Mechanism which causes gravitational waves?

[Anonymous No.11121258]

Don't bother answering if your explanation is one word or a single phrase.
The following explanations are invalid:
>we don't know
>spacetime curvature
>consciousness
>extra dimensions
>parallel/ extra universe(s)
>electric universe with tesla.jpg
>Wall of text with Latex math summarizing general relativity
>string theory
>this question is impossible to answer
>hermetic mysticism + wildly incoherent, speculative rambling

Please do not reply if you just finished watching PBS Spacetime and think you are now a big boy.
Please do not reply if you are a belligerent nigger who is just going to troll in all caps.
Please do not reply if you are going to ramble incoherently using physics terms as if they are interchangeable.
As always, please feel obligated to enumerate every single detail of your reasoning and define your terms when needed.

No Chris Langan, Tooker, Gary, Celestial Girlfriend Poster, or Solvagus.
No soibois, brainlets, manlets, shitskins, slopes, women or trannies.
No feds, kikes, or glowies of any kind.

[Anonymous No.11121265]

>>11121258
>what is the mechanism that causes gravitational waves
Mass

[Anonymous No.11121268]

>>11121258
Mate, not one fucker on /sci/ can answer this based on your criteria.

[Anonymous No.11121285]

>>11121265
You must have a very elaborate and unusual definition for mass.

[Anonymous No.11121286]

>glowie
Huh?

[Anonymous No.11121293]

>>11121285
No, I dont. Mass is what causes gravitational waves. This is literally what we observe.

[Anonymous No.11121339]

>>11121286
Was this post meant to be ironic?

[Anonymous No.11121366]

>>11121293
I'm not denying that it does, but what is the mechanism?

[Anonymous No.11121371]

>>11121366
We don't fully know-without a quantum theory of gravity any answer you get here is incomplete or even wrong.

[Anonymous No.11121372]

>>11121265
What is the mechanism that pulls two masses together in space?

[Anonymous No.11121378]

>>11121372

Time dilation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcvq1DAM-DE

[Anonymous No.11121390]

>>11121258
>Mechanism which causes gravitational waves?
Gauge symmetry collapsing. Goodbye.

[Anonymous No.11121396]

>>11121378
Negatory.
I'm not clicking that shit nigger.

[Anonymous No.11121398]

>>11121366
We don't know yet.

[Anonymous No.11121399]

>>11121396
why? those videos are great u faggot

[Anonymous No.11121402]

>>11121371
Did you not read the OP?

[Anonymous No.11121405]

>>11121398
Read the OP.
Don't be a faggot.
>>11121399
It violates protocol.

[Anonymous No.11121426]

>You’re not allowed to say we don’t know even though literally no one knows

[Anonymous No.11121429]

>>11121405
I did read the OP. Saying "'we don't know' is unacceptable" is an absurd statement. You don't know how science works.

[Anonymous No.11121431]

>>11121258
God

[Anonymous No.11121437]

>>11121426
Are you sure about that?
>>11121429
It's invalid because I'm not asking for an excuse, I am asking for an explanation.
A lack of an explanation is not an explanation.
If you don't have an explanation then don't post.
baka

[Anonymous No.11121439]

>>11121437
What the fuck is your answer then?

[Anonymous No.11121443]

>>11121429
You fucking straw man faggot of a kike nigger queer. Don't use quotations if you're just going to make shit up. Cunting whore.

[Anonymous No.11121446]

>>11121439
You're dodging the question because you aren't sure. It's just something you would really prefer to believe.
I'm not obligated to have an answer because I never claimed to have one. I'm still thinking about it, which is one of the reasons I made this thread to begin with. You don't need to get your pussy hurt every time someone points out you're being a faggot. It's good medicine for you.

[Anonymous No.11121454]

>>11121446
>I don't know

[Anonymous No.11121457]

>You fucking straw man faggot of a kike nigger queer. Don't use quotations if you're just going to make shit up. Cunting whore.

