/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12386082]

Scientifically speaking, how much closer are we to having sex robot girlfriends that can simulate genuine companionship?
I'm sick of real women.

[Anonymous No.12386112]

Real women are necessary. Look at yourself in mirror and tell me you would fuck yourself.

[Anonymous No.12386127]

>>12386112
I do just that every night with my palm.

[Anonymous No.12386145]

>>12386112
>Real women are necessary.
Cucked, unbased and cringe

[Anonymous No.12386146]

>>12386127
you have not answered my question. Purpose of women is to keep males in good health. They choose healthy males to procreate with. This is how they also keep genetics in check. Imagine your fat ass cumming into robot waifu with artificial womb. Your children would be same as you. Fat retarded slobs with no motivation and then they would simply choke themselves with spit thus ending whole genetical lineage and perhaps even humanity.

You know im right.

[Anonymous No.12386151]

>>12386146
I just did.
Women are bane to men's existence and are better off being replaced by artificial ones.

You have no other argument aside from the reptilian juices in your brain telling you otherwise.

[Anonymous No.12386157]

>>12386146
The only thing necessary about women is their eventual obsolescence.

[Anonymous No.12386856]

>>12386146
cumbrain

[Anonymous No.12387008]

>>12386146
Why is that emo thot fit to judge the future of society?

[El Arcón No.12388255]

>>12386146
Women's fascination with the slave collar is really disgusting.

[Anonymous No.12388309]

filled to the brim with bullshit as always.

We have robots that walk around like people, still way to big and bulky and expensive. Slimmed down to healthy female proportions, maybe end of decade, sticking them in sex doll realistic coverings maybe end of decade, human level Ai end of decade. Will anyone build that? i doubt it, it would be a lightning rod for dumb people to aim all their anger at

[Anonymous No.12388323]

>>12386082
It's probably at least 20 years away, depending a bit on what the expectations are. Robotics just aren't there yet and while something like a complex personality simulation could be implemented on somewhat static sex doll human fooling emotion is lot harder. Simply put it's hard to fool yourself that you are interacting with a thing that has feelings when it's living and moving in real world. On the robot side there's still lot to be done to create even over sized "humanform" robot that is on par with humans regarding mobility and abilities with it's hands. A pure sex bot wouldn't be too difficult but if you want it to be a robot wife then there's lot of stuff that just doesn't work yet especially when miniaturized to a qt female size.

That being said positive news is that the demand is absolutely massive on both the AI and the robotics fronts so they are basically inevitable unless society collapses before they arrive. Humanform robots will be incredibly useful on many applications (including stuff like a maidbot) while complex AI is also just money printing machine and as such they are being worked on relentlessly. There are technical challenges ahead but they will inevitably get solved, it's just hard to say when that happens.

[Anonymous No.12388420]

>>12388323
>blah blah blah blah I will spout my stupid idiotic opinion here that has no basis in either technological knowledge or fact.

[Anonymous No.12388866]

>>12388420
What did he say wrong?

[Anonymous No.12388871]

>>12388420
enraged, irrational roastie detected.

[Anonymous No.12388920]

>>12388420
are you fucking retarded? genuine question.
which of his points do you find to be nonfactual and misleading, specifically?

[Anonymous No.12389479]

>>12386082
Lets break it down:

>Question: how much closer are we to having sex robot girlfriends that can simulate genuine companionship?
Question is the beginning of the scientific method.
>Research
Research is the next formulation of the method. We can look at a few domains needed to fulfill the question. Those domains are:
* Mechanical, Material, and electronic engineer
* Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Of the first domain, we can be assured that all of the needed physical properties of a robot are in place with todays technology and industry. You can buy a robotic sex doll now. The mechanical limitation in current products would be proper placement of servos, joints, and sensor feedback loops to allow for bipedal movement driven by proper software.
The software limitation of proper bipedal movement and artificial intelligence is the current bottleneck for commercial sex bots fulfilling the question.
>Hypothesis
Current commercial and prototype sex robots cannot become a suitable companion until commercial advances in Bi Pedal movement and artificial intelligence allows for viability.
>Additional Research and Testing
This would require additional research to see where companies currently are in tackling commercial viability of bi pedal processes and artificial intelligence and then attempting to find a pattern between availability of the technology and the time of adoption by the sex robot industry. These sub questions allow for a fuller response.
>Conclusion
Here we would summarize that sex robots currently not viable as companions due to limitation of realistic locomotion and artificial intelligence. The time aspect would be based on projections of current research in those fields independent of the sex industry and the time it takes for sex robot manufactures to adopt new technology. The time is based on commercial viability and technological advancement.

