emergent time

[Anonymous No.11115688]

is Ed right about the big bang and the nature of time? pic related

[Anonymous No.11116746]

bump

[Anonymous No.11116764]

>>11115688
probably. Ed is right about everything, he has the phenotype.

[Anonymous No.11116779]

>>11115688
maybe he is referencing this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartle%E2%80%93Hawking_state

>Hartle and Hawking suggest that if we could travel backwards in time towards the beginning of the Universe, we would note that quite near what might otherwise have been the beginning, time gives way to space such that at first there is only space and no time. According to the Hartle–Hawking proposal, the Universe has no origin as we would understand it: the Universe was a singularity in both space and time, pre-Big Bang. However, Hawking does state "...the universe has not existed forever. Rather, the universe, and time itself, had a beginning in the Big Bang, about 15 billion years ago.", but that the Hartle-Hawking model is not the steady state Universe of Hoyle; it simply has no initial boundaries in time or space.

[Anonymous No.11116848]

time does not exist. what we call time is change, thats it

[Anonymous No.11116900]

>>11115688
>is Ed right
Yes

[Anonymous No.11116935]

>>11115688
How can I hope to be right on something Ed is wrong on other than by accident?

[Anonymous No.11116939]

>>11116848
Change must happen in a medium. However time as we experience it doesn't exist, you've got that right.

[Anonymous No.11116954]

>>11116848
>time is change
So time exists. Got it.

[Anonymous No.11118082]

bump again

[Anonymous No.11118083]

>>11115688
nice digits ;)

[Anonymous No.11118130]

>>11115688
Death created time to grow the things that it would kill.