/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11204424]

Convince me that global warming is a bad thing and not simply a rebound from the ice ages which almost destroyed all plant life due to the lowest recorded CO2 concentrations during that time.

[Anonymous No.11204427]

>>11204424
It's neither good nor bad, it's just a natural thing that happens on earth.

[Anonymous No.11204429]

>>11204424
Its a fucking taxation scam and people are goddamn cattle

>inb4 a shill/brainwashed newspaper scientist posts "BUT MUH 98% PROBABILITY OF BEING TRUE"

[Anonymous No.11204461]

>>11204424
>Convince me that global warming is a bad thing
The published research agrees it will be a net negative for man:

https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-positives-negatives-advanced.htm

>not simply a rebound from the ice ages
We're still in an ice age, perhaps you mean glacial period? We warmed out of a glacial period 10,000 years ago. According to the natural cycle during an ice age we should be slowly cooling over the next tens of thousands of years but instead we are rapidly warming on top of the interglacial warming from 10000 years ago. So not only is it not a "rebound," it's the exact opposite of three cycle of "rebounds."

>which almost destroyed all plant life due to the lowest recorded CO2 concentrations during that time.
Low temperature and low moisture are the limiting factors for plant growth during glacial periods, not CO2. See how many plants you can find in the Arctic/Antarctic despite high CO2 levels.

[Anonymous No.11204463]

>>11204461
Pic related

[Anonymous No.11204469]

>>11204429
>the government needs a giant conspiracy of scientists to pass a tax
>even though they pass taxes all the time without needing one
>and they haven't even passed the tax even though they easily could by now
Really smart conspiracy theory, makes total sense.

[Anonymous No.11204470]

it's gonna be fucking awesome

t. Canadian

[Anonymous No.11204484]

>>11204461

>muh coral reefs
The negative effects on flora and fauna are purely speculative and have no basis in reality. And considering how efficiently we're already driving extinction I don't think we need any help from +4C.
Coral reefs is probably one of the worst examples since it's been demonstrated that the corals recover quickly after bleaching events and that the crown of thorns is a natural phenomenon that helps rejuvenate the coral reefs after it cleans through them. Not that anyone knows this because such news is kept out of the mainstream. I only know because I had a lecturer who did such research and was fired from the Uni for daring to insinuate that the coral reef doomsaying was bullshit money grubbing.

>muh worsening disasters
Also a load of shit. Might as well believe in religion which has been calling for such events for thousands of years if you're going to believe that a few degrees in temperature fluctuations is going to bring about Armageddon.

>muh coastal cities
So what? Coastal cities can get fucked. They don't produce anything, they're just consumers. Increasing sea levels and heat is a good thing for all inland communities which struggle without rain, literally decreasing the supposed drought which is going to wipe out all the farms.

[Anonymous No.11204487]

>>11204469

[Anonymous No.11204490]

>>11204470
this i cant wait for our permafrost to melt unleashing millions of years of methane onto albertards. they will be brapped to death.

[Anonymous No.11204491]

>>11204487
left because both families are memes

[Anonymous No.11204853]

>>11204484
>The negative effects on flora and fauna are purely speculative and have no basis in reality.
Not at all, there are several studies based on real world example of low pH environments:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1122

>Also a load of shit.
Not an argument. Try again.

>So what? Coastal cities can get fucked.
OK so you admit global warming will be bad for coastal cities. Glad we can agree.

[Anonymous No.11204863]

>>11204487
>muh cunspiracy
https://youtu.be/GXHNzNxV6RM

[Anonymous No.11204873]

>>11204487
This is just a badly structured infographic in reaction to the good one.

[Anonymous No.11205066]

>>11204853
>OK so you admit global warming will be bad for coastal cities. Glad we can agree.
And that's good for the rest of the world, glad we agree.

[Anonymous No.11205832]

>>11204487
>That infographic
There's no business to be made in a dead or humanless or human-scarce planet nigger, and noone of your pet targets of conspiracy theories have black holes in place of their brains like you do.

[Anonymous No.11205870]

>>11205832
>There's no business to be made in a dead or humanless or human-scarce planet nigger
>being this delusional
>need clean water
>make company that sells clean water
>need food which is expensive due to ruined land
>make a company that synthesizes gray shit they call food
>desperate for money
>become slave
>need clean air to breath
>create a company to sell air
>protect faggot scientist who are your literal slaves
>have ridiculous amount of funding and hardly any moral and legal obligations.
>force science fags to make you immortal and super human
>let all the commoner die
>no need for them
>design semi-organic cybernetics to make yourself even better
>eventually become inert due to there being no totality
>fly in space endlessly
>with god like powers go back in time and fix global warming and destroy 4chins to save the losers from becoming incels
>give up your god like abilities and live a normal mortal life with death.
>world fucks itself anyways, in a nuclear war
>>11205066
yeah I fukcing hate those west coast asshole, so long losers.

[Anonymous No.11206455]

>>11205870
Legit "not an argument".

[Anonymous No.11206524]

>>11204470
Canada is going to become so much richer once the arctic melts and it is able to control the northwest passage shipping routes (that is, if canada doesnt get cucked by world superpowers)

[Anonymous No.11206533]

>>11204463
Show what happened before -20000.
Labels are retarded by the way. It's 20000BC, not -20000BC, which would be in the future.

[Anonymous No.11207174]

>>11206524
>oh wow new shipping lanes!
to ship what exactly once east asia is underwater?

[Anonymous No.11207288]

>>11206533
Before that is a cycle of glacial and interglacial periods for millions of years, hardly different from 0 to 20,000 BC.

[Anonymous No.11208889]

>>11207288
So it's hardly any different from what happened in the past. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.11209479]

>>11208889
The past is hardly different from the past, yes. Current climate change is completely different as you can see >>11204463 in both its direction and in rate.

[Anonymous No.11209559]

>>11204484
Canada will be the Islamic republic of Chindia by then, and no one is going want to risk getting hit by rockets, so its best to just to start giving Polar Bears citizenship and overpopulating them in Canada to prevent this.