/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12088212]

Hey Tooker, have you tried sending your quantum gravity paper to Sabine Hossenfelder?

[Anonymous No.12088471]

>>12088212
This midwit wishes she could conceive of a theory of everything.

[Anonymous No.12088502]

>>12088471
Projecting

[Anonymous No.12088529]

>>12088471
Yeah. I too would like to be a midwit who works at CERN

[Anonymous No.12088543]

>>12088471
nobody has conceived a theory of everything yet dumbass

[Anonymous No.12088645]

Feyman said it better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KmimDq4cSU
and I don't think he would have agreed with her. She's too conservative. Feynman worked on unifying quantum mechanics and special relativity, resulting in quantum electrodynamics.

[Anonymous No.12088701]

>>12088471
She is smarter than you.

[Anonymous No.12088707]

>>12088502
>>12088529
>>12088701
simp

[Anonymous No.12088721]

>>12088707
Cope and false.

[Anonymous No.12088726]

>>12088471
>>12088707
I have a gf who does everything I say, like do anal and swallow my cum, and I KNOW you're an incel.

[Anonymous No.12088860]

>>12088543

If your only criteria is validation from authority then you are right.

But if you care about truth, even if discovered by a lowly pathetic public school teacher, then I have news for you

https://youtu.be/WuXCS_K_8qM

[Anonymous No.12088881]

>>12088860
Are you serious dude? I'm not appealing to authority, I am just being sceptical when you expect me to believe some random high school teacher has somehow discovered something that has eluded the greatest minds in history.

[Anonymous No.12088887]

>>12088701
>She is smarter than you.
but below average physicist

[Anonymous No.12088908]

>>12088887
How would you know? You are too stupid to evaluate that. And in fact she's a top physicist.

[El Arcón No.12088909]

I think she deleted my comments when I posted it on her blog. Maybe that was just Lubos. From what she writes, I can tell she already saw it.

[Anonymous No.12088914]

>>12088909
She's a tooker magnet

[El Arcón No.12088915]

I like Sabine but I think me and German intelligence agencies are on the outs, and Sabine probably likes them A LOT more than she likes me.

[Anonymous No.12089033]

>>12088915
Tooker, I...

[Anonymous No.12089064]

>>12088909
>>12088915
Damn, so this is why you called yourself Geometric Unity for a while some years ago? I don't give a shit about physics so I never realized. I only knew you for your insanely retarded Riemann Hypothesis argument.

[Anonymous No.12089070]

Sabine is a troll that likes attention.

[Anonymous No.12089082]

>>12088707
>>12088887
>>12089070
>wymin bad man good

[Anonymous No.12089101]

>>12088860
hahaha big gary in the house. You are one of my fav jews Gary

[Anonymous No.12089185]

>>12088726
She's not a girlfriend if you are paying her by the hour.

[Anonymous No.12089195]

>>12089070
>Sabine is a troll that likes attention.
That makes her based.

[El Arcón No.12089291]

>>12089064
Yes, that is the reason why I called myself that. I see you don't give a shit about physics and never realized, but could you say a little more about you think my RH argument is tarded?

[El Arcón No.12089312]

>>12089064
Are you aware that Mochi's "Hodge theater" is just my cosmological model dressed in inaccessible jargon?

[Anonymous No.12089548]

>>12089312
Academia is such garbage. If you published a book that built your principles from the ground up, I'd be the first to buy it.

[Anonymous No.12089553]

>>12089291
>but could you say a little more about you think my RH argument is tarded?

Let me be clear and say something that probably no one has ever said on 4chan. Your idea of infinity hat is actually pretty clever. The idea of the numbers at infinity is one that any mathematician has toyed with and many have formalized a system to study them in meaningful ways. Yours is probably one of the most creative/interesting. The retarded part comes when you applied them to solve a long-standing problem that was clearly not meant to involve that stuff.

>>12089312
I am aware and I will not agree that Mochizuki, an actual genius, copied you or even had an idea that you had discovered first.

