueds, and pale in comparison to true geniuses like korolev and von braun, who had actually sane visions for the future of humanity. Try reading nonfiction next time, anon.

[Anonymous No.15358733]

So what happens if the flight is a success?

[Anonymous No.15358734]

>>15358724

[Anonymous No.15358736]

>>15358733
Flight 2 proceeds without any changes maybe

[Anonymous No.15358739]

>>15358733
Next launch should be happening quite soon then

[Anonymous No.15358740]

>>15358733
I cum

[Anonymous No.15358745]

So how does everyone think the flight will end?

[Anonymous No.15358749]

>>15358739
don't they want to build more starbase infrastructure first?

[Anonymous No.15358750]

Who makes the best engine and why is it merica?

[Anonymous No.15358752]

18h

[Anonymous No.15358753]

>>15358627
Lmao, Europe is fine, meanwhile the US is half niggers

[Anonymous No.15358754]

>>15358750
Russia built better engines actually due to their successful socialist system. The decadent west will fall in 2 weeks.

[Anonymous No.15358755]

>>15358705
Joe is based and the other guy works at SpaceX so is based by default.

[Anonymous No.15358756]

well v spin is a false dichotomy, humanity's destiny is to become the STAR LOCUSTS who devour entire systems for raw material and move on

[Anonymous No.15358757]

>>15358745
see >>15358692

[Anonymous No.15358759]

>>15358749
They also want to start launching starlinks as fast as possible

[Anonymous No.15358761]

>>15358753
Europe is not fucking fine man

[Anonymous No.15358762]

>>15358733
Depends what they learn about about the booster and starship on the way down, they might make adjustments to the next flight hardware.

It can be a success but things can still go wrong, that would be relevant to expanded goals.

[Anonymous No.15358764]

>>15358754
>2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.15358766]

If starship needs some major design overhaul it's going to take a while

[Anonymous No.15358769]

>>15358732
> post a quote that criticized scifi for juvenile assumptions
> anon tells me to stop reading scifi
cool

[Anonymous No.15358770]

>>15358753
Lol no, it's going to shit here as well. We're just 20 years behind in demographic death but will catch up eventually when you consider the hundreds of millions of Africans that are projected to seek towards Europe in the upcoming decades. Will be a continent of mutts in the west and slavshits in the east.

[Anonymous No.15358771]

>>15358761
It is tho

[Anonymous No.15358776]

>>15358770
>hundreds of millions of Africans that are projected to seek towards Europe
next level cope

[Anonymous No.15358777]

>>15358769
>(((planetary chauvinism)))
leave now

[Anonymous No.15358779]

>>15358776
Next level delusion.

[Anonymous No.15358781]

>>15358779

[Anonymous No.15358782]

>>15358143
>100db at least at the viewing area locations and SP Island

That's pretty bad desu, usually I disagree with this fag but he may be right here, shit is gonna be loud, unless SpaceX have beefed up the water sound suppression since then which I doubt

This has a real possibility of being SpaceX's only launch, if too many people complain and too much damage occurs even if it goes all well

[Anonymous No.15358784]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcY8W9y0VaA&ab_channel=RocketFactoryAugsburg
interesting chapters 0w0

whats up with rfa these days anyway

[Anonymous No.15358787]

>>15358781
>slavshits
LMAO, holy fucking retarded cope. No better than your average shitskin.

[Anonymous No.15358788]

>>15358777
Can't wait to suck rust in my brand new womb!

[Anonymous No.15358789]

>>15358787
dial 8

[Anonymous No.15358792]

>>15358502
nevada here, sleeping at 6pm-ish

[Anonymous No.15358795]

>>15358782
What static fire could he be referring to?
None of them have been very loud at all

[Anonymous No.15358797]

>>15358382
Exact opposition, you need to do a deep space inclination change to hit Mars in these scenarios and the model can't account for that

[Anonymous No.15358798]

>>15358782
Streamer people on South Padre said the 31 engine SF was (subjectively) the same sound level as the 3-7 engine SF.

[Anonymous No.15358799]

>>15358789
>butthurt slavshit thinking he's some savior of Europe
Europe were much better off when you low IQ parasites were behind the iron wall.

[Anonymous No.15358802]

>>15358798
Yes because low throttle raptor is very quiet.
You see it on the mcgregor streams.

[Anonymous No.15358805]

>>15358784
>it's real

[Anonymous No.15358806]

>>15358782
No one will go deaf from 100db

[Anonymous No.15358808]

>>15358799
seethe more, lmao

[Anonymous No.15358810]

>>15358782
>esgfag
he's almost certainly making shit up, twisting the truth.
the faa isn't stupid. if the loudness measurements don't conform to the model they would have done something

[Anonymous No.15358811]

>>15358586
I could have driven down to the one in Georgia

[Anonymous No.15358812]

I hope that screeching boomer lady who called into the FAA public comment line saying her condo shakes during launches gets tinnitus and dies.

[Anonymous No.15358813]

>>15358788
You are deranged, the analogy to the womb was pseud garbage that sounds like schizo ramblings. you are literally a decadent crypto earther who wants to live confined in a faux-earth tube dreamed up by losers in the 60s who like it for the same reason they'd like to buy a yacht. Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.15358818]

>>15358813
>decadent
>buy a yacht
seething anti prosperity fag detected.
up the well everyone can have a yacht

[Anonymous No.15358821]

>>15358422
Starship doesn't use hydrolox.

[Anonymous No.15358822]

>>15358525
More like scroobing

[Anonymous No.15358823]

>>15358808
I will. A future of brownoids and slavshits is something anybody should seethe over.

[Anonymous No.15358824]

>>15358781
look at sweden, britain, france, germany
it is definitely not fine

[Anonymous No.15358828]

>>15358802
>low throttle raptor
>>15358782
>100dB at that spot

>high throttle raptor on launch
>even higher decibels at that spot and at the viewing areas

That's not good

[Anonymous No.15358834]

>>15358828
110dB*

[Anonymous No.15358837]

>>15358813
>confined
And if a Martian needs to visit Earth, he'll be confined to bed

[Anonymous No.15358840]

>>15358812
source?
I didn't listen to many of those

[Anonymous No.15358842]

>>15358732
Von Braun wrote science fiction in addition to his IRL achievements because he knew it had the power to shape the future direction of scientific research and tech development. The only reason we haven't had proper spinhabs by now is government incompetence. Look at how Jurassic Park influenced biology, palaeontology, genetics, and even computer science and mathematics a bit.

[Anonymous No.15358845]

>>15358813
>pseud garbage that sounds like schizo ramblings
You have been filtered. I shudder to imagine how you'd try to interpret Plato.

[Anonymous No.15358846]

>>15358784
Lol, what even is the context? It sounds like they say "nazi platform" but they clearly mean something else.
Anyways, RFA's majority owner is looking to sell their share, so not good.

[Anonymous No.15358848]

>>15358813
because its luxurious? whats the problem with that lol

[Anonymous No.15358851]

>>15358840
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKNZuIteyk8

might be in this one.

[Anonymous No.15358853]

ResearcherAnon here. My paper has been 3 months away for over a year. Goddamnit.

[Anonymous No.15358854]

>>15358782
Are you retarded? Not even the 90db circle includes the viewing areas that are accessible to the public. I would personally bring earplugs but I do that basically everywhere anyway so I can shoot people without damaging my hearing.

[Anonymous No.15358855]

>>15358818
>>15358848
I am of course anti prosperity. Prosperity is fundamentally dysgenic. Imagine if musk had simply reinvested into yachts like so many others. longterm material prosperity for all is not a worthwhile goal, and is absolutely disgusting.

[Anonymous No.15358858]

>>15358853
just submit it, yolo

[Anonymous No.15358859]

>>15358116
See space mexicans >>15357941

They are cheap and get the job done even more cheap!

[Anonymous No.15358860]

Anyone got the popsci mush reaction image?

[Anonymous No.15358861]

>>15358854
Are you retarded? look at where the 110dB was actually recorded far outside the red circle, then use that knowledge to expand the actual circle and you see the marine viewing area is indeed in the 90-100dB range

[Anonymous No.15358864]

>>15358860
nevermind found it

[Anonymous No.15358866]

>>15358853
R&R hell or are you just procrastinating?

[Anonymous No.15358867]

i haven't posted here since sn8-sn15 days, but i've been lurking almost daily since then. glad we're back

[Anonymous No.15358868]

>>15358056
except block its FAA clearance

[Anonymous No.15358869]

[Anonymous No.15358872]

>>15358861
That's if you take the source at their word. Are they really trustworthy? What kind of equipment was being used? Did they share hard proof of their testing?

>An FWS employee

[Anonymous No.15358873]

>>15358782
>>if too many people complain
>build and launch biggest rocket in history
>scrap the project because 200 boomers living nearby complained about the noise

[Anonymous No.15358875]

>>15358733
Well the first thing they need to do is update the license to allow for more flights, regardless of success

[Anonymous No.15358877]

>>15358868
ah, when starship had legs...

[Anonymous No.15358878]

>>15358872
Yeah there could be bias, messed up sensors but idk, something to keep in mind that SpaceX are also biased here they wouldn't want to be stalled any further

>>15358873
they would just pivot to Florida then

[Anonymous No.15358879]

>>15358867
"Gentlemen, we are so back"

[Anonymous No.15358880]

>>15358782
>>15358810
>>15358828
>>15358854
>>15358861
Yup as I predicted. ESGnigger is flat out lying. The FOIA request talks about a maximum level.
These are the maximum levels as predicted by appendix B.

[Anonymous No.15358881]

>>15358855
Yes, steely eyed missile men never enjoy the good life

[Anonymous No.15358882]

>>15358855
It's retarded

[Anonymous No.15358883]

>>15358873
>US is hampered by having to please boomers, minorities, and corrupt byrocrats
>China is hampered by "made in china" shit quality parts failing well below their certified values
this is the space race of the 21st century

[Anonymous No.15358884]

>>15358861
That is of course assuming that sound is linear and not a wave that can be focused by atmospheric effects to produce highly localized areas of high intensity sound. It just do that sometimes.
>>15358869
You'll be fine at 90 but I would wear hearing protection.
At 110 hearing protection is mandatory.

[Anonymous No.15358886]

>>15358880
At 100 dB it is important to wear hearing protection

[Anonymous No.15358889]

>>15358882
looks like space colonization isn't for you, faggot. actual, real colonists will have short, harsh lives in ugly places. I desire that, spinfags do not, because they are not real space colony enthusiasts.

[Anonymous No.15358891]

SpaceX is going to be Spacejunk after Ukraine is destroyed, followed by an invasion of Taiwan which will exhaust the USA while China-Russia will pincer attack North America.

[Anonymous No.15358899]

>>15358880
>110dB reading in the expected 110dB circle
>>15358782

Okay then what the fuck is ESG bitching about then, that adds up to what the FAA predicted but hes acting like this is some gotcha?

[Anonymous No.15358901]

>>15358891
You have been sentenced to 20 years in the penile colony of Rura Pislocke for your posts.

[Anonymous No.15358902]

>>15358891
two more weeks chingchong. Just after the african rape monkeys of the east are dont exploring each other assholes

[Anonymous No.15358906]

yeah

[Anonymous No.15358909]

>>15358899
I think he is just being disingenious on purpose, not the first example from ESGturbofag

[Anonymous No.15358910]

>>15358891
Lmao

[Anonymous No.15358911]

>>15358889
Holy seethe

[Anonymous No.15358914]

>>15358906
SLS is irrelevant

[Anonymous No.15358917]

>>15358886
It's fine.

[Anonymous No.15358918]

100dB
>Jet take-off (at 305 meters), use of outboard motor, power lawn mower, motorcycle, farm tractor, jackhammer, garbage truck. Boeing 707 or DC-8 aircraft at one nautical mile (6080 ft) before landing (106 dB); jet flyover at 1000 feet (103 dB); Bell J-2A helicopter at 100 ft (100 dB).
>8 times as loud as 70 dB. Serious damage possible in 8 hr exposure.

90dB
>Boeing 737 or DC-9 aircraft at one nautical mile (6080 ft) before landing (97 dB); power mower (96 dB); motorcycle at 25 ft (90 dB). Newspaper press (97 dB).
>4 times as loud as 70 dB. Likely damage in 8 hour exposure.

[Anonymous No.15358921]

>>15358891
keep us posted

[Anonymous No.15358922]

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1647655398957268992

[Anonymous No.15358925]

>>15358889
>space colony enthusiasts
You mean scuttle from one gravity well to another enthusiasts

[Anonymous No.15358926]

>>15358922
>lets launch into the sunrise so everyone's view will be ruined
t-thanks!

[Anonymous No.15358928]

>>15358891
Shouldn't have left Energia to rot, Dimitry.

[Anonymous No.15358929]

>>15358886
Do you wear hearing protection while mowing your lawn?

[Anonymous No.15358931]

on further review of my archive yes, perhaps 2019 starship-stans had a bit accelerated view of the program. we were expecting orbit by late 2020 perhaps.

[Anonymous No.15358934]

[Anonymous No.15358936]

>>15358922
SIRS

[Anonymous No.15358937]

>>15358745
GLORIOUS

[Anonymous No.15358940]

>>15358929
Naturally. I can listen to some titillating discussion in what would otherwise be a very dull and monotonous task.

[Anonymous No.15358941]

>>15358922

[Anonymous No.15358945]

>>15358745
In an explosion, the question is really where the flight will end.

[Anonymous No.15358946]

>>15358937
Sagan would be a anti-Musk seether were he still around

[Anonymous No.15358947]

>>15358934
this might well still happen, in any case SLS is a joke even if they launch once a year

[Anonymous No.15358948]

What would he think of Starship?

[Anonymous No.15358954]

>>15358925
Are you really that much of an earther that you would only leave earth when you could go live in a comfy faux-earth habitat in space?

[Anonymous No.15358955]

>>15358946
I read Seagal at first and I was kinda confused.

[Anonymous No.15358957]

4.5k waiting

[Anonymous No.15358959]

>>15358954
the habitat can be anything, even faux-mars lmao

[Anonymous No.15358960]

>>15358955
yeah, seagal would love it. Imagine filming in weightlessness, where being a fatass wouldn't prevent you from doing stunts and shit

[Anonymous No.15358963]

>>15358946
he'd be pro SpaceX tho

[Anonymous No.15358965]

>>15358934
I fucking KNEEL

[Anonymous No.15358969]

>>15358954
To visit? Sure. But I wouldn't want my kids to grow up freaky in low gee, unable to live in higher gravity

[Anonymous No.15358970]

>>15358948
He would be overjoyed someone got full reuse working but dismayed it took so long to do.

[Anonymous No.15358973]

nuclear salt starship

[Anonymous No.15358974]

>>15358929
Doesn't everyone? I'd rather kms than listen to a lawnmower close up for an hour

[Anonymous No.15358975]

>>15358948
would present the streams alongside insprucker

[Anonymous No.15358976]

im back from a 5 hour nap whatd i miss? fuckin melatonin gummies destroying me

[Anonymous No.15358978]

>>15358969
you need to leave /sfg/. You are unironically a filthy e*rther.

[Anonymous No.15358979]

>>15358928
Imagine! They could have had an Energia-M with flyback boosters, and a small spaceplane!

[Anonymous No.15358980]

>>15358976
postponed until friday

[Anonymous No.15358981]

>>15358976
absolutely nothing

5h 45min for Elon Starship Spaces though

[Anonymous No.15358983]

>>15358976
Your nap is longer than my night

[Anonymous No.15358984]

>>15358978
>STATISTS could be here. I HATE the government.

[Anonymous No.15358989]

>>15358976
>melatonin gummies
best

[Anonymous No.15358994]

>>15358981
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647339528833896449

Reminder

[Anonymous No.15358996]

>>15358963
>he'd be pro SpaceX tho
Nah, he'd complain about it
https://daily.jstor.org/should-we-go-to-mars-carl-sagan-had-thoughts/

[Anonymous No.15358999]

>>15358974
I don't and my hearing is still fine which is way no way starship firing would damage anything from that distance if it's not above 100db

[Anonymous No.15359000]

>>15358996
>le mars for the martianss

I mean other than that

[Anonymous No.15359002]

>>15358989
yeah theyre good for getting to sleep but even if you take one for a couple nights in a row you have to nap a long time eventually. its like a crash when your sleepless but youre actually sleeping

[Anonymous No.15359004]

>>15358983
alaska anon?

[Anonymous No.15359008]

Apparently ESG is comparing two different measurements and calling them the same thing

Reading his QRT's lots of correction there that of course he is completely ignoring

[Anonymous No.15359012]

>>15359000
You cant just skip over 'if microbes, then colony evil'. Its faggotry on his part.

