Is science dead lads?

[Anonymous No.12275650]

The science behind global warming is speculative and incomplete, meaning no concrete conclusions can be drawn regarding human involvement in climate change.

Elites in various fields use either real or artificial crises to maintain the existing social order, misusing the “science” behind global warming.

As a result of potential conflicts of interest, the scientists conducting research on topics related to global warming may subtly change their findings to bring them in line with their funding sources. Since climatology can not incorporate double-blind studies, as are routine in other sciences, and climate scientists set experiment parameters, perform experiments within the parameters they have set, and analyze the resulting data, a phenomenon known as “bias” is offered as the most benign reason for climate science being so inaccurate.

A key concept, delivered from the eccentric Professor Hoffman, suggests, in Hoffman’s words, the existence of a “politico-legal-media” complex, comparable to the “military-industrial complex,” of the Cold War era. Hoffman insists climate science began using more extreme, fear-inducing terms such as “crisis,” “catastrophe,” and, “disaster,” shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall, in order to maintain a level of fear in citizens, for the purpose of social control, since the specter of Soviet Communism was gone. This “state of fear” gives the book its title.

[Anonymous No.12275829]

>>12275650
climate science isn't science; it's indoctrination
science is fine
however there are anti-scientists LARPing as scientists, many on government payroll, many at NASA

[Anonymous No.12276188]

>>12275650
No.

I bless you to find only solutions.

The environment must be protect.
This is a small world and our world is a spaceship with a glorious balance.
Maintain it against all and transcend the challenges.

[Anonymous No.12276294]

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

[Anonymous No.12276312]

>>12276188
Unironically this
Rise to the occasion

The problem is the institutions handlers, and those who are dictating what gets to grow.
Imo, for now, consider working on the bios, enviro stuff, the language in the sciences.

[Anonymous No.12276319]

Hey can anyone give me an alternative theory to the greenhouse effect that can account for the increased surface ocean, and tropospheric warming, along with stratospheric cooling? Not completely rewriting the laws of thermodynamics would be a plus.

[Anonymous No.12277401]

>>12275650
>The science behind global warming is speculative and incomplete, meaning no concrete conclusions can be drawn regarding human involvement in climate change.
How so?

[Anonymous No.12277544]

>>12275650
Please jus launch the nukes. I fear thr climatologist. Soon no man will know what reason n is

[Anonymous No.12277581]

>>12275650
>The science behind global warming is speculative and incomplete, meaning no concrete conclusions can be drawn regarding human involvement in climate change.
You have been hopelessly mislead, please try and reassess your beliefs