[Anonymous No.12089562]

>>12089553
>an actual genius
Mochizuki is a perfect example of academic elitism. He sits in his own room, compiling his shit, refusing to cooperate or share. Then one day, he drops a massive TURD, claiming to have made a grand discovery. And then, when people start asking him questions, he refuses to help then understand, save one workshop where he discussed the paper. And finally, when he receives criticism for his pile of shit, he quickly starts name-calling.

[Anonymous No.12089565]

>>12089562
Let me ask you a quick question. Yes or no answer or you are retarded.

Do you support the German SS?

[Anonymous No.12089573]

>>12089565
No.
Why would I support a lost cause?

[Anonymous No.12089577]

>>12089573
I don't support Scholze and Stix either. I'm glad we could agree that Mochizuki is right.

[El Arcón No.12089625]

>>12089548
You mean if I was a proficient enough social networked to get someone else to publish my book? I wrote a book about my physics research program. I published it online and it is available to download for free:
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
I wrote LONG paper about my research program in math, and I guess you call it a short book but really it is a long paper. It's also free online:
>Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237
I wrote a novel, too, which I have for sale:
>The Weather Vane
>https://www.amazon.com/Weather-Vane-Gedalia-Gershon/dp/1723762806
It is probably free online too but I prefer that you gibmedat for it.

[El Arcón No.12089657]

>>12089553
>clearly not meant to involve that stuff.
Pic related comes from Clay's definition of RH:
>Problems of the Millennium: the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf
The problem clearly isn't about the negative even integers, and yet they explicitly exclude them in the statement of the problem. If the neighborhood of infinity was an idea that any mathematician has toyed with, and if it is not in scope for RH, then why did they make an explicit statement excluding the negative even integers but not the numbers that every mathematician has toyed with? Please riddle me that, Different Poster.

Here is were I get ~REALLY~ retarded: even if the sum total value of my work is to add a corner case which Clay's "rigorous" statement of the problem neglects to mention, one which forces a clarification, then my result is important enough to appear in the Annals of Mathematics and it is not the trash 30 journals, arXiv, and a dozen trolls have all said it was.

Furthermore, I totally dispute your idea that the neighborhood of infinity is out of scope. The scope relates to the distributions of primes "p", pic related, and numbers of the form (INFHAT-p) have the EXACT same distribution as the regular primes but now we have new arithmetic tools
>Fractional Distance (Section 5)
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237
for analyzing such numbers. Overall, I think your claim "clearly not meant to involve that stuff" is stupid. RH was not "meant" to involve any new technique which might make the problem more plainly tractable, and ultimately the tractability is the only thing that matters. I think my solution says everything about primes that RH is expected to say. Even if it only shows a case that needs to be excluded from the formal statement of the problem, then my result belongs in the Annals.

[El Arcón No.12089670]

>>12089553
>The retarded part comes when you applied them to solve a long-standing problem that was clearly not meant to involve that stuff.
pic relevant

[Anonymous No.12089674]

>>12089657
>Please riddle me that, Different Poster.
When Clay says real they are excluding your numbers at infinity. 99.999999% of people do not count those as real numbers.

[El Arcón No.12089684]

>>12089674
Do you disagree that [math] \mathbb{R}=(-\infty,\infty)[/math]? Do you think Riemann would have disagreed? Do you see where I am going with that?

[Anonymous No.12089686]

>>12088707
it's actual feminist shills trying to cultivate a female presence on /sci/. The exact same posters are behind this, the scihub girl, the black hole girl, and all the other variation of their shilling like the "male inferior lol" threads that used to get bumped for a whole week straight a couple of months ago

[Anonymous No.12089691]

>>12089684
Depends. What is your formal definition for that interval? What do the symbols mean? Full detail. Because in a foundations class by the time you define intervals you already assume that the interval contains real numbers. I hope that you have a definition of an interval that comes even before the reals. Otherwise, you are going in circles.

[Anonymous No.12089700]

>>12089686
Pretty sure that’s just the black hole girl, and even then it’s obvious bait most of the time. I’m willing to bet Gary is behind this one. As for the sci hub girl, the threads really only started after she put a gif of herself on the site, so it’s probably just organic appreciation.