[Anonymous No.15359016]

>>15359008
And of course the other QRT's are all $TSLAQ faggots

[Anonymous No.15359020]

thank you zoomer anon, it actually worked

[Anonymous No.15359021]

>>15358994
I really want to hear this but I also know this is the only time he will ever do a space on starship so can any other anons who paypig out let us know what he says? That or I have to resort to looking at Launch Pad's twitter...

[Anonymous No.15359024]

>>15359020
jesus christ that reads exactly like some of my friends talk.

[Anonymous No.15359027]

>>15359021
Subscriptions aren't available in the vast majority of countries yet
I think it was like USA, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and Australia or something

[Anonymous No.15359036]

>>15358928
tfw Energia/Buran was a fully automatic 100 tonner, while the American Shuttle could only carry 25t and needed pilots.

[Anonymous No.15359040]

>ESG is so incompetent in checking his work that he somehow missed spaceX hired a NASA favorite contractor to do all the sound level/pressure models and didn't just wing it themselves

lmao, how can you be this bad at basic fact checking

[Anonymous No.15359042]

>>15359036
If you include the mass of the shuttle then it's also around 100 tons.

[Anonymous No.15359043]

>>15359042
>If you include the mass of the shuttle then it's also around 100 tons.
Why would you. Starship payload also doesn't include the mass of the Starship.

[Anonymous No.15359045]

[Anonymous No.15359047]

are we all not sleeping tonight?

[Anonymous No.15359048]

Tonight proudly, the Starships remember their brothers
>They remember their brothers who fell for Starbase as Martyrs
Commander Shotwell as one of the leaders
>May Elon grant her the gift of Paradise
>Fists in the air, praising Elon
>Reciting praise until we are out of breath

[Anonymous No.15359054]

[Anonymous No.15359056]

>>15359047
I'm going to sleep so I'm fresh for Starship launch

[Anonymous No.15359057]

>>15359043
Because the 100 tons figure for Energia/Buran includes Buran. Energia/Buran is like if you slapped the orbiter on the side of SLS and doesn't do much more than the shuttle which recovered more hardware.

[Anonymous No.15359061]

>>15358670
wheels are in very bad shape. NASA should be ashamed of themselves.

[Anonymous No.15359065]

>>15357923
Cringe, cringe at the musk tweet

[Anonymous No.15359067]

Redpill me on Beal Aerospace
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal_Aerospace
Bullshit or SpaceX strangled by NASA faggotry?

[Anonymous No.15359073]

>>15358201
>I hope Elon makes a mission to get back their own samples by 2028
Doubt it will happen, Elon is too autistic to care about space beyond "muh colonies" and he will also waste more money into social media.

[Anonymous No.15359076]

hmm... Saturn V with starship upper stage

[Anonymous No.15359083]

>>15359067
>kerosene/HTP
I am laffin (out of respect)

[Anonymous No.15359085]

>>15358207
HEIL

[Anonymous No.15359091]

>>15358175
Cute!

[Anonymous No.15359097]

>>15359054
shh no tears, only dreams now.

[Anonymous No.15359098]

>>15359083
It's a very cheap and high density option, that's not quite as nasty as hypergolic mixes like nitric acid and doesn't require any cryo.

It's pretty close to, but better performing than the Ethanol/HTP that the Germans used, but it's lower performance than Kerolox.

[Anonymous No.15359100]

>>15358175
>anti-anime autist not seething about this and throwing a tantrum derailing the thread

I knew he was a furry

[Anonymous No.15359101]

>>15359098
I'm not against htp in principle, it's just weird seeing it so late relatively speaking. it's unironically one of the best candidates for in-space mono propulsion with harvested water.

[Anonymous No.15359103]

https://twitter.com/nextspaceflight/status/1647659719992000512

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN57x2a_waw

[Anonymous No.15359105]

Iapetus is overrated

[Anonymous No.15359106]

>>15358356
Yesterday it was literally arguing with me, saying there was a scene in the Spongebob Squarepants movie with a time machine at Thug Tug bar.

[Anonymous No.15359107]

>>15358175
Even he wouldn't complain about OC.

[Anonymous No.15359109]

>>15359067
Going up against a government funded launch vehicle wasn't fair in the slightest, but even if they had got past that they still had to compete against the Proton-M and Ariane 5. With the megaconstellation projects of the late 90s collapsing there just weren't enough payloads for the numbers of competitors that wanted into the market.

[Anonymous No.15359114]

>>15358466
he is absolutely the most annoying. i can only stand Das

[Anonymous No.15359115]

>>15359100
Holy fuck, I just finished catching up on the last thread, an I was wondering why the anti-anime poster only gets upset about anime/v-tuber shit, but not furry shit? Hmm, I wonder why that could be? It really activates my almonds.

[Anonymous No.15359116]

>>15358664
/sfg/ is most comfy during euro hours.

[Anonymous No.15359118]

>>15359105
> Giant two tone walnut with the only good view of the rings
Its massively underrated

[Anonymous No.15359122]

>>15358521
WE ARE GOING

[Anonymous No.15359126]

>>15359116
What a fuckin bald-faced lie that is

[Anonymous No.15359127]

uh lfg lmao

[Anonymous No.15359128]

>>15358899
The picture where the circles match ist the predictions for the launch, not the static fire. If you compare it to the contours of the SH static fire, it's harder to tell because for some reason it's super zoomed out but the 110 circle seems further inwards. He also says he's comparing the proper measurements (LAmax and not the other one with the larger contours) but I know fuck all about sound engineering so I don't know if that's accurate.
Either way this won't stop the launch and if the FWS measured for the static fire I'm sure they'll do so for the launch as well so with some luck someone will FOIA those measurements as well and we'll know for sure.

[Anonymous No.15359129]

>>15359118
its a piece of shit moonlet that doesnt deserve a second thought. THERES NOTHING ON IT ITS ANOTHER FUCKING DUSTBALL. GO TO TITAN ITS BIGGER THAN MERCURY AND HAS MASSIVE FUCKING METHANE LAKES

[Anonymous No.15359132]

>>15359127
>mars orbit 2030+
>on fucking sls
nasa sisters in shambles by 2040 when they havent even put another rover on it

[Anonymous No.15359134]

>>15359129
We're on to you, alien piece of shit. Iapetus belongs to us and we will expel you from its sacred soil.

[Anonymous No.15359135]

Any reason they are landing starship on the belly in the ocean?

[Anonymous No.15359140]

>>15359135
So it will blow up and sink and they don't need to deal with tons of debris or the Chinese stealing their shit

[Anonymous No.15359141]

>>15359135
no fuel to make it light as possible give it the best chance of surviving reentry + they want it to sink anyway so the chinks cant steal it.

[Anonymous No.15359142]

>>15358207
was this supposed to be set to the chinese anthem?

[Anonymous No.15359143]

[Anonymous No.15359144]

>>15359105
How is it overrated when no one ever mentions it? It looks cool and that alone puts it above 90% of moons

[Anonymous No.15359146]

>>15358891

[Anonymous No.15359148]

>>15359122
should I go buy some monsters tomorrow?
drink one as Starship lifts off

[Anonymous No.15359150]

>>15359126
Don't worry about it.
I'm looking forward to all you newfags who came in after falcon 9 heavy&starman starting to complain about the new flood of "newfags" if starship has a succesfull launch.

[Anonymous No.15359151]

>>15359127
>year long mars simulated mission
what the fuck? why not just go to mars

[Anonymous No.15359155]

>>15359151
too dangerous. give us another 10 years of taxpayer money and then maybe we'll go. no promises.

[Anonymous No.15359157]

>>15359142
It's just a rewrite of Théoden's speech.

[Anonymous No.15359162]

>>15359134
its literally just a tourist trap, theres no strategic advantage to it other than muh saturn rings and muh mountains which are literally everywhere in the system. yes here lets charge $2b to go and see saturns rings when you could just as easily make a closer orbiting station

[Anonymous No.15359167]

How much delta v does it have?

[Anonymous No.15359168]

>>15359167
it has so much dV that it can easily do 180 degree inclination changes

[Anonymous No.15359170]

>>15359144
>muh cool muh mountains.
no strategic advantage in colonization, literally just for space tourists to go and see saturns rings. mountains are nothing burgers, go to miranda if you want to see something tall

[Anonymous No.15359171]

>>15359146

[Anonymous No.15359173]

>>15358946
post the hd version

[Anonymous No.15359175]

>>15359146
AAAAAAAAAAAA let me post

[Anonymous No.15359176]

>>15357900
Mmmmm roggs

[Anonymous No.15359182]

>>15358539
It's not about adding more sunlight, it's about concentrating it.

[Anonymous No.15359183]

[Anonymous No.15359185]

>>15358664
Always have done. At least someone is fucking building and flying anything new

[Anonymous No.15359186]

>>15359047
you know when the launch window opens, why even stay up?

[Anonymous No.15359188]

>>15359148
Yes sir

[Anonymous No.15359189]

>>15359173
holy shit is this the sõyence bible?

[Anonymous No.15359192]

[Anonymous No.15359194]

>>15359186
because 7 in the fucking morning is a really early time to wake up

[Anonymous No.15359195]

>>15359170
>B-BU-BU-BUT MUH COLONIZATION!!!! MUH COLONIZATION!!!!!!!!! NO TIME TO LOOK AT COOL THINGS WE NEED TO COLONIZE OR HUMANITY WILL PERISH!!!!!! I'M THE COLOONEEZER!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.15359196]

>>15358539
Just build a mass driver up Pavonis Mons or a space elevator there

[Anonymous No.15359197]

>>15359047
I must wörk

[Anonymous No.15359200]

>>15359115
>xhe finally figured out /sfg/'s secret
sure took you long enough

[Anonymous No.15359202]

So, how come this doesn't damage the wings?

[Anonymous No.15359205]

>>15358614
No, I mean JPL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Parsons

[Anonymous No.15359209]

>>15359202
its not actually touching them, there are lifting points below them
and those aren't wings, they are control surfaces

[Anonymous No.15359212]

>>15359202
Starship is not being picked up by the forward flaps, you can see the attachment points underneath them in this picture.

[Anonymous No.15359217]

Starship literally launches tomorrow and all Zubrin can talk about is UKRAINE, NUKES, CLIMATE, NUKES, UKRAINE, CLIMATE, PUTLER. The same fucking topics for years, it's maddening

[Anonymous No.15359218]

>>15358631
我看有可能

[Anonymous No.15359219]

>>15359143
>>15359171
>>15359175
>>15359183
>>15359192
AI posters get the rope

[Anonymous No.15359220]

>>15359217
Mindbroken by bloodlust, many such cases

[Anonymous No.15359223]

>>15359118
Wouldn't Enceladus have the best view? It must be a mindfuck to view the scale

[Anonymous No.15359225]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/spacex
They uploaded lots of new SS pics on flickr

[Anonymous No.15359226]

>>15359209
>and those aren't wings, they are control surfaces
so...wings?

[Anonymous No.15359227]

>>15359047
I pulled an all-nighter Thursday/Friday for an unrelated reason and still haven't fully recovered, but otherwise I probably would. I still feel weirdly wired though and have slept less than I normally do on the weekends.

[Anonymous No.15359229]

>>15359226
no

[Anonymous No.15359232]

>>15359212
are they expecting to catch it on those? that seems precise.

[Anonymous No.15359236]

>>15358636
>skiing in 1/10,000 G
>good
hmmm

[Anonymous No.15359237]

>>15359021
It will be posted on youtube like anything musk related. But I don't expect any meaningful new information. Especially if you follow the development closely.

[Anonymous No.15359239]

>>15359223
>Enceladus
>Inclination, 0.009° (to Saturn's equator)
The rings would just be a straight line

[Anonymous No.15359241]

Launch thread tomorrow at T-2 bong from SpaceX stream start. this may be the most important launch thread I'll have ever made.

[Anonymous No.15359242]

>>15359195
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN WE CANT WASTE RESOURCES ON STUPID SHIT!?!?! I WANT TO GO SEE SATURNS RINGS THAT LOOKS EXACTLY THE SAME FROM THE IMAGES ONLIEN BUT IN PERSON!!! NO NO NO NO NO NO YOU HAVE TO GO AND PUT US ON THIS SHITHOLE ROCK AND WASTE DECADES OF PROGRESS!!! YOU HAVE TO BECAUSE LOOK ITS A COOL ROCK AND NOW GO PUT US ON IO TOO!!! I WANT TO SEE JUPITER CLOSE UP!!! I DONT CARE IF YOU DIE INSTANTLY YOU HAVE TO WASTE MONEY ON STUPID SHIT!!!

[Anonymous No.15359243]

>>15359237
>>15359021
someone will mirror the stream somewhere, just gotta find it

[Anonymous No.15359245]

>>15359232
doesn't starship land on it's own? It needs to, in order to serve as hls and a mars vehicle.

[Anonymous No.15359247]

>>15359239
that reminds me...we still dont know how starship will be powered for long voyages

[Anonymous No.15359254]

>>15359245
Mars one and Moon one will need legs, but tower should be catching starship like booster

[Anonymous No.15359255]

>>15358806
It would be very loud

[Anonymous No.15359259]

>>15359255
4u

[Anonymous No.15359261]

>>15359245
easier on low gravity worlds

fuck earth and fuck 1g

[Anonymous No.15359263]

>>15359118
Mimas also has a good view of the rings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R3ufj28lzM

[Anonymous No.15359265]

>>15359259
thanks, big guy

[Anonymous No.15359266]

The elon dicksucking here is pretty lame. You can like spacex without being a blind follower of elon

[Anonymous No.15359267]

>>15359150
Any newfags from the JWST launch here?

[Anonymous No.15359269]

>>15359266
But I like Elon and am a blind follower of SpaceX

[Anonymous No.15359270]

this is the last day you will see starship and the orbital mount intact. Say goodbye spacexchuds it's over for you it's gonna RUD at T-0

[Anonymous No.15359273]

welp the collage is ready. Guess it was worth the effort, we'll see. I'll only post it if all goes well. Got it to fit in the 4mb limit.

[Anonymous No.15359275]

>>15359263
>Inclination, 1.574°
How is that a good view?

[Anonymous No.15359277]

>>15359047
what time is it in USA?

[Anonymous No.15359276]

>>15359270
RUD at T-3

[Anonymous No.15359279]

>15359270
>15359266
samefag is baiting (You)'s. theres literally so many people here who constantly shit on elon

[Anonymous No.15359280]

>>15359266
No you actually cant

[Anonymous No.15359282]

I hate NSF like you wouldn't believe

[Anonymous No.15359283]

>>15358926
Have you tried asking them nicely to change the direction of the Earth's rotation for your convenience?

[Anonymous No.15359284]

>>15359277
stream starts at 7:15 am, 8 pm launch

[Anonymous No.15359285]

>>15359241
based baker

[Anonymous No.15359288]

>>15359282
you can just stop watching it's easy

[Anonymous No.15359290]

>>15359118
reminder that Saturn can't be seen from Titan

[Anonymous No.15359291]

>>15359242
>WASTE RESOURCES
resources are infinite. ngmi

[Anonymous No.15359293]

You know, god forbid if technology like DART falls in the wrong hands.

[Anonymous No.15359294]

>>15359275
it looks good in the video

[Anonymous No.15359296]

>>15359293
wdym? its already in US hands.

[Anonymous No.15359299]

[Anonymous No.15359300]

>>15359266
SpaceX exists because of Musk, SpaceX built Starship because of Musk
people were telling him that this is ridiculous, probably some people still telling him this is going to be ridiculous
there is no other company that even has a falcon 9 clone yet
you can like spacex without "being a blind follower" of elon, but not recognizing what elon has done is ridiculous
there are approximately an infinite amount of rocket startups, there were many before SpaceX started but no company is even close

[Anonymous No.15359301]

[Anonymous No.15359306]

>>15359299
cutiepie

[Anonymous No.15359307]

[Anonymous No.15359308]

>>15359242
>WE CANT WASTE RESOURCES ON STUPID SHIT
Billions for space research, pennies for the space colonists.

[Anonymous No.15359309]

>>15359301
I wish

[Anonymous No.15359310]

>>15359299
THIS is what they took from you

[Anonymous No.15359311]

>>15359282
>LIKE SUBSCRIBE COMMENT SHARE DONATE BUY MERCH
too be fair it seems like they have alot of costs compared to other youtubers of their size...they only have 700k subscribers but have to put out lots of livestreams, videos, and pay a large staff

[Anonymous No.15359312]

[math]\unicode{x1F680}[/math] [math]\unicode{x1F316}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15359313]

>>15359293
DART is low tech it’s literally a probe with an ion engine

[Anonymous No.15359314]

>>15359300
>>15359269
i think allot of us in /sfg/ fall under the category of blind follower of SpaceX and like Elon right?

