how can a flat universe contain a non-flat earth?

[Anonymous No.12317769]

[Anonymous No.12317777]

because a flat 3-dimensional surface can contain a curved 2-dimensional surface

[Anonymous No.12317785]

>>12317777
The universe is clearly 3-dimension just like the earth.

[Anonymous No.12317793]

>>12317777
checked

[Anonymous No.12317796]

>>12317777
The same way earth contains you brainlet.

[Anonymous No.12317805]

there are strong proofs for 3 spatial dimensions.
only in 3D space planetary orbits are stable.
any other number of space dimensions does not work.

nevertheless there is the time dimension.
and space-time is one combined thing.
no observing/measuring/calculating all this without time.

[Anonymous No.12317980]

>>12317805
Turnover of internal material into a body's attractive field of radiation literally cancels any net affect of time.

This happened:
Oxygen came together with a grill's charcoal bed, it fell out in pieces, but back together with the Earth (nature).
There was no net effect on how separate the pieces of the world are, only TRANSfer.

There's net conservation of "material" intactness which makes entropy an insidious commie lie.

There is the collective nigger god LEGION and the white individual God LESBIAN.*

Space isn't a vacuum: it's loose flowing pieces that objects eat to excrete their fields
which don't stop incoming objects because these fields of "TINY" pieces ghost through them.

Here's another set of facts.
The world has an infinite number of pieces, each thing has an infinite number of pieces,
each piece has an infinite number of pieces, each thing has surroundings,
and the only thing the world can have to surround it is itself THEREFORE
each thing is the world sitting inside itself.

All things are centened about an isovectorial core that results in turnover into field pieces
ghosting out through what's incoming rather than the "crystal of stillness in balance" that
imbecile Michio Kaku posited this would result in.
Mutual isopressure vectorially results in internal "heat" which "radiates" SPEWS the interiors
of the participating objects out as their fields,
which means for EACH thing coming together from separate things
JUST AS MUCH comes apart AND VICE VERSA.

*Objects literally move or remain in location DUE TO THEIR POLITICS.

[Anonymous No.12317998]

>>12317980

[Anonymous No.12318008]

>>12317785
well the earth is actually a 3-dimensional flat object, it's a closed 3-manifold with the induced flat metric if you look at its interior. but the boundary of a flat riemannian manifold with the induced metric is not always flat.

[Anonymous No.12318014]

>>12318008
>closed
no. closed = compact and without boundary

[Anonymous No.12318033]

>>12318008
ok

[Anonymous No.12318047]

>>12318014
whatever, i meant compact manifold with boundary. who cares what geometers think closed should mean. i meant the image under the obvious embedding is closed.
>>12318033
ok? do you not understand what i said?

[Anonymous No.12318051]

>>12318047
about half.

>but the boundary of a flat riemannian manifold with the induced metric is not always flat.
which boundary?

[Anonymous No.12318052]

>>12317998
Electro-magnetism is literally just Cooling-heating/Blueshifting-redshifting.

[Anonymous No.12318057]

>>12318051
Do you know what manifold is? Do you know what manifold with boundary is? Do you know what boundary of a manifold with boundary is?

[Anonymous No.12318077]

>>12318057
Id like to know how the boundary of a whole sphere is defined.
so I mean the borders of the topological space. it is closed in itself.

>Do you know what boundary of a manifold with boundary is?
no.

[Anonymous No.12318114]

>>12317805
>only in 3D space planetary orbits are stable.
>any other number of space dimensions does not work.
Can I have a source on that?

[Anonymous No.12318168]

>>12318114
harald lesch mentioned it in a talk, years back. around 2003.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q21qMAE6eqY
thats 'alpha Centauri' episode 57

he says that in the 60s some theoretical physicists had a closer look on inverse-square law (hope that is the correct term for it).

I hope that helps if you really want to find it.

[Anonymous No.12318179]

the big bang and all of conventional cosmology is all just a bunch of made-up academic dogma, it does not dovetail with observed reality, it contradicts itself.
big bang mythology is just a soience fiction rewrite of the book of genesis, only stupid child believe in that idiocy. the idea that academic priests can look into telescopes and tell you the entire history of the universe accurately is a story that only a vapid retard could buy.

[Anonymous No.12318198]

>>12318179
>nothing
>people
>people look in telescope
>people look in microscope
>people observe
>people understand basic physics
>people build huge things like bridges, skycrapers
>people build trains, cars, trucks, huge ships
>people put together information from telescope, microscope and observations
>people build radio, tv, computer
>people build internet
>you

[Anonymous No.12318955]

booo

[Anonymous No.12319734]

>>12318198

[Anonymous No.12320449]

>>12317777
so the earth is not part of the universe ,the earth is just a boundary

[Anonymous No.12320857]

>>12318198
based

[Anonymous No.12321201]

>>12317769
a patriot...