[El Arcón No.12089718]

>>12089691
Ok, Different Poster Who Is Rapidly Turning Into Same Poster: [math] \mathbb{R} [/math] is the set of all real numbers. We also have
[eqn] \infty=\lim\limits_{x\to0} \frac{1}{x} [/eqn]
The interval notation (a,b) denotes the set of all elements which satisfy two simulataneous order relations: they are greater than a and less than b. The minus sign, I hope you understand but I can explain it i you prefer.

Do you agree that all of those are the standard definitions? Now: do you disagree that [math] \mathbb{R}=(-\infty,\infty) [/math]

[El Arcón No.12089720]

>>12089691
>definition of an interval that comes even before the reals.
It's a Hausdorff space of dimension one.

[Anonymous No.12089728]

>>12089718
No no no, Tooker. You are going in circles. Which comes first. The reals, or the interval?

>>12089720
The definitions for Hausdorff space already require reals. You are again defining reals in circles.

[Anonymous No.12089729]

>>12089577
Oh YOU CUNT! I can't believe you played me like a fiddle.

[El Arcón No.12089747]

>>12089728
>The definitions for Hausdorff space already require reals
No it doesn't. A space is Hausdorff if any for two distinct points there exist neighborhoods of each which are disjoint from each other.

>You are going in circles.
I'm not going in a circle. I'm responding to the issues you raised in the order you raised them.

[Anonymous No.12089762]

>>12089747
>No it doesn't. A space is Hausdorff if any for two distinct points there exist neighborhoods of each which are disjoint from each other.
Indeed, I realized we are getting ahead of ourselves.

>>12089720
>It's a Hausdorff space of dimension one.
As you said it is 'a' Hausdorff space of dimension one. But it is not 'the' Hausdorff space of dimension one as this would not be a sufficient definition. You have yet defined the real numbers.

If your definition of reals is the interval given above, then please give the definition of said intervals.

[El Arcón No.12089786]

>>12089762
>then please give the definition of said intervals.
an interval (a,b) is the set of objects which satisfy two simultaneous order relations:
greater than a
less than b

>>12089718
>The interval notation (a,b) denotes the set of all elements which satisfy two simultaneous order relations: they are greater than a and less than b.

[Anonymous No.12089797]

>>12089786
Then define what those order relations mean. What does it mean that b is greater than a?

[El Arcón No.12089824]

>>12089797
Then define what those order relations mean
Order relation tells you whether (b-a) is positive, negative, or zero.

>What does it mean that b is greater than a?
If b is greater than a, then the alligator mouth of the order symbol opens toward b. Also, if b is greater than a then (b-a) is a positive number.

[Anonymous No.12089826]

>>12088212
Who cares what Sabine hossenfelder says she is retarded and acts like the only use for the FCC is to prove and disprove super symmetry. If you actually look it up. Just at the face of it if it was just for super symmetry(it’s not) then just the construction will have huge benefits not taking account for any scientific discoveries from using the FCC directly. There was a cost analysis paper on this. It’s kind of like Apollo missions in this remark. It probably won’t be as revolutionary as the Apollo missions which basically revolutionize aero space but the point still stands. Large bleeding edge projects like this give a lot of good just in the design and creation. If she cared or wasn’t so retarded she’d know this. She’d also know of the other discoveries the FCC will allow. There are shit tons of papers on this she could read if she cared or wasn’t retarded. Mostly in the realm of anti matter and dark matter.

[Anonymous No.12089827]

>>12089824
>(b-a) is positive, negative, or zero.
So b and a are already real numbers? Then how come you can define the reals in terms of intervals?

[El Arcón No.12089846]

>>12089827
>So b and a are already real numbers?
a and b are "minus infinity" and "infinity," you stupid person. They are not real numbers. The interval I use is [math] \mathbb{R}=(-\infty,\infty) [/math]. In turn, the Cauchy definition of a limit is such that
[eqn]\infty=\lim\limits_{x\to0}\frac{1}{x}[/eqn]
is defined with rationals. You guys must really be stupid if you thought you were going to catch me in a circle with this stupid approach.

If you want to see all the little details, then look in my paper:
>Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

I can see your strategy is to ask me about things, and then when I answer you in the order you ask, you will try to cite a circle that you have constructed with the order in which you asked your questions. If you look at my paper and cite the article numbers, e.g.: Axiom.7.6.2. then I will entertain your inquiry.