[Anonymous No.15359315]

>>15359300
Come again?
>there is no other company that even has a falcon 9 clone yet

[Anonymous No.15359316]

>>15359300
>SpaceX exists because of Musk
And that's a bad thing. America didn't use to have integral indispensable people behind key projects.

[Anonymous No.15359317]

>>15359312
Since when did emoji work on 4chuds?

[Anonymous No.15359321]

[Anonymous No.15359322]

>>15359290
It will be when the atmosphere is removed by Dysonchads

[Anonymous No.15359323]

>>15359315
How much mass have they launched into orbit?

[Anonymous No.15359326]

>>15359316
who was von braun?

[Anonymous No.15359327]

>>15359317
always [math]\unicode{x1F914}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15359328]

[Anonymous No.15359329]

>>15359316
god what a retard.

[Anonymous No.15359330]

>>15359266
You're a fucking retard if you think even one hundredth of what's happening now would have happened without Elon. I wanted to hate him and thought he was just some rich cunt environmentalist at one point years ago, but the reality is too obvious to deny.

[Anonymous No.15359332]

>>15359266
Well you can but it would be retarded. Every good thing about SpaceX exists because Elon willed it

[Anonymous No.15359333]

>>15359327
Really makes you thinklstein

[Anonymous No.15359335]

>>15359328
it would be SO EASY... to strap those two to a central booster with a starship on top. Call it starship super heavy super heavy

[Anonymous No.15359336]

>>15359129
Just go back and forth between them, problem solved

[Anonymous No.15359337]

>>15359284
>12 hour stream
wew

[Anonymous No.15359339]

>>15359282
I do hate NSF's presenters with all my heart, but the video content is good.

[Anonymous No.15359344]

>>15359316
wrong, the much maligned captains of industry / robber barons were basically the same with some differences
and what about Jobs? there are plenty of key people that push through seemingly crazy projects and move tech/industry forward quicker than it might have otherwise gone
and in some cases it might have been abandoned for decades, like the space industry had been
there were numerous attempts before musk but they just didnt have that something that musk has
and I really doubt its purely luck. Getting lucky in one are and company? maybe
but getting lucky in two large disruptive areas? I don't think so
this is not to mention upcoming stuff like self driving, grid storage, boring tunnels, neuralink
most of these areas have competitors (except for perhaps boring tunnels, nobody really cares about that except musk)

[Anonymous No.15359345]

the MARS COLONIAL TRANSPORTER...

[Anonymous No.15359346]

https://twitter.com/NASAGoddard/status/1116310431969239040
We asked and SpaceX checked. The LUVOIR space telescope concept can indeed fly on Starship! (graphic used by permission)

[Anonymous No.15359347]

>>15359323
China is going to carry 10,000 passengers to space by 2045 for cheaper than Spacex because they don't have mutt demographics.

[Anonymous No.15359349]

>>15359329
It means that progress hinges on random chance and not a process.

[Anonymous No.15359352]

>>15359291
>LGSC
untrue, always has been untrue.

[Anonymous No.15359354]

>>15359346
please no more unfolding mirrors.

[Anonymous No.15359356]

>>15359346
Thank you voyager poster

[Anonymous No.15359357]

>>15359346
Some comments are saying that only the smaller Luvoir B version can fit, the larger Luvoir A would require SLS Block II.

[Anonymous No.15359359]

>>15359346
looks like they have room to spare. make it bigger and add more folding mirrors

[Anonymous No.15359360]

>>15359354
ONE KILOMETER DIAMETER

[Anonymous No.15359361]

>>15359347
allright chang

[Anonymous No.15359362]

>>15359354
I'm pretty sure the actual issue was the unfolding heatshield.

[Anonymous No.15359363]

>>15359347
Spend those wumao wisely brother

[Anonymous No.15359365]

>15359349
holy shit im not giving this faggot any more (You)s. you sound just like an anti-musk tranny from my astronomy club, everything youve posted makes absolutely no sense

[Anonymous No.15359366]

[Anonymous No.15359367]

>>15359356
Who is the voyager poster?

[Anonymous No.15359368]

>>15359357
>require SLS Block II
The thing that's never happening? Especially if starship works.

[Anonymous No.15359371]

>>15359346
>LUVOIR
>Launch date 2039 (proposed)
jesus motherfucking christ

someone please do for space telescopes what SpaceX is doing for launch services

[Anonymous No.15359372]

>>15359346
holy based, astronomy faggots kneel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Ultraviolet_Optical_Infrared_Surveyor

[Anonymous No.15359375]

>>15359349
>>15359316
ATTENTION: I want everyone to read what this fag posted

[Anonymous No.15359380]

>>15359371
not that easy in opticks

[Anonymous No.15359384]

>>15359368
We will build all the variants and you will be happy

[Anonymous No.15359385]

>>15359346
How does it get out of the Starlink slot?

[Anonymous No.15359388]

>>15359385
retard

[Anonymous No.15359390]

>>15359385
Clamshell doors, duh.

[Anonymous No.15359389]

>>15359371
Won't happen unless someone finds a way to make telescopes profitable. And the chance of some rich guy being interested in funding a telescope is minimal, they usually prefer to waste money to go fuck around in LEO for a bit.

[Anonymous No.15359391]

>>15359384
For me it's LSSS

[Anonymous No.15359393]

https://www.youtube.com/live/TGfSrVZh7fM
DAWN OF THE FINAL STREAM

[Anonymous No.15359398]

>>15359393
dawn of the final license

[Anonymous No.15359405]

>>15359389
I think some space mining companies had some plans that started with some kind of telescopes to look for good candidates for asteroid mining
perhaps there would be some economic incentive function there that scientific telescopes could piggyback on?
and in any case, just making satellite buses cheaper in general and launch cheaper in general will make it easier for even unis and so on to fund and iterate over telescopes

[Anonymous No.15359406]

>>15359389
>a way to make telescopes profitable.
just turn them the other way and look at Earth

[Anonymous No.15359407]

Reminder that our moon dominates the sky of its planet like no other moon

[Anonymous No.15359413]

>>15359407
I bet charon dominates Pluto's sky a bit

[Anonymous No.15359417]

>>15359407
weird how our moon's actual size perfectly lines up with it's apparent size and none of the others do.

[Anonymous No.15359419]

>>15359405
I guess they could do with the primary intent of searching for dangerous asteroids, but this would fuck capabilities for other purposes. Once I thought about a private telescope that sells observation time to universities or whoever wants to buy it, but I have no idea how viable would this be.
In the end, the best scenario I can imagine is NASA giving up completely on rockets and focusing only on developing science missions, and buy rockets from private companies.

[Anonymous No.15359420]

>>15359413
charon mogs the moon on apparent size from pluto

[Anonymous No.15359422]

>>15359417
this and the fact that the Moon has the same apparent size as the Sun makes me believe in higher powers

[Anonymous No.15359423]

What the booster be launching?

[Anonymous No.15359425]

>>15359417
lmao, you really made me think anon

[Anonymous No.15359427]

[Anonymous No.15359429]

>>15359413
Charon isn't a moon. They're a binary planetary system.

[Anonymous No.15359430]

>>15359407
What about Charon?
And the view of moons from the gas giants is meaningless because no one will ever go there. The cool thing is the view of the planets and moons from the other moons.
>>15359417
It's just used as the standard unit for comparison.

[Anonymous No.15359436]

>>15359419
>Once I thought about a private telescope that sells observation time to universities or whoever wants to buy it, but I have no idea how viable would this be.
doesn't sound completely insane, but that would be a different funding model
how is observation time given out at the moment? is it related to how much funding came from a university or completely unrelated?

[Anonymous No.15359437]

>>15359427
I would put some graffiti on Starship

[Anonymous No.15359440]

>>15359429
binary manlet-planet system

[Anonymous No.15359448]

>>15359422
What would a higher power want? Why haven't they communicated us? Or are our biological instincts, in a way, an unspoken instruction from higher powers?

[Anonymous No.15359450]

>>15359413
>dominates the sky of its planet
>Pluto
>planet

[Anonymous No.15359451]

>entire stack explodes on ignition
>/sfg/ collectively seppukus

[Anonymous No.15359452]

>>15359450
Jupiter Saturn Neptune and Uranus aren't planets either.

[Anonymous No.15359454]

>>15359451
This is what I’m afraid of

[Anonymous No.15359455]

>>15359451
sfg will be too busy masturbating to foxes

[Anonymous No.15359458]

>>15359448
>What would a higher power want?
About tree fiddy.

[Anonymous No.15359460]

>>15359451
I'll just wait until they fix everything and stack the next one to try again

[Anonymous No.15359462]

>>15359047
I slept 5 hours last night
I am too tired to hold out
Plus am euro so why the fuck not?!

[Anonymous No.15359463]

>>15359451
STEP BY STEP, GLACIALLY

[Anonymous No.15359465]

Anyone got the high res photo of the spacex girls next to the starship tiles?

[Anonymous No.15359466]

>>15359455
Keep your dick out of the fox

[Anonymous No.15359467]

I’m so scared bros

[Anonymous No.15359470]

>>15359451
Honestly seems quite unlikely. The engines are the most explodey part, and they've been tested to hell and back, including in flight.

[Anonymous No.15359471]

I'm so excited bros

[Anonymous No.15359473]

14 HOURS

[Anonymous No.15359474]

>>15359470
Getting cold-staging right is very hard. I'm worried the upper stage will hard-start and RUD.

[Anonymous No.15359476]

>>15359451
I have my Nikes on ready to go

[Anonymous No.15359477]

>>15359451
Failure is absolutely a likely outcome and wouldn't be the end of the world. The real thing to be happy about is that they're finally doing real (read: entertaining) testing again; think of this as a full duration static fire sans static. I just hope that if/when it blows up it's as spectacular as possible. I doubt anyone here will flat out kill themselves but I do hope you guys recognize that the point of the test is to fly the rocket, not to see it get to orbit which would just be a very nice bonus.

[Anonymous No.15359478]

[Anonymous No.15359484]

>>15359477
even if its 100% successful its not going into orbit

[Anonymous No.15359485]

>>15359478
TWR 0.5

[Anonymous No.15359486]

is our guy berger going to be there? he lives in houston

[Anonymous No.15359491]

>>15359467
>>15359471
The duality of man

[Anonymous No.15359494]

>>15359486
Yes I'll be there

[Anonymous No.15359495]

>>15359486
yes, hullo is not going to go though

[Anonymous No.15359499]

>>15359486
He's stowing away on starship with a MOOSE

[Anonymous No.15359500]

norminal

[Anonymous No.15359503]

The Asteroid Redirect Mission was cool and I'm tired to pretend it wasn't

[Anonymous No.15359505]

>iS ThiS aN oRbiTaL LaUnCh????
we literally have word for this...we've had it for decades. its called fractional orbital.

[Anonymous No.15359506]

>>15359384
Still missing the LSL

[Anonymous No.15359507]

>>15359484
To be pedantic technically it's meant to go into TAO, but yeah I forgot.

[Anonymous No.15359514]

>the 100th anniversary of spaceflight is only 30 years away
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

[Anonymous No.15359515]

https://twitter.com/Anton81191831/status/1647597472922087426

L_max vs L_Amax

[Anonymous No.15359517]

>>15359514
and more happened in the first 25 years than what came after up until now

[Anonymous No.15359519]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5QXreqOrTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmDB1316Mjk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vb9hFqF6i0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN57x2a_waw

[Anonymous No.15359521]

>>15359514
Just in time for the first manned Mars mission

[Anonymous No.15359523]

>>15359515
> A-weighted decibel (dBA or dB(A)) is an expression of the relative loudness of sounds as perceived by the human ear. A-weighting gives more value to frequencies in the middle of human hearing and less value to frequencies at the edges as compared to a flat audio decibel measurement.

https://www.nti-audio.com/en/support/know-how/frequency-weightings-for-sound-level-measurements

z-weighing is zero weighing would be equivalent to the pure sound I guess

[Anonymous No.15359524]

>>15359499
is that guy...ok?

[Anonymous No.15359529]

>>15359470
if the engines are so reliable then why didn't a couple of them start during the static fire

[Anonymous No.15359532]

>>15359241
are you including all streams? these were all the ones I could find. had to convert YT links from live to watch?v= for them to embed >>15359519

[Anonymous No.15359534]

>>15359491

[Anonymous No.15359537]

>>15359515
These guys... in the license, the FAA asked SpaceX to model shit like how would Starship explode when hitting the water in the middle of fucking nowhere to see potential effects, but sure, they made some basic errors in calculating sound

[Anonymous No.15359538]

>>15359519
>trailers for upcoming live streams
neat

[Anonymous No.15359540]

>>15359316

[Anonymous No.15359542]

>>15359519
Do you have one of those that have musk talking about crypto and a btc address that claims doubles the amount sent?

[Anonymous No.15359545]

>>15359532
Yes I will have a thorough OP as normal. Thank you for the links tho

[Anonymous No.15359546]

>>15359316
>America didn't use to have integral indispensable people behind key projects.
But that's always how American projects have been, the Dwight D. Eisenhower Interstate Highway System comes to mind as one of the largest

[Anonymous No.15359549]

>>15359519
Live in 14h
Live in 14h
Live in 12h
Live in 7h

Perhaps I should go to sleep

[Anonymous No.15359551]

>>15359436
>how is observation time given out at the moment? is it related to how much funding came from a university or completely unrelated?
For the best observatories (JWST, HST, VLT, ALMA) it's given out on the basis of proposals, which request time for a specific science goal. There's no cost to the user, in fact a successful NASA proposal in the US means funding comes with it. For some projects and private telescopes it's possible to by into the project early on and benefit later, but this really only funds smaller projects and a handful of private telescopes (e.g. Keck) which now struggle to complete. Very little telescope time is actually sold.

[Anonymous No.15359553]

>>15359524
he's fine

[Anonymous No.15359555]

We

[Anonymous No.15359556]

>>15359555
Wuz

[Anonymous No.15359558]

>>15358268
That's not how cancer risk works
Linear no threshold model is bullshit

[Anonymous No.15359559]

>>15359555
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN

[Anonymous No.15359567]

We need the image limit raising
> muh catbox
no acceptable

[Anonymous No.15359568]

>>15359523
>Pure sound
Won't somebody think of the poor beetles subjected to the noise?
Arrest Felon Musk immediately!

[Anonymous No.15359569]

>>15359549
NSF starting that stream 7 hours early to collect those superchats

[Anonymous No.15359576]

>>15359567
still 54 to go

[Anonymous No.15359577]

>>15359567
Just use 4chanX.

[Anonymous No.15359578]

>>15359542
lol

[Anonymous No.15359581]

reminder that right now some 70% of sci posts are on sfg

[Anonymous No.15359582]

>>15359519

would be cool if someone could find one from the Mexico side, but maybe no one is streaming there

[Anonymous No.15359583]

>>15359581
rookie numbers

[Anonymous No.15359584]

>>15359372
>>15359371
>>15359346
Note that LUVOIR is dead, it was only a proposal. The mission being considered now (Habitable Worlds Observatory) calls for an mirror of a bit bigger than 6 meters. Even in the 8 meter version of LUVOIR was too expensive and would take too long. Note that WHO also isn't on track for 2040 right now. The astrophysics budget has been flat for years, if that doesn't change it will slip by years. They need a huge new funding wedge just to hit 2040.

[Anonymous No.15359585]

>>15358462
That wasn't a permanent solution last time we tried it.

[Anonymous No.15359587]

>>15359581
well just look at the rest of the board
you've gotta have some kind of brain damage to attempt to engage

[Anonymous No.15359588]

>>15359569
EDA has some prelaunch stream too but i didnt post it because holy gay

[Anonymous No.15359592]

>>15359555
gon make it

[Anonymous No.15359597]

>>15359581
If sci is 70% space, why not rename it to spc space board?

[Anonymous No.15359601]

>>15359584
based astro anon knowing his shit

[Anonymous No.15359603]

>>15359584
LUVOIR is dead yet HWO is basically gonna have unfolding mirrors by the sound of it

[Anonymous No.15359604]

>>15359587
>you've gotta have some kind of brain damage to attempt to engage
based anon calling me brain damaged

[Anonymous No.15359609]

why havent we see any pics or videos of the crowd yet? there must be 100k people there.

