[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 73 KB, 800x606, Northern_Cardinal_Broadside.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10972479 No.10972479 [Reply] [Original]

Scientifically speaking, why are some cardinals inaccessible?

>> No.10972505

>>10972479
>scientifically speaking
>/sci/

>> No.10972513
File: 228 KB, 767x959, IMG_0196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10972513

>>10972479
Some are guarded

>> No.10972515

>>10972479
this question literally doesn't make sense

>> No.10972516

>>10972479
Probably just cranky during the molt.
>Hmmmmmmmmmm hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

>> No.10972517

>>10972515
>this question literally doesn't make sense
What do you mean?

>> No.10972518
File: 77 KB, 1200x800, 1200-18833029-cardinal-with-molting-head.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10972518

>>10972516

>> No.10972520

>>10972517
That question literally does not make sense, either.

>> No.10972522

>>10972517
you cant scientifically speak on a math topic

>> No.10972523

>>10972515
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inaccessible_cardinal

>> No.10972527

>>10972523
>set theory
>science

>> No.10972530
File: 63 KB, 475x587, cardinalgangsigns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10972530

>> No.10972541

>>10972517
the existence of inaccessible cardinals is independent of ZFC. so the question "why" doesn't make any sense since you have to take their existence as an extra axiom if you want to work with them

>> No.10972566

>>10972479
you trick me into posting in a math thread like geeks use hot sister to bamboozle cool kids to birthday party.

>> No.10972605

>>10972520
>That question literally does not make sense, either.
What do you mean?

>> No.10972608

>>10972522
>you cant scientifically speak on a math topic
Of course we can.

>> No.10972640

>>10972541
>the existence of inaccessible cardinals is independent of ZFC. so the question "why" doesn't make any sense since you have to take their existence as an extra axiom if you want to work with them
Who said anything about ZFC?

>> No.10972651

>>10972640
your mom

>> No.10972734

>>10972605
Now THAT question literally does make sense, but my answer would not.

>> No.10973147
File: 436 KB, 1080x1296, Spambot Bingo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10973147

>>10972479