/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11221306]

Can you solve this, /sci/?

[Anonymous No.11221379]

None just looking at the first period. Delete this thread, zoomlet

[Anonymous No.11221394]

>>11221306

[Anonymous No.11221405]

>>11221306
>180iq.jpg
From buzzfeed.com
This stupid sequence has no question, so you can make whatever retarded logic to back up your answer, whereas true IQ tests only have one possible answer

[Anonymous No.11221441]

>>11221379
wrong

>>11221405
wrong

you don't even understand the problem since you always expect a raven matrix but this is not raven for fucks sake.
and there is exactly one solution.

[Anonymous No.11221466]

>>11221405
>true iq tests only have 1 answer
I guarantee you there are multiple patterns discernible for every complex IQ question since no question is given. IQ tests are basically pseudoscience - the real challenge is trying to figure out the question, which is stupid. They're abstract shapes.

[Anonymous No.11221500]

>>11221306
It's B, obviously

[Anonymous No.11221505]

>>11221441
Shut up retard
>>11221466
Shut up retard
>>11221306
The answer is all of them. Why, you ask? Because I have a 188 IQ, and unless you have a 181 IQ, you could not possibly comprehend the reasoning behind this

[Anonymous No.11221533]

>>11221306
none

[Anonymous No.11221540]

>>11221306
It really is a shit image. There is so many holes to fall into and no reason for any decision that is made. Assuming the output is a multiplexed signal is stupid.

[Anonymous No.11221604]

>>11221306
assuming these are clock cycles, and the slowing rate of the cycle it would be A or potentially D.

[Anonymous No.11221616]

E as it's the only one that shows a complete repetition of the wavelength

[Anonymous No.11221620]

>>11221616
Nevermind I am dumb and gay

[Anonymous No.11221626]

Sum of triangular, rectangular and saw pulse?

[Anonymous No.11221702]

>>11221533
wrong

>>11221540
wrong

>>11221604
wrong

>>11221616
wrong

>>11221620
wrong

>>11221626
wrong

[Anonymous No.11221706]

>>11221702
So I'm not dumb and gay? Y-you too

[Anonymous No.11221713]

>>11221626
well ok, there is a sum involved yes, but it is the sum of A+B on the condition of C, each represented by the phases of these three waves. Hint: it is a crossfade synth pattern, where two waves are added but the crossfade point is determined (modulated) by the third wave.

[Anonymous No.11221771]

>>11221713
So it's B then

[Anonymous No.11221778]

>>11221771
I agree B is a valid answer

[Anonymous No.11221779]

>>11221713
D for dick (had help)

[Anonymous No.11221792]

>>11221771
>>11221778
correct. but you have to admit it was a legit problem. so those who claimed there was no pattern and hurr durr it is a bullshit, were wrong.

[Anonymous No.11221833]

>>11221713
So when you're saying that it's conditional on C does that mean something along the lines of that when the line of C is at 0 then the resultant displayed is A and than when the line of C is at 1 then the resultant displayed is B?

Just want to make sure I understand what you're saying here. I don't know what a crossfade synth pattern is.

[Anonymous No.11221860]

>>11221792
No, that’s bullshit. This is a puzzle for someone whose familiar with wave function behaviour, not an IQ question.

[Anonymous No.11221865]

>>11221713
>>11221792
OP is a faggot. There is actually no reason to assume B. This is also not a crosswave synth pattern. Brainlet. There is no A+B it is A or B with C being the gate controlling which signal goes through.
You an absolute brainlet, doesn't realize D is the same pattern but inverted. Equally valid.
E is reflected.
What good is your genius when you are assuming answers and then saying they are true because it is the one you assumed.

[Anonymous No.11221876]

>>11221865
Yeah, I was thinking the same. I thought A made the mist sense since its the only pattern to include the defining characteristic of the three given.

[Anonymous No.11221884]

>>11221833
Basically yes. Crossfading is just adding two signals by gradually decreasing the level of signal A while simultaneously increasing B.
And there is a certain crossfade point where they are equal. Which would be smack in the middle in the simplest case. But in this case this "crossfade point" is modulated by the square wave C which jumps from 0 to 1 back to 0 shifting the crossfading point to the opposite sides. So as a result you either get full A or full B which is a special case of crossfading.

https://www.keithmcmillen.com/blog/simple-synthesis-part-12-crossfading/

>>11221860
Nope, it is the ability to recognize patterns without knowing the subject matter which is the whole point of IQ tests, right?