[Anonymous No.15359611]

>>15359232
the first Starships are not going to be caught, they just need to be lifted for now

[Anonymous No.15359614]

>>15359584
Yet again, nothing ever happens.

[Anonymous No.15359617]

>>15359609
delusional

[Anonymous No.15359621]

>>15359315
>drone dolled up to look like a rocket

No my China strong friend.

[Anonymous No.15359624]

>>15359346
>Apr 11, 2019

newfags out themselves

[Anonymous No.15359625]

does someone have the diagram about the launch SpaceX recently released

[Anonymous No.15359628]

>>15359624
wtf a space account I follow shared this today

[Anonymous No.15359632]

>>15359603
Probably. The language in the Decadal mentioned 'incribed diameter', which presumes it is segmented. But there is no design so far, a benefit of choosing half way between LUVOIR-b and HabEx is that all the design questions are back on the table. It's also not going to be designed right away, so things could shift slightly if the launch landscape changes to the extent they can put confidence in.

[Anonymous No.15359633]

>>15359609
This is a test flight. Not a manned flight to Moon or something.

[Anonymous No.15359634]

Can't wait for the biggest non-nuclear explosion in human history.

[Anonymous No.15359635]

reminder that Elon is still CEO of Twitter

[Anonymous No.15359637]

>>15359634
kek

[Anonymous No.15359639]

>>15357995
How nice, showcasing how a baby is made

[Anonymous No.15359641]

>>15359635
>>>/pol/
>>>/g/
I really don't give a fuck about Elon's other companies today.

[Anonymous No.15359649]

>>15359634
>biggest non-nuclear explosion
Halifax, Nova Scotia sends its regards

[Anonymous No.15359650]

why does elon always reply to that obnoxious ching chong guy? what has he done to elevate himself and his mouthbreather opinions?

[Anonymous No.15359651]

>>15358128
Von Braun, the man who had the displeasure of realizing just how insidious Americans can be

[Anonymous No.15359657]

>>15359609
lmao no. there will be maybe 10k

[Anonymous No.15359659]

>>15359624
Jesus I can't believe it's been 4 years already

[Anonymous No.15359663]

>>15359609
100k for the first manned mission to Mars

[Anonymous No.15359664]

>>15358929
yes
I have electronic earpro that lets me listen to music while doing it over bluetooth

[Anonymous No.15359669]

>>15359663
nah artemis ii a fucking robotic test flight pulled 400k. first manned mission to mars will be millions.

[Anonymous No.15359670]

>>15359651
Reminder that the US would have been the first to launch a satellite if they didn't cuck Von Braun and his team.

[Anonymous No.15359674]

/sfg/ history dive-

>pre-Dec 2018
Various unconnected launch threads
>17 Dec 2018
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10223076
Initial catalyst, quadruple launch thread, first boca chica pics
>21 Dec 2018
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10223076/#10230858
First suggestion of "spaceflight general"
>21 Dec 2018
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10231408
SpaceX GPS launch thread, staged from previous launch thread
>22 Dec 2018
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10231408/#10235763
First collective OC
>23 Dec 2018
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10237471
First Starship/BFR discussion thread, starting relatively unbroken thread chain
>18 Feb 2019
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10399256
First thread with "spaceflight general" in subject line

>19 Apr 2019
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10562453/#10562640
First suggestion to use /sfg/ in general name instead of /sg/
>19 Apr 2019
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10571535
First thread using /sfg/ in subject line
>1 Aug 2019
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/10853630/#10854978
First post of SLS is real copypasta on /sfg/ (or /sci/ in general)
>03 May 2020
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/11632487/#11632831
Creation of 4ASS
>09 Jun 2020
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/11779749/#11780018
First appearance of PROOONT-anon
>10 Aug 2020
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/11993520/#11994869
First Krystal post
>07 Dec 2020
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/thread/12425748/#12430004
First appearance of the Zubrin sniffer

[Anonymous No.15359675]

Can't for the upcoming SLS launch from Texas!!

[Anonymous No.15359677]

>>15359670
True but that did cause the space race

[Anonymous No.15359678]

>>15359634
I wish. But it wouldnt even make the top 5. maybe top 10 or 20. N1 was less than 1 kt TNT

[Anonymous No.15359679]

https://twitter.com/johnkrausphotos/status/1647716250943127552

[Anonymous No.15359680]

>>15359675
Scale's more than a little off but not bad over all.

[Anonymous No.15359683]

>>15359679
is that his gf?

[Anonymous No.15359684]

>>15359669
400k "SAW" it across all of florida. big fuckin whoop

[Anonymous No.15359685]

>>15359679

[Anonymous No.15359687]

>>15359683
kek

[Anonymous No.15359688]

>>15359674
wish fireden wasnt so AIDS now

[Anonymous No.15359689]

>>>/pol/423783488

[Anonymous No.15359692]

>>15359679
Kraus can take some good snaps even if he looks like a dork

[Anonymous No.15359693]

>>15359679
>startits
I hope that loser has a mental breakdown and starts weeping for mommy.

[Anonymous No.15359695]

>>15358475
>58475▶
>>>15358466
>I’m going bald and I’m afraid of looking like a redditor
Embrace it, begin the reddit spacing

[Anonymous No.15359696]

>>15359689
>cue the flat earthers and moon landing hoaxers posting their cherrypicked webms, shitty conspiracy pics and terrible opinions

[Anonymous No.15359697]

>>15359688
Yeah someone else posted that 18 months ago, when I saved it, when fireden was usable.

[Anonymous No.15359700]

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A federal judge in Austin issued an emergency ruling on Sunday to suspend SpaceX's highly anticipated Starship Superheavy first orbital test flight, initially scheduled to launch from Boca Chica, Texas. The decision comes after a consortium of environmental organizations filed a federal lawsuit, alleging that the pending launch poses significant environmental risks and that proper assessments have not been conducted. The court's intervention puts an abrupt halt on the high-profile test, raising questions about the future timeline of SpaceX's ambitious project.

[Anonymous No.15359703]

>>15359696
honestly they seem to have a pretty good grasp of space, they even posted this image

[Anonymous No.15359706]

>>15359678
Any LNG tankers in the Gulf of Mexico? Just curious.

[Anonymous No.15359707]

>>15359700
2 weeks bros, we are so back

[Anonymous No.15359709]

>>15359696
Just ask them if they agree with the Talmud on anything else
>The rabbis of the Talmud believed that the world was flat, and that the sun revolved around the Earth every day. There is a debate about the length of the solar year in the Talmud, and its consequences and the rare Jewish ceremony of the Blessing of the Sun (Birkat Hahammah) are discussed. The view of the talmudic rabbis is contrasted with that of the contemporary Greek astronomers. While the rabbis of the Talmud argued about the size of the flat Earth, the Greeks had determined the Earth to be a sphere, had calculated its circumference and had moved on to consider other questions.
https://academic.oup.com/book/1751/chapter-abstract/141387578?redirectedFrom=fulltext

[Anonymous No.15359710]

>>15359700
don't scare me like that

[Anonymous No.15359713]

>>15359703
Rocketry and National Socialism lead to each other if you do them right.

[Anonymous No.15359717]

>>15359700
tfw it's real
https://apnews.com/article/starship-test-launch-emergency-order-78241a08883aa903d3cf7eb6edaa1108

[Anonymous No.15359720]

guys go to Dr Marco Langbroek's website. click through the 'dubious stuff' links. Check it out...

[Anonymous No.15359722]

>>15359706
No but you could easily shoot a starship tank farm

[Anonymous No.15359724]

>>15359717
FAKE
BICH BASTERD

[Anonymous No.15359725]

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and company officials have yet to release an official statement regarding the emergency ruling. While Musk has previously downplayed environmental concerns surrounding his ambitious space exploration projects, his silence in the wake of the court's decision highlights the gravity of the situation. Members of the environmental consortium expressed cautious optimism, stating that this pause offers a crucial opportunity for proper examination and analysis of the rocket's environmental impact before resuming any future tests. Agitated SpaceX supporters argue that the ruling stagnates progress, but the company's next steps largely hinge on how regulatory agencies and the courts assess the potential ecological consequences.

[Anonymous No.15359728]

>>15359720
Cunt

[Anonymous No.15359727]

how do i filter gpt posters

[Anonymous No.15359729]

>>15357889

[Anonymous No.15359730]

00:03

I cant believe today Starship attempts a launch . Not next week , not next month , today.

[Anonymous No.15359732]

13 HOURS

[Anonymous No.15359733]

So I know it's not a full orbital test, but does it suffer full reentry stress?

[Anonymous No.15359734]

>>15359674
anything notable after 2020?

[Anonymous No.15359737]

>>15359729

[Anonymous No.15359736]

>>15359675
I giggled like a little girl

[Anonymous No.15359738]

>>15359733
>but does it suffer full reentry stress?
no since it will carry no fuel during reentry

[Anonymous No.15359739]

Tower, you are clear for launch

[Anonymous No.15359740]

>>15359734
there were epic threads

[Anonymous No.15359741]

>>15359733
Anon , they will reach *7600 m/s instead of the 7780 necessary for a 200x200 km orbit . Its literally a fart away

*speculation

[Anonymous No.15359742]

when sticky

[Anonymous No.15359745]

>>15359689
>>15359696
>ctrl f
>"jew"
>0 results
wow

[Anonymous No.15359747]

launch thread paste is locked and loaded. Ready for action tomorrow morning.
I've been waiting for this one.... Starhopper, SN5/6/8/9/10/11/15 were all so long ago. Eons ago. Back when it was worthwhile to make launch threads for even lowly Starlink launches.
We're GOING lads

[Anonymous No.15359748]

>>15359742
launch thread is going to be the sticky

[Anonymous No.15359751]

>>15359747
Can't wait to poast in your launch thread

[Anonymous No.15359752]

>>15359742
Lunch thread goes up ~1 bong before the test window opens. Up to the moderators then, I'd imagine quite soon when we get into the final count.

>>15359748
yeah

[Anonymous No.15359754]

>>15359747

[Anonymous No.15359756]

Apparently the injection orb it is 250X50 kilometers. Literally closer to orbital than Starliner at separation

[Anonymous No.15359757]

>>15359747
Thank you old frend

[Anonymous No.15359759]

>>15359478
Superheavy Block 5 FT

[Anonymous No.15359764]

Let us reflect on the faggots who tried to stop us and FAILED

[Anonymous No.15359765]

>>15359756
Lol 4chan thinks posting a TLE as text is spam.
https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2023/04/the-starship-inaugural-launch-is-near.html

[Anonymous No.15359768]

Ok but seriously, what are the chances it aborts today

[Anonymous No.15359769]

which stream will have the best coverage?

SpaceX Official?
NSF?
LabPadre?
Estronaut?
Clear?

[Anonymous No.15359775]

>>15359769
Clear!

[Anonymous No.15359776]

we need an updated version of this

[Anonymous No.15359777]

L2 reports SpaceX targeting 1 hour into the window - a delay of an hour

[Anonymous No.15359778]

>>15359769
spacex

[Anonymous No.15359779]

>>15359769
Expect a mixture of Estronaut and SpaceX to give you the best camera views.
Estronaut on full mute obviously.

[Anonymous No.15359780]

>>15359769
Spacex official, no doubt about that. The tranny autist that manages the who stream said this one is gonna be bigger than FH

[Anonymous No.15359782]

Soo... when do they start evacuating the turtles? There's not much time left.

[Anonymous No.15359784]

if they scrub tomorrow is it hard to find another launch window, or can they try again soon

[Anonymous No.15359786]

>>15359769
probably official spacex and clear in the background.

[Anonymous No.15359787]

>>15359782
countless grackle, turtle and beetle nests are going to be incinerated by elon soon

[Anonymous No.15359789]

>>15359784
There are no orbital constraints. They would just need the closures adjusted and commodities refilled.
Could probably do it next day or day after that.

[Anonymous No.15359790]

>>15359470
The engines alone are probably ok. Feeding 33 engines at full thrust is harder problem they haven't had the chance to test yet. If it fails at lift off, decent chance it would be reflected energy causing havoc in the engine bay plumbing.

[Anonymous No.15359791]

TOUKO ANON I HOPE YOU ARE STILL HERE
I MISS YOUR VIDEOS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR6DATfX7kI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8p-DklOW4A

required viewing if you haven't seen em

[Anonymous No.15359794]

>>15359782
Too late for that, they will be roasted alive and the government refuses to do anything about it

>ESGfag: The heat plume expected from launch would instantly kill any animal unfortunate enough to be caught in its wake. Though SpaceX did admit to this fact, several wildlife biologists I spoke with were stunned at some of the language used in FAA’s justification for minimizing modeled casualties. Lines such as: “Noise from the Raptor engines would cause a startle response of animals and would effectively direct them away from the area and reduce the risk of being affected by the heat of the plume5” appear to serve more as handwaving away actual impacts rather than discuss them in a serious manner.

[Anonymous No.15359795]

>>15359787
>grackle
>nests
not possible with those nigger birds

[Anonymous No.15359796]

what if we glue ourselves to the rocket? That will have to force them to abort right?

[Anonymous No.15359798]

THE PIPING PLOVER

[Anonymous No.15359800]

>>15359737

[Anonymous No.15359801]

>>15359776
>Q3 2021
it's crazy to think that this was two weeks ago

[Anonymous No.15359806]

>>15359769
I thought clear only commented over other people's footage

[Anonymous No.15359807]

>>15359794
It sounds unlikely that there would be any animals close enough for a heat plume to cause any meaningful harm, considering how much noise they make around that area at a constant rate. Id be amazed if there was really any animals at all around the area

[Anonymous No.15359809]

>>15359807
The damage from SpaceX’s incursion into South Texas’ pristine coast is already real. The harm from the full launches will undoubtedly be greater than what was disclosed to the public. These damages may show up as shattered windows and the corpses of hundreds of dead shorebirds; immediate and obvious. Or they may not be entirely clear until years from now when SpaceX eventually closes shop on the Texas coast for greener pastures. The scars on the land, the people, and the wildlife won’t just disappear. They’ll linger, and hopefully, by then people will be willing to listen to the story.

[Anonymous No.15359810]

These retards are going to cause this species to go extinct at this pace.

[Anonymous No.15359811]

>

[Anonymous No.15359812]

>>15359796
They will only notice right before the launch, and then it will already be too late - the automated launch will begin and by then.. it will all be joeover

[Anonymous No.15359813]

>>15359794
They will learn to respect human supremacy. Although I doubt the plume is large enough to do serious damage except for right at the stand, which should pretty much already be empty of wildlife. I hope it is though because that would look cool.

[Anonymous No.15359815]

>>15359809
I hear what you are saying, but its going straight through the other ear - I have zero reaction at all to this. Its completely banale to attempt to move and move the current timeline even further back for the sake of some annoyed citizens and a few hundred shorebirds. We build windmills and it kills more than a hundred birds a year. And then we build 20 of them, not even to generate any real meaningful power - its just there for posturing. Do you really think your posturing will have any meaningful impact over this launch or not?

[Anonymous No.15359816]

>>15359226
Wings provide lift, control surfaces control shit, its not fucking hard to understand anon, cmon.

[Anonymous No.15359817]

>>15359811
Fucking bats, get your ass back to Comal County.

[Anonymous No.15359818]

>>15359801
Kek
two weeks bros, it was really fun shitposting with you

[Anonymous No.15359822]

Sneed shuttle

[Anonymous No.15359823]

>>15359791
God those were good times. And great videos. 2021 was a really great year in sfg history

[Anonymous No.15359825]

>/pol/ thread is already filled with flat-earthers who say it's all fake
pottery

[Anonymous No.15359826]

>>15359815
he's just copying the esg article kek. hook line and sinker

[Anonymous No.15359828]

Starship test flight mentioned on NBC Nightly news

ummm based, seems slanted though, "not all its test flights have gone well", yeah because move fast, break things

[Anonymous No.15359830]

>>15359825
/x/ has been a disaster to humankind

[Anonymous No.15359831]

>>15359675

[Anonymous No.15359832]

>>15359810
evolve or die

[Anonymous No.15359833]

>>15359826
Ah I see, I have embarassed myself in this public space

[Anonymous No.15359834]

>>15359815
Wind power kills fewer birds per gigawatt-hour than most other sources of power, including nuclear

[Anonymous No.15359837]

>>15359834
Lmao

[Anonymous No.15359838]

>>15359828
Good news isnt interesting to them. Everything has to be portrayed in a negative light to get air time

[Anonymous No.15359839]

>>15359832
ok
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acBKrrqTkGI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLY1EjI3wr0

[Anonymous No.15359840]

>>15359739
Does the tower catch the tower or does the tower catch the tower?