[Anonymous No.12389505]

>>12386082
real women are the ultimate sex robot girlfriends

[Anonymous No.12389512]

>>12389505
the only thing real women are ultimates are, is ruining the lives of men.

[Anonymous No.12389517]

>>12389479
Best post I've seen on /sci/ in a long time.

[Anonymous No.12389787]

>>12389479
thank you for this high quality post anon, take a you.

[Anonymous No.12389825]

>>12386082
>Scientifically speaking, how much closer are we to having sex robot girlfriends that can simulate genuine companionship?
Much closer.

[Anonymous No.12389846]

>>12389479
> software limitation of proper ... artificial intelligence is the current bottleneck for commercial sex bots fulfilling the question.
Well there's always progress there. The current winner of the Turing Test can fool most people into thinking it's a 13 year old foreigner. That is, shoddy language skill and little world experience. And "most" is just >50%. Of the general public, not people with a clue.

But I've been with plenty of fleshy meat-bags with tits that simply fail to fulfill that "genuine companionship" requirement. Get a dog.

If you want to chat with your cocksleeve after it rides you ragged, set up ELIZA with some pillow-talk learning sets and a quiet sleepy french text-to-speech engine.

[Anonymous No.12391355]

Atlas walks around like a person right now, getting Atlas down to the dimensions of a 'sexy' woman, 2029/2030

Human Level Ai 2029

Rigging Up a sex Bot (sexy robot frame with human level AI) that looks like a sexy woman, no one wants to take the heat. Maybe things in 2030 will be different, now, no way. People would go ape shit and say its the end of the world

[Anonymous No.12391674]

>>12386146
o fugg 8-DDDD

[Anonymous No.12391847]

>>12386082
You're asking the right question, but in the wrong website. We don't do that here. There's a much better place for this
>>12386146
>Purpose of women is to keep males in good health
No, it's to keep the species not extinct, just like with men. The fact that they're the reproductive bottleneck of our species is a failure, not an accomplishment, because it limits us. We developed an advanced social order to counteract this. The result into our species' supremacy in our own planet is a side effect women didn't really select for.
If you faggots can't see that men advanced humanity too fast for women's desires and tendencies to keep up then the ones that should go extinct are you.
>>12386112
>real women are necessary
ofc they are, we still need human experimentation for ectogenesis and egg cell creation from the skin

[Anonymous No.12393572]

>>12386082
It will happen 1 day before they are banned.

[Anonymous No.12393729]

>>12386112
>Real women are necessary.
Many of us cannot afford one.

[Anonymous No.12393743]

Why are you trying to create a dystopian future even worse than the one we are living in now? We need less technology, not more.

[Anonymous No.12394186]

>>12393743
>has never read any of his work but posts pictures of him with vague anti-tech sentiments anyway

Good job

[Anonymous No.12394257]

>>12391355
I'd be more worried about deep fakes and ai mass surveillance than robo-waifus.

[Anonymous No.12394261]

>>12391847
Which website would that be?

[Anonymous No.12394610]

>>12394186
do you think he may have approved of sex robots? if so, why?

[Anonymous No.12394771]

>>12394610
no, nor do i think he would approve of 4chan in general, much less sci. However, he shouldn't be taken as any kind of authority and i personally don't give a fuck what he thinks. I just get annoyed that people go right to him whenever the conversations turns to anti tech stuff.

[Anonymous No.12394777]

Wouldn't it be easier to just become gay?

[Anonymous No.12395035]

>>12394257

oh, believe me, the day people see a attractive robot (male or female) strut down a street, all hell will break loose. endless ranting that no one will have babies anymore. They will dust off the religious leaders no one takes seriously right now to get on a high horse, people who have sex with robots will be called some derogatory name, calls to liberate the bots from the perverts.

this will be the 'activism' of the mid 2030s

[Anonymous No.12395414]

>>12394777
gays are even sluttier, and more unfaithful than women are.

[Anonymous No.12395427]

>>12386082
We're closer to having sex with robots then the life of Cleopatra was to when the pyramids were built.

[Anonymous No.12395445]

Would it be easier to just make an A.I like JOI from Blade Runner or SARA from Toonami that just projected an avatar of some kind

[Anonymous No.12395607]

i dont want a robot i want a real person

[Anonymous No.12395610]

>>12395607
You have my pity

[Anonymous No.12396318]

>>12386112
>hey guys look sex is for pleasure and we can all fuck no consequences!!!!
>wait no don't just replace every single sexual partner with a robot :(

[Anonymous No.12396887]

>>12386146
lol faggot, with artificial womb and crispr tech you can have genetics however you like.