[Anonymous No.11121458]

>>11121454
>I don't know != "literally no one knows"

[Anonymous No.11121459]

>>11121443
lol
>>11121446
>prefer to believe
Nah, it's a fact nobody has an answer to this.
>>11121458
No, literally nobody knows. This is an open problem in physics. Go ahead, try and find somebody who does.

[Anonymous No.11121462]

>>11121459
>Nobody knows
>Nobody I can find knows
pick one
It's a fact that you're a transsexual

[Anonymous No.11121466]

>>11121458
So why are you the special snowflake who gets to not know but the rest of us are held to your shitty criteria?

[Anonymous No.11121468]

>>11121258
>Answer this question but don't give me the actual answer because I don't like it.

[Anonymous No.11121473]

>>11121466
I'm not responding to a thread asking for an explanation by insisting that no one knows.
That's you. You did that.
I haven't violated any criteria by not knowing.
Furthermore, you are gay.

[Anonymous No.11121476]

>>11121258
The exceedingly large mass that is my dick

[Anonymous No.11121484]

>>11121462
Feel free to point to any human who knows.

[Anonymous No.11121549]

>>11121258
Quantum mechanics is a hoax.
If you do research into gravitational waves the results were because of computer algorithm errors.
The LIGO results were officially protested because the scientists are lieing about results to get research grants.
There are no gravitational waves, or evidence that they are real.
It is a hypothesized phenomenon with no supporting observed evidence.

[Anonymous No.11121554]

>>11121549
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24032022-600-exclusive-grave-doubts-over-ligos-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/amp/

You are the victim of an elaborate hoax caused by charlatan con artists taking advantage of groupthink human behaviour.

[Anonymous No.11121555]

>>11121258
>asks /sci/ a question
>says the entirety of /sci/ isn't allowed to post

[Anonymous No.11121561]

>>11121555
That's because moment those reasons are correct, so "please don't post wrong answers" is reasonable.
When a group of scientists publish fradulant results, and other scientists try and explain the results, all answers are wrong.

It's like me saying I can teleport and asking you to explain it scientifically.
The scientists involved in gravitational wave research are playing you like a bitch.

[Anonymous No.11121564]

>>11121561
>physics dont have a theory of everything yet so its all bullshit lol

[Anonymous No.11121570]

>>11121554
I am aware of this argument.
Are you saying that gravity is a hoax?
If not, then would you care to explain the mechanism for gravitation?
I find it difficult to believe that gravitational waves do not exist, because I believe gravity exists, and I observe that this force of gravity is indistinguishable from acceleration due to constant thrust, which requires an exchange of momentum between a body and some propelling force.
Also, I ain't clicking that shit nigger.

[Anonymous No.11121579]

>>11121549
Ironically the notion that gravitational waves are a hoax is a hoax. It's a bit too close for comfort that that people are starting to think of gravity as a mechanical wave traversing some medium, instead of some defacto force that can only be explained though abstract, contrived mathematics.
Silly goyim.

[Anonymous No.11121590]

>>11121570
I am not saying gravity isn't real or anything like that.
Gravity is a natural phenomenon of attraction just like magnetism, electronegativity, chemical bonding etc,
All it is is that mass attracts mass, with an inverse square law just like light, there is no more magic or quantum phenomenon to it that when you hold two magnets in your hand and they attract each other, or having a statically charged piece of cling film stick to something.

And you don't need to click it, just read the link
>New scientist magazine
>Grave concerns over gravitational wave research.

I'm not trolling man, I know it feels like I am but I did a lot of work and research into QM, and I'm sorry but it's So diluted with fradulant research it's basically a religion now.
You can publish anything, there is a peer reviewed paper that proved the existence of God lol.
And no I'm not going to tell you which university I went to.
You will just have to intuitively work out if im lieing or not :)

[Anonymous No.11121594]

>>11121579
I'm not claiming anything like that, that's quantum mechanics, which I am in opposition of. What you posted is strange lol.
Also I'm a Jew so....