[Anonymous No.15359842]

>>15359834
>including nuclear
steamed pigeon?

[Anonymous No.15359847]

>>15359837
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1943815X.2012.746993

[Anonymous No.15359852]

>>15359837
he's right tho

[Anonymous No.15359854]

>>15359828
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Starship, is in fact, Starship-Super Heavy, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Super Heavy plus Starship. Starship is not a Mars settlement vehicle unto itself, but rather another multimillion dollar component of a fully functioning Earther destruction system made useful by the Super Heavy booster, incinerated beetles, and illegal alien welders comprising a full send as defined by Elon.

Many Mars settlers use a modified version of the Super Heavy system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Super Heavy which is widely used these synods is often called "Starship", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Super Heavy system, developed by the Super Heavy team.

There really is a Starship, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Starship is the rocket: the payload in the system that allocates the Earthers' resources towards ends that will result in their destruction. The rocket is an essential part of an Earther destruction system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of an independent Mars and total beetle extinction. Starship is normally used in combination with the Super Heavy booster: the whole system is basically Super Heavy with Starship added, or Starship-Super Heavy. All the so-called "Starship" bombardments are really bombardments from Starship-Super Heavy.

[Anonymous No.15359855]

>>15359685
>>15359687

Wow they cleared every thing out.

[Anonymous No.15359857]

>>15359834
if anyone ever mentions bird deaths as an argument for why anything is bad you can be 1000% sure they're totally full of shit
an estimated billion birds die per year from building collisions in the US alone but you don't see anybody bitching about that and it's had no noticeable population effects

[Anonymous No.15359858]

>>15359825
>bots programmed to poison the well, quickly congregate on threads they are designed to target
huh you don't say

[Anonymous No.15359866]

>>15359857
cats kill 5 billion or thereabouts. they're the biggest threat to suburban area songbird populations.

[Anonymous No.15359867]

>>15359791
RIP TOUKO
a real submartian chad

[Anonymous No.15359868]

>>15359769
Estronaut and LabPadre’s streams are going to crap out at T-10 secs—as is tradition

[Anonymous No.15359870]

yeah that's some starship right there
oh yeah that'll work

[Anonymous No.15359873]

>>15359769
yes.

[Anonymous No.15359874]

>>15359818
And it will still be fun, because another two weeks will start after.

[Anonymous No.15359875]

reminder we've had at least ONE Mexican welder post here with starbase pics

[Anonymous No.15359876]

>>15359346
>>15359354
the really funny part is that they used the smaller LUVOIR-B concept instead of the 8 meter folded diameter LUVOIR-A concept, despite it clearly fitting inside of Starship

[Anonymous No.15359877]

>launch in Starbase but land booster on Florida tower
is there any way this saves dV or is possible

[Anonymous No.15359878]

>>15359867
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDs7D9hqDLE
fuck I remember this. so damn beautiful.

[Anonymous No.15359883]

>>15359866
Wind turbines kill raptors, though. That's a much bigger problem than house sparrows flying into windows. The kind of bird that's affected should matter.

[Anonymous No.15359884]

is that elon starship twitter space going on right now?

[Anonymous No.15359885]

clearposters should be shot on sight

[Anonymous No.15359886]

>>15359407
the moons of Saturn and Jupiter from the planet itself is a pointless comparison, you need to compare the moons from the surface of the other moons

[Anonymous No.15359887]

>>15359877
With a Starship you can go anywhere you want.

[Anonymous No.15359888]

>>15359877
maybe a little? they have a lifting reentry anyways, so I think maneuvering could be accomplished with just the grid fins and rcs

[Anonymous No.15359891]

>page 6
>only 29 images left
We can't go on like this, raise it to 350

[Anonymous No.15359892]

DM-1 launch day, /sci/ had 11,000 posts. All-time record. Will that be broken tomorrow? First American crewed launch in 10 years vs Starsneed?

[Anonymous No.15359894]

>>15359891
Mods will sticky the thread surely

[Anonymous No.15359895]

>>15359877
super heavy would need to be going like 4 km/s to reach the cape from boca. if it were to boost itself forward to reach that it'd be a little less delta v than a RTLS maneuver, but it'd also mean a much hotter reentry than it was designed for.

the bigger practical issue is that you could only launch into one inclination if you were doing that.

[Anonymous No.15359897]

>>15359877
It would probably be difficult to get the latitude right and limit the orbits Starship launches into, but I think it's possible in terms of pure dv. Also worth noting that it would mean coming down directly over land, which is generally avoided for obvious reasons.

[Anonymous No.15359898]

>>15359892
* and by DM-1 I mean DM-2

[Anonymous No.15359899]

>>15359894
sfg? no, that's for the launch thread. We survived some dark times with 150 image threads, we can survive one more.

[Anonymous No.15359902]

>>15359891
real men will post vivid descriptions of their images so others can visualize them perfectly in their mind

NPC's need not apply

[Anonymous No.15359904]

>>15359892
I think DM2 will still beat Starship, but it wont beat Artemis 3. Maybe not even Artemis 2

[Anonymous No.15359905]

>>15359902
real men have hover over plugin to view image url inline

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2304/M2D9_HubbleSchmidt_985.jpg

[Anonymous No.15359906]

>>15359885
Furries should be shot on sight

[Anonymous No.15359907]

>>15359891
Everyone start bumping lower page threads

[Anonymous No.15359908]

Fuck bros it's really happening

[Anonymous No.15359909]

>>15359905
>docking porn
no thanks fag

[Anonymous No.15359911]

>>15359559
>"we're going"
niet wat hij zij
hier ik doe het nog eens voor
WE GAAN

[Anonymous No.15359913]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZSTkunGczI

>>15359907
isn't that illegal

[Anonymous No.15359912]

>>15359892
probably not just because dm-2 got shilled so hard to normies

[Anonymous No.15359916]

Any streams for the Elon twitter space, soon?

[Anonymous No.15359917]

I wonder if bobndoug ever got reprimanded for snarfing down their entire food supply by the 3rd orbit of DM-2.

[Anonymous No.15359918]

>>15359904
I take it back somewhat, I think Starship OFT has a good chance of beating DM2, because /sfg/ began as a tankwatch thread and even runup to DM2 didnt have 1000+ posts per thread

[Anonymous No.15359925]

>>15359908
starship launch orgy party when?

[Anonymous No.15359929]

>>15359916
how? I'll pay rn how do I get it to us live

[Anonymous No.15359931]

>>15359913
>isn't that illegal
What? Engaging with outer-/sci/?

[Anonymous No.15359932]

>>15359906
Furries are actually based
/vt/umors are not

[Anonymous No.15359938]

[Anonymous No.15359939]

>>15359929
yt/twitch

[Anonymous No.15359940]

>>15358782
I've been at louder concerts and they lasted way longer than the couple of minutes it'll sustain at that level.

[Anonymous No.15359941]

>>15359929
discord stream on your private discord server

[Anonymous No.15359942]

>>15359929
do a youtube stream

[Anonymous No.15359944]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647736242363068418

https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/08/how-and-why-spacex-will-colonize-mars.html

[Anonymous No.15359946]

How much dV has a fully fueled starship in orbit? do we have estimates about that shit?

[Anonymous No.15359947]

>>15359932
The mental gymnastics of bestialphiles is astounding

[Anonymous No.15359948]

>>15359689
i wish the tourists would fuck off

[Anonymous No.15359949]

>>15359946
Just do the rocket equation

[Anonymous No.15359950]

>>15359947
>he thinks furries are all about fucking animals
lmao this dumb nigger, no I just want to partially be one you dumb cretin

[Anonymous No.15359952]

>>15359938
good way to drum up interest for subs and get people talking, but kind of annoying to do it before most people can subscribe
but I guess in the end it doesn't really matter that much, its going to be somewhere anyway

[Anonymous No.15359955]

>>15358265
>Judge Dredd
Good taste.

[Anonymous No.15359956]

yt is a no

[Anonymous No.15359959]

>I just want to partially be one
KEEEEK

[Anonymous No.15359961]

>>15358415
At his side, the Adeptus Mexicanicus.

[Anonymous No.15359965]

>>15359946
6-7 km/s

[Anonymous No.15359966]

>>15359956
what the fuck?
you can't just start streaming with your jewgle account anymore?
just bake a twitch account then

[Anonymous No.15359969]

I'm in

[Anonymous No.15359970]

>>15359950
So you're a tranny? That's even worse

[Anonymous No.15359971]

Alright I'm subscribed to Elon Musk. what should I ask him?

[Anonymous No.15359973]

live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P73lXIJ5cy4

[Anonymous No.15359975]

Starship in low orbit above mars, with the planet's red glare caught in the heat shield. Beside it drifts a tiny lander encapsulated in its white aeroshell, inside which nests a bulbous rocket two meters long - the Mars Sample Return ascent vehicle.

[Anonymous No.15359976]

>>15359973
GOOD MORNING SIRS

[Anonymous No.15359977]

>>15359970
i wish for total tranny death
tranny =/= transhumanist

[Anonymous No.15359983]

>>15359969
Summary so far:
FAA will only allow mini-starship launches from Boca going forward
Dragon to be phased out in favor of Starliner 2
pause for FAA land acknowledgement

[Anonymous No.15359986]

>>15359971
ask him something really stupid that will infuriate him.
>will it have people on board?

[Anonymous No.15359988]

>>15359973
Thank you kind sir rajesh benchod

[Anonymous No.15359989]

>>15359971
>With the exciting launch of Starship today and big plans for the future, has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

[Anonymous No.15359990]

poking around the web inspector for an audio stream url but I can't find it

>Elon says Chris B can talk
oh man

[Anonymous No.15359991]

>>15359944
This blog post and the one on Elon and AI that he published around the same time is what got me into Elon, spaceflight and AI. It was really far ahead of the curve in retrospect

[Anonymous No.15359993]

>>15359971
>>15359986
"when are you going to try launching it as an ssto?"

[Anonymous No.15359995]

>>15359955
Dredd hates Musk

[Anonymous No.15359997]

>>15359973
Is this a scam channel?

>>15359971
Ask him who his waifu is

[Anonymous No.15359998]

>solving problems on Earth

[Anonymous No.15360004]

>LOW expectations
>probably delayed
>success is: don't blow up launch pad

Chris B asks about launching
>probability of triggering abort is high

[Anonymous No.15360006]

>>15359971
>>15359986
>Isn't starship technically a spaceplane?

[Anonymous No.15360007]

>An ENTIRE cubic kilometer?

[Anonymous No.15360009]

>>15359998
the earth problems are easy and already being worked on

[Anonymous No.15360011]

>"win" if they don't blow up the OLM

[Anonymous No.15360012]

>>15359983
>Dragon to be phased out in favor of Starliner 2
Is that a joke?

[Anonymous No.15360015]

>>15359995
Nobody gives a shit about new woke Dredd. 2000AD Dredd was the goods.

[Anonymous No.15360016]

>>15360006
>>15360007
>>15359997
>>15359993
>>15359989
>>15359986
These are all great ideas

[Anonymous No.15360019]

where's link?!?

[Anonymous No.15360020]

>>15360012
he's meming I'm doing the actually summary

>>15360004
>>15360011

[Anonymous No.15360022]

>>15360006
>>15360007
>>15359997
>>15359993
>>15359989
>>15359986
These are all terrible ideas

[Anonymous No.15360024]

>>15359973
is this the old stream?
the channel isn't official
this smell fake

[Anonymous No.15360025]

>>15360020
Cheers

[Anonymous No.15360026]

now he's explaining to the normies about horizontal velocity = get to space

[Anonymous No.15360028]

He's been autistically explaining the difference between space and orbit for the last 5 minutes

[Anonymous No.15360029]

My solution for not blowing up the launch pad: scrub

[Anonymous No.15360030]

>>15359840
Yes

[Anonymous No.15360031]

ahhhh someone livestream it or something pls

[Anonymous No.15360032]

>>15360024
good morning

[Anonymous No.15360033]

>>15359956
discord would be easy but extremely cringe. you must agree to delete the server afterward and lock the chats and mute everyone.

[Anonymous No.15360034]

is one of you guys actually going to stream it?

[Anonymous No.15360036]

>>15360015
It was, true

[Anonymous No.15360035]

>>15360006
>>15360007
>>15359997
>>15359993
>>15359989 (You)
>>15359986
These are all ideas

[Anonymous No.15360039]

if starship explodes on the pad, will SpaceX pay for every broken window in Brownsville?

[Anonymous No.15360040]

>>15360034
how?

[Anonymous No.15360042]

>>15359838
>>15359854
its okay, less slant than I expected, Sheetz redeemed it too

I can post the link to it when they do on YT, this is the first time they've ever covered Starship

[Anonymous No.15360043]

>>15360034
anything spicy I'll post here, it's really nothing new yet

[Anonymous No.15360044]

>>15360034
Doing so will change the Starship crash location to your house.

[Anonymous No.15360045]

>>15360039
i'm sneaking into brownsville tonight to break all the windows myself to save spacex a few bucks

[Anonymous No.15360046]

>>15360040
nigger you dumb

[Anonymous No.15360048]

He's just talking about Falcon 9 now and how great it is

[Anonymous No.15360051]

>>15360039
All windows will be secretly broken by the SpaceX ninjas tonight.

[Anonymous No.15360052]

alright call me on my cell and I'll hold my phone up to my laptop speaker
number is now pinned in the sfg discord

[Anonymous No.15360054]

>>15360048
>f9
>great
it was obsolete as of 1995

[Anonymous No.15360055]

>>15359993
superheavy with a nose cone and very small payload could unironically be an SSTO, though obviously not reusable

[Anonymous No.15360057]

this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013OrwV5hRQ

[Anonymous No.15360059]

He finally drops one new tidbit: Maezawa will select one lucky beetle for DearMoon as part of an EPA settlement

[Anonymous No.15360060]

>so many improvements.... hundreds.... between b7 and b9
>electric TVC on 9
>head shield on base on 9 is redesigned
>7 has retrofitted heatshield

[Anonymous No.15360061]

>>15360054
Why would you post this?

[Anonymous No.15360062]

HAIL MUSK

[Anonymous No.15360066]

Autisinal rocket lmao

[Anonymous No.15360067]

>b7 is an artisanal rocket

[Anonymous No.15360068]

>Autismry at scale

[Anonymous No.15360069]

>>15360057
Bless you, anon

[Anonymous No.15360070]

>>15360059
The tardigrades will tear it apart

[Anonymous No.15360074]

>>15360057
is that you? based

[Anonymous No.15360073]

>>15360052
I lost the discord invite, you got the pastebin?

[Anonymous No.15360075]

Holy shit I can't believe he mentioned 4chan

[Anonymous No.15360076]

>>15360057
this is actually real

[Anonymous No.15360078]

I feel excluded, I want to listen to Elon too :(

[Anonymous No.15360079]

"there are many improvements in the bowels"

[Anonymous No.15360082]

massive W for staging

[Anonymous No.15360085]

>>15360078
here >>15360057

[Anonymous No.15360086]

realistically when would we get a movie about SpaceX?

[Anonymous No.15360089]

>>15360073
https://pastebin.com/kEZrkDvb

[Anonymous No.15360090]

>got to make sure the ship can land accurately/through max heating before you can fly it over populated areas for a landing

[Anonymous No.15360092]

Wait, are they no longer ditching off Hawaii?

[Anonymous No.15360096]

>>15360089
I want to get a chuckle on this but it doesn't work on my machine

>>15360092
they still are for this one

[Anonymous No.15360099]

>>15360092
They're ditching it on top of the Chinese fishing boat/surveillance ship that will inevitably be in the area

[Anonymous No.15360102]

>>15360096
View it raw

[Anonymous No.15360107]

>>15360092
It's aiming for the Chinese aircraft carrier

[Anonymous No.15360110]

>cape is for operational launches, not developmental

[Anonymous No.15360112]

what major things has elon said so far about starship in the twitter space

[Anonymous No.15360117]

>>15360112
nothing new

[Anonymous No.15360118]

Cringe post inc:
It is really unbelievable that they guy who's building all the cool stuff in the world is also incredibly open about everything. Starship itself is insanely cool but the fact that we can ask him directly about it and he does it all out in the open makes it so much more special

[Anonymous No.15360119]

>>15360112
nothing noteworthy besides >>15360060
also probably expect a scrub?

[Anonymous No.15360122]

>>15360112
Not much. He said that it will be a major success if it gets past stage separation.

