[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 371 KB, 1225x920, mosaic83ad166391ef1397dfc76b9a14cf3fb7e00be5ec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12222889 No.12222889 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.12222896

I pick Newton out of those 12.

>> No.12222918

>>12222889
I don't see Jesus there.

>> No.12222982

>>12222918
Die in agony like your lord christcuck.

>> No.12222998

>>12222889
Einstein by far.

>> No.12223013

>>12222889
>All of them are white
Go back stormfag.

>> No.12223016

>>12222982
Why so triggered?

>> No.12223052
File: 22 KB, 300x354, JohnvonNeumann.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12223052

>>12222889
John von Neumann
>Two bicyclists start 20 miles apart and head toward each other, each going at a steady rate of 10 mph. At the same time a fly that travels at a steady 15 mph starts from the front wheel of the southbound bicycle and flies to the front wheel of the northbound one, then turns around and flies to the front wheel of the southbound one again, and continues in this manner till he is crushed between the two front wheels. Question: what total distance did the fly cover? The slow way to find the answer is to calculate what distance the fly covers on the first, southbound, leg of the trip, then on the second, northbound, leg, then on the third, etc., etc., and, finally, to sum the infinite series so obtained.

>The quick way is to observe that the bicycles meet exactly one hour after their start, so that the fly had just an hour for his travels; the answer must therefore be 15 miles.

>When the question was put to von Neumann, he solved it in an instant, and thereby disappointed the questioner: "Oh, you must have heard the trick before!" "What trick?" asked von Neumann, "All I did was sum the geometric series."

>> No.12223061

Where's Adolf Hitler(pbuh)?

>> No.12223093

>>12223052
This

I don't care if he sounded like a retarted Jew. He converted on his death bed and was a yotta chad.

>> No.12223120

>>12222889
Jesus Christ. Unironically.

>> No.12223380

>>12223052

He knew how to mental calc fast, great. Does that make him the biggest genius of all time ? No.

>> No.12223384

>>12222918
>>12223120
these

>> No.12223390

>>12223013
>jew
>white
>meds
>white
YIKES
Aryans decent from celts, retard.

>> No.12223393
File: 594 KB, 597x704, kantGoblin2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12223393

where is kant

>> No.12223400

>>12222889
me

>> No.12223547

>>12222889
fermi

>> No.12223586

I don't know about the biggest brain, but my favorite is definitely Grothendieck.

>> No.12223619
File: 296 KB, 749x591, Pascal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12223619

Pascal

>> No.12223628

>>12222889
galois :)

>> No.12223649

It’s a very hard choice, but out of this lot, I pick Newton. Dude was brilliant.

Greatest genius in history? Jesus.

>> No.12223665

>>12223380
You should check out his wiki — the guy was meaningfully prolific (led a huge number of projects)

>> No.12223679

Jesus

>> No.12223720

>>12222889
There is no objective answer to this. What do you wanna base this on? All of them are geniusses.

>> No.12223728

>>12222918
>>12223120
>>12223649
>>12223679
Jesus was a mentally ill fictional character.

>> No.12223732

>>12223728
Factually incorrect. Don’t be so vehement.

>> No.12223803
File: 76 KB, 557x604, 1593075783517.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12223803

>>12222889
From an evolutionary perspective, the one who got more pussy and had the most children, while at the same time made significant contributions to science, is the biggest genius to have existed. I'm sure he's not in that picture.

>> No.12223818

>>12222889
Riemann definitely

>> No.12223958

>>12222918
this

>> No.12225612
File: 30 KB, 300x404, archimedes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12225612

>>12222889
Archimedes of Syracuse was, for all intents and purposes, a demigod.

>> No.12225619
File: 18 KB, 220x294, 220px-Genghis_khan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12225619

>>12223803
Genghis Khan
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan

>> No.12225782

>>12223393
Kunt

>> No.12225804

brainlet here. who is right middle?

>> No.12225809

>>12222889
Ramanujan

>> No.12225817

>>12222889
Lord kek

>> No.12225887

>>12222889
Euler

>> No.12225911

>>12222889
Euler and it's not even close.

>> No.12225955
File: 70 KB, 640x480, 1602367763315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12225955

>>12223628
Is simping over a whore and dying at 20 genius tier? Abstract algebra and subsequently, Galois theory is hard to wrap you head around.
>Is his work inherently fundamental for mathematics?
You bet.
>Does his reasoning show an outstanding capability of organization and forethought?
Absolutely
>Did his work come as a sole result of his creative genius?
No

Galois was to mathematics what Maxwell was to physics, a brilliant man who saw pieces of a great puzzle and came up with a way to give backbone to mathematics, much in the same sense that Maxwell gave backbone to E&M via ideas that had been already provided by others. Galois was brilliant, but he was no genius, just a kid with plenty of time on his hands. A true genius would be something like Euler or Gauss

>> No.12225982

>>12223803
Do you even know about Euler?

>> No.12226527
File: 10 KB, 285x298, don11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12226527

>>12222889
in terms of PURE genius and sheer computational power it's got to be Euler, no one else comes close. Gauss is a close second and they're followed by Von Neumann/Newton, i can't quite decide on who had the bigger brain

in terms of impact it's absolutely Newton, followed closely by Maxwell, followed by Riemann and Einstein in tandem (Einstein's physical theories wouldn't exist without Riemann's work), followed by Euclid (the father of mathematics). no idea who top right is, i assume it's Socrates? in that case Euclid, followed by Socrates, followed by Galois, followed by Grothendieck, with Leibniz at the end (his biggest contribution is ostensibly calculus, which Newton came up with as well, so he doesn't have much else to offer)

you KNOW i am right, this thread is officially over
>>12225887
>>12225911
based Euler-bros

>> No.12226626

>>12223393
ugly bastard haha

>> No.12226630

>>12223586
Growth-on-dick?

>> No.12226637

>>12222889
Darwin

>> No.12226649

>>12222918
>>12223120
These are correct IF he was a real person.

>> No.12226656

>>12226527
>Socrates
Archimedes

>> No.12226676

>>12222998
Lolno. Newton understood calculus before he was 10 and had publications in many different fields. Einstein only had 3 publications of note.

>> No.12226718

>>12226656
>Archimedes
in that case i might squeeze him in between Maxell and Riemann-Einstein

>> No.12226727
File: 42 KB, 640x640, 1595847321444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12226727

>>12222889
einstein worked out relativity with a pen and paper

idk, that means a lot

>> No.12226914

Newton > Euler > Gauss > Einstein > Riemann > Grothendieck > Maxwell > Everybody else