[Anonymous No.12396892]

>>12389505
lol this guy has never lived with a fefail.

[Anonymous No.12396948]

>>12386146
>Purpose of women is
to generate new humans
>They choose healthy males to procreate with
They choose morally bankrupt males to procreate with*
>Fat retarded slobs with no motivation
All sorts of types like that with women and having sex
>thus ending whole genetical lineage
Women dont give a shit if the guy they are fucking murders them before she can give birth to their child so take this muh ending lineage stuff somewhere else.

[Anonymous No.12397164]

>>12386082
Based robo-GF lover

Ever since seeing sex dolls and more recently Emmy the robot I've been toying with the idea. Specifically looking at this I've decided a few design choices which may make the process simpler.

1.the use of artificial muscles based on surgical tubing filled with a liquid (propylene glycol-water) driven by a central diaphragm pump and a solenoid valve cluster.
2. Bend sensors, temperature sensors, and compression sensors for touch and noocioception
3. A thermoregulation system that circulates the working fluid through the tissue via tubular vessels to regulate the temperature at exactly 40C at all times.
4. 3D printed and dissolved pla cast components of which I have started accumulating sketches
5.remotely "piloting" it from a central PC for computational simplicity.
6.training the ai off linguistic rules and behavioral rules before passing it to VR chat for optimization and controlling balance separately from behavior.

I've yet to solve other issues like realism vs anthropomorphism, how to get it to walk or talk (although the API is probably a solution), long term power, and secretions-lubrication so it's self cleaning. This is tech that is years away but if I can build it for under 1M I'll certainly try.

[Anonymous No.12397166]

Won't happen in our lifetimes.

[Anonymous No.12397177]

>>12397166
No.
Please don't say that.

[Anonymous No.12397180]

>>12397177
Stay strong brothers

[Anonymous No.12397319]

>>12386112
It's not about whether some woman exists out there who would spread her legs for me but the time/effort/frustration of finding them not being worth the payoff 99% of the time.

[Anonymous No.12397331]

>>12397180
is this an anus prototype

[Anonymous No.12397727]

>>12386082
I think that genetically modified uberwaifus are more realistic. The only issue is getting someone to fund you and overcoming the inevitable massive outrage that such a project would produce. Though I bet China is working on something like this right now.

[Anonymous No.12397742]

>>12389479
I think one of the largest challenges in creating a robot gf is overcoming the uncanny valley. Another might be battery technology. No one wants to plug their robowife in every 2 hours.

[Anonymous No.12397804]

>>12397727
>>12386082
I agree. I would rather fuck some genetically modified being who is genetically programmed to love rather then a machine. Could you imagine getting your cock caught in a wire or some other machinery.

[Anonymous No.12397880]

>>12397804
Imagine >>12397180 clamping down on your dick and not letting go.

[Anonymous No.12398669]

>>12397727
>>12397804
Chances are, china has been working on this for the past several years.

I would not be surprised if some filthy rich oil prince has made generous donations to such a project just so he could have perfect CRISPR waifu.

She's probably literally a toddler right now, though.

[Anonymous No.12398916]

>>12391847
Men advanced civilization for women blah blah blah

Your mind on incel ideology

[Anonymous No.12399110]

>>12397727
There is plenty of outrage of the mere prospect of sex bots for men. Somehow sex toys for females are exempt from any criticism.

[Anonymous No.12399127]

>>12389505
>nagging
>sexless marriages
>cheating
>divorce rape
we have VERY different defitions of ultimate.

[Anonymous No.12399993]

>>12398669
For awhile I was strictly against genetically modified people, but I've recently opened up to more. We are the first species to bypass natural evolution and force our genome to bend to our will. Hopefully modification doesn't cause health issues.

[Anonymous No.12400114]

>>12395445
When I read Jerk Off Instruction, I realized I was coomer.

[Anonymous No.12400197]

>>12398669
>>12399993


Okay. Dolly the sheep. Was recorded as a successful clone in 1996.

There is a 99.999999% chance that it wasn't the first attempt. So how many years/decades have people been working on it. 10-20years for a vaccine.

And there are advertisements about cloning your pet. For a fee. Every pet cloned. Is just more data to refine the cloning process.

But who in their right mind would just say.
There are no clones. The sci/pop. Not possible.

There is a law that prohibits human cloning for ethical reasons.

But advertisements pointing out. "Choose your child's traits" who's children have they been testing it on?