[Anonymous No.15360123]

>>15360112
talked about the failure modes

[Anonymous No.15360125]

>>15360112
Plans to launch a Starlink satellite constellation around Mars

[Anonymous No.15360126]

elon making comparisons to the n1 now
it's over

[Anonymous No.15360128]

>biggest concern is loss of launch pad

[Anonymous No.15360129]

>>15360112
He accidentally said "Krystal from Starfox" instead of "Methalox"

[Anonymous No.15360131]

>>15360118
Imagine bezos and blue origin was developing starship? We would hear nothing for years, then perhaps one video or something and a launch that might not even be livestreamed

[Anonymous No.15360132]

>>15360126
The n1 is iconic

[Anonymous No.15360133]

Rocket fuel melts steel beams????

[Anonymous No.15360135]

>>15360112
rocket fuel can melt steel beams

[Anonymous No.15360136]

>>15360112
Rocket fuel can melt steel beams

[Anonymous No.15360137]

>>15360110
holy copium from elon, the original idea was for boca chica to be the main site. Then the FAA came and ruined it all, why doesn't he admit that

[Anonymous No.15360138]

"may fate smile upon us and we clear the launchpad. that's all i'm asking."

[Anonymous No.15360139]

woman alert

[Anonymous No.15360142]

>>15360112
several months to rebuild the launch pad if it gets melted by starship blowing up

[Anonymous No.15360144]

>>15360125
that makes sense. he should sell nasa a constellation around the moon for artemis.

[Anonymous No.15360145]

Starship is boring, post Shuttles

[Anonymous No.15360147]

>>15360132
sure, starship nuking the launchpad would be iconic too

[Anonymous No.15360148]

>>15360144
(he didn't say that)

[Anonymous No.15360149]

>>15360145
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15360150]

>she asked a question
>he totally ignores it and goes off talking about something completely different

[Anonymous No.15360151]

>>15360135
>>15360136
melting beam mind

[Anonymous No.15360154]

"PROBABLY TOMORROW WILL NOT BE SUCCESSFUL"

[Anonymous No.15360155]

"probably tomorrow will not be successful"

[Anonymous No.15360156]

>but probably tomorrow won't be successful
OVER

[Anonymous No.15360157]

Musk seems very pessimistic about Starship reaching orbital speeds

[Anonymous No.15360159]

>>15360150
"what happens if starship doesn't n1 it?"
"it's going to n1 it"
"but what if it doesn't?"
"it just will"

[Anonymous No.15360160]

Elon like
>but I did eat breakfast yesterday
woman like
>but what if you didn't, how would that make you feel?
Elon like
>but I did, it was delicious

[Anonymous No.15360162]

My god he is so fucking autistic, RUD was not the question tard

[Anonymous No.15360163]

It's over bros…we're back!

[Anonymous No.15360164]

>if engineers threatened with gulag can't do it after 4 tries why should we be able to first try
good point ngl elon

[Anonymous No.15360165]

Got an EA live video stream with Elon coming up

[Anonymous No.15360169]

Wearebackbros, it's over

[Anonymous No.15360173]

>>15360160
He is truly an african american

[Anonymous No.15360176]

Elon knows the RNGods are watching. He's doomposting to counteract but we'll see if they buy it.
No lucky dice so it's a big risk.

[Anonymous No.15360177]

>>15360160
>>15360173
KEK

[Anonymous No.15360178]

>>15360169
2 week bros, we are so back

[Anonymous No.15360179]

>>15360165
Estronaut is there and it's live:
https://streamable.com/5t353u

[Anonymous No.15360180]

>>15360160
>How would you feel if you got stabbed?
But I didnt, I stabbed HIM
>But How would you feel if you were the guy that got stabbed
BUT I DIDNT STAB HIM?!?

[Anonymous No.15360181]

reminder: EM said that FH flight 1 would fail 50% likely. It worked mostly perfectly.
I think it'll be fine tomorrow

[Anonymous No.15360184]

>>15360160

[Anonymous No.15360185]

it's not going to blow up
it's going to do so well they say fuck it and land it softly in the water

[Anonymous No.15360186]

>>15360173
LMAO

[Anonymous No.15360187]

>>15360149
no

[Anonymous No.15360188]

i know elon always tries tempering expectations before test flights but this almost feels like he's scared of negative media coverage in the event of a failure

[Anonymous No.15360191]

>1000+ posts 2 threads in a row
based

[Anonymous No.15360193]

>mass flux
wow... a newtons per coulomb times meters squared cubic kilogram

[Anonymous No.15360194]

Elon is not a very good impromptu public speaker

[Anonymous No.15360196]

>>15360191
4 in a row, and the fifth was close

[Anonymous No.15360197]

>>15360188
any coping won't help lol
he should have said this like weeks before
too late now, but it almost seems like he heard something new recently that got him this pessimistic

[Anonymous No.15360198]

>>15360149
Anon, please. Just tell him to go fly in a Shuttle.

[Anonymous No.15360199]

>>15360194
yes, autism

[Anonymous No.15360200]

elon just really has an aversion to thinking about things that are not immediately important. he would refuse to talk about the oil rigs to tim dodd because it's too far off

[Anonymous No.15360201]

>>15360196
just like the N1

[Anonymous No.15360202]

where the fuck is the pirated real stream?

[Anonymous No.15360204]

TOTAL CIVILIZATION DIAPER DEATH

[Anonymous No.15360208]

HOLY SHIT ITS LIKE HE'S READING FROM A SCRIPT

Everytime its the same few talking points, over and over and over, every interview, every Q&A

[Anonymous No.15360209]

>>15360188
Maybe hes so embarrassed from the term Elon Time hes finally decided to temper himself and his promises a lil

[Anonymous No.15360210]

>>15360194
He is fucking terrible speaker in general, spergs are like this

[Anonymous No.15360211]

>>15360202
here
>>15360179

[Anonymous No.15360212]

>>15360208
wouldn't you do the same if you were asked the same sorts of questions every time

[Anonymous No.15360213]

>>15360202
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=013OrwV5hRQ

here is a re-sstream

[Anonymous No.15360214]

>>15360179
im not a furfag but krystal is kinda cute

[Anonymous No.15360215]

>>15360212
Thing is he's not responding to the questions he's just immediately guiding them towards these narrow talking points lol

[Anonymous No.15360216]

>N1 mentioned once again
It's over.

[Anonymous No.15360219]

reaching image limit with the most based image in recent time

[Anonymous No.15360218]

>>15358636
What's that

[Anonymous No.15360220]

>>15360208
it's just autism
>holy grail of rocketry, order of magnitude, what if planes were expendable, wake up in the morning and think the future is gonna be great

[Anonymous No.15360223]

>>15360216
>I encourage you to review the history of the soviet N1
lel

[Anonymous No.15360222]

>>15360198
It was a perfectly safe vehicle while in orbit, just needed to improve on the getting up and getting back portion of the trip

[Anonymous No.15360224]

>still no 4k re-scan of N1 footage
we're still stuck with the same awful 360p videos after 60 years. Fuck.

[Anonymous No.15360226]

>>15360220
>self sustaining on Mars, cost per ton to orbit, etc

[Anonymous No.15360227]

>>15360220
same old stuff mostly

[Anonymous No.15360229]

>>15360226
>production is hard
>population collapse

[Anonymous No.15360230]

>>15360219
Okay this is based

[Anonymous No.15360234]

> 'over' 100 tons
>reiterates 'over' 100 tons

I T S O V E R
T
S
O
V
E
R

[Anonymous No.15360235]

>>15360222
>while in orbit
Oh wow just like an airplane in the air, man imagine if planes were expendable - prices would be orders of magnitude higher!

[Anonymous No.15360236]

> I am literally the reincarnated Korolev, come back to finish his work
Elon wtf!

[Anonymous No.15360238]

TIM??

[Anonymous No.15360240]

>>15360220
>>15360226
>>15360229
you just don't have the right stuff.
this focus on what is important is why he succeeds

[Anonymous No.15360243]

>>15360240
Yes, it's also why he sucks at public speaking

[Anonymous No.15360244]

the solution is clear
gulag for spacex engineer if no orbit today

[Anonymous No.15360245]

>>15360220
>>15360226
To be fair, Blue Origins entire -
>We are just at the beginning
- video, was just a repeat of the phrase: reuse is the future of space travel - over and over and over and over

[Anonymous No.15360250]

>>15360245
>asks about why they aren't doing fake landing on the ocean
>we can't add legs (???)
>ignores the question about the trinket completely
Elon please

[Anonymous No.15360253]

zack asking a question now
>what was the largest hurdle to get the launch away?

[Anonymous No.15360254]

>>15360250
He mentioned something about needing to shift ballast around to reorient the ship. I guess they just didn't bother with it since they don't expect to get that far anyway.

[Anonymous No.15360255]

>>15360250
didnt mean to quote

[Anonymous No.15360256]

>>15360244
Da. Not a cushy one like Kolyma but
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazino_tragedy

[Anonymous No.15360257]

>>15360253
engines, we had to do a complete re-designe of the engines because Raptor 1 was simply not reliable and impossible to mass produce
it caused a delay of 6-9 months
lots of problems with the ground systems, the ground system is very difficult

[Anonymous No.15360259]

>only 3.8k twitter spaces listeners

Premium twitter is a dud. Elon's star has set. He's lost the golden touch he once had.

[Anonymous No.15360261]

god shutup you dumb nigger

[Anonymous No.15360263]

hot dog

[Anonymous No.15360266]

>>15360259
a lot of people just can't subscribe

[Anonymous No.15360267]

>>15359448
The eclipse is an instruction to build a Dysonsphere.
When we build it the Ayys will finally come down and greet us and saying, “Wait a minute, you aren’t Cambrian era fish?”

[Anonymous No.15360269]

elon says he regrets building their own prop tanks instead of getting off-the-shelf stuff

[Anonymous No.15360271]

>>15360259
Starship pad explosion confirmed.

[Anonymous No.15360272]

>>15360259
goes to show, space is exclusively for us classy folks - its the theater of old

[Anonymous No.15360273]

More likely to scrub than not

[Anonymous No.15360274]

SCRUB CONFIRMED

[Anonymous No.15360275]

>>15360259
It's been open for like a day

[Anonymous No.15360277]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiEaNluqMlw
Corridor Crew made a kino video on Pluto today, great VFX and points. You all gotta watch

[Anonymous No.15360278]

>it's more likely to scrub than not
it's over

[Anonymous No.15360279]

>>15360273
Cool, I won't bother to wake up early then.

[Anonymous No.15360281]

>>15360269
That whole incident was a mess, it seemed good at first - as they were able to use some scrap material they had laying around. But then it turned out there was quite a few regulations around How a propane farm is supposed to be built, insulated, needs a brick shell etc etc etc...

[Anonymous No.15360282]

I will never have hope again. my soul is forever tarnished. truly, it is over.

[Anonymous No.15360283]

>>15360279
the power of elon saying it will scrub is overpowered by the power of an anon possibly missing a launch because the thinks it will scrub

[Anonymous No.15360284]

Abrupt ending

[Anonymous No.15360285]

>>15360277
insufferable

[Anonymous No.15360288]

>>15360277
We dont classify Pluto as a planet because if we did we would have so many planets on our hands wed have trouble keeping track of them in those nifty astro models you see at the physics class room

[Anonymous No.15360290]

alright off to the store for scrub day snacks.

[Anonymous No.15360291]

>>15360283
this is my fear, so I have to wake up tomorrow only to be blueballed again.

[Anonymous No.15360292]

Post a picture of how excited you are for tomorrow, /sfg/! Here's mine.

[Anonymous No.15360295]

>>15360292
pic related

[Anonymous No.15360297]

>>15360292
mine:

[Anonymous No.15360299]

https://twitter.com/waynehale/status/1647730058201579521

Best wishes to SpaceX for a successful flight tomorrow. The nation needs that big rocket.

But having experienced first time rocket launches before, I’m keeping expectations in check.

[Anonymous No.15360300]

>>15360292
>:).apng

[Anonymous No.15360301]

>>15360277
Good video for anyone under the age of 14

[Anonymous No.15360303]

>>15360292
(｡◕‿‿◕｡)

[Anonymous No.15360304]

>>15360291
>>15360295
>>15360297

[Anonymous No.15360305]

https://twitter.com/Astrolab_Space/status/1647752052938887170

Our CEO, Jaret Matthews, is on-site to view @SpaceX
’s Starship launch tomorrow morning.

We’re all very excited and wish our launch & landing provider good luck on this exciting test flight!

[Anonymous No.15360306]

>>15360292
ok anonymous, here's mine
...............…………………………._¸„„„„_
…………………….…………...„--~*'¯…….'\
………….…………………… („-~~--„¸_….,/ì'Ì
…….…………………….¸„-^"¯ : : : : :¸-¯"¯/'
……………………¸„„-^"¯ : : : : : : : '\¸„„,-"
**¯¯¯'^^~-„„„----~^*'"¯ : : : : : : : : : :¸-"
.:.:.:.:.„-^" : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :„-"
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : : : : : : : : : ¸„-^¯
.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : : : : : : : ¸„„-^¯
:.' : : '\ : : : : : : : ;¸„„-~"
:.:.:: :"-„""***/*'ì¸'¯
:.': : : : :"-„ : : :"\
.:.:.: : : : :" : : : : \,
:.: : : : : : : : : : : : 'Ì
: : : : : : :, : : : : : :/
"-„_::::_„-*__„„~"

[Anonymous No.15360308]

"Hey Elon, just one last quick question before you go. If Starship makes it to sub-orbit tomorrow, will it be a planet?"

[Anonymous No.15360309]

>>15360292
8==============D

[Anonymous No.15360310]

>>15360285
>>15360301
faggot pluto lover i posted this video so you niggers would fuck off with trying to get it named a planet

[Anonymous No.15360311]

>>15360292
:=|

[Anonymous No.15360314]

>>15360306
wtf is that real?

[Anonymous No.15360315]

>>15360277
pop_sci_mind_mush.gif

[Anonymous No.15360317]

>>15360292
:DD :D

[Anonymous No.15360318]

>>15360306
Cute, is that Twotoes from the zone beyond time

[Anonymous No.15360320]

Sooo the black guy was just trying to validate his own GSE coverage? fag

[Anonymous No.15360321]

>>15360310
the corridor crew should be executed for being faggots

[Anonymous No.15360325]

12 fucking horus man

[Anonymous No.15360327]

>>15358043
I have a PhD in mathematics, and my thesis mostly involved a lot of linear algebra so I'm used to looking at matrices with a particular regular structure. When I did an IQ test the score came out as 153, and I know for a fact that I'm average at best. I found all of the pattern finding questions very easy, because they reminded me of the stuff I was doing all day at work.

[Anonymous No.15360328]

>>15360325
Don't worry, it will probably scrub

[Anonymous No.15360330]

https://twitter.com/TrevorMahlmann/status/1647751340397830144

Elon similarly set expectations before the inaugural Falcon Heavy, and then it aced the flight near the end of the window. I’m pumped for a 9:25am launch and hoping for a great learning experience for SpaceX tomorrow

[Anonymous No.15360331]

Raptor 1 600hz doomers validated completely

[Anonymous No.15360336]

12 HOURS
smug-starship-chan.png

[Anonymous No.15360339]

>>15358596
told you it would scrub tomorrow. you retards just don't want to listen

[Anonymous No.15360340]

>>15360330
Elon is far FAR more of a Starship OFT doomer than at any point for FH Demo

[Anonymous No.15360341]

https://twitter.com/TMFAssociates/status/1647752735817867268

> NPR’s piece on the upcoming Starship launch, including my comments on the business implications

https://www.npr.org/2023/04/16/1169734535/spacex-prepares-to-launch-its-mammoth-rocket-starship

> SpaceX prepares to launch its mammoth rocket 'Starship'

[Anonymous No.15360342]

>>15360292

[Anonymous No.15360343]

>>15360327
>I know for a fact that I'm average at best
>I have a PhD in mathematics
?????

[Anonymous No.15360344]

>>15360340
yeah he sounded really pessimistic, perhaps more pessimistic I've ever heard him other than when talking about AI doom

[Anonymous No.15360345]

Well, at least if it RUDs and it carpet-bombs the launchpad I'm going to laugh a little bit with the comments here and the hundreds of "it's over" replies, before I get depressed and close the tab.

[Anonymous No.15360348]

>>15360343
So afraid of being a dunning pseuder he HAS to downplay himself

[Anonymous No.15360350]

>>15360345
They'll just setup a launch tower production line alongside the boosters and ships.

[Anonymous No.15360351]

>>15360345
Imagine if Estronaut gets crushed by a falling Raptor

[Anonymous No.15360353]

>>15360325
>horus
elon was once his half-brother, anubis

[Anonymous No.15360355]

Staging:
>>15360354

[Anonymous No.15360360]

>>15360355
dummy

>page 7

[Anonymous No.15360362]

>page 7

[Anonymous No.15360364]

https://twitter.com/wapodavenport/status/1647732244209868800

> It’s a very big rocket.