>>11221865
wew.

[Anonymous No.11221887]

>>11221884
>knows the subject matter
>I totally would have gotten it as an African Bushman, even though I had to use terms like “crossfade” to explain the answer.

[Anonymous No.11221899]

>>11221884
I think the argument people are making here is that it's too easy to recognize other patterns here and that it's too difficult to make the distinction as to what's determined as the correct pattern without what they're arguing is the prerequisite knowledge.

Like, now that I've read through the thread, I get it, but when I was just looking at it raw I wasn't really sure what I was supposed to be doing with it. I worked through a few different possibilities that didn't really math out until I decided that the simplest solution was to ask.

I don't know if I would have gotten it if I had stared at it for another five minutes or not, but now that I've had it explained to me I know that I can sus out similar patterns on my own, or at least make the attempt more easily, which is kind of antithetical to the purpose of an IQ test.

The argument isn't that this isn't recognizing the pattern, the argument is that the real test here is determining the basis of the question in order to determine what pattern may or may not be valid.

[Anonymous No.11221910]

>>11221884
It is just a basic multiplexer, which perhaps crosswave synth is some name for the same function when it comes to music synthesizers.

>>11221876
It might be safe to assume there is only one correct answer to this problem and that would eliminate B, D, and E as they are all equally likely and thereby all wrong. Actually using logical deduction in this format is stupid though.

I was trying to figure out how to make A work as well. I went a completely different direction. Some sort of base two or base three product is what I first thought but I couldn't get it to work. I started fucking with the angles. Somewhere around that time I started making parallels to circuit layouts and I gave up. It is just a garbage question.

[Anonymous No.11221926]

>>11221910
Well like I said it is a special kind of a crossfade that can be thought of as a multiplexer or whatever, as it shifts the mixing point all the way to 1 or to 0. Thats all. It can be modulated by any other wave such as a sine in which case the crossfade point would be moving along the sine waveform. You can think of it in an abstract way as a pattern that you apply to two wave forms, or just two pictures with two shapes really, that are combined in a certain way according to the 3d shape to get the result. I thought it was kinda cool regardless of synth or electronics in general but sorry if I disappointed you guys.

[Anonymous No.11221930]

>>11221306
B is simplest (3rd wave selects between 1st and 2nd, like a multiplexer)
but there's actually no reason to assume the output isn't also inverted during one or both half cycles, which would result in E or D
and i'm sure if you sperged hard enough you could find a way to make it A or C too
shit thread is shit

[Anonymous No.11221962]

>>11221306

[Anonymous No.11221982]

>>11221930
Actually I’m starting to think that B has to be the wrong answer because the IQ involved with identifying the family of BD and E seems to be greater than just assuming B because it looks like the starting patterns.

[Anonymous No.11222001]

>>11221306
Here's the answer.

[Anonymous No.11222064]

>>11221792
It's pretty obvious even without your explanation.

>>11221865
>>11221876
>t. brainlets
This is literally babbys first digital circuits. None of the other patterns match anything else considering all three waveforms.

[Anonymous No.11222104]

>>11221306
It's A because A contains a square wave, the zig zag wave and the jagged wave. It's the sum of all three.

[Anonymous No.11222111]

>>11222001
3. Flip each shape on its own axis along a 135 degree angle.

[Anonymous No.11222115]

>>11222104
Okay, so then you admit its not a culturally neutral question, such as is considered desirable for an IQ test.

[Anonymous No.11222361]

>>11221306
B, D and E are valid.
B = 1(!3) + 2(3),
D = (!1)(!3) + (!2)(3)
E = 1(!3) + !2(3)

A and C doesn't follow any pattern here.

[Anonymous No.11222399]

>>11222115
so it is a?

[Anonymous No.11222403]

>>11222001
2

[Anonymous No.11222435]

>>11222115
The fuck I didn't admit to anything?

[Anonymous No.11222440]

>>11221306
B. A and C are not cyclic. D start is inverted but none of the three in the question sum to negative. We are left with B and E. In the second cycle end of it the sum should be greater because wave 2 and 3 are adding. While start should be small. Hence B is the answer.

[Anonymous No.11222456]

>>11222440 (my answer)
I haven’t heard about crossfade before. I just assumed it’s about adding 3 waves.
Btw, OP, this ain’t a 180IQ question cause I’m surely much less.

