[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 18 KB, 425x425, 71m4pT65u+L._SX425_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999753 No.10999753 [Reply] [Original]

Can you scientifically prove that Cat-Dog doesn't exist?

Pro-Tip: You can't. This post proves Cat-Dog being at least of uncertain physical state.

>> No.10999758

I define the Cat-Dog Existence Axiom, which posits that Cat-Dog doesn’t exist :^)

>> No.10999763

>unfalsifiable claims
>science

Pick one

>> No.10999811
File: 73 KB, 500x500, literally catdog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999811

>I feel ridiculed

Nothing new, just try to prove that Cat-Dog doesn't exist, scientifically.

You see Cat-Dog? Yes? Or No? That says to you that Cat-Dog does exist, doesn't it?

Can you explain how you could not have the opinion of Cat-Dog being existent? What possibly could have flawed or biased your experience of Cat-Dog being existent, what are the odds you could think of?

You now see Cat-Dog for the second time:

>> No.10999819

>>10999763

What you mean is religion, not science.

>> No.10999855
File: 74 KB, 499x499, again catdog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999855

How often have you already seen Cat-Dog?

How long were you looking at each opportunity of seeing Cat-Dog and how often have you looked at these in what timespan?

Can you observe two opportunities Cat-Dog of observing Cat-Dogs existence simultaneously?

Here is a third opportunity of seeing Cat-Dog:

>> No.11000235

Okay, so my one month old daughter is capable of disproving Cat-Dogs existence scientifically.

>> No.11000488

>>11000235

...and since she is only a child, I don't take her "proofs" seriously, She can't even into basic quantum physics, how could she determine the existence of Cat-Dog correctly?