/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11397864]

*struggles to open bottle of onions*
*asks my wifes son to open it for me*
*glug glug glug*
>RICHARD NOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.11397868]

>>11397864
He's losing the plot.

[Anonymous No.11397874]

>>11397864
I'd eat human steak if it was from someone I find attractive

[Anonymous No.11397878]

>>11397864
what's basedlet with this tweet? asking for friend.

[Anonymous No.11397881]

>>11397864
Sounds awful but he's not wrong. It could be done but it would still be revolting. He made the same argument about eugenics that caused Twitter liberals to purposefully go out of their way to misunderstand and misrepresent because they have no arguments besides "muh dogs".

Honestly the behaviour of the modern left is indistinguishable from fundamentalist Christians. The only difference are the tenets of their respective doctrines.

[Anonymous No.11397882]

>It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks and become one with all the people.

[Anonymous No.11397886]

>>11397881
this.

[Anonymous No.11397891]

>>11397864
I’d eat cultured human meat as a novelty, I suppose.

[Anonymous No.11397894]

>>11397881
Sad fact is idiot authoritarians can be found all over the nominal political spectrum.

[Anonymous No.11397897]

>>11397864
Fact: Richard dawkins is actually autistic

[Anonymous No.11397900]

RICHARD NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.11397902]

>>11397864
God this faggot has always been like the retarded sibling of that entire group he’s or was a part of. The only one more insufferable and psuedo than him is Weinstein.

[Anonymous No.11397903]

>>11397881
>It could be done but it would still be revolting

To you.

[Anonymous No.11397905]

>>11397894
That’s why the “political spectrum” is an outdated and retarded idea.

[Anonymous No.11397912]

>>11397905
What have they replaced the political spectrum with?

[Anonymous No.11397919]

>>11397912
Horshoes

[Anonymous No.11397926]

>>11397881
>>11397919
>hurr durr deez people’s do this thing and deez other people do this ting too so they’re both completely equal ideologies
Stupid horseshoe fags

[Anonymous No.11397928]

>>11397905
>>11397912
It's been outdated since the late 19th century t.bh

[Anonymous No.11397936]

>>11397912
It’s better to represent it as a compass with two axes.

[Anonymous No.11397962]

>>11397926
t. Christian fundamentalist or leftist extremist

[Anonymous No.11397965]

>>11397962
Both of those terms lack objective meaning.

[Anonymous No.11397967]

>>11397864
the tragedy is not to die, but to be wasted.

https://vimeo.com/98606653

[Anonymous No.11397975]

>>11397864
the tragedy is not to die, but to be wasted.

https://vimeo.com/98606653

[Anonymous No.11397977]

>>11397864
this is pretty much what i would do if i am on my deathbed and have some notoriety. just shitpost everything i was not allowed to say before i kick the bucket.

[Anonymous No.11398008]

>>11397965
They're umbrella terms that very likely apply to you. Don't try to play semantic games with me faggot.

[Anonymous No.11398013]

>>11397882
horrifying

[Anonymous No.11398019]

>>11397864
lmao, thank you Richard Dawkins

take that, you stupid racist eugenics posters intentionally misinterpreting his tweets

[Anonymous No.11398020]

>>11397874
>human steak
Christ no.
Human meat is supposedly more like pork than beef.
That shit's not steak.
A roast, sure.
Chops, sure.
But PORK IS NOT STEAK.
Get yer shit together Richard.

[Anonymous No.11398033]

>>11397881
>because they have no arguments besides "muh dogs".
Here's one: Who picks the "desired characteristics"?
The present GOP politicians would probably want more people like current GOP voters.
And the same goes for Democrats.
There are no objectively "good" characteristics, so who gets to pick the shape of the future human race?

[Anonymous No.11398041]

>>11397874
Dude

[Anonymous No.11398091]

i mean, i wouldn't mind, the problem comes with thinking of it as a living thing thats now dead, but if you thinks of it as food, then it aint so bad

[Anonymous No.11398092]

>>11398033
The process of eugenics still works even if it can be handled poorly idiot, even if it works. You can select for tallness and over several generations get progressively taller people, simple as.

You seem to be caught up in obsessing about how your chosen boogeymen would use it, not on seriously arguing if it would work or not.

[Anonymous No.11398126]

>>11398033
It's an argument, but not against eugenics. It's just another variation of "who watches the watchman".

[Anonymous No.11398132]

>>11397864
>onions
found the newfag

[Anonymous No.11398211]

>>11398033
>There are no objectively "good" characteristics,
Get out of /sci/.

[Anonymous No.11398297]

>>11398033
Eugenics doesn't prescribe objectively good characteristics. It a method to achieve characteristics deemed superior, whatever they may be.
That's like saying for a painter studying and years of practice doesn't lead to painting good paintings because there art is subjective.

[Anonymous No.11398307]

>>11398033
>so who gets to pick the shape of the future human race?
currently, it's women. so it's no wonder there are so many narcissists and psychopaths running around.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012245

[Anonymous No.11398317]

>>11397864
>human meat
Oh god yes. I've always had a weird, morbid fascination with human flesh and the taste it might have. Just thinking about a nice thick steak, well seasoned with a good sauce and cooked to medium rare perfection, makes my mouth water. I'm not even a big steak connoisseur normally, but I'd pay good money for the opportunity to devour a juicy, aromatic piece of human neck or sirloin. Don't even know what it would taste like, but nonetheless the mere thought of it creates an insatiable hunger within me.
For reference: https://nhentai.net/g/149425/ (i don't like human meat for sexual reasons though)

[Anonymous No.11398320]

This is why we need philosophy, so you don't end up a retarded old crank like Dawkins.

