[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 98 KB, 635x808, 1550261770182.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11016564 No.11016564 [Reply] [Original]

What IQ do I need to understand calculus?

>> No.11016574

>>11016564
fully understand its implications and meanings? some

pass uni exams and so? not much really

>> No.11016577
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11016577

>>11016564
Pic related

>> No.11016580
File: 235 KB, 1100x3300, mathematics trench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11016580

>> No.11016590

>>11016580
It's like someone went on Wikipedia and grabbed some terms without really knowing what they mean. The stuff at the bottom like "one-time pad decryption" and "random sequence extrapolation" is trivially impossible, and "poly-dimensional topology" and "irrational pattern functions" aren't even real things.

I'm also not sure why homotopy is apparently simpler than cohomology, or how you can study Riemann surfaces without understanding meromorphic functions. It's pretty clear that whoever made the chart doesn't actually know what these things are.

>> No.11016620

>>11016564
Honestly, not very high. Average (i. e. 100) or below. If you are understand what local is, and what approximation is, and what linear is, then you pretty much get the main idea.

>>11016580
What is the current unironic term for cringe? I'll go with "yikes".

>> No.11016819

>>11016577
>i pulled these numbers out of my ass btw

>> No.11016918

>What IQ do I need to understand calculus?
The fundamental theorem of calculus says that the integral of a function is it's anti-derivative. Other than that, you'd need to do a bunch of practice problems to get your head pretty well around it.

>> No.11016946

>>11016590
i didn't create or post it but you are taking it too seriously. apart from a couple of minor things you spotted, i think it gives a pretty good idea about the hierarchy of mathematics. of course it is a strange mix of individual concepts and branches of mathematics, for example "real analysis, convergence" is kind of like saying, "apples oranges fruits" but who cares.

>> No.11017006

>>11016564
>pic
Holy fucking lmao 200 IQ paper

>> No.11017262

[math]\swoosh[/math] How come \swoosh don't work?

>> No.11018798

>>11016819
It's pretty clear how he calculated it. IQ isn't a high precision number anyway.

>> No.11018828

>>11016577
obviously the "discovery" iq should be more or less constant
if you could take the guy who "discovered" the pythagorean theorem and send him to 2019 he'd be an innovator today too

>> No.11018837

>>11016580
>one-time pad decryption
but that's literally impossible, anon. it's not a matter of iq

>> No.11018850

>>11016577
>>11016819
It's linear (increases by 10 everytime and the "discovery" always takes 30 points more than mastery) so it's obviously fake. Might be a joke though.

>> No.11018939
File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548672444364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11018939

>another IQ thread

>> No.11019089

if you mean basic calculus courses that cuckgineers take, you could be retarded and still pass.

>> No.11019126

>>11019089
HAVe u seen the thermodynamics subject they take ? Its literally table cross referencing and plug n chug.

>> No.11019168

>>11016564
Uhh is no one gonna mention the calculus swoosh? Lmao what

>> No.11019172

>>11019126
Yeah you're right. Engineers should definitely perform statistical mechanical analysis everytime they want to find the isentropic efficiency of a throttling process or whatever.

>> No.11019178

>>11019168
Newfag

>> No.11020196
File: 79 KB, 640x640, f57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11020196

>>11018939
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIvobmqIJu8

>> No.11020286

>>11016564
About 100

>> No.11020305

>>11016564
90 to 100 seriously

>> No.11020372

>>11016564
People who are bad at calculus are actually bad at trig/algebra. Calculus is literally one new concept.

>> No.11020373

>>11016564
Lower than 100 like way lower.

>> No.11020402

>>11016564
you don't need any IQ

>> No.11020410

>>11020305
All of these “calculus knowers” struggle with real analysis

>> No.11020418

>>11016590
The absolute state of /sci/
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1rkc0r/found_this_on_4chan_what_do_you_think/

>> No.11021437

>>11020410
this. I aced Calculus 1, 2 and 3.

I hit a wall though once I got to analysis

>> No.11021468

>>11018828

>the guy who "discovered" the pythagorean theorem

You mean Pythagoras?

>> No.11021558

>>11020418
>>11016590
fucking LMAO

>> No.11021571

>>11016590
I can see someone who knows what they're doing with a sense of humour making this

>> No.11021577

>>11016564
IQ of the average engineer, so about 5 IQ.

>> No.11021582

>>11020418
Lmao, goddamn it, I fell for it

>> No.11022464

>>11021468
Could have been one of his students.