There laws that prohibit murder and espionage. But do the military personnel just stop before a person dies?

And if a human was cloned within 4 years of dolly the sheep. That clone could be around their 20's.

Everyone we cloned a sheep. But we promise none of this research will be used for human cloning.

World governments/rich people/the Kabul: Of course no one will do that. It is immoral and unethical. *everyone shakes hands and agrees*

[Anonymous No.12400219]

2035

[Anonymous No.12400224]

>>12391355
>Atlas walks around like a person right now
No it doesn't

[Anonymous No.12400231]

>>12397727
This.
Genetically modified amazon big titty thick women who are genetically predisposed to get off to being motherly and loving you.

[Anonymous No.12400233]

>man invents AI
>AI invents everything to control humans, including robot waifus
if you want your waifu, get to programming.

[Anonymous No.12400250]

The first sex bots aren’t going to be self contained. They’re going to be tied, wireless or with a tether, to a central computer server that controls everything. She’d be installed in your house like an air conditioner would be. The avatar would be just that, a mechanical husk with a polymer veneer. You gotta remember that even at a height of 5’0” the thing is going to weight almost 600 lbs if you try to jam all the parts inside of it. That’d crush your pelvis.

[Anonymous No.12400267]

>>12400250
This is an interesting point. They are not bound by the laws of biology. Nothing says their body and their brain has to be in the same place. Imagine Superintelligent AI becomes a thing (I know it's a meme, just humor me for the sake of argument). Such an AI could puppeteer waifubots via WiFi to keep the dumb meatbags happy while it sets about administrating the world.

Honestly though. By the time sex robots become practical, convincing, and (most importantly) affordable we'll either be dead or too old to remember what they're for.

[Anonymous No.12400285]

>>12400197
>But advertisements pointing out
What advertisments?
Also, I'm 200% sure that there's at least one human clone hanging out living the good life in the PRC. Maybe even the west.

[Anonymous No.12400294]

>>12400267
>via WiFi
Why not 5g? Then your waifu could come with you wherever you wanted, like in Chobits.

[Anonymous No.12400309]

>>12388323
I think you are wrong. People don't have to be fooled into having feelings for a robot. I own a roomba. Very primitive. But when it tries to do something and gets thwarted, but keeps trying, I feel sorry for it. I talk to it. So does my girlfriend. I'm not fooled into thinking it is actually alive or has feelings. But we tend to treat things that act alive as if they were alive.

When Boston Dynamics posted the video of an engineer kicking one of their robots to demonstrate its stability, people complained that it was mean to do that. Humans will very easily project feelings and personalities on robots as they exist today. And it will only get easier as tech advances.

It will be a long time before humans are fooled by humanoid robots, but that is not necessary for humans to have an emotional bond with a robot.

[Anonymous No.12400868]

>>12400309
The robots should have some cute yet non human feature like >>1239774 . Maybe this would bypass the uncanny valley and let people become emotionally attached easier.

[Anonymous No.12400871]

>>12400868
I meant >>12397742

[Anonymous No.12401140]

>>12398669
>>12400197
Pic. related is what the US was working on back in 2008. China, having no inhibitions, is probably wanting the same, plus even more. Especially obedience.

[Anonymous No.12401663]

>>12401140
>bleeding out
>army nurse gives you an estrogen shot
lel

[Anonymous No.12401677]

>>12386112
im not gay

[Anonymous No.12401688]

>>12397164
At this point you may as well scientifically create a mindbreaking rape dungeon.
Far less effort. And you might even get willing volunteers.

[Anonymous No.12401845]

>>12401688
You would just end up with a psychologically broken wreck. Look at mkultra and other such projects. Extremely unethical and downright evil.

[Anonymous No.12401920]

>>12386082
>simulate genuine companionship

if you're already unsatisfied with the genuine companionship that genuine humans offer than simulated genuine companionship isn't going to be satisfying for you. i don't think that what you're after is simulated genuine companionship, you probably want something else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IEqQpIW5gA

[Anonymous No.12401987]

>>12386151
The problem is not men/women. Its fucking losers like you v everyone else. Dont worry tho, when genetic editing comes to be mass market available, people like you will be extinct, for the good of the human race. Its not women being removed....its whatever shitty genes you have.

[Anonymous No.12402192]

>>12401987
All I care about is having a robowaif.

I don't worry about such primitive things as breeding and passing on my "genes" like some deluded animal think they are of some kind of higher importance.