[Anonymous No.15360366]

>>15360355
>page 7

[Anonymous No.15360369]

>>15360355
too early

[Anonymous No.15360370]

>página siete

[Anonymous No.15360372]

>>15360355
i got chewed out last time for posting your image in an op.

[Anonymous No.15360375]

>>15360343
Most of the people I know have PhDs. A few have real genius but most are kind of retarded like I am. I discovered years ago that getting down and just working, especially if you enjoy the work, is more useful than inate genius.

[Anonymous No.15360376]

Musk liked this tweet

https://twitter.com/wapodavenport/status/1647740749742571520

> Elon Musk on Twitter says success of Starship's first launch is: "Just don't blow up the launchpad." Says there is a high probability of postponement given the complexity of the rocket and the stakes.

> "It might launch tomorrow. But if we're going to be very careful, and if we see any thing that gives us concern we will postpone the launch. ... This is not like, you know, some sort of train leaving the station at precisely like 9:03a.m. or something like that."

>On possibility of a RUD: It's got "33 engines, and if any one of them goes wrong, it's like it's like having a box of grenades. You know, really big grenades."

> "Probably tomorrow will not be successful. If by successful one means reaching orbit."

[Anonymous No.15360377]

>>15360342
wtf, I think this my post but the reply is missing. Does 4chan strip out some characters? Testing with my reply after the colon:

[Anonymous No.15360378]

>>15360364
>>15360364
>>15360364
>>15360364

[Anonymous No.15360388]

>>15360342
how did you reply without posting anything?

[Anonymous No.15360389]

>>15360364
>Scott Manley
>It looks shorter than your head
GIGAKEK

[Anonymous No.15360392]

>>15360388

[Anonymous No.15360394]

>>15360355
Fuck OFF

[Anonymous No.15360396]

>>15359476
based self annihilating space eunuch

[Anonymous No.15360398]

t-minus: TWO! MORE! WEEKS!!!

[Anonymous No.15360399]

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1647714873701269511

> Even in person, the scale of Starship is astonishing

[Anonymous No.15360402]

>>15360399
>even in person
what
That's where it would be most astonishing

[Anonymous No.15360407]

>>15360378
kek

[Anonymous No.15360409]

>>15360392
teach me

[Anonymous No.15360410]

>>15360378
nice

[Anonymous No.15360413]

>>15360355
#rekt

[Anonymous No.15360414]

>I have to get back to work

The work: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647757075869466627

[Anonymous No.15360415]

>>15360399
>>15360364
Are they doing a pre launch press conference tonight or something? seems like all the journos are down there early

[Anonymous No.15360418]

Thank you for protecting the integrity of /sci/ (for free), jannies.

[Anonymous No.15360419]

>>15360413
Our Icarus flew too close to the sun ;_;

[Anonymous No.15360421]

5,328 waiting Scheduled for Apr 17, 2023

[Anonymous No.15360422]

>>15360414
Again, learning from the Soviets. Their space program fell apart because their country fell apart.

[Anonymous No.15360424]

>>15360414
How come elon is tweeting right now if I'm watching him live talking about crypto?

[Anonymous No.15360427]

>>15360422
It was a shadow of itself long before then.

[Anonymous No.15360428]

>>15360424
His PR handles twitter. you dont actually think it's him tweeting did you? LOL

[Anonymous No.15360429]

>>15360427
I believe in Energia, and you should too.

[Anonymous No.15360430]

>>15360424
He is tweeting via neuralink

[Anonymous No.15360431]

>>15359776

[Anonymous No.15360436]

https://www.youtube.com/live/vT3B4WYAntI?feature=share holy shit everyday todd is streaming now

[Anonymous No.15360438]

>>15359407
The gas giant moons are surprisingly big in the skies of their worlds.
Also I'm surprised at how visible Phobos is.

[Anonymous No.15360439]

Elon setting low expectations is good. I can finally go to bed.

[Anonymous No.15360442]

What background music should I play during the launch?

[Anonymous No.15360444]

>>15360436
Those super charts aren't gonna donate themselves

[Anonymous No.15360445]

>>15360414
Being based and redpilled is a lot of work.

[Anonymous No.15360447]

>>15360439
GOODNIGHT ANON!

[Anonymous No.15360448]

>page 7, now page 6
>jannies abusing their image posting privileges openly

lol

lmao

[Anonymous No.15360450]

>>15360448
I think you can still do some mobile posting weirdness to get around the limit, sometimes

[Anonymous No.15360451]

>>15360431
what the fuck
>mods = gods
>verification not required

[Anonymous No.15360453]

>>15360448
This thread is never going to die

[Anonymous No.15360454]

>>15360448
>>15360450
No what you do is delete one of your previous posts

[Anonymous No.15360459]

>>15360429
It doesn't really compare to the amount of progress they made in the '60s and early '70s. They never really set their sights quite so high after then.

[Anonymous No.15360460]

[twitter screenshot]

[Anonymous No.15360463]

Can someone tell me why /sfg/ is so far back in catalog when there is 1200 replies and constantly new replies posted within ten minutes?

[Anonymous No.15360464]

>>15360460
holy shit its over, musk is finished.

[Anonymous No.15360465]

>>15360459
Late 80s soviet space program was the best it was since the 60s

[Anonymous No.15360466]

>>15360463
delightfully counterintuitive

[Anonymous No.15360468]

>/sci/ catalog
>sort by repliy count
>all the other "top" threads like 200 replies and are like a week old
>this thread: 1,2K replies in half a day.
alright.

[Anonymous No.15360469]

>>15360463
newslut

[Anonymous No.15360470]

>>15360463
bump limit reached, otherwise /sfg/ would never reach page 10 and die.

[Anonymous No.15360471]

>>15360448
archive shows that this post >>15357968 got deleted at the same time as the early stager

[Anonymous No.15360472]

>no proof viruses exist.: cell culture is retarded

>Are you prepared for the golden age of Indian Mathematics?

>I heard there is a pedophile jannie that is deleting content that talks about him and authorities were contacted. Is this true?

>How developed would science today be if the Nazis won the war?

some quality threads out there on /sci/. Now I know why I don't venture from sfg.

[Anonymous No.15360474]

premature staging right before a huge, important launch is a very bad omen

[Anonymous No.15360475]

>>15360470
Thanks, appreciate it

[Anonymous No.15360477]

let's be honest here, a KABOOOOOMMMM jusssssstt high enough in the air so that nothing is harmed on the ground is the most KINO outcome. Plus it will still get SpaceX some critical data on something to fix I'd imagine.

[Anonymous No.15360478]

>>15357884
Shameful really.

[Anonymous No.15360479]

Felon Huskkk is Finnish

[Anonymous No.15360481]

>6. Compliance Monitoring: An FAA Safety Inspector must be present at SpaceX’s Boca Chica Launch Complex for flight operations.


what safety are they exactly inspecting? can he stop the launch on his own?

[Anonymous No.15360482]

>>15360474
fucking tourists ruining the mojo

[Anonymous No.15360485]

>>15360481
He's inspecting the cookie jar for crumbles

[Anonymous No.15360486]

elevator status?

[Anonymous No.15360488]

>>15360486
out of order, same as SLS

[Anonymous No.15360490]

the krystal poster and /vt/umor should fight again

[Anonymous No.15360491]

>>15360486
We still lack the knowhow to construct a space elevator anon

[Anonymous No.15360492]

damn we're already out of images on page 6
alright who wants to go bump shit threads in the catalog with me so we reach page 10 faster?

[Anonymous No.15360493]

>>15360486
never began

[Anonymous No.15360494]

>>15360492
yes, already on it kek

[Anonymous No.15360496]

>>15360492
>>15360494
reported to /sci/ber police

[Anonymous No.15360497]

>>15360474
Getting all the scrubs out of the way early.

[Anonymous No.15360498]

>>15360496
>announcing a report

[Anonymous No.15360499]

>>15360375
>Most of the people I know have PhDs
You're living in an absurdly unusual social bubble. You have lost sight of what it means to have average intelligence.

Go hang out in a gas station shop for a few hours. It should remind you of what "average intelligence" actually looks like.

[Anonymous No.15360500]

>>15360486
The best counterweight is no counterweight.

[Anonymous No.15360502]

https://4stats.io/
you can already see today as a peak compared to the past several month.
It's been a very long two weeks since the last huge happening.

[Anonymous No.15360505]

ack the cyber-cyber police got me

>>15360500
delightfully sugarcoated

[Anonymous No.15360507]

Jannies in my /sfg/?
More likely than you think.

[Anonymous No.15360508]

>>15360481
>what safety are they exactly inspecting? can he stop the launch on his own?
He has the important job of standing directly under the stack and making sure none of the engine nozzles are blocked by stray beetles or turtle eggs

[Anonymous No.15360509]

>>15360472
/sci/ catalog is hilariously bad

[Anonymous No.15360510]

>>15360507
They must be making bank off all my superchats.

[Anonymous No.15360511]

Anons, I just want to let you know that you CAN lose the bodyfat and keep it off. For those whom it concerns, join us:

>>>/fit/70642835

[Anonymous No.15360514]

>>15360509
hey that reminds me, what's the chance of winning who wants to be a millionaire again?

[Anonymous No.15360515]

>>15360507
Everyone posts a yellow rat when talking about janitorial, but I think the truth of their appearance to be something much more terrifying...

[Anonymous No.15360516]

>>15360511
>ads
>for other gens
>on other boards

[Anonymous No.15360518]

>>15360486
What elevator? There is no elevator.
Meds now.

[Anonymous No.15360520]

>>15360343
Getting education is about how much you can endure the grind, not how much you are actually intelligent.

[Anonymous No.15360524]

>>15360509
but for real lets solve the hard problem of consciousness and qualia, here and now, in this very thread
>thread #542515

[Anonymous No.15360526]

>>15360516
I just want to help my fellow spacefag fatties
t. down 120 lbs and counting.

[Anonymous No.15360528]

>>15360511
dog all of us squat and do mega cardio to maintain consciousness when under high gs

[Anonymous No.15360530]

>>15360526
I am underweight

[Anonymous No.15360532]

what exactly will NSF ramble about for their 8 hour pre-stream?

[Anonymous No.15360535]

>>15360532
Thanks for the Superchat musical wolves

[Anonymous No.15360536]

>>15360532
We've got a 3hr "Best of NSF" compilation we'll be watching and discussing.

[Anonymous No.15360538]

How hard would it be to refit SN15 for an orbital flight?

[Anonymous No.15360541]

>>15360532
heyyy, musical wolves coming in with another $50 superchat. thank you! your support means so, so much to us.

[Anonymous No.15360543]

alert /sci/ at 132% nominal posting rate

[Anonymous No.15360545]

>>15360528
Pretty much this.

[Anonymous No.15360546]

>>15360538
impossible. why?

[Anonymous No.15360547]

>Nearly called Terran R “Hard R” in front of a space thot
You did this to me

[Anonymous No.15360550]

>>15360543
you ain't seen nothing yet

[Anonymous No.15360552]

>>15360547
I called Russians “Ziggers” in my history class lol

[Anonymous No.15360554]

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1647767704177192961

[Anonymous No.15360555]

[math]\unicode{x1F680}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15360556]

>>15360543
Nature is healing.

[Anonymous No.15360558]

>>15360552
I almost said vatnigs but I played it off as fumbling the word vatnik kek

[Anonymous No.15360559]

>>15360554
T-12 hours it’s over

[Anonymous No.15360560]

>>15360554
>T-12 hours until the first flight test of a fully integrated Starship and Super Heavy rocket; targeting ~8:00 a.m. CT for liftoff

[Anonymous No.15360561]

>>15360552
based

[Anonymous No.15360562]

>>15360547
I called a police Lieutenant a glowie by accident kek

[Anonymous No.15360564]

>>15360547
The /sfg/ NLP is taking hold.

[Anonymous No.15360565]

>>15360448
I was just watching the image limit and noticed that it was at 250 instead of 251
somebody must have deleted an image
if you check, it was this image: >>15357968

[Anonymous No.15360568]

L2 is fucking dead by the way

[Anonymous No.15360570]

if it isn't Tim "Hard R" Ellis

[Anonymous No.15360571]

>>15360554
>0.0714 more weeks

[Anonymous No.15360575]

>>15360520
A 107 IQ is not getting a mathematics PhD no matter how hard they grind you nonce

[Anonymous No.15360577]

Anyone have a guess on when the actual launch will happen? I'm working tonight and I don't want to fuck up my sleep anymore than I need to.

[Anonymous No.15360580]

>>15360577
Elon confirmed it, it's in 2 weeks

[Anonymous No.15360581]

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/16/science/starship-spacex-launch-stream.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

[Anonymous No.15360582]

>>15360580
Great, thanks.

[Anonymous No.15360583]

>>15360555
ROGGET

[Anonymous No.15360585]

>>15360575
Well not, like, a White or Asian guy, no.

[Anonymous No.15360590]

>>15360577
Thursday at 4:20 pm

[Anonymous No.15360592]

>>15360490
i dont want that ever again

[Anonymous No.15360593]

>T-4 seconds tomorrow
>HOLD HOLD HOLD boat in exclusion zone

it'll happen

[Anonymous No.15360596]

>>15360577
A nervous Elon keeps saying expect delays, just sleep on it and enjoy the vods. Have a good one

[Anonymous No.15360597]

Project Starship IS ON!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZbRf-X5XfE

[Anonymous No.15360599]

>>15360596
NTA but hoping for a delay to Friday because that's when I'm off

[Anonymous No.15360600]

>>15360593
>gunshot rings out
>false alarm folks proceed with launch

[Anonymous No.15360603]

SpaceX targeting 8:00 a.m. CT for launch.
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1647767704177192961

[Anonymous No.15360604]

What are the chances Musk is extra-overly cautious tomorrow (setting up the expectation with todays twitter spaces) just so it fucking launches on 4/20 like he's obsessed with?

[Anonymous No.15360605]

>>15360593
>T-1 second
>HOLD HOLD HOLD too much wind

[Anonymous No.15360610]

A SIGN FROM THE GODS https://twitter.com/TVickz/status/1647671088040620032

[Anonymous No.15360611]

>>15360603
>8am CT
nice. I wasn't sure I'd make it trying to get up an hour early

[Anonymous No.15360613]

> image board
> images are rationed
wtf

[Anonymous No.15360616]

>>15360613
Buy a 4chan pass

[Anonymous No.15360617]

>>15360603
how much launch window there is after this?

[Anonymous No.15360619]

What if giant spinning habitats are just physically impossible? What if beyond a certain size it just can't act as one solid structure like smaller objects do?

[Anonymous No.15360623]

>>15360613
https://files.catbox.moe/2ser5w.png

[Anonymous No.15360624]

>>15360617
hour and half

[Anonymous No.15360625]

>>15360616
> pay to post
lol
lmao even

[Anonymous No.15360626]

/sfg/ should stage after hitting the image limit

[Anonymous No.15360628]

>>15360619
if we can build skyscrapers on earth we can build spinning habs in a 0g frictionless environment

[Anonymous No.15360627]

>>15360617
90 minutes. Window is 150 minutes, launch is scheduled an hour after the window opens

[Anonymous No.15360633]

>>15360626
Just raise the image limit
Simple as

[Anonymous No.15360634]

>>15360625
where do you think elon got the idea?

[Anonymous No.15360635]

>>15360626
if you want it to be staged then start bumping posts

[Anonymous No.15360636]

>>15360633
4chan pass = no limit
wouldn't object to that as a solution. but that might end up being a slope slippery.

[Anonymous No.15360637]

>>15360626
Blow me

[Anonymous No.15360641]

>try to delete post
>it's too old
[math]\unicode{x1F923}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15360642]

>>15360619
>What if giant spinning habitats are just physically impossible?
What if they're not and qualified people said they're entirely possible and show their reasoning as to why?

[Anonymous No.15360644]

>>15360633
/sfg/ already got the /sci/ image limit raised. It isn't feasible to raise it high enough to accommodate one-off events like the Starship first launch

[Anonymous No.15360652]

ya'll niggroes ready? are you prepped and ready to fuck?

[Anonymous No.15360654]

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A federal judge in Austin issued an emergency ruling on Sunday to suspend SpaceX's highly anticipated Starship Superheavy first orbital test flight, initially scheduled to launch from Boca Chica, Texas. The decision comes after a consortium of environmental organizations filed a federal lawsuit, alleging that the pending launch poses significant environmental risks and that proper assessments have not been conducted. The court's intervention puts an abrupt halt on the high-profile test, raising questions about the future timeline of SpaceX's ambitious project.

