[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 29 KB, 450x450, blonde.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670019 No.11670019 [Reply] [Original]

are women all idiots?

>> No.11670032

explain

>> No.11670046

>>11670032
i haven't met or interacted with a single woman who has reflected the level of critical thinking or depth of thought/knowledge which I have seen in dozens of men. I'm saying this a girl myself, I don't consider myself an exception, I don't get much of what is discussed on the more serious discussions thread.

but considering how repressed research on this topic is because of politics and whatever, I am having trouble finding anything to accredit this suspicion i have that 'women are idiots' besides my personal anecdotes and experience.

even my own mother, who is a very professional and 'cultured' woman, shows a lot of lapses in logic and thinking and is overcome with vanity and self-obsession.

>> No.11670047
File: 58 KB, 720x473, pol soyboy vs trannychad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670047

No. Trans women have higher than average IQ.

>> No.11670052

>>11670046
>i haven't met or interacted with a single woman
You could have just stopped right there.

>> No.11670054

>>11670052
lol, trust me, im 100% femoid. ive had my experience in high school hanging out with both mainly female and mainly male crowds and this is what I've collected.

>> No.11670055

>>11670046
>i haven't met or interacted with a single woman who has reflected the level of critical thinking or depth of thought/knowledge which I have seen in dozens of men
i haven't met many men or women who think deeply or critically. ive lived and worked in 3 states. travelled a lot. what the fuck's your gripe, you got 4chan for good discussion. irl is for survival and emotional stability. >>>/sci/ is for figuring the universe out

>> No.11670063

>>11670055
yeah, i suppose you're right. most people don't think 'critically' at all, but whenever i do see it is in men. maybe i need to be more open-minded, but I don't see how that would change anything I've observed.

i still see women as being superior in a lot of other regards, but speaking just about 'intelligence,' this is what i've seen

>> No.11670069

>>11670063
what do you consider "thinking critically"?

>> No.11670075

>>11670069
actually something I've pondered about a lot because I have failed to put my finger on it. it feels like there's just an intuition for when someone is trying to bring to light nuance and complexity, or just really analyze something to it's roots originally rather than just regurgitating cookie-cutter takes and perspectives. that's a crude explanation.

>> No.11670088
File: 384 KB, 700x394, z9d8vj89.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670088

>>11670075
>that's a crude explanation.
crude is best. fuck complexity. simplicity is brilliance. have a gif

>> No.11670093

>>11670069
>>11670075
This isn't a 4chan thing. It's in real life.
www criticalthinking org/
pages/defining-critical-thinking/766

>> No.11670102
File: 11 KB, 201x251, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670102

>>11670093

>> No.11670116

Although I have no evidence to support either side in this; in my own life, I have seen a clear uprising in the number of people (men and women) who believe (that women are idiots) in some way.

>> No.11670118

God I hate women

>> No.11670127

>>11670019
As an engineering student, ive worked in several groups with female students, and some have been lazy retards, but some were really really good. Im in the bell curve theory, I think the top 10% of women are on par with the top 25% of men or so.

>> No.11670132

>>11670102
And that's why you're still stupid.

>> No.11670134

>>11670127
The non retarded females in my engineering department are turbo autistic. Really autistic. You never want an engineer girl.

>> No.11670136 [DELETED] 

>>11670116
idk, i personally think women have moar potential to be smart since they get first hand experience in the reality of being sexual objects that trigger all sorts of reactions in all sorts of men. pretty hard to become depersonalized in the midst of that imo. depersonalization is the place to be to see things in their simplest form.

>> No.11670141

>>11670127
firstly i clicked on something and your post went all red?? wtf is that lol help, idk anything about 4chan

also, yes I agree with that but i don't think it's 10% - 25%.

also, i participate in a lot of math competitions, and when I meet females and males who get the same score as me, even among these statistically equal people the men seem to have more of a comprehension of the topic and the problems they are solving and their real meaning... just like a girl who gets a 100% on a test because she swallowed all the material and a guy who gets a 100 because he organically understands it.

>> No.11670144

>>11670132
nah that's why i'm pretty smart. i don't waste time sifting through huge walls of useless words that hardly deliver anything of value. meanwhile you whine liek a cunt cuz i dont give a fuck about your stupid link.

>> No.11670148

>>11670116
idk, i personally think women have moar potential to be smart since they get first hand experience in the reality of being sexual objects that trigger all sorts of reactions in all sorts of men. pretty easy to become depersonalized in the midst of that imo. depersonalization is the place to be to see things in their simplest form.

>> No.11670150

>>11670144
maybe men r retarded too, if you are a man

>> No.11670152

>>11670019
It's quite possible. They're also highly malleable, and when put in traditionally male or leadership roles, they tend to be psychopathic. They have less of a sense of hierarchy, sport, or "honor". They won't dominate a man and then leave him, knowing he's been shown that he must improve. They tend to destroy him completely, and when he's down, the boot comes down on the throat. It's really quite curious. Obviously it takes little insight to know they do this and worse to their own.

>> No.11670156
File: 48 KB, 570x537, ..012.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670156

>>11670150

>> No.11670157

>>11670019
yes

>> No.11670160

guys thanks for ur rants about women and rants about me calling women retarded but some stats or citations please thank you

>> No.11670161

>>11670019
you have to tread the line between being an incel and being a simp/cuck

>> No.11670164

>>11670161
im a girl rofl

>> No.11670165
File: 43 KB, 400x328, 48957483975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670165

>>11670160

>> No.11670168

I want an autistic engineering gf

>> No.11670169
File: 42 KB, 600x395, tits-or-gtfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670169

>>11670164

>> No.11670170

>>11670164
Can you be my autistic engineering gf. But first post tits or gtfo

>> No.11670185

>>11670019
You think you're an special snowflake but you're not. You just need to get to know more people and stop idolizing dicks. Also, you aren't as smart as you think.

>> No.11670192

>>11670185
i don't think i am smart at all and i know that through constantly being in environments with people levels above my intellectual capabilities in a dozen different ways.

i guess i should probably try to make deeper connections with people who i disregard as shallow-minded based on a couple of impressions, but wdym by 'idolizing dicks'?

>> No.11670196

>>11670192
penises

>> No.11670197

>>11670196
lmao, thought they meant dicks as in people.

>> No.11670205

>>11670197
Are females this retarded

>> No.11670207

>>11670197
he did, i don't think you're as smart as you think you are

>> No.11670209

>>11670205
yeap

>> No.11670212

>>11670207
maybe not, not really my priority or concern though

>> No.11670216

DID I MENTION I SUCK FUCK AND SHIT CUNT LOL IM A GURL <3

>> No.11670217

>>11670216
ok

>> No.11670218

>>11670019

yes. they also dont understand how to take risks, so they always over or undershoot massively and think that men who take risks are idiots who just guess (because thats what they do)


female research is always recognizable by 2 things:
1. it doesn't cause any controversy
2. it is always catered to please the larger audience

nothing pleases females more than pleasing others and getting recognition by (paternal) authority figures (perceived ones in most cases)

ironically this is also true for very old females, who will admire mostly dead , male authority figures from their own field

females are eternal children and if you treat them as such they will respect you more

>> No.11670256

Most people are idiots
Men and women alike
Most people don't have critical thinking abilities

>> No.11671225

>>11670019
There are more male retards and also more male geniuses. This is why people arrive at two polar opposite conclusions regarding this topic. If you don't hyper focus on the extremes, on average, we are about the same.

>> No.11671242

>>11671225
There are less male retards and more male geniuses

>> No.11671253

>>11670046
Wrong take a look at my waifu tibees

>> No.11671296

>>11670046
everyone is subject to irrational thought and behaviour. the depth of your critical thinking is defined by the depth and quality of your experience in the subject. IMO men can be much more autistic and focused on certain skills or fields of knowledge and thus become great critical thinkers in those fields.

>> No.11671316
File: 10 KB, 186x186, smileling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671316

>>11670093
>critical thinking
>also known as not being retarded

>> No.11671335

>>11670019
No.
The majority seem t lack logic and reason, but not all women are like this, and many have other specialized skills.

Their forced introduction into Science and Politics is going to assuredly end in disaster though.

Meritocracy and Ethics should rule, not feelings.

>> No.11671435

Not all women of course, I've met a few excellent mathematicians. However the vast majority of them indeed are completely stupid and useless. Most men too, but the proportion is smaller.

>>11670047
Based

>> No.11672055

>>11670019
Yes. Absolutely. They are inferior.

>> No.11672073

>>11670019
Vast majority, yeah. I have met a very select few who weren't (at least as far as I could tell), but I am 100% certain they were all lesbians. And not the "lesbian for attention" lesbians, but like butch as shit to the core, not in the tumblr way, lesbians.

>> No.11672074

>>11670118
Honestly this, but unironically.

>> No.11672109

>>11670019
p much. 0.99999999 = 1 after all.