[Anonymous No.12402233]

based

[Anonymous No.12402275]

>>12386082
>simulate genuine companionship?
Define genuine companionship. Depending on what you mean, it can range from already possible to never ever going to happen
This also isn't really a question of science, it's at best an engineering question

[Anonymous No.12402849]

>>12401663
>lel
The higher pitched version of the more manly "lol", right? Right?

[Anonymous No.12403641]

>>12402849
Exactly. Due to the abruptly elevated levels of estrogen.
>>12401920
The issue is that a lot of men (and some women) can't find genuine companionship due to either their own flaws or how our social world has been warped by the internet/society at large.

[Anonymous No.12403730]

>>12401688
If I wanted biocunts I'd have sex with one. I'm not an incel I just dislike women and want a harrem of robotic QTs for my enjoyment.

[Anonymous No.12403760]

>>12393729
If you can't afford taking someone out for a nice dinner, you can't afford a humanoid robot

[Anonymous No.12404255]

>>12403730
>I'm not an incel
Stopped reading right there
Could you be any more obvious?

[Anonymous No.12404270]

I'd like to get a cute daughterwifebot like Roll in my lifetime.

[Anonymous No.12404704]

>>12403760
Hopefully the bot is not as high maintenance.

[Anonymous No.12404793]

>>12404270
>daughterwifebot
excuse me?

[Anonymous No.12405281]

>>12404270
I want to impregnate Roll so much

[Anonymous No.12405329]

>>12386112
I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me so hard.

[Anonymous No.12405421]

>>12400285


http://www.fertility-docs.com/programs-and-services/pgd-screening/choose-your-babys-eye-color.php?gclid=Cj0KCQiAzZL-BRDnARIsAPCJs70cLp21uOPBXiFRhL5M_9nZvnxRy5RCFzZn9kdlxdL-EvMDhHmIb-IaAgHmEALw_wcB


It looks like the only trait being picked is the eye colour right now.

It is between the genetic code of the two biological parents.

But through their research they can increase the chances of the preferred eye colour.

[Anonymous No.12405468]

>>12401987
>year 2020 of our lord Jesus
>idealize natural selection

[Anonymous No.12405550]

>>12400267
Think about it from a commercial perspective. Why sell a complete standalone robo waifu? Think of it more like how cell phone price structuring works or how online games work. You’d buy the physical husk and then shell out additional dollars for your waifus “personality” subscription which would receive regular updates or you’d have an online store where you could buy features ala carte. This is also an insidious form of personal data collection because there is no doubt your robo waifu is going to be harvesting your every interaction for salable data.

>>12400294
The main purpose of having a cable tether is power. You’d blow your entire weight budget on batteries if you went full wireless. Although a battery pack could be sold as an accessory for short trips around town.

[Anonymous No.12405570]

>>12405550
Remove her wifi/bluetooth access day one.

[Anonymous No.12405578]

>>12405570
You know damn well that would violate the service warranty and probably render her inoperable.

>yfw black market waifu servers for degenerate anons into perverse shit.

[Anonymous No.12405653]

>>12405578
Literally the first thing anyone will do upon the development of fembots will be to jailbreak them so you can run linux

[Anonymous No.12405694]

>>12386082
running to a robot gf is a cowards move
not based at all

[Anonymous No.12405721]

>>12405694
The point of Robo Waifu’s isn’t to out and out replace women. It’s to completely undermine women’s sexual market value. Their mere existence is a threat to female values and is a counter punch to feminisms dismantling of the nuclear family.

[Anonymous No.12405804]

>>12405721
women dont have any self worth until men give it to them
u just got memed on idiot with all this feminist bs
youre already in control
women are the og incels and they always will be
all they talk about is how they want men, hate men, and want men some more
robo gf pushing is just attacking the pawns of the shitty culture
there was a twitter post full on feminazi that i cant find that was like
>wait stop anons, w-w-whos gonna cook and clean for you
>a robot cant do the things I can do
>please wait uhhh ur a (emasculating word here) please pick me please please please
it works insanely well but it isnt the true solution

[Anonymous No.12405851]

>>12405804
Bro, if pussy was a stock it would be considered overbought and overvalued. Yeah, it’s men driving that value but that doesn’t change the fact that the bubble needs to be popped. I can’t think of any other way to reset every females expectations in one fell swoop that doesn’t involve a global war.

[Anonymous No.12406137]

>>12405851
shame campaigns for hedonism and unlady like behaviours
full sincere (unironic) promotion of good virtues.
ol hitler boy succeeded when prostitution was on every street corner

[Anonymous No.12406254]

>>12397164

Dude, way too hard.

find a way to make Atlas very very very cheap/ slimmed down. Stick that in sex bot coverings, then rig that with the top of the line Ai of 2030.