[Anonymous No.11222498]

>>11221306
It's not A or C, because there's no pattern. If the square is acting as a switch, there's a question of whether there's an inversion element or not, in which case it could be B (non inverted), D (both inverted), or E (saw inverted).
Occam's razor would suggest B is the simplest, but it's technically indeterminate: anyone who's worker with logic knows that inverters are often simpler.

shit question, OP

[Anonymous No.11222500]

>>11222440
You are assuming you are supposed to sum, which is not indicated anywhere.
>>11222456
It's not IQ question anyway, because to be IQ question there should be at least one example from which you could understand what pattern of action you are supposed to undertake.

[Anonymous No.11222595]

>>11221306
none

[Anonymous No.11222641]

>>11221306
Is there a question or we're just supposed to guess what the fuck we're supposed to do? Are we adding the functions together? Subtracting? Multiplying them?

[Anonymous No.11222653]

>>11221306
You could design a system that outputs any of those waveforms with the given input. Trivially, just by outputting the wave and ignoring all input, but also through pretty simple operations with the input. For example:
A is !a + c (clamped)
B is a * !c + b * !c
C is !a * !c + !b * c

This is really an 80 IQ question.

[Anonymous No.11222673]

>>11222500
>>11222500
Yes. Cause OP hasn’t given directions on how to solve, assuming multiple ways to solve, there are then multiple answers as well. Under my summation assumption B should be right.

[Anonymous No.11222675]

>>11222641
OP seems retarded by not providing a

[Anonymous No.11222676]

>>11222675
*adequate information

[Anonymous No.11222711]

>>11221306
Solve what? You only posted a picture without stating any problem.

[Anonymous No.11223089]

>>11222711
>>11222675
>>11222641
Well, find a pattern.
Do they give you any more info in the Ravens type IQ tests which /sci/ seems to love so much? The only difference is you got used to the ravens format. The question is this: combine the 3 rows according to a certain pattern to the get result.

[Anonymous No.11223100]

>>11221306
Are people here serious? You can see in about 1.5 seconds that it’s either B or E and then quickly rule out E because the decline is too long...

[Anonymous No.11223107]

>>11222673
No read this: >>11223089

>>11222653
But it is not about designing a system. You are overthinking this. All you need to do is notice the following pattern for the three rows:
if 3=0 then 1 otherwise 2. That's it. A lot of people failed to notice this simple pattern and then accused me of not stating the problem clearly. But it can be treated completely separately from the context of signals, crossfading/multiplexing or any of that stuff.

[Anonymous No.11223128]

>>11222435
Sure you didn’t

[Anonymous No.11223129]

>>11222500
>You are assuming you are supposed to sum, which is not indicated anywhere.
Just like in a typical IQ test, they don't give you any clues if you need to combine rows or columns, or you need OR them or XOR them or AND them or you need to rotate THEN XOR them or any number of things.

[Anonymous No.11223133]

>>11222403
There really is no reason it can’t be 2. IQ test Jews are ironically stupid. However its 3 as I explained

[Anonymous No.11223137]

>>11222673
Which multiple ways? There is only one way which you are supposed to find: given three rows X Y and Z, for each step: if Z=0 then X otherwise Y. That's it.

[Anonymous No.11223139]

>>11223089
>the Ravens type IQ tests which /sci/ seems to love so much
I have no idea about what is this. Don't assume iq shitposters are representative of the whole board.
>combine the 3 rows according to a certain pattern to the get result
Which pattern, faggot? You can come up with combinations that yield any of the given options.

[Anonymous No.11223145]

>>11222361
>test: there’s only one answer
>/sci/: WeLl SinCE ThReE of tHE FiVE AnSWerS hAVe a coMMOn PaTTern, wE cAN rULe ouT thE OTHer TwO

[Anonymous No.11223147]

>>11221899
Which other patterns? Again, this is no different than a typical IQ test where they give you no clues, no instructions, they give you some kind of a sequence and you are supposed to find a pattern to combine each element: you can try adding them, rotating them, XORing them, etc. This is no different, except it is not a familiar 3x3 box but three rows. And the answer is pretty obvious: given three rows XYZ, for each step of the sequence: if Z=0 then X otherwise Y. You don't need to know anything about signals or waveforms or synth. Just some basic pattern recognition.

[Anonymous No.11223154]

D

[Anonymous No.11223155]

>>11221930
>3rd wave selects between 1st and 2nd, like a multiplexer)
this is correct

>but there's actually no reason to assume the output isn't also inverted
why the hell would you assume that? if you assume something that is not in the picture, then any answer can be correct. your reasoning makes no sense to me.

