Electric Universe Theory

[Anonymous No.11272351]

Anyone else think this is far more reasonable than the standard model? I started to really question the SM after thinking about dark energy and dark matter and how nonsensical they were.

thunderbolts.info for more information on EUT

[Anonymous No.11272771]

>>11272351

if I'm brutally honest I don't understand any of that stuff

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273418]

>>11272351
is it because the "Standard Model" is "Worship Einstein or go flip burgers"?

[rnοοt |Εp8pui8Vw2 HH Αdrnin No.11273468]

>>11273418
exactly, william tift's promising academic career came to a screeching halt half a century ago when he was impertinent enough to publish observations of the night sky that he made which contradicted the standard model. to this day nobody has been able to explain
redshift quantization in the context of the big bang and instead of questioning the big bang dogma, they just ignore redshift quantization and prevent progress in hopes of maintaining the status quo. not all that different from a pope and his cardinals who didn't want people listening to galilleo 400 years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift_quantization

[Anonymous No.11273473]

>>11272351
>Anyone else think this is far more reasonable than the standard model
not me

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273474]

>>11273468
that's because eventually, every hierarchy and hierarchical model gets infiltrated and co-opted.

because motherfuckers refuse to learn from history.

[Anonymous No.11273530]

>>11273418
nigger, either accept being a pariah whos ridiculed until death and then praised in the afterlife by the same types of pricks who made your life hell or go fucking work medical research and shut your fucking mouth

A good scientist has a hundred things to test but only has the money/resources/ability for a handful to test with, a good scientist picks and chooses a few thing to test through the process of elimination of what will provide results, you write your paper and get published, and get a cushy job, by the time measuring equipment gets cheap enough to actually test all those hundred things and it completely disproves your paper, it doesnt matter because youll probably have tenure and every one of your peers and braindead moron undergrads will shout at everyone who points out whats actually wrong

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273539]

>>11273530
>nigger, either accept being a pariah whos ridiculed until death and then praised in the afterlife by the same types of pricks who made your life hell or go fucking work medical research and shut your fucking mouth

where is the barycenter of the galaxy?

What is the effect of solar wind refraction on the shapiro delay, and "lensing" effects observed around massive stellar objects?

Where in the atmosphere are muons produced?

What is the effect of dragging a microwave resonance cavity across the planets magnetic field lines?

Wouldn't a space elevator ground the van alen radiation belts and turn into a solid bar of lightning?

whenever you're ready.

[Anonymous No.11273542]

>>11273539
do I look like a textbook publisher?

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273543]

>>11273542
you were talking mad shit a second ago, what happened?

[Anonymous No.11273548]

>>11273543
I am not the astrophysics "establishment" and neither are any of the biology and math department losers who post here

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273552]

>>11273548
>I am not the astrophysics "establishment"

then why are you defending them like you are?

That's not very good science.

[Anonymous No.11273556]

>>11273552
what are you talking about
I literally just said science is mostly bullshit that hasnt been reviewed yet

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273560]

>>11273556
So, what do you think about Einstein, and relativity?

[Anonymous No.11273564]

>>11273560
I literally dont care
and did you not actually read my post?

[Anonymous No.11273566]

>>11272351
>electric universe

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273569]

>>11273564
>I literally dont care

wow, thanks for the conversation, which is now over.

good day.

[Anonymous No.11273573]

>>11273468
>observations of the night sky that he made which contradicted the standard model
Can you name a few?

[Anonymous No.11273583]

>>11273569

[Anonymous No.11273588]

>>11273530
>>11273542
>>11273548
>>11273556
>>11273564
fucking srsly based anon knows how the world works i fucking love you anon

[None !niqjediPCA No.11273597]

>>11273583
I said good day.

[Anonymous No.11273606]

>>11273588
nah, I learned that recently
a lot of stuff that was "word of god" in my field recently was fucked sideways by some half-assed big data aggregate study by a corporate entity and it hurt a lot of feelings and a lot of the idiots that run the guard still havent accepted it

[Anonymous No.11273611]

>>11273573
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift_quantization

[Anonymous No.11273660]

>>11273611
>hypothesis

[Anonymous No.11273664]

>>11273660
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method