[Anonymous No.15360657]

>>15360654
wtf is this real?

[Anonymous No.15360660]

Starship will [math]\unicode{x1F9E8}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15360661]

>>15360657
yeah
it's over

[Anonymous No.15360663]

bumpbros...
we're getting closer...

[Anonymous No.15360662]

>>15360603
You will spent all day hyped, only to watch some fueling if you are lucky.

[Anonymous No.15360665]

>>15360616
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.15360666]

>>15360657
no its not, if theres no link its not real

[Anonymous No.15360668]

>T-1 second
>Hold hold hold
>Uh looks like we have to review some engine data see you tomorrow!

[Anonymous No.15360669]

>Pass user since 2019
>disgusted pepe.webp

[Anonymous No.15360670]

Two more ninty degree rotations of the earth

[Anonymous No.15360671]

>>15360668
* 3 days minimum because puny tank farm

[Anonymous No.15360672]

>>15360665
HAHAHAHAHAHA LOOK AT THIS LITTLE PAYPIG AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAH

[Anonymous No.15360676]

>>15360672
>implying I would pay real money for it

[Anonymous No.15360679]

>normies don't care

>elon musk thinks it wont work

>common sense skeptic raising valid points, retweeted by the biden administration

>elevator system in the tower is completely destroyed

>nsf grifters live streaming constant ads for their tshirts and mugs

>thunder foot about to release another exposé

>discarded pictures of an anthropomorphic blue fox creature from that dinosaur planet game was found on site at boca chica disturbing an endangered beetles nest and a full investigation now needs to be conducted

Yup, it's officially over.

[Anonymous No.15360682]

>>15360616
> Hiroposting

[Anonymous No.15360683]

[math]\unicode{x1F340}[/math]

>>15360679
still any chance of a sugarcoating?

[Anonymous No.15360686]

>>15360679
>common sense skeptic raising valid points, retweeted by the biden administration
link

[Anonymous No.15360687]

>>15360683
All the sugar in the world cannot cost this

>>15360679
It is odd though that Elon is so depressed about it

[Anonymous No.15360689]

>>15360626
Literally used to happen but non-functional autists started demanding it goes to page 10

[Anonymous No.15360690]

>>15360679
>retweeted by the biden administration
Nigger what

[Anonymous No.15360692]

why is elon so pessimistic about it?

[Anonymous No.15360696]

>>15360679
>the biden administration
lol lmao

[Anonymous No.15360697]

>>15360692
because it's a complicated behemoth of a rocket with somewhat staging, launch release, software, yada yada. FH was different. They had already flown much of the 'stuff' just in a different configuration.
It's an engineering challenge

[Anonymous No.15360698]

>page 9
Stage?

[Anonymous No.15360699]

>>15360692
too much twitter

[Anonymous No.15360701]

>>15360698
stage 4 inoperable, mr anon
i'm sorry

[Anonymous No.15360702]

>>15360697
*somewhat untested

>>15360698
no

[Anonymous No.15360707]

>>15360701
>>15360702
you have no idea how many threads i've bumped to get us to page 9
theres barely page 10 atm anyways

[Anonymous No.15360709]

whoever bakes don't use Untitled-4.png. It's bad juju.

[Anonymous No.15360711]

>>15360707
KEK it worked

[Anonymous No.15360713]

>>15360679
Is this true?

[Anonymous No.15360714]

starship's official name is...
>plunky chunky chungus

[Anonymous No.15360715]

>>15360711
of course it does retard
it's just time consuming

[Anonymous No.15360716]

>>15360610
>under 50 views
Is this your account?

[Anonymous No.15360719]

>>15360679
kek really baiting all these tourists

[Anonymous No.15360722]

>>15360713
Sadly... yes

[Anonymous No.15360723]

we need more IPs. advertize on other boards guys

[Anonymous No.15360724]

>>15360716
nah I just decided to search twitter for stuff happening in Brownsville and sorted by date

[Anonymous No.15360727]

>>15360723
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15360729]

>>15360727
t. posts comprise 40% of the thread

[Anonymous No.15360731]

>>15360723
/sfg/ has always had about 100-150 posters ever since the hop era

[Anonymous No.15360732]

>>15360723
no then we'll hit the thread IP limit too and that would be a disaster

[Anonymous No.15360740]

>>15360729
board*
https://files.catbox.moe/z3439i.png

[Anonymous No.15360744]

:^)

[Anonymous No.15360745]

oh we hit the image limit already

[Anonymous No.15360746]

sfg is dead

[Anonymous No.15360748]

>not even 4chan passovers can post images
wats the point

[Anonymous No.15360749]

>>15360707
at that point just bake a new thread. it's way less disruptive to the board than bumping dozens of shit tiers from page 10

[Anonymous No.15360751]

>>15360749
no
rules are rules

[Anonymous No.15360752]

>>15360749
too late
>>15360740

[Anonymous No.15360754]

>>15360679
>pictures of an anthropomorphic blue fox creature
SHUT IT DOWN SHUT IT DOWN

[Anonymous No.15360755]

>>15358842
>Look at how Jurassic Park influenced biology, palaeontology, genetics, and even computer science and mathematics a bit.
So, not at all?

[Anonymous No.15360756]

>>15360731
Imagine a meetup with all those 150 people

[Anonymous No.15360757]

>last post was over 30 seconds ago
it's over

[Anonymous No.15360758]

>>15360756
Would be kind of cool

[Anonymous No.15360759]

>>15360756
here lemme start a Zoom and we can all turn on our webcams

[Anonymous No.15360760]

>>15360751
based autist

[Anonymous No.15360761]

>>15358848
The Faustian Man is repelled by luxury and comfort.

[Anonymous No.15360762]

150, teehee :>

[Anonymous No.15360764]

>>15360756
>Elon shows up

[Anonymous No.15360766]

I am literally checking my phone every 5 minutes for an update goddamn

[Anonymous No.15360767]

>>15360731
this thread made me forget how niche my autistic fixation is

[Anonymous No.15360770]

>>15360764
He already knows about spacexmasterrace, I give it a 50/50 chance he's aware this place exists too.

[Anonymous No.15360772]

ahhhhh no we hit the IP limit
no new anons allowed

[Anonymous No.15360773]

>>15360761
>>15358881

[Anonymous No.15360775]

starship fans have been edging for years

[Anonymous No.15360776]

>>15360767
Never apologize or feel bad about your passion blud

[Anonymous No.15360778]

>>15360756
imagine all the brownies shared

[Anonymous No.15360779]

I swear to G*d of Starship blows up I will fucking kill myself

[Anonymous No.15360781]

>>15360756
don't actually do this, these things never go well

[Anonymous No.15360782]

>>15360779
It's fine, it's an old model anyway. They have lots more ready to go.

[Anonymous No.15360783]

>>15360756
my only friends :,(

[Anonymous No.15360786]

They're kicking people out and restricting the launch site. It's over.

[Anonymous No.15360789]

>>15360786
the tower is collapsing.
musk will finally be arrested

[Anonymous No.15360790]

>>15360781
I've organized and been to 4 /o/ meetups. they were fine.

[Anonymous No.15360791]

>>15360786
I'm afraid it's only just begun.

[Anonymous No.15360795]

>>15360778
KEK

[Anonymous No.15360801]

>>15360779
lol, I remember wanting to kill myself but thinking that I first needed to see Starship going orbital at least. Three years later and I'm still here lol

[Anonymous No.15360804]

>>15360801
this one isnt even orbital, still cant kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15360806]

>>15360689
Don't lie, the page ten rule has been apart of /sfg/ pretty much since inception

[Anonymous No.15360810]

>>15360806
we've also survived without any trips for 3+ years too

[Anonymous No.15360811]

>>15360806
I can remember a couple of times we staged after hitting the image limit.

[Anonymous No.15360812]

you're a big thread

[Anonymous No.15360813]

>>15360804
Oh, that's right, I forgot that. Blueballed again, thanks Elon?

[Anonymous No.15360814]

Go to bed faggots, the mods are not going to make your thread be the launch thread, they'll start their own.

[Anonymous No.15360817]

whats the poster limit again? cant remember the last time we hit it

[Anonymous No.15360820]

>>15360756
>they're all normies

[Anonymous No.15360821]

>>15360817
i don't think there is one

[Anonymous No.15360822]

>>15360692
>why is elon so pessimistic about it?

This your first launch of a new SpaceX rocket?

[Anonymous No.15360823]

>>15360814
Fuck jannies also you have to go back

[Anonymous No.15360824]

>>15360814
they don't typically though. and it's being made 1200 UTC so after most burgers are awake anyways (7 CT).

[Anonymous No.15360827]

>finally page 10
bumpbros…we—i mean you—did it

[Anonymous No.15360829]

Live in 9 hours
6,331 waiting Scheduled for Apr 17, 2023

[Anonymous No.15360830]

Set my alarm for 5 AM but I bet I'll wake up at like 2 AM like every other time I went to bed early. I guess I'll have plenty of time to get set up to record every stream.

[Anonymous No.15360831]

>>15360789
>musk will finally be arrested
AI artists pls respond

[Anonymous No.15360833]

>PAGE 10

[Anonymous No.15360835]

[math]\unicode{x1F51F}[/math]

[Anonymous No.15360836]

Now for duplicate threads

[Anonymous No.15360837]

>page 10
STAGE STAGE STAGE

[Anonymous No.15360838]

>>15360830
>record every stream
VOD's exist...

[Anonymous No.15360839]

>>15360822
Yes
I regret not following them during the last decade

[Anonymous No.15360840]

I'm hitting the space bar but the thread isn't staging, how do I fix it? Go back to the VAB?

[Anonymous No.15360841]

PAJE TIN LADZ

[Anonymous No.15360842]

>>15360779
nike.jpg

[Anonymous No.15360844]

autistbots roll out

[Anonymous No.15360845]

>>15360840
we still are at the *top* of page 10. no need to rush.

[Anonymous No.15360846]

>>15360838
Webms only take a minute or two to render, anon. Also, no vods on the perpetual streams after 12 hours.

[Anonymous No.15360848]

STAGING

>>15357868
>>15357868
>>15357868
>>15357868
>>15357868

[Anonymous No.15360850]

>>15360840
You probably have the staging set-up wrong. Sometimes engines from later stages can get mistakenly moved lower and then the game doesn't really know how to handle it.

[Anonymous No.15360851]

>>15360848
dirty

[Anonymous No.15360852]

msm videos starting to drop https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewm5xkPv57U

[Anonymous No.15360855]

>>15360848
well done

[Anonymous No.15360856]

>>15360848
LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.15360857]

> retards bump schizo /sci/ threads that deserve to die instead of breaking convention
dedication to the 'tism

[Anonymous No.15360858]

>>15360848
REUSABLE THREADS

[Anonymous No.15360860]

>>15360756
That would be so fun. I'll bring goldfish crackers

[Anonymous No.15360861]

>>15360848
alright this is the new thread, no one else stage

[Anonymous No.15360862]

>>15360857
fuck /sci/, garbage board
long live /sfg/

[Anonymous No.15360863]

>>15360857
hey man i'm just here to shitpost while i listen to the new lana del rey album

[Anonymous No.15360865]

>1500 posts within sight

[Anonymous No.15360866]

Next thread is scrubbed, just like tomorrow's launch.

[Anonymous No.15360867]

>>15360860
I'm impressed you managed to get your cum into the last batch

[Anonymous No.15360868]

>>15360756
Given the amount of people who seem to be in the industry, a meetup at scitech or a similar event might actually work

[Anonymous No.15360869]

Thread did not stage, obviously a major malfunction

[Anonymous No.15360870]

I would make a new one but I don't want to get bullied again

[Anonymous No.15360871]

>>15360868
Any anons going to Space Symposium?

[Anonymous No.15360873]

big thread, big socks

[Anonymous No.15360874]

>>15360870
imagine giving a damn
just imagine

[Anonymous No.15360876]

I was the OP of the rocket equation thread, AMA

[Anonymous No.15360877]

>>15360756
I live million of kilometers away from all of you. Good luck :(

[Anonymous No.15360880]

>>15360867
I'm impressed with myself even

[Anonymous No.15360881]

i hope bud light asks to put their logo on starship when it gets sent to mars
would be fun

[Anonymous No.15360883]

>>15360756
I'll bake some brownies for the frens :)

[Anonymous No.15360886]

Posting in a based thread

[Anonymous No.15360889]

staged
>>15360884
please ration images this time kids

[Anonymous No.15360891]

>>15360823
>>15360824
NO! NO! IT'S MY RIGHT TO SPAM EVERY IMAGE I HAVE BECAUSE IT'S HAPPENING!
fucking zoomers

[Anonymous No.15360893]

>>15360885
I was earlier I think, we'll see what the jannies do

[Anonymous No.15360898]

>>15360889
tragedy of the commons
I'm going to post as many images as possible so i can delete them later and keep posting once it hits limit
also I'm going to drink all the milk in the communal /sfg/ kitchen

[Anonymous No.15360900]

>>15360876
Do you think that schizo is still here?
The collagefag

[Anonymous No.15360904]

I called it
>>15360836

[Anonymous No.15360905]

>>15360891
this but without the sarcasm

[Anonymous No.15360906]

>>15360898
>so i can delete them later
You can't delete after about 30 minutes, newfag.

[Anonymous No.15360908]

>>15360891
Seething boomoid

[Anonymous No.15360911]

>>15360893
I win by 10 seconds sorry anon :(

[Anonymous No.15360917]

>>15360900
No I think he got bored and went elsewhere after he failed to start a dedicated spaceflight board.

[Anonymous No.15360923]

cummon 1500

[Anonymous No.15360928]

>>15360906
> thread lasts only a few hours
> bump limit comes late
with repetition and good timing it means I'll have a fairly good chance of a buffer while imagelets are posting moe links that no one clicks on

[Anonymous No.15360930]

>>15360917
We can only hope
He was incredibly deranged

[Anonymous No.15360933]

>>15360930
I replied to him every single post
I feel responsible for him being bullied to /qa/

[Anonymous No.15360956]

>>15360933
>to /qa/
what? do you mean
/n/

[Anonymous No.15360960]

>>15360811
>>15360806
Page 10 rule is imposed by jannies, sometimes they allow early staging for habbenings due to image limit. Lord knows we’re saints compared to /sci/ proper

[Anonymous No.15360964]

>>15360956
a mod stepped in at one point and said requests for new boards should be relegated to /qa/

>>15360960
page 9.99999999....

[Anonymous No.15360965]

can we actually stage this holy shit

[Anonymous No.15360969]

>>15360965
it is staged nigger

[Anonymous No.15360977]

1488 oops

[Anonymous No.15360981]

>>15360960
It's the inverse, early threads get mass reported and then the jannies delete them for us.

[Anonymous No.15360982]

>>15360375
>>15360499
>absurdly unusual
that anon is not alone, I used to work in a an office whose corridor had near everyone but me with a PHD, some had double doctorates, I socialised with one who made his own rocket engine as part of a PHD, and he was an Ok guy.

[Anonymous No.15360996]

IN 1492
COLUMBUS SAILED
THE OCEAN BLUE

[Anonymous No.15361002]

>>15360996
FAGGOT MISSED IT HAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.15361004]

lets get this old girl over the line

[Anonymous No.15361010]

theres nothing to talk about other than wait for launch.

[Anonymous No.15361014]

I will be all the last 7 posts by myself if needs be

[Anonymous No.15361017]

>>15361010
what is your favorite space movie

[Anonymous No.15361019]

excuse me bakers pls make this the image for the next op
https://twitter.com/RoughRidersShow/status/1647777617745985540

[Anonymous No.15361027]

>>15361017
The Martian, I love Interstellar, but The Martian is just better for me

[Anonymous No.15361035]

summary of the twitter spaces by elon
https://twitter.com/GailAlfarATX/status/1647764808001900544

[Anonymous No.15361036]

>>15361027
I like Outland

[Anonymous No.15361040]

hey, 1500. BAKE THAT FUCKING THREAD ALREADY

[Anonymous No.15361043]

>>15361040
See:
>>15360848

[Anonymous No.15361048]

Thread already got made, 72 posts in but nobody announced the fucking stage so here I am.

>>15360884
>>15360884
>>15360884
>>15360884
>>15360884

[Anonymous No.15361076]

>>15361048
I did lol >>15360889

[Anonymous No.15361108]

>>15361017
strictly astronaut movies or movies in space in general? (including fantasy)