[Anonymous No.11223163]

>>11222500
>should be at least one example from which you could understand what pattern of action you are supposed to undertake.
>example
you mean a pattern. you are supposed to find it. and you have 5 steps or two full periods in the sequence, which is enough to find the pattern.

[Anonymous No.11223169]

>>11223139
This pattern: >>11223137
I stated it like 10 times already. It is a simple pattern that you are supposed to be able to find if you take any kind of an IQ test.

[Anonymous No.11223193]

>>11223137
>>11223169
For this pattern, the answer would be B. Notice, however, that if choose to also mirror Y, then the answer would be E. Likewise, I can come up with more elaborate patterns that yield the other options. So this is an average iq question? Guess iq really is a useless number.

[Anonymous No.11223249]

>>11223107
>You are overthinking this.
"""180IQ"""
>All you need to do is notice the following pattern for the three rows
If there was an associated question, "which output is the simplest using all three inputs" then B is the answer. If the question is "which output is the simplest given any of the inputs" then A is the answer (b is ignored).
There was no associated question. The answer is ambiguous even when thinking in good faith. Like I stated, A, B, and C all have very simple equations to map the input to them. So this is really a bullshit problem. It might be useful to give to someone in person so you can observe their thought process and get them to explain their answer, but as something posted by an asshole on an imageboard with no context, it's basically a troll.

[Anonymous No.11223266]

>>11221306
It's clearly D. B is the obvious but wrong answer since the slope of the prgoression is also clearly osciliating, thus the answer is B in reverse -> D

[Anonymous No.11223277]

>>11223145
Yeah, what about this? If three answers seem equally right, doesn’t that rather suggest they are all equally wrong?

[Anonymous No.11223421]

>>11223277
Hello? Bueller?

[Anonymous No.11223450]

>>11223089
I can find patterns in the clouds nigger. Also, IQ tests ask you to find patterns in the given problem not in the given solutions. You got three waves. the ramp, triangular and square wave functions and the only two that have any relation with each other are the square and triangle waves, as the former is the derivative of the latter. If you're asking me to find some function of the three that gives one of the answers, then you obviously don't understand how IQ tests work. The pattern is in the question not the solution.

[Anonymous No.11223481]

>>11223450
>I can find patterns in the clouds

Yes, thanks to HAARP

[Anonymous No.11223494]

>>11223481
The point is, IQ tests give you the pattern in the original row, and ask you to find the solution that satisfies the pattern in said rows. Here, OP is giving us X,Y,Z with no patterns between them whatsoever, except for the one I said previously, and is asking us to find which of the a1,a2,a3,a4 provided can be made with the input given. Well guess what, he's effectively giving us 3 inputs, and asking us given a specific system that has not be given, which one of these is the output. You can tailor any system to give any of the outputs. Given a periodic input to a time invariant system, the output must also be periodic, which means A and C are out of the question if the system is time invariant. But since there are aren't any pattern that are given in this problem and only three inputs, you could build a system that creates any output you want, including a non-periodic output.

[Anonymous No.11223520]

>>11223494
I would say to the extent that B D and E are the same answer, all we can say about them is they’re almost certainly wrong.

[Anonymous No.11223527]

>>11223277
if you had sex with three people today and they were all girls does that mean they are also boys?

[Anonymous No.11223529]

>>11223527
What a stupid analogy. Actually its not even an analogy. What is this piece of shit supposed to be anyway?

[Anonymous No.11223530]

>>11221306
Add all and average.

As in: none of the below.

[Anonymous No.11223550]

>>11223277
Just because there are multiple answers, it does not mean they are wrong. If I were to ask you what is Sqrt(4), a) -2 b) +2 c) 3 d)0, are you saying that the answer must be either 3 or 0 if someone says it could be either a) or b)? A problem can have more than one solution, but if the problem assumes that there is only one possible solution, yet it is found to have more than one valid answer, then perhaps the guy asking the question is mistaken.

[Anonymous No.11223572]

>>11223550
Look, IQ tests obviously expect there to be one answer and, if anything, the more obscure the answer, the better it is in determining IQ. The faggot known as OP says the answer is B. Why the fuck should it be B? When you look at D and E , B is the simplest in a family of answers showing the same pattern, the first and second wave modulated by the third. If anything it takes someone of higher IQ to rule these all out on the basis of their sameness. No-ones arguing OP isn’t a faggot or that his question doesn’t suck ass.