[Anonymous No.11121595]

>>11121590
Well I'm not really interested in the arguing the validity of quantum mechanics.
This thread is dedicated to the mechanism responsible for the phenomenon of gravitation.
"All it is is mass attracts mass" doesn't satisfy as an explanation. It's just an observation.
I find this extremely annoying and patronizing.

[Anonymous No.11121601]

>>11121594
Furthermore, you can't reduce the notion of gravitational waves to "quantum mechanics, which I am in opposition of."
Classical mechanics describes the motions of waves in a medium just fine. I don't know how you could draw that conclusion of
>gravitational waves are quantum mechanics, and I don't believe in quantum mechanics so therefore gravitational waves don't exist
Also, you really should be able to explain why gravitational waves are a hoax without linking to some buzzfeed article for inbred retards.

[Anonymous No.11121602]

>>11121595
Hypothesized explanations of theoretical gravitational phenomenon is quantum mechanics.
They are trying to prove theories of how gravity is theorised to work.
Don't you know what quantum mechanics means?

I am sorry if I am making you feel patronised , I think I'm being polite but I have austism and asbergers so sorry if I am being annoying.

[Anonymous No.11121608]

I didn't know Rick Delano browsed /sci/

[Anonymous No.11121611]

>>11121258
So bro you know how things can't move faster than light? What if like gravity can't move faster than light? So like if you have a change in gravity somewhere, like the change won't be felt instantaneously everywhere it'll propagate at the speed of light. So if we like make something change speed we end up with this change in gravity piling up.

[Anonymous No.11121612]

>>11121602
You're caught in a logical loop.
>Hypothesized explanations of theoretical gravitational phenomenon is quantum mechanics.
>Quantum Mechanics doesn't real
>Therefore hypothesized explanations of theoretical gravitational phenomenon don't real
>However gravity does real
So what's the explanation for gravity?
>Error. Error. 404. Brain not found. Error.

[Anonymous No.11121779]

>>11121601
A team of five researchers — James Creswell, Sebastian von Hausegger, Andrew D. Jackson, Hao Liu and Pavel Naselsky — from the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, presented their own analysis of the openly available LIGO data. And, unlike the LIGO collaboration itself, they come to a disturbing conclusion: that these gravitational waves might not be signals at all,


Lol BuzzFeed.

[Anonymous No.11121781]

>>11121268
>no one can answer this based on any criteria
ftfy

[Anonymous No.11121783]

>>11121779
>Gravitational waves may not be signals
>Therefore gravity isn't exist

[Anonymous No.11121785]

>>11121462
I see youre mentally challenged since the set of people anon can find falls under everyone. Asking a question and then eliminating any possible reasonable response and even some unreasonable ones is retarded. This thread is garbage.

[Anonymous No.11121802]

>>11121785
You are gay.
This thread is E T E R N A L

[Justin Ramsey No.11121806]

[Anonymous No.11122231]

Bompu

[Anonymous No.11122236]

>>11122231
Your thread sucks, autist.

[Anonymous No.11122241]

>>11122236
So far so good

[Anonymous No.11122260]

>>11121258
Jerk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

[Anonymous No.11122266]

>its another schizophrenic samefag episode

[Anonymous No.11123868]

>>11121258
>Mechanism that causes gravitational waves
>Without using the only framework in which they are predicted
Yeah nice job man

[Anonymous No.11123944]

>>11123868
What is the mechanism (using whatever framework you'd like)
?

[Anonymous No.11123959]

>>11123944
Curved spacetime (general relativity)

[Anonymous No.11123968]

>>11123959
What causes the curvature?

[Anonymous No.11123973]

>>11123968
Energy and matter

[Anonymous No.11123981]

>>11123973
How?

[Anonymous No.11123994]

>>11123981
It's complicated

[Anonymous No.11124003]

>>11123994
Sure it is. You just keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous No.11124014]

>>11124003
What don't you like about them?