[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 122 KB, 1200x900, 1537980213324.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10965311 No.10965311 [Reply] [Original]

How can a fabric be "wind and waterproof" yet "breathing"?

>> No.10965317

>>10965311
dark matter.

>> No.10965356

>'proof'
There you go anon.

>> No.10965367

>>10965311
It's leather.

>> No.10966577

>>10965367
are you blind?

>> No.10966672

>>10965311
gunna go out on a limb here and guess the 'breathable' fabric (interior lining) is not the same material that's wind/water res.(shell).

>> No.10966681

>>10965311
vented in hidden places under the arm.
also, breathable fabric like goretex.
it lets warm perspirant air out, while preventing wind and rain from penetrating from the outside.
magic technology

>> No.10967020
File: 22 KB, 691x351, 1546960511591.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10967020

>>10966681
>goretex

>> No.10967024

it has a rating which is a spectrum.
the higher the waterproofing rating the less breathable it could be

>> No.10967069

>>10965367
Leather doesn't breathe.

>> No.10967125

>>10967069
It does, though. That's why they put chamois in those tay bicycle shorts.

>> No.10967131

>>10967020
>PTFE
It’s only dangerous past the flash point, where fluorocarbons are released, and no studies linking the dangers between humans have been conducted that say it’s dangerous. Birds have seen flu-like symptoms, but there’s no data on human cancer or birth defects.

>> No.10967250

>>10967131
>no studies linking the dangers between humans have been conducted that say it’s dangerous
>birth defects in humans
>no studies about humans
????

>> No.10967272
File: 63 KB, 695x390, https_%2F%2Fcdn2.tstatic.net%2Fjabar%2Ffoto%2Fbank%2Fimages%2Fsineenat-wongvajirapakdi-maha-vajiralongkorn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10967272

The problem is the industry realized people will pay huge sums for these ridiculous promises and the industry basically created an environmental nightmare

Microplastics from the disintigrating fibers
Polyurethanes
Fluorocarbons permanently in the environment and for chain now

And perhaps the realest lulz is that waterproof is a fucking lie, a bit of dust or dirt on the fabric reduces its wetting resistance and once wet through its not waterproof at all. Every single piece of gear I had failed.

It's nothing but a marketing gimmick and false advertising with the collateral damage to the environment and consumer wallets

All the manufacturers are silently hoping the spotlight doesn't fall on them and enough time passes that everyone forgets.

Meanwhile the $1 per hour sweatshop worker will get cancer and the microplastics continue to accumulate in the food chain.

In case you think you are special and aren't at risk these toxic compounds continue to be added to carpets, upholstery, and other goods worldwide.

American Chemical Society has no shame, your politicians hope they can avoid blame and no one wants to hear their closets and houses are full of biologically dangerous substances.

Cowardice & ignorance & a whole lot of lazy consumers sleepwalking to their inevitable cancer diagnosis

>> No.10967362

>>10967125
I don't know that I've ever heard lamb skin called leather though.

>> No.10967389

>>10967272
god i hate humanity. i should been born as a great white Dolphin, master of the ocean

>> No.10967390
File: 292 KB, 319x562, 1537116503516.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10967390

>>10967362
>I don't know that I've ever heard lamb skin called leather though.
holy shit are you serious? there are many types of leather depending on what animal skin is used and how it's treated.

>> No.10967392

>>10965311
Something to do with the composition of the fabric.

>> No.10967393

>>10967392
yeah well what exactly?

>> No.10967399

>>10967390
it puts the lotion in the basket

>> No.10967409

>>10967020
This is why I only use cotton

>> No.10967438

>>10967409
this. i always did prefer cotton over synthetics mostly.
even though cotton has some drawbacks.

>> No.10967455

>>10965311
If you've ever had a good jacket you'll know what they mean. It basically has to do with the layering, sweat and heat gets funneled out usually by the armpits, but the rest of the jacket is water and wind proof. So it's not so much the material, but more the design.