[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 39 KB, 590x324, ISS-Wires-1142405[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11992498 No.11992498[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Hey there /sci/

I have been looking through a lot of videos of astronauts on the ISS, and a lot of the "Fake ISS" videos showing the weird "wires" that it sometimes looks like they are hanging from.

I do not really believe they are hanging by wires, but some of the videos are quite strange so I was wondering how could you fake items being in 0g? Like in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Epdz2ySd3hE

The camera and microphone is obviously not on any wires, so would there be any way to fake this, or is this basically proving that they are in 0 gravity?

>> No.11992520

Also, there is no way that can be CGI right? I honestly do not believe you can make CGI that behaves that realistically...

>> No.11992548

>>11992498
they got a cargo plane that goes way high up and dives. its done for crude zero g tests as the pools only do so much good considering how much resistance there is in the water

civilians can pay a lot of money to ride the plane. you get zero g for like 20 seconds or so then it has to climb again. if you sound proofed a room made to be in the plane and made it like the iss then you could do it. off camera led display tells them if its about to dive or not and how much time is left

>> No.11992575

It couldn't be faked unless they are using some advanced CGI well beyond what's publicly available. But then you'd have to believe there's some serious deep state shit going on putting in an incredible amount of effort to fake videos that are often only watched by a few nerds on the internet. The vast majority of people don't give a shit about any of this.

Doesn't make any sense if you actually think about this for 5 seconds.

>> No.11992580

>>11992498
I'm pretty sure they wear wires anyway not to fake stuff but so they arent floating around everywhere

>> No.11992736

I can't wait till elon abducts flat earthers and moon hoaxers and shoves them in a starship. The live stream of them going to and landing on the moon will be priceless comedy.

>> No.11992853

https://youtu.be/QvTmdIhYnes 1 hour video of a tour continuously filmed no cuts they move around freely through the whole station. How was this faked and why was it faked why would they make such a difficult scene for such a throw away video. No schizo can debunk it because they are retarded. To answer your question things move around differently in zero g. Our human concept of how things should be don’t really apply in zero definitely since non of us ever experienced it

>> No.11992880

>>11992498
Fake zero-G isn’t great. There’s a reason they filmed nearly every space scene in Apollo 13 on the vomit comet.

>> No.11992962

>>11992548
Their livestreams are for hours sometimes. It's not their in a nosedive for that long, come on. Spaceflight is real, get over it, all of you.
>>11992580
No... they don't, and there is no wire.

>> No.11993066

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Et4sMJP9FmM

>> No.11993138

>>11992580

They don't, they hook their feet on hatches.

>> No.11993179

>>11992575
I don't think it's fake, but I don't trust NASA one bit. People would kill you for a dollar, can't imagine for that amount of money. I think they lie about the purpose and for sure they don't really seem to put a real effort in accomplishing anything. This is the highest achievement in history of mankind, somehow you can't see anything important, you don't feel any sense of urgency, they flip, they say first-grade level crap and in general in interviews they talk like it was Kids TV. Right, How do you shit in Space? That's what I want to know. In my mind Space "Exploration" should be World's first concern and goal, somehow I look around and I see people and media talking only about some criminal killed by mistake by a cop instead.

>> No.11993205

>>11992520
if I were to go to the trouble of rendering that with cg. I'd at least make it look like it wasn't filmed on a phone from 2005.

>> No.11995266
File: 2.74 MB, 932x524, wiretangled.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995266

>>11992498
>hanging by wires

>> No.11995269
File: 27 KB, 250x330, chromakeybluescreen2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995269

>>11992498
>so would there be any way to fake this

>> No.11995276
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, bushatnasa.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995276

>>11995269
blue/green screen

>> No.11995280
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, cgiproof.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995280

>>11995276
>>11995269
warp tech confirmed?

>> No.11995287
File: 1.18 MB, 400x224, CGIgrabbingNOTHING.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995287

>>11992520
>Also, there is no way that can be CGI right? I honestly do not believe you can make CGI that behaves that realistically...

>> No.11995296
File: 1.57 MB, 1280x720, invisiblemanFINAL.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995296

>>11995287
>there is no way that can be CGI right?
>>11992520

>> No.11995395

>>11995266
Fuck me, I am getting even more confused than before now, this is sketchy as fuck...

How about the water, I have seen the video of the woman washing her hair in 0 g, and it looks totally legit, and it disproves the hair spray theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOIj7AgonHM

>> No.11995437

>>11995296
Oh no, NASA has fade transition technology.

>> No.11995454

>>11992853
OK this video shows that they are very much in 0 g, and there is no way they are faking a video like this with that many objects and interactions without any mistakes.

This whole experience is mind boggling though, as there are videos like this one >>11995269
which is weird as fuck.

I know NASA definitely is manipulating us to some degree and is not being 100% honest about everything, but I am quite certain they are in space.

>> No.11995469

>>11995266
?? He wrapped his foot into something to hold him in place.

>> No.11995478

>>11995469
That arm movement though, that is really strange..

>> No.11995480

>ITT retards encouraging the gravity schizo
He makes this thread every week anons, just stop.

>> No.11995481

>>11995276
Why would their "green screen" have all those hard to key out white lines? It's clearly for measurement or something.

>> No.11995491

>>11995481
Also there is a ball there which is in 0 g no? and there is no wire to be seen.

>> No.11995538

>>11995491
>hide the fact that you have sentient anti gravity tennisballs that have been rigging Wimbledon since 1947 by photoshopping them live into water droplets

Also for the non schizo explanation, the blanket has the lines for measurement. The off screen objects are the same because it's filmed at the same spot.

>> No.11995569
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995569

>>11995454
>but I am quite certain they are in space.

why lie though?

>> No.11995585

>the government is capable of creating cgi so good it's indiscernible from reality
>but they arent capable of putting someone in space
>so they dont reveal the cool cgi
>and instead use it to make fake videos
>because ???

>> No.11995591

>>11995569
Not sure exactly what this is supposed to show but the dots are clearly dust on the window.

>> No.11995605

>>11992498
Just curious OP, do you believe in other conspiracies, and if so which ones?

>> No.11995625
File: 168 KB, 1024x693, apolloDICK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11995625

>>11995591
>Not sure exactly what this is supposed to show but the dots are clearly dust on the window.

I love the damage control you guys do

>> No.11995696

>>11993179
>In my mind Space "Exploration" should be World's first concern and goal

If you honestly think this you have some problems with prioritization. No adult, that is in control of their own life, should be thinking that "space exploration" should be the primary concern of economically developed countries in the year of our lord two thousand twenty.

>> No.11995714

>>11993205
>if I were to go to the trouble of rendering that with cg. I'd at least make it look like it wasn't filmed on a phone from 2005.

I don't believe for a second that this is CG. But I will argue that it would be pretty stupid to make the CG look state of the art. That would only leave room for more holes that people could pick apart. If you're shooting on a logitech webcam with 320p, then you can easily hide all sorts of weird CG shit and just say it's an artifact of the poor video quality. If you're shooting with 12k IMAX cameras, you wouldn't be able to hide shit.

>> No.11995982

>>11995625
wtf, there's two moons?

>> No.11996088
File: 1.26 MB, 1079x809, iss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11996088

>>11995276
you're a spastic

https://www.youtube.com/c/NationalSpaceAcademy/videos

>> No.11996121

>>11995605
Hmm.. There are definitely some that I think are worthy of researching, or that are not as simple as the official accounts made would make you believe.

>>9/11.
>>Pedophilia/human trafficking in the upper elite.
>>Aliens and Area 51.