Here is me paraphrasing you:
>DUUUUUHHHHHH
>SOOOO UMMMMMM LIKE
>SCIENTOLOGY SAID
>WE WOULD BTFO YOU
>IF WE SAID a AND b ARE REAL
>BUT IT DIDNT WORK
>REEEEEEEEEEEEE

[El Arcón No.12089853]

>>12089827

[El Arcón No.12089854]

>>12089853

[Anonymous No.12089858]

>>12089846
your definition of real numbers is "numbers larger than minus infinity and lesser than infinity". how should I understand this? does this mean all rational numbers?

[El Arcón No.12089861]

>>12089858
>how should I understand this?
read the paper. cite the article number if you don't understand something.

[Anonymous No.12090050]

>>12089291
you an aight jew too tooker. God bless little bro if you and Gary survive the race war I will vouch for you in the ethnostate we build afterwards

[Anonymous No.12090067]

>>12089553
>>12089553
>. Your idea of infinity hat is actually pretty clever. The idea of the numbers at infinity is one that any mathematician has toyed with and many have formalized a system to study them in meaningful ways. Yours is probably one of the most creative/interesting

I'm hooked, is there a link to this?

[El Arcón No.12090071]

>>12090050
Since you have addressed me in a way that displeases me, anything you might vouch for me in will be totally destroyed. If my authorities are to come from you, then they are worthless.

[El Arcón No.12090073]

Hi, I am Jon Tooker: the inventor of the time circuit...
https://pastebin.com/uHZrB238

Mundane events related to time travel.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1240030/pg1

John Titor, the Montauk Project, the e-Cat and Geometric Unity
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread966329/pg1

I am the anonymous physicist featured in the black hole article yesterday.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ukbz6/i_am_the_anonymous_physicist_featured_in_the/

[Anonymous No.12090077]

test

[Anonymous No.12090198]

>>12090073
Tooker, when was the last time you inserted your penis inside a woman?

[Anonymous No.12090212]

>>12089625
>MOOOOM I POSTED IT AGAAAAAAIN

[Anonymous No.12090217]

>>12090198
i would have preferred not to have to imagine that

[Anonymous No.12090228]

>>12090217
I'm just worried that when Tooker dies from his anal infections we'll have no one to carry that legacy.

[Anonymous No.12090431]

>>12088726
traps arent women

[Anonymous No.12090435]

>>12090071
You renounce Judaism? Even better you crazy bastard, We will build a new die glocke where the reich left off and go to other dimensions in the new ethno state

[El Arcón No.12091390]

>>12090435
I renounce the Synagogue of Satan which claims to be Jewish but is not. When I kill all of those people, and their children, it will be a masterclass in what Judaism really is.

[El Arcón No.12091493]

And let me say something else about that as well. If I kill all of the Jews except for myself, and not just all of the Israelis, then everything will be totally kosher and licit. Since I am David's heir, as long one from my line is always king, my covenant with David will be fulfilled. As long as my own descendants become more numerous than the stars, my covenant with Abraham will be fulfilled. As I told told Abraham that he will be reckoned through his son Isaac, now the reckoning is through me. Those other people who misuse my name J.W. to call themselves Jews have no part in it and if I kill them all, it will be a hollow cost. As the history of those people shows, they cannot go five minutes without forgetting what the Lord did for their ancestors and turning to false gods, and now they have turned to the so-called queen of heaven, who is not queen at all, and they say, "We do right in your eyes Lord, because that woman is related to you." They do not do right in my eyes and I will kill all of them who had Helene as their god before me: the Sovereign Lord. I reject them and I will make a mightier people.

[Anonymous No.12093368]

>>12091493
https://youtu.be/WO9ewCO7TYI

[El Arcón No.12093975]

>>12091390
>>12091493
>Johnson added. "I want to be absolutely clear that, as we have said right from the start, that would be a good outcome for the U.K. As a government we are preparing, at our borders and at our ports, to be ready for it."

[Anonymous No.12094223]

>>12091390