>>12400224

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhND7Mvp3f4&t=111s

it does


The only thing holding this up is the will of the right people to do it. They dont want to take the heat.

[Anonymous No.12406275]

>>12406254
Nah, the main thing is a legitimate synthetic analogue to human muscle. It’s going to need to be a light weight polymer or meta material. Current actuators suck. They’re far too unwieldy and rather dangerous to put in something designed for you to stick your dick in or have ride on top of you. The other two problems are immediately worked around with tethers and server side computation.

[Anonymous No.12406290]

>>12406275


Atlas is the best humanoid bot in the world. it just needs to be slimmed down into the proportions of a sexy slim woman. That will happen anyways over the next 10 years. But it would be nice if someone would just read between the lines and work on it from where it is right now, and try to get it to that point by 2025. Hell, build a team of people to do it. And, i wouldnt even bother with the Ai.

Build the internal robot/skeleton, take that to the porn industry, they'd take it from there

[Anonymous No.12406305]

>>12406290
Bro, you didn’t listen to what I just told you. All those actuators and steel, even if you slimmed it down, would still be to heavy. Not to mention the control isn’t precise enough to keep it from ripping your dick off or crushing your rib cage. Your weight budget for safety is like 200 lbs max. A sexbot needs better linear actuators, ideally something close to if not identical to human muscle.

[Anonymous No.12406444]

>>12406290
One of the problems with Atlas is the fact that it's not commercial, it is being designed purely for the US military. Agility Robotics is more promising in that sense.
https://youtu.be/e0AhxwAKL7s

[Anonymous No.12406477]

>>12406290
The difference between atlas and a waifu bot is that altas is designed to jump around and carry heavy things, while a waifubot simpliy needs to be able to move around and maybe carry light objects. What I'm saying is that it probably wouldn't be too hard to scale down altas's armature to our desired size.

[Anonymous No.12406485]

>>12406477
>What I'm saying is that it probably wouldn't be too hard to scale down altas's armature to our desired size.

It is hard. Actuators that small suck absolute donkey balls and are jerky as shit. She’d rip your balls off trying to play with them.

[Anonymous No.12406495]

>>12406485
I guess we need to get going on finding a viable artificial muscle solution.

[Anonymous No.12406507]

>>12406495
The rub with that is the only reason to create a synthetic muscle for non implant use is to make a robot you can fuck. Worker bots are totally okay with the current technology.

It’s a bummer.

[Anonymous No.12406531]

>>12406507
It could be used for all sorts of things. From food handling to geriatric care. Silent, light, agile, scalable actuators would have thousands of regular uses that don't involve sex. Whoever invents something like that will be instantly wealthy.

[Anonymous No.12406540]

>>12406531
Not saying it wouldn’t have other applications, just that there is no immediate push to develop something like that because what we have is “good enough”

[Anonymous No.12406547]

>>12406540
Then those of us who desire a robot wife will have to figure this one out on our own. Any ideas?

[Anonymous No.12407149]

>>12405550
Don't give them any ideas

[Anonymous No.12407163]

>>12406305
>thinking men wouldn't pay to get their pelvi crushed by a mecha waifu

[Anonymous No.12407686]

>>12406444

yes, definitely want a sex robot

that walks like a horse.

>>12406477

hopefully

[Anonymous No.12407831]

>>12407149
Please give us ideas.

[Anonymous No.12408142]

I don't know much about robotics, but are dielectric elastonomers a good alternative to standard mechanical actuators right now?

[Anonymous No.12408381]

>>12405851
From the reactions so far it looks like sexbots will cause a global war.
Funny thing is, most on 4ch would rather have a comfy GF-bot that also could do the cooking etc. Sex is overhyped.

[Anonymous No.12408417]

>>12406444
A military sex bot?
What could possibly go wrong?

[Anonymous No.12408442]

>>12406290
Halodi makes robots that don't seem too shabby either: https://www.halodi.com/media

[Anonymous No.12408480]

>>12408442

[Anonymous No.12408622]

>>12406290
You extremely overestimate the ability of these machines and what will happen over the next decade.

[Anonymous No.12408624]

>>12397164
>>12386082
You should be ashamed. Nandroids must not be brought up in a conversation about whorebots, and your familiarity with them must not exceed being platonic.

[Anonymous No.12408635]

>>12386112
Every engineer on this site would

[Anonymous No.12408648]

>>12408624
>not wanting to release all your pent up sexual frustration on your maidbot after a long hard day of wageslaving

[Anonymous No.12408665]

>>12408648
Telling her to make you a drink would be both psychologically and physiologically healthier for both parties.

