/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11536076]

If we genetically engineered everyone to have IQ's of 200 we could have space colonies by now.

[Anonymous No.11536085]

>>11536076
holy shit look at how highly developed those huts are, they are so finely crafted, only a genius mastermind would be able to create something so perfect.

[Anonymous No.11536091]

>>11536085
Insects are capable of building more intricate structures alone.

[Anonymous No.11536121]

>>11536076
Yeah but First Nations have some esoteric thing going on that other people don't understand. They have the equivalent in cultural development.

[Anonymous No.11536156]

>>11536121
Yeah of course we can't understand it because they are retarded animals who can't communicate with humans.

[Anonymous No.11536178]

>>11536156
They're not retarded, they can be assimilated into greater society but that would be immoral. You couldn't integrate an actual animal into society like a penguin for example.

[Anonymous No.11536188]

>>11536076
>Japanese
Kek. They stole everything from chinese and westerners, even their culture.

[Anonymous No.11536194]

>>11536121
>Yeah but First Nations have some esoteric thing going on that other people don't understand
we too went through that phase 3000 years ago

[Anonymous No.11536202]

>>11536076

Explain Inuit Eskimos anon. They're averaging 90-94 and have fuck all to show for it.

[Anonymous No.11536203]

>>11536188
not an argument

[Anonymous No.11536209]

>>11536188
Seriously, at least use the English or the French as your high IQ example. If not for them everyone would still be living medieval style >>11536076

[Anonymous No.11536222]

>>11536156
Actually tribal languages tend to be extremely complex.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polysynthetic_language

[Anonymous No.11536264]

>>11536076
to be fair khoisan people aren't niggers, they are not as violant, but more stupid and naive.

[Anonymous No.11536283]

>>11536121
>>11536202
>>11536222
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom
he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings
or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among
minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the
minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities
and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The
terms “negro”, “oriental”, “handicapped” or “chick” for an
African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick”
were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy”, “dude” or
“fellow”. The negative connotations have been attached
to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal
rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word
“pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion”. Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid
saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the
word “primitive” by “nonliterate”. They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive
culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply
that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely
point out the hyper sensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

[Anonymous No.11536290]

that would eliminate you retard because space colonization is the most useless waste of resources possible. years of research and tons of raw materials that will disappear forever just to get to an empty hell hole with only silica iron and carbon, the most abundant fucking elements on earth

[Anonymous No.11536464]

>>11536076
>WHY IS IT THAT OUR CARBON EMISSIONS KEEP GOING UP!!!

[Anonymous No.11536707]

if it was so easy

[Anonymous No.11536717]

East asians are descendents of forerunners not h*mans we will punish the wh*Tes in time.

[Anonymous No.11536745]

>>11536076
If everyone had IQs of 200 it would be refit so that they would be 100iq

[Anonymous No.11536746]

>>11536222
>We have a common phrase in our language: "ooga booga"
>Oh, so what you're saying is that one can never "know" anything for sure, all of humans' reality is based on levels of confidence rather than pure knowledge?
>Uh...yeah, that.
>Wow, such a complex language! And only in 2 words! We westerners/easterners have much to learn.

[Anonymous No.11536780]

>>11536745
No actually. The mean doesn't have to be 100. You clearly don't understand basic statistics.

[Anonymous No.11536788]

>another IQ thread

[Anonymous No.11536791]

>>11536780
That's how IQ is set though, you'd be changing an aspect of IQ as it's currently used to get that