[Anonymous No.11223575]

>>11223129
Nope, typical IQ test gives you 2 examples.
Even single Example could show you if waves are supposed to be summed, inverted or maybe both.

[Anonymous No.11223582]

>>11223572
>Why the fuck should it be B?
Because it is the only correct answer. Prove me wrong. Give me a rule to manipulate XYZ to get a different answer?

[Anonymous No.11223591]

>>11223582
As people already explained E and D are just inversions. >>11222361. Are you saying the idiots who write these tests are simply too lazy to make more distinctive answer options?

[Anonymous No.11223592]

>>11223575
Here is the most typical IQ test mentioned on this board all the time:
http://test.mensa.no/
Show me where it gives any "examples".
Here is a typical question.

[Anonymous No.11223601]

>>11223591
inversions? so? i don't get your point. these inversions/reflections are wrong answers so who cares what they are? i told you already the pattern is like this: given 3 sequences, XYZ, for each step, if Z=0 then X otherwise Y.
Not inverted X or inverted Y.
So these inversions/reflections do not match this pattern. still confused?

[Anonymous No.11223605]

>>11223592
I don’t remember the pattern for that one but you don’t have to check the answers against it in any of those problems if you actually derive the meta-pattern (the pattern that reconciles the operations performed in each row to the operations performed in each column and states them as a single rule.)

[Anonymous No.11223614]

>>11223601
I’m just thinking, you’d think these stupid kikes could come up with answers that are more wrong. But even the EE’s in the thread seem to think D and E are equally valid. Also, maybe someone should invert your asshole.

[Anonymous No.11223653]

>>11223572
>Look, IQ tests obviously expect there to be one answer
You assume OP's pic is an IQ test and not some shit he pulled out of his signals textbook.

[Anonymous No.11223664]

>>11223582
Take whatever you did to ge B, then simply invert it along the x axis. Boom, you got yourself D. Or take whatever you did to get B, then simply invert it along the Y axis. Boom you got yourself E. It's literally one more step from B to get D and E. The reason why people like us get this is because you learn about signal manipulation in electrical engineering, and because you do it so often, you can see it right away. You can create any system that takes three inputs and produces 1 output easily. That output can be absolutely anything and is dependent on the system used. Now in OP's image, there is no information given about the system, you're only given three inputs and then asked to find the output. If they included the three inputs and an output, then gave you three new inputs and asked you what the output would be, then it is definitely doable. But you don't get that information. It's like asking 3x = ?, and then I give you 4 possible answers for ?. There isn't one possible answer to that question.

[Anonymous No.11223682]

>>11223592
I am a brainlet (￣ω￣;)

[Anonymous No.11223684]

>>11223592
F

[Anonymous No.11223695]

Wow this's garbage. How can IQ tests hold any ground when the people behind the questions are sub-90?

[Anonymous No.11223701]

>>11223695
walking forward is always easier than walking backward

[Anonymous No.11223779]

>>11223664
>>11223664
Forget about signals. Imagine the following three sequences:

X: 5,5,5,5
Y: 2,2,2,2
Z: 1,2,3,4

And you know you need to apply certain operations to get one of the *predetermined* outcomes spelled out for you as several possible solutions.

And you have the following choices:
a: 14,13,12,11
b: 11,13,12,14
c: 11,12,13,14

You can clearly tell that the answer is C since the two operations are multiplication and addition that you apply to the three elements in each column and you will
get 5*2+1=11,5*2+2=12,etc. No matter what operations you try you won't end up with A or B.
So C is the only correct answer. And the problem with mixing signals is exactly the same.

[Anonymous No.11223847]

>>11223779
>And you know you need to apply certain operations to get one of the *predetermined* outcomes spelled out for you as several possible solutions.
Except that in OP's case, you can perform 3 different operations to arrive at 3 different given answers. it would be the equivalent of having the following three possible answers:

a. 14,14,14,14
b. 11,12,13,14
c. 3,4,5,6

As people have explained earlier, D and E are just the time reversal and amplitude reversal of B. In other words, if you can get B by applying a certain operation, you can literally get D and E by just multiplying by -1 instead of 1 or by -x instead of x.