[Anonymous No.11398325]

>>11398317
>neck

that shit would have the texture of tendons, disgusting

[Anonymous No.11398328]

>>11398320
>This is why we need philosophy, so you don't end up a retarded old crank like Dawkins.

[Anonymous No.11398343]

>>11398320
There is no good philosophical argument against in vitro cannibalism. All you can say is that it's yucky.

[Anonymous No.11398349]

>>11398343
Natural repulsion is a good compass.

[Anonymous No.11398356]

>>11398349
So if I'm not naturally repulsed by human meat then it's all good? Sounds like moral relativism.

[Anonymous No.11398365]

>>11398033
I like how your answer to his post about purposely going out of your way to miss the point is to then literally purposely go out of your way to miss his point. Do you by chance have a blue check mark next to your twitter handle?

[Anonymous No.11398368]

>>11398320
dawkins was never smart. he appeals to the midwit with great success that's all his talent.

[Elder NPC No.11398393]

>>11397864
Is this just not another way of society saying they do not have the fortitude or endurance to handle the questions/hypotheticals posed; things which are thought experiments designed for others to be able to critically examine their existing set of perspectives/beliefs/indoctrinations?

[Anonymous No.11398461]

I was considering reading his book the selfish gene but now I will not.

[Anonymous No.11398476]

>>11398393
yes, rhetorical question poster man.

[Anonymous No.11398478]

>>11398343
>>11398349
based on evolved disease aversion.

[Elder NPC No.11398485]

>>11398476
Would it not be branch and bound expatiator person? Or node, if person is too human-centric.

[Anonymous No.11398487]

>>11398485
sure, column a and b. i guess.

[Elder NPC No.11398501]

>>11398487
I hereby dub thee fractal inference student-teacher, Anonymous. The grain of sand that feels the warmth of every hand that holds you.

>or whatever klol fag etc. etc.

[Anonymous No.11398539]

>>11398501
lol thanks, fren. or whatever i guess. ;p

[Anonymous No.11398553]

>>11398033
>Here's one: Who picks the "desired characteristics"?
The battle of life itself.

[Anonymous No.11398558]

>>11397897
fact.

[Anonymous No.11398562]

>>11397864

[Anonymous No.11398566]

>>11397926
but he literally said the difference

[Anonymous No.11398569]

>>11398020
It really depends on the persons diet.

[Anonymous No.11398576]

>>11397864
>this is your brain on scientism

Why didn't you listen, /sci/?

[Elder NPC No.11398633]

>>11398539
identity = eval ÷ a priori

>haha! Gotchu!

>>11398553
What fucking piss-weak battle is not being able to describe yourself as an isolatable sex god?
>t.self/i

[Anonymous No.11398706]

>>11398365
What the fuck is his point then, except to bait people into misunderstanding him on an already heated subject ? His tweet basically says "water is wet", is he just doing it for the (you)s ?

[Anonymous No.11398714]

>>11398576
Left are largely referring to natural philosophers. Not your local uni cat lady preaching about the immorality of the decadent post-capitalist patriarchal obsession of using phallic shaped objects to imprison earthly nutrient liquids.

[Anonymous No.11398715]

>>11398706
>We're making fools of ourselves
>he's to blame

[Anonymous No.11398722]

>>11397864
SOMEBODY STOP THIS MAN

[Anonymous No.11398729]

>>11398715
He's literally trolling and fishing for reactions then
The only thing I'm mad about is that the mods wont delete this stupid thread from /sci/

[Anonymous No.11398732]

>>11398729
>He's literally trolling and fishing for reactions then

>still blaming him for your stupidity

[Elder NPC No.11398735]

>>11398706
That is what the economy is based on. (You)'s. University is based on references and citation, which is just another form pf (You).

Is this your awareness virginity being taken?

[Anonymous No.11398758]

>>11398393
Evidently. Theres retards ITT who seriously think Dawkins Tweet is advocating for in-vitro human meat.

I thought /sci/ was supposed to be the high IQ board.

[Anonymous No.11398788]

>>11397864

[Anonymous No.11398790]

>>11398788
>Roast Leg of Bastard
holy fucking win

[Anonymous No.11398792]

>>11398790
Transmetropolitan was a great comic.

[Anonymous No.11398794]

>>11398792
i gotta check that shit out. thanks anon

[Anonymous No.11398798]

Isn't human flesh one of the worst things you can eat health wise?

iirc it fucks everything in your body up.

[Anonymous No.11398815]

>>11398798
If you're some Papua New Guinea tribal partaking of ritual cannibalism where you consume a freshly dead family member, brains and all to consume their spirit, that shit ain't good for you. That's how you get kuru and other nastiness.

As for otherwise? I wouldn't even care to speculate. No idea. We do know that funerary cannibalism leads to kuru though.

[Anonymous No.11398823]

>>11398478
Which is another way of saying that it's yucky to most people, just with the added detail of describing why. That still doesn't get you to unethical.

[Anonymous No.11398895]

>>11397897
no, he's an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.11398904]

>>11398576
>anglo "pop scientists" vs real scientists

[Anonymous No.11398913]

>>11397864
>It would be cultured from a single nameable person. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall
Damn, Richard

[Anonymous No.11399163]

>>11398913
read it like that at first too

[Anonymous No.11399185]

fuck is up with americans wanting to eat human flesh?
the placenta meme was from mothers in the USA, the black dude high on drugs that ate the face of another man, now this

[Anonymous No.11399239]

>>11397874
same, imagine tucking into some ass steak

[Anonymous No.11399275]

>>11397864
he's interesting to listen to lately
haven't learned anything from him, but he sounds more lively than he has in years

based Dick