[Anonymous No.12408674]

>>12408648
Telling her to make you a drink would be both psychologically and physiologically healthier for both parties.

[Anonymous No.12408717]

>>12408624
Then of course you have the companion bots, small cuddly bots that children grow up with and also are upgraded in size and functionalities over the years. Something like pic. related.

[Anonymous No.12408720]

>>12408717
Jesus Christ how horrifying

[Anonymous No.12408815]

>>12408717
I was talking about nandroids (the cartoon in the OP pic). You shouldn't subject sapient beings to mental torture, and since there's no avoiding the coomer plague, I guess dedicated whorebots with modified goals/desires have to be made.
In my opinion, artificial sapience shouldn't be made at all - but there's no preventing it.

[Anonymous No.12408865]

>>12408720
>horrifying
Erm, why?

>>12408815
>I was talking about nandroids (the cartoon in the OP pic).
Sure, I am just continuing an interesting tangent.
>You shouldn't subject sapient beings to mental torture,
Agreed.
>and since there's no avoiding the coomer plague, I guess dedicated whorebots with modified goals/desires have to be made.
Girls already have all sorts of sex toys, expect the companion bots to get suitable peripherals.
>In my opinion, artificial sapience shouldn't be made at all - but there's no preventing it.
Why not? Dogs and cats have some intelligence.

[Anonymous No.12408926]

>>12408865
I'm not comfortable with making robots entirely functional replications of humans, so servitors should remain servitors only and have the mind just to raise children or cook etc., and sexbots should do just that. I think we agree on that, though.
As for the second point - dogs and cats obviously aren't as 'conscious' about their surroundings, and robots would form a significantly bigger threat if aggregated. This connects to my first point, that they should have the mind to do one thing well. Of course, you have the discussion concerning the morality of doing such thing, and if it's fair for us to make robots suffer and what not, but that's an entirely different conversation.
I apologize I didn't proof-read, as I'm going to sleep now. Hopefully the thread is up for us to talk tomorrow. Good night anon

[Anonymous No.12408930]

>>12386082
Blame that on transsexuals ruining the femine essence.

[Anonymous No.12409176]

>>12386146
nice bait coomer

[Anonymous No.12409268]

>>12386146
yes anon the slut on your pic should be gatekeeper of future generations

[Anonymous No.12409330]

>>12408926
>I'm not comfortable with making robots entirely functional replications of humans, so servitors should remain servitors only and have the mind just to raise children or cook etc., and sexbots should do just that. I think we agree on that, though.
I agree and I note also that most humans have enough empathy to feel uncomfortable about the video showing robots that were kicked for testing their stability. I hear people even care enough for their Roombas to want them repaired rather than replaced.
>As for the second point - dogs and cats obviously aren't as 'conscious' about their surroundings, and robots would form a significantly bigger threat if aggregated. This connects to my first point, that they should have the mind to do one thing well. Of course, you have the discussion concerning the morality of doing such thing, and if it's fair for us to make robots suffer and what not, but that's an entirely different conversation.
There is a huge forest of terminology such as sentient, sapient, conscious and more, I don't really have a proper overview of this yet. And people also discuss "uplifting" dogs.
>I apologize I didn't proof-read, as I'm going to sleep now. Hopefully the thread is up for us to talk tomorrow. Good night anon
Yes, the topic is interesting, hope it will survive the night. Stay comfy.

[Anonymous No.12410035]

i want robotic perfect copies of humans

dont be a pussy

[Anonymous No.12410349]

>>12408624
In my blood stirs the overwhelming desire to fuck a maid, for that is the ideal sexual encounter. This truth is demonstrated by the Franco-Japanese cultural obsession with this ideal, as they are the undisputed masters of erotica in the West and East respectively. Anything less, anything resembling restraint given the opportunity to lewd a human or machine in a maid dress, is homosexuality.

[Anonymous No.12411085]

>>12386082
The problem with robot GFs is that the only people who want robot GFs are the ones who know how they'd work, which takes all the magic out of it. An AI wouldn't love you in a way that humans do.
>>12397164
>muscles
research TCP muscles. It's not likely to replace motors but it's pretty cool nonetheless. It's also a lot less messy than hydraulic muscles when they fail.

[Anonymous No.12411971]

ive had a really hot submissive woman love me before. i gotta say lads, its about the chase. i cant love something that doesnt make it hard.

