Evolution or the Big Bang Theory is NOT scientific

[Anonymous No.12277348]

The Big Bang Theory
There is literally nothing scientific about the whole universe coming from nothing or from a giant "explosion" (which came from nothing).

That breaks literally every fundamental law of science.

It cannot be tested.

It cannot be recreated.

This falls under the real of philosphy and religion.

Evolution likewise
>A fish over a quadrillion years turned into a person with a soul and a spirit.
Again, unscientific.

Cannot be tested
Cannot be observed

>But dog breeding, fly breeding, etc prove Evolution
No my guy. One type of dog turning into another type of dog is not """Evolution""". It's still a dog.

Think about it.

[Anonymous No.12277365]

>>12277348
Do you really think I'm going to fall for this bait, son?

[Anonymous No.12277370]

>>12277365
>Makes a valid point
>xD bait

Science by definition is observable and testable. The Big Bang theory is not. Evolution is not.

The day someone creates life from raw materials is the day I will accept it.

[Anonymous No.12277383]

>>12277365
LOL!

You're nothing more than a house cat who has never been outside.

Earth is that house.

[Anonymous No.12277396]

>>12277348

To add to this

Scientists say that

>0.999...=1

But how can this even be tested?


You can't construct something that is infinitely close to being 1 meter long...
But yet scientists make this absurd claim
Untenable and unscientific

[Anonymous No.12277413]

>>12277396
I can easily prove this,

1/3 = .33333333333...
Multiply both sides by 3
3/3 = .999999999999...
1 = .9999999999999....

Do you have any more stupid retorts.

[Anonymous No.12277420]

>>12277348
cope harder idiot. you know in your heart that evolution is real. DNA and just look at fucking animals. it’s obvious. admit it to yourself. “can’t be reproduced in a lab!” is just a pseudoscientific way for you to grab at straws. just stop being in denial anon

[Anonymous No.12277434]

>>12277348
The fact that you think big bang and ebolutionary theory cant be tested proves you have no idea what the fuck your'e talking about

[Anonymous No.12277446]

>>12277434
This

You have to be 18 to post here you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.12277498]

>>12277434
>>12277446
Well don’t leave me hanging.

Post the video of scientists creating a life form out of raw (dead) materials.

Post the study of flies being bred to turn into grasshoppers.

Go on,

>>12277420
DNA tells me there is a God in heaven that created life.

[Anonymous No.12277550]

>>12277498
>not even having a high school education of biology
go on, tell us how old you are

SAGE

[Anonymous No.12277607]

>>12277413

[Anonymous No.12277614]

>>12277370
What I've read (not very deeply, though) is that since the universe is constantly expanding outward, it must have started from a single point (if we "reverse" the expansion) which is where the Big Bang Theory comes from.
Also,
>>12277348
Your remarks regarding soul and spirit are likewise unscientific because unless you denote the human consciousness (as of yet a bit of a science mystery) to be "soul and spirit". Otherwise, hypotheses regarding the eventual change of species are confirmed by looking at fossil records.

[Anonymous No.12277616]

>>12277550
So you gonna post those videos
(I know you won't because they don't exist and never will, but I want you to admit it)

Literally post the video of scientists creating life and I will concede

[Anonymous No.12277618]

>>12277498
>DNA tells me there is a God in heaven that created life.

[Anonymous No.12277622]

>>12277616
>Literally post the video of scientists creating life and I will concede
if he did then you would just argue on the definition of what constitutes "life"

[Anonymous No.12277623]

>>12277614
>>12277614
>Soul and spirit unscientific
These things are observed by human behavior.

>>12277614
>Finds a fossil
>Ahah! This must be the fish/human hybrid
>Gets tenure
Nah.

[Anonymous No.12277625]

>>12277622
Life is self evident.

P.S.
A computer program is not life.

[Anonymous No.12277626]

>>12277413
if you have 3 1/3 one of these 1/3 would need to have a 0.0....1 at the end therefore saying 1/3 is equal to .333... is not valid

QED

[Anonymous No.12277631]

OP makes a good arugment

most of "science" today is just junk popsci that can't be repeated

[Anonymous No.12277637]

>>12277626
You're an idiot.

[Anonymous No.12277642]

>>12277420
>cope harder idiot. you know in your heart that evolution is real. DNA and just look at fucking animals. it’s obvious. admit it to yourself. “can’t be reproduced in a lab!” is just a pseudoscientific way for you to grab at straws. just stop being in denial anon
reproduce macroevolution where change above the speciation happens then come back, what you've been learning is pseudoscience. have you ever had an independent thought and analyzed something beyond the eyes of an authority? there's literally no way you can replicate evolution in a lab

[Anonymous No.12277648]

If /sci/ had answers that could btfo OP instantly, it'd have been posted already. Outside of the highest tier math, nobody can even prove close to what is true and what is not. You're safer proclaiming agnosticism than a theism(atheism). Just remember - if they had actual answers they would post them, lol.

[Anonymous No.12277649]

>>12277642
>eproduce macroevolution where change above the speciation happens then come back
>you gotta make a monkey become a man in a lab before i will believe you!!!!
do you comprehend how ridiculous you sound?

[Anonymous No.12277653]

>>12277649
lmao you just proved its pseudoscience

it doesn't follow the scientific method in any shape or form

monkey becoming a man or any change above the species level has never been observed yet even replicated, please learn what the scientific method is before you come here and talk underage shit

[Anonymous No.12277654]

The so called evolutionarians can't cope with the fact that they can't prove that life was just created by God. Its easier for them to bury their little heads in books that spout nonsense than look up and behold the world.

[Anonymous No.12277660]

A question to the pro evolutionists, how can you hypothesis evolution if you've never observe it happening in nature?

[Anonymous No.12277661]

>>12277648
>You're safer proclaiming agnosticism than a theism(atheism)
Bingo, even in my most cringelord days, I was an agnostic. I would never just outright deny the idea that there could be a God. That's just mental illness and willful delusion.

Truth at it's basest form is ultimately a philosphical and religious endeavor.

>Everything I can observe is true
This is assuming you aren't the figment of someone's imagination or some highly complex puppet in this giant palooza we call life. (How do you even know "life" is real? How do you know what you observe is real?)

Ultimately some things need to be taken by faith.

Atheists will literally readily admit that a Honda Ford has a creator but that something as complex and beautiful as the human body came from nothing.
Mental illness.

I love science and it's useful.
Real science.

[Anonymous No.12277666]

>>12277348
Go away godboi

[Anonymous No.12277670]

>>12277661
its*