Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 47 KB, 485x505, 1554164624357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11046435 No.11046435 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3bQbEYaOOM

Just this and I felt sad for the robot.

Is there a reason to feel compassion toward an inanimate object?

>> No.11046445
File: 42 KB, 450x351, wJyalPv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11046445

>> No.11046448

>>11046445
/thread

>> No.11046589

>>11046435
>pic
log_a(x) is wrong.

>> No.11046609

>no metaphysical implications should be infered
Idiot
That itself is a metaphysical implication that which is that any metaphysical implecation that might be discussed is obvious. But thats bullshit

>> No.11047918

>>11046589
Eagles Eye!
Assuming a ≥ 1

>> No.11047946

>>11047918
Granted. Its assumed at every other function too.

>> No.11048347

>>11047918
don't you mean a < 1?

>> No.11048405

>>11047918
Thats still wrong. a^x > 0 whenever a > 0, so log_a(x’) cant even be defined for negative x’

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action