[Anonymous No.12411973]

>>12386082
You're probably sick of them due to the "genuine companionship" aspect, so robots wouldn't help you

[Anonymous No.12411977]

>>12410349
>for that is the ideal sexual encounter
Just why?

>>12411971
>its about the chase
Do you also chase your dinner around the house before you eat?

[Anonymous No.12412001]

>>12404270
roll was made out of spare vacuum parts. just put your dick in a vac, turn it to suck, and be done with it

[Anonymous No.12412024]

>>12411971
>i cant love something that doesnt make it hard.
You're not really the target demographic. Normal relationships are becoming unattainable for an increasingly large group of people who nevertheless still want a relationship (or at least sex). The appeal is potential companionship for those who have already resigned themselves to a life of loneliness. I can't imagine robotic companions will be viewed as socially acceptable or a viable alternative to human relationships anytime soon.

[Anonymous No.12412031]

>>12412024
chii~?

[Anonymous No.12412047]

>>12403641
So what you're trying to say is that you live in this world with all of the humans that exist and you haven't been about to find satisfactorally genuine companionship and its all everyone else's fault so you need a robot which is unlike any human that you'v ever met to satisfy your companionship requirements?
Have you ever considered the possibility that you're repulsive and that satisfactory companionship does exist, but its just not interested in being your companion? Have you ever considered the possibility that you've got unrealistic standards for companionship. Have you ever though that your perfect dream companion, who you clearly feel entitled to, might also have their own high standards which you don't meet? Maybe its not that they're not good enough for you, maybe its that you're too inferior?

[Anonymous No.12412073]

>>12412047
If he's such a vapid and repulsive social reject, why are you opposed to him having a robotic companion and leaving every one else alone? Do you just want him to be eternally miserable because he couldn't figure out how to play he social game?

[Anonymous No.12412161]

Enjoy.
https://mangadex.org/title/46011/boku-no-tsuma-wa-kanjou-ga-nai/covers/

[Anonymous No.12412164]

>>12412161
I had ONE job to do, and I fucked it up.
Here is the correct link:
https://mangadex.org/title/46011/boku-no-tsuma-wa-kanjou-ga-nai

[Anonymous No.12412196]

>>12412161
>>12412164
looks interesting ill add it to my bookmarks

[Anonymous No.12412205]

>>12412196
>looks interesting ill add it to my bookmarks

It actually is pretty good.

[Anonymous No.12412412]

>>12396318
>Who you quoting?

[Anonymous No.12412466]

>>12412047
>So what you're trying to say is that you live in this world with all of the humans that exist and you haven't been about to find satisfactorally genuine companionship and its all everyone else's fault so you need a robot which is unlike any human that you'v ever met to satisfy your companionship requirements?
That is not what he said.
>Have you ever considered the possibility that you're repulsive and that satisfactory companionship does exist, but its just not interested in being your companion?
For my part, sure. In fact I went to a dating consultant and was immediately informed there was no hope for me unless I aimed for a girl with poor eyesight and a desperate need for permanent residence permit. I was received with the revulsion you expect when you drive your wreck of a car to a second hand salesman who has made excessive promises of what wrecks he can successfully shift. Especially the kind where he realises your wreck is the last thing he wants to soil his lot with.
>Have you ever considered the possibility that you've got unrealistic standards for companionship.
To the contrary, my standards have been beaten into the ground.
>Have you ever though that your perfect dream companion, who you clearly feel entitled to, might also have their own high standards which you don't meet?
That is the essence of it though I never felt entitled.
>Maybe its not that they're not good enough for you, maybe its that you're too inferior?
At least I can buy potted plants.

[Anonymous No.12412488]

>>12386082
You can already buy one that "simulates companionship." you'll have to be more specific

[Anonymous No.12412909]

>>12412488
Elaborate

[Anonymous No.12412927]

>>12412909
it's called a dog

[Anonymous No.12412940]

>>12412927
doges aren't robots nor waifu material try again.

[Anonymous No.12412950]

>>12386112
Retarded point, men and women have completely different sexual grading systems. To understand a woman's sexual grading system imagine if only model tier females were seen as attractive and thats it ONLY them are attractive every other Becky is an ugly hideous freak who should die.

[Anonymous No.12413017]

>>12388309
>way to big and bulky
brosnan.jpg

[Anonymous No.12413024]

>>12386082
>hey, stop right-
>oh it's you anon!
>welcome home, i missed you

[Anonymous No.12413040]

>>12389846
>talking to eliza
>ask do you want to kill me
>"oh, i want to kill you"
they warned us about ai