[Anonymous No.11223861]

>>11223155
>why the hell would you assume that?
Why wouldn't you? Nowhere in your premise does it say you cannot invert. You're telling people, here are three input waves, which of these output waves can be obtained by performing some operation on the three input waves? You can do some operation to get B. But you could also do the same operation with one extra step, which is time inversion to get D. That operation is as valid as the first one, because as every fucking person has said it earlier, you haven't given one example to set the pattern for the next one. In other word, there aren't any patterns to find, you're just asking to find a system which can create one of the output givens, and as it turns out, you can easily create such system for 3 of the outputs.

[Anonymous No.11223864]

To everyone who think its B, do you think an IQ test should be measuring common sense?

[Anonymous No.11224033]

>B

[Anonymous No.11224073]

>>11221616
B does this as well.

[Anonymous No.11224125]

>>11223147
I'm just saying that the argument is that the pattern isn't apparent without the prerequisite knowledge and that there's a good chance that people who would otherwise get it would get caught up on other things before they would be able to parse it without that knowledge, but I might just be stupid so I can't say for sure.

[Anonymous No.11225107]

>>11221306
No, because you forgot to ask any questions.

[Anonymous No.11225135]

>>11223592
A, D or F, leaning toward F.

[Anonymous No.11225154]

>>11223592
I think it's F and here's my reasoning. There are 4 boxes that contain a black square. 4 that contain lines and 5 that contain blank. So in a sudoku type approach F fits because then we have 5 of each box.

[Anonymous No.11225156]

>>11225154
Oh wait nvm I miss counted there's 5 of the lined squares... Idk F just feels right maybe even D

[Anonymous No.11225161]

>>11221306
I’m guessing D

[Anonymous No.11225173]

Iq tests àre only as smart as the examiner who wrote them.

Why you get retarded questions like these.

[Anonymous No.11225179]

>>11223137
Add, Subtracting, keeping one as zero adding other 2 etc. there are many ways. It's ambiguous.

[Anonymous No.11225188]

>>11223592
Too little time

[Anonymous No.11225198]

>>11223779
You can also get a.
-> 3*X + 0*Y - Z

[Anonymous No.11225322]

>>11225198
haha, nice. so the question is still valid but it is responsibility of the authors to go over all corner cases and come up with non-ambiguous choices.

[Anonymous No.11225390]

>>11221394
P7¥¥}πY3°\p3πy-| 3pyπ×E=
-π\7y-E{3}
=7y-π3E/7P=πE/¥7.

[Anonymous No.11225398]

>>11222001
Order of magnitude from 37 degree change the angular trajectory of the first isoceles Diachtromode to co-exist for the first perpendicular angle exacting in one point but not indiferent to the inherent angular de generation.

[Anonymous No.11225404]

>>11223592
A.

[Anonymous No.11226090]

Just imagine not knowing the answer is c.
Go back to primary school brainlets

[Anonymous No.11226270]

This whole thread is wrong including OPs pic. Heres what these three waveforms together look like

[Anonymous No.11226372]

>>11223193
>So this is an average iq question?
Its not even an IQ question. OP is doing babby's first audio DSP and thought this question would make a good IQ question even though it has multiple valid answers.

[Anonymous No.11227463]

>>11223592
B
Brainlets btfo

[Anonymous No.11227537]

>>11223592
Does this test tend to be accurate?

[Anonymous No.11227542]

>>11221306
the answer is minimoog

[Anonymous No.11227543]

>>11226270
it was never about combining them. 3 is the switching signal

[Anonymous No.11227594]

>>11225322
Indeed

[Anonymous No.11227653]

>>11227537
If you took it first time, it might be.
I scored >>11223682
But in real test back when I was 9 or 10 I scored 136.
Though I feel stupider than I used to be sometimes.
Be it I am still quite good at math and physics.
So take it as you wish,
if you really care about your IQ you might want to go take real test,
not internet one.

[Anonymous No.11227665]

>>11227537
It was. The new version is bad and actually harder than the real mensa test. If you want to try to older version: http://www.mensa.fi/iq/index_2.html..

[Anonymous No.11227670]

>>11221306
it's A

[Anonymous No.11228611]

>>11227653
>>11227665
Uhh I might get my IQ tested

[Anonymous No.11229787]

>>11221792
Holy shit was it B?
I guess I am smarter then I thought

[Anonymous No.11229823]

>>11229787
No, as has been broadly discussed, thinking B is more reasonable than D or E is brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11230542]

>>11229823
>t. brainlet that answered the question wrong

[Anonymous No.11230557]

>>11230542
T. OP that is still applying Vic’s Vapor Rub to his destroyed butt.