[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 573 KB, 2100x9200, spacetime.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600283 No.11600283[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.11600286
File: 247 KB, 1920x1080, lolretard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600286

>> No.11600293
File: 152 KB, 1300x1279, 1561697270791.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600293

>>11600286
>if i close my eyes perhaps reality will go away
Pathetic.

>> No.11600294

>>11600283
Where has (ct)^2 been called the time coordinate and why does it matter? (ct)^2 being equal to x^2+y^2+z^2 for light does not show it is "dependent" generally. Since you already admitted t is an independent coordinate, what exactly is your point? How does this argue against relativity?

>> No.11600295
File: 91 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600295

>>11600293

>> No.11600318

>>11600283
Based and redpilled!

>> No.11600325
File: 84 KB, 511x755, dc98a85a09f4bca2932070764a342a92ec6d5d78ddeab3e0e764148682df6ed7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600325

>>11600318

>> No.11600331

>>11600325
>what is 4chanx
>what is mark new ips

>> No.11600333
File: 51 KB, 553x599, Lol_1a0433_301728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600333

>>11600331

>> No.11600344

>>11600283
I didn't read past the first few lines.
How is time not perpendicular to X,Y,Z axis? You can be at a different point in time without changing either X,Y or Z, as something can be stationary. Vice-versa, at singular point in time, you can compare a point at position (X,Y,Z) to any other position (X1,Y1,Z1) and they will not have a different time as X1, Y1 or Z, are changed.

>> No.11600346
File: 16 KB, 583x196, 1559799609734.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600346

>>11600333
>admitting to newfaggery
Return to your subreddit.

>> No.11600352
File: 107 KB, 500x476, retard-memes-6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600352

>>11600346

>> No.11600357
File: 58 KB, 456x740, anon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600357

>>11600344
>I didn't read past the first few lines.

>> No.11600359
File: 71 KB, 160x224, ..6.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11600359

>>11600357

>> No.11600372

Does OP even understand his own image? He can't answer these simple questions >>11600294

>> No.11600377

>>11600357
When you publish a paper, all of your peers aren't forced to read through your publication.

>> No.11601130

>>11600357
When the paper contains very obvious errors that are addressed in the very lowest level treatments of the thing you are critiquing, it is a very good idea to stop wasting time reading the paper.

>> No.11601239

I'll give you that it's retarded how physicists talk about spacetime as some novel concept that wasn't present in classical mechanics. Yes time is still time in relativity, it just not a universal parameter anymore so drawing shit needs to be done in spacetime as you cannot assume all objects can have curves in x,y,z described a by a universal "time". But this is jus typical physicists confusion because they refuse to learn math properly. There's nothing in galilean relativity that can't be expresed using 4D spacetime, its just trivial.

>> No.11601446

>>11600283
That pic literally defines a spacetime interval and then says "look, this is not correct" without any explanation.
